
- Select a language for the TTS:
- UK English Female
- UK English Male
- US English Female
- US English Male
- Australian Female
- Australian Male
- Language selected: (auto detect) - EN
Play all audios:
An image of a purported Greta Thunberg sex doll has been circulating on social media for several days now. The pic was reportedly initially published on an imageboard known for mocking as
well as controversial content and was accompanied by a description that the supposed creator of the doll had spent $3,400 on developing it. The caption also indicated that the voice of the
toy is programmable, as it is supposedly able to deliver naughty, but environment-related, comments during sexual acts. > “Its being constructed by a Japanese company. She will be here in
> 2 more months”, the description of the image claimed. > There is a Greta Thunberg sex doll. There is a Greta Thunberg sex > doll that someone spent $3400 to make. She will be
programmed with > Greta’s voice to say phrases like “How dare you!” During sex. > The earth needs to hurry up and burn. 🌏🔥 > pic.twitter.com/2stPm1OQzR > — Andie💖🦠
(@andietheaspie) March 1, 2020 While the publication stirred outrage among social media users, considering the fact that the prominent environmentalist is also underage, many rushed to
Twitter to suggest that the story about a Greta Thunberg sex doll is nothing more than a prank. Many argued that it could have originated on the image posting board 4chan, which is
well-known as a source of anonymously made Internet memes, jokes, and user-generated images. It has also been repeatedly criticised for allowing illegal content to be posted as well as
inciting harassment and violence. > “Don’t know what’s funnier, 4ch making s**t up or twitter > falling for it”, one social media user wrote as the image of the > fake Thunberg
sexbot was shared online. > That’s disgusting, but as others have pointed out - > > 1. It’s a Chan site. They exist to agitate & the predominate user > base have a
collective net worth in the real world of $8.37 > > 2. That image looks computer generated. I don’t believe it > actually exists. > — Miracle Man (@Kimota1977) March 1, 2020
> The stories and information posted here are artistic works of > fiction and falsehood. > Only a fool would take anything posted here as fact. > — Ugly Bag of Mostly Water
(@UglyWaterBag) March 1, 2020 > It's on 4chan, it must be true > > Nobody on that website would ever tell a lie or try to troll people > — Capn, back home and missing
friends (@Capn_Conspiracy) March 1, > 2020 Some netizens, however, remain unconvinced that the idea of creating a doll in the likeness of the teenage activist has not actually crossed
someone’s mind, dismissing the notion that it was just a joke – albeit an inappropriate one. Debate on the matter has been ongoing for several days.