How many kinds of BBC bias are there? Let me count the ways

When it comes to Dominic Cummings, how many kinds of BBC bias are there? Let me count the ways.

On BBC’s flagship documentary programme, Panorama, recently, one of the main interviewees was Professor John Ashton. His left-wing political affiliations were not mentioned. This is curious

because the programme was broadcast on 27 April. Two weeks before, Guido Fawkes, on Twitter, ran a clip from Sky News in which the presenter introduced Ashton as “the former president of the

faculty of public health, Professor John Ashton; we should also say he’s been a member of the Labour Party at various points.” Ashton shouted back: “Where did that stuff come from about the

Labour Party? I am not a member of the Labour Party… I have not been in the Labour Party for over a year… Please don’t politicise this.”

As Guido Fawkes pointed out on 13 March, when Professor Ashton appeared on BBC 1’s Question Time, where he vigorously attacked the government’s Covid policy, he had been introduced as a

“former regional director of Public Health England for the North West.” What viewers were not told was that two years ago he described himself as a “broad left, radical, non trot, baby

boomer, green, gender inclusive, feminist labour Party member for 53 years.” Panorama had somehow missed all this or chose to ignore it.

Another regular media pundit is Professor Susan Michie. When she appeared on Radio 4’s Broadcasting House on Sunday, 24 May, she was introduced as a member of a sub-group of SAGE, and went

on to attack Cummings. When the Conservative MP, Sir Peter Bottomley was introduced, he pointed out that Professor Michie “has been a member of a far left party for decades [The British

Communist Party], donated more to the Labour Party under Corbyn than I’ve given to the Tory party in forty years, was the wife of a former Labour Party special adviser and mother of Labour’s

head of complaints. That might have been better than just saying she’s a member of SAGE.” The presenter, Paddy O’Connell, criticised Bottomley for his “ad hominem attack”, rather than

acknowledging his and the programme’s shocking omissions.

All three BBC programmes misled the viewers/listeners by presenting a speaker with well-known left-wing, anti-government affiliations as simply a medical scientist.

When Andrew Marr interviewed Pippa Crerar, Political editor of the Mirror, on Sunday 24 May he asked her how she broke the Cummings story that weekend. She said, “We have just done

old-fashioned traditional journalism.” No follow-up question from Marr. Nothing like, “Come off it! You just managed to track down the two people in the whole of Durham who happened to have

allegedly spotted Cummings? Are you sure they didn’t contact the two main left-wing newspapers in the country and hand you the story?” Even if this wasn’t the case, surely the question was

worth asking. Not on the BBC.

Much of Radio 4’s Today programme on 25 May was taken up with the Cummings story. I only heard one defender of Cummings, the Education Secretary. Opposed to him were a Labour shadow minister

and numerous other critics of Cummings.

In addition, the news bulletins during the programme quoted various bishops who had criticised Cummings. Apparently, not a single bishop supported Cummings.

On Tuesday 26 May The World at One quoted a Conservative MP, Harriett Baldwin, who had criticised Cummings and therefore, implicitly, Boris Johnson. The BBC forgot to mention that Johnson

had fired Baldwin and that she had then supported Jeremy Hunt in the leadership campaign. On the same day, James Vincent, BBC Yorkshire’s Political Editor, quoted a Tory MP who had

criticised Cummings and Johnson, but omitted to mention that the MP was anti-Brexit. Might this have coloured his view of them?

On Tuesday’s World at One the BBC led with the Cummings story. There were no big new revelations. A Scottish Tory MP I had never heard of had resigned as a Junior Minister and a few Tory MPs

I had never heard of had criticised Cummings and the PM. That was it. No new revelations. In the meantime, mortality figures had fallen dramatically, small shops were to be opened, US

deaths were due to pass 100,000 that day. None of these stories were considered as important as this obscure Scottish Tory.

We always assume media bias is obvious. Sometimes it isn’t. It often takes subtle forms. What’s missed out as much as what’s said. The follow-up question that’s never asked. How guests are

introduced. But there are also spectacular examples of clear bias like the preachy introduction to last night’s Newsnight by Emily Maitlis, which has created a firestorm on social media. The

journalist Stephen Pollard, no fan of Cummings, tweeted, “there can be a place for editorialising on TV, but not in the intro to a flagship BBC analysis programme.” The Daily Mail, also no

supporter of Cummings, wrote, “BBC is blasted for ‘bare-faced bias’ after Emily Maitlis states as fact that Dominic Cummings ‘broke the rules’.”

The programmes I have mentioned are not trivial. These are the best-known news programmes on the BBC. They are all guilty of bias on some of the biggest British news stories in years.

By proceeding, you agree to our Terms & Conditions and our Privacy Policy.

If an account exists for this email address, you will shortly receive an email from us. You will then need to:

Please note, this link will only be valid for 24 hours. If you do not receive our email, please check your Junk Mail folder and add info@thearticle.com to your safe list.