The impact of labor mobility with fellow townsmen on the wages of rural migrants: evidence from china

ABSTRACT Labor mobility is an inherent component of economic development and labor market changes. With globalization and urbanization, labor mobility is on the rise in many developing

countries, and it is of great significance to study the economic outcomes and poverty alleviation effects of this phenomenon. This paper explores the impact of labor mobility on the wages of

rural migrants when they move out with their fellow townsmen (folks from the same county). The study uses the China Migrants Dynamic Survey (CMDS) data and applies the Propensity Score

Matching (PSM) method for empirical analysis. Our results suggest that labor mobility with fellow townsmen significantly increases the wages of rural migrants. The paper shows two promotion

mechanisms: mobility with fellow townsmen affects the wages of rural migrants by improving their ability to search for information and negotiate wages. Heterogeneity analysis indicates that

mobility with fellow townsmen significantly increases the wages of rural migrants engaged in producer service, consumer service, blue-collar occupations, and working in state-owned and

private enterprises. Furthermore, it has a more positive impact on the wages of older rural migrants from an intergenerational perspective. Interestingly, rural migrants may “give up” part

of their wages to care for their families when they move with their spouses, parents, or children. Therefore, the government needs to take effective policy measures to promote the employment

service system and improve the labor rights and interests protection mechanism for rural migrants. SIMILAR CONTENT BEING VIEWED BY OTHERS SOCIAL STATUS, HUKOU CONVERSION AND UPWARDS CLASS

MOBILITY: EVIDENCE FROM CHINESE RURAL‒URBAN MIGRANTS Article Open access 20 March 2025 MIGRANTS AND INCOME CHANGES UNDER THE SHADOW OF THE COVID-19 PANDEMIC IN CHINA: THE ROLE OF COMMUNITY

SUPPORT Article Open access 08 March 2025 THE IMPACT AND EFFECTIVENESS OF CHINA’S ENTREPRENEURSHIP POLICY FOR BACK-HOME MIGRANT WORKERS Article Open access 13 May 2024 INTRODUCTION The link

between labor mobility and wages has received extensive attention and research. Along with urbanization and economic development, the movement of people from rural to urban areas has begun

to take shape in different countries around the world. For decades, the persistent urbanization of populations has shaped societies around the globe (UN, 2015; Rye, 2018). In the scenario of

China, with the rapid urbanization and relaxation of the Chinese Hukou system (The household registration system of China), many rural laborers have chosen to work outside the countryside

in search of more employment opportunities and higher-income jobs. They have become the so-called “rural migrants”. Chinese rural migrants are those who used to be farmers but left the

countryside and found jobs in cities due to China’s economic reform and rapid development (Li and Li, 2007; Zhu, 2016). They have significantly contributed to China’s booming labor market

and urbanization and have played an important role in accelerating the transition from Planned Economy to Market Economy. According to the Report of the National Bureau of Statistics of

China (CNBS), the total number of rural migrants, including outgoing rural migrants and local rural migrants, was 292.51 million in 2021. The number of outgoing rural migrants was 171.72

million, accounting for 58.71% of the total rural migrants. It is evident that moving from rural to urban areas to become rural migrants is still the main choice of most rural residents

today. Simultaneously, the number of labor mobility is still growing. When rural migrants choose to go out to work, deciding whom to move with is a critical question. In China’s rural

“vernacular society”, the concept of “human kindness” is deeply rooted in people’s hearts and minds, thus forming a unique way of information exchange in rural China—rural migrants

communicate information through human kindness (Liang, 2013). Chinese rural societies are networked with kinship as the main axis, forming a “differential order pattern” different from the

West (Fei et al., 1992). As a result, they tend to rely on pre-given kinship or geopolitical ties to build and expand social networks and, in doing so, mitigate risk, seek employment, and

adapt to urban life (Luo and Xu, 2010). When making mobility decisions, rural migrants choose to go out with their folks from the same county, which often serves to reduce costs and spread

risks. However, does the joint mobility of rural migrants and their townsmen affect the wages of rural migrants? Currently, there are also different views on the relationship between rural

migrants’ mobility and their wages. Some scholars believe that gathering rural migrants from the same town can help increase rural migrants’ wages. The gathering not only maintains the

emotional cohesion of rural migrants from the same region but also promotes the increase of rural migrants’ wages. The more rural migrants tend to congregate in the same group, the higher

the income return from the congregation (Zhang and Xie, 2013a). Studies of cohort aggregation have found that ethnic minorities organized in cohort aggregations can obtain relatively

equitable economic opportunities in cohort economies (Portes and Rumbaut, 2006; Castles, 2002). Studies of spatial dispersal policies among migrants in Denmark have found that an increase in

the size of congruence in migrant agglomerations significantly increases migrants’ annual earnings and that the ethnic networks formed by migrants can improve the quality of migrant-job

matches by disseminating information about jobs, thereby increasing migrants’ hourly wage rates (Damm, 2009). Conversely, it has also been argued that the agglomeration of fellow townsmen

results from social divisions and is likely to have a negative economic impact on vulnerable groups such as rural migrants (Wei, 2016). And a series of studies have demonstrated the negative

association between minority agglomeration and economic outcomes (Lewin-Epstein and Semyonov, 1994). Ethnic agglomeration is usually associated with lower income levels. Employment in the

ethnic economy is generally associated with lower earnings than employment outside the ethnic labor market (Lewin-Epstein and Semyonov, 1994). Using the historical migration data of

Norwegian migrants, Eriksson (2020) finds that ethnic agglomeration negatively affects the occupational earnings of migrants from Norway to the United States. In addition, ethnic

agglomeration is detrimental to assimilation or social integration, and at the same time, this agglomeration process also involves employers exploiting migrants by race or blood ties (Liu

and Wang, 2023; Bonacich, 1987). The clustering of ethnic groups increases the probability of crime, and when conflicts arise with employers, they tend to act “aggressively” and are prone to

social security cases (Wei, 2016). However, empirical studies on the agglomeration and rural migrants’ wages resulting from “moving with fellow townsmen” are still in the initial stage.

Although the networks of fellow townsmen are an important source of social capital for rural migrants, it still needs further exploration and study. The potential relationship between the

informal network of fellow townsmen and labor mobility behavior cannot be ignored in a Chinese culture that values interpersonal relationships. Thus, the employment earnings of rural

migrants may be positively influenced by mobility with fellow townsmen activities, mainly because extensive prior research has identified the advantages of social capital for migrant

employment and economic status. In addition, the evidence on the impact of mobility with fellow townsmen on earnings needs to be more extensive, especially in identifying causal effects.

Although studies have provided various perspectives to understand better the positive impact of social networks on migrant employment earnings, within the mainstream theoretical framework,

studies have largely ignored the group-differentiated characteristics of “followers” and the migration characteristics of migrant employment sectors. However, there is still little research

on the possible differential effects of moving with fellow townsmen on migrants’ employment and earnings levels from the perspective of labor mobility and urbanization. Moreover, from

existing studies, empirical research on the impact of rural migrants’ mobility on employment wages in China has been limited to factors such as the migrant’s own individual, family, and

external environment. However, the results of some existing studies may have different answers due to the quality of the methodology used; if not, most of the existing studies on this

relationship need to be fully robustly validated, considering the reliability of the survey data used in the analysis. In addition, most studies neglect to discuss empirical causal effects

in the relationship. In addition, a potential problem that may arise in the empirical study of mobility with fellow townsmen of rural migrants in China is that an a priori study is needed to

control for sample selection bias, which may lead to inconsistent estimates and potentially misleading conclusions. Therefore, more research and prudent research methods are needed to

determine how the different contexts of labor mobility affect the employment earnings of rural migrants. Since no consensus has been reached on the relationship between labor mobility and

wages for rural migrants, this paper’s research may help extend or contribute to existing research on rural migrants’ wages. The potential marginal contribution of this paper is that: First,

the research perspective is relatively novel. According to the authors’ literature, there are relatively few empirical studies in the current literature on the effects of mobility with

fellow townsmen on rural migrants’ wages in the Chinese context. Only some literature has explored the economic effects of hometown associations and the aggregation of rural migrants. This

paper contributes to the existing literature by examining the impact of mobility with fellow townsmen on Chinese rural migrants’ wages based on different mobility situations, such as moving

with their family members, classmates, and siblings. Second, the detailed and specific information of CMDS 2017 data provides fertile ground for this paper to identify the potential

mechanisms by which mobility with fellow townsmen affects Chinese rural migrants’ wages. The unique context of CMDS 2017 data with information on the characteristics of the migrant

population and information of fellow townsmen allows us to fully understand how mobility with fellow townsmen affects Chinese rural migrants’ wages and to accurately estimate this causal

relationship in conjunction with other good covariates. Third, this paper considers the possible endogeneity problem in the CMDS 2017 data. To ensure the reliability and accuracy of the

study, we use various methods, such as descriptive statistical method, ordinary least squares (OLS) method, and propensity score matching (PSM) method, to empirically analyze the

relationship between rural migrants’ mobility with fellow townsmen and wages. Also, we verify the robustness of the finding. The PSM method was chosen to estimate such a relationship because

it can alleviate the sample selection bias associated with cross-sectional data. Fourth, this paper’s research extends the depth of existing studies. This paper provides an in-depth

analysis of the mechanism of the impact of rural mobility on rural migrants’ wages from the perspectives of information search and wage negotiation. Meanwhile, this paper investigates the

heterogeneous effects of labor mobility on rural migrants’ wages from different dimensions, such as occupation, employment enterprise, and generation. Therefore, this paper’s research helps

expand and enrich the literature on labor mobility with fellow townsmen and employee wages. On the one hand, understanding and analyzing this potential impact can inform labor market policy

improvements in China. On the other hand, with the rising trend of global population migration across the country and the region, mobility with fellow townsmen will become common and

frequent. The research in this paper can provide a research reference for this pattern of mobility with fellow townsmen based on geography and blood ties. In addition, this mobility pattern

with fellow townsmen has similarities and higher replication value in East Asia and Southeast Asia areas, which are deeply influenced by Confucian culture. This paper’s research has some

applicability to the study of labor mobility in the areas mentioned above and can provide possible references for other studies. The remainder part of this paper is as follows: The

“Literature review” section systematically reviews the theories and empirical studies on the relationship between wages and labor mobility of rural migrants. The “Theoretical framework”

section discusses the relevant theories of migrant assimilation and human capital. It also introduces the Mincer equation and presents three theoretical hypotheses. The “Methodology” section

discusses the content about the data acquisition and processing, variable and definitions, model specification, and estimation methods used. The “Empirical analysis” section introduces the

results of descriptive statistics and results of the impact of rural migrants’ mobility with fellow townsmen on wages. The “Mechanism analysis” section discusses two mechanisms by which

labor mobility affects rural migrants’ wages. The “Conclusion and discussion” section summarizes the findings of this paper and puts forward the policy suggestions, limitations, and future

research scope of this paper. LITERATURE REVIEW A study of the economic assimilation of rural migrants in the context of rural migrants moving together with their fellow townsmen has broad

exploratory value. Migrant assimilation is an important topic in migration research, which refers to the time and extent to which migrants can integrate economically and culturally into the

host society (Alba and Nee, 1997). Two main theories explain the assimilation process of migrants in international migration research: the straight-line assimilation theory and the segmented

assimilation theory. The linear assimilation theory suggests that migrant assimilation is a natural and inevitable process (Nagel, 2002; Rumbaut, 1997). In this process, migrants from

different countries work overtime to gradually reject the culture of their origin, accept the local culture of their new country and eventually converge with natives regarding economic

opportunities (Portes and Rumbaut, 2006; Castles, 2002). Studies of immigration in the United States have shown that the assimilation process of migrant children and children of migrants

becomes more difficult due to the diversity of racial and ethnic backgrounds, differences in socioeconomic status, and immigration policy constraints (Zhou, 1997a). Large-scale immigration,

structural shifts in the hourglass economy, the emergence of new racist and anti-migrant sentiments, inequalities in the public education system, and media stereotypes of minorities make the

assimilation process more difficult and outcomes more uncertain for second-generation migrants after 1965 (Zhou, 1997b). Therefore, the single assimilation path described by linear

assimilation theory was difficult to describe and explain the new migrant problem, and in this context, segmented assimilation theory was developed (Portes and Zhou, 1993). Segmented

assimilation theory provides a theoretical basis for studying Chinese rural migrants’ homogeneous mobility. The theory states that while migrants try to adapt to the society of the country

they migrate to, their adaptation and assimilation are constrained by specific social conditions and contexts that are related to migrants’ ethnic group attributes and ethnic characteristics

(Rumbaut, 1997; Kim, 2017; Zhang and Xie, 2013b; Mai and Wang, 2022; Lin et al., 2022). The assimilation process of migrants is selective, and they may have the possibility of being

assimilated by the middle and upper classes as well as by the lower social classes, i.e., migrants economically converge to the natives but retain the ethnic and cultural characteristics of

the place of emigration (Portes and Zhou, 1993). In reality, migrants are vulnerable to discrimination and exclusion in assimilation and cannot enter the national labor market (Wei, 2016).

To avoid various disadvantages, migrants tend to adopt agglomeration of ethnic groups to give themselves fair economic opportunities (Xie and Gough, 2011; Zhou, 1997b). Against all odds,

migrants organizing in ethnic agglomerations help to counteract the adverse effects of the underlying American subculture on the socialization of migrant offspring and provide relatively

equitable economic opportunities in a same-race economy (Zhou, 1997b). In addition, the choice of ethnic agglomeration can lead to higher earnings for migrants (Zhang and Xie, 2013a, 2013b;

Chen, 2019). Massey (1986) studied the assimilation process of Mexican migrants in the US and found that as Mexican migrants gained experience in the US, social and economic ties were

formed, and Mexican migrants gained more stable, better-paying jobs. Enclaves increased the hourly earnings of non-rural migrants by 50.8% (Ye, 2021). On the one hand, population migration

creates clusters of people and “ethnic groups” and constructs networks of social relationships based on geographic, ethnic, and cultural factors (Castles, 2003; Kipgen and Panda, 2019). The

informal institution of social networks reflects the interconnectedness of members or specific groups and the flow, transmission, and sharing of various types of resources within the

network. Recent economics studies have shown that social networks linked by kinship, geography, etc., are important channels for rural migrants to conduct job searches and achieve employment

(Portes, 1998; Bertrand et al., 2000; Liu and Wang, 2023). The role of social networks is both instrumental and normative in that the reciprocity principles and trust contained in the

networks facilitate access to and sharing of information and resources and in that social networks can constrain and regulate the behavior of their members and create a sense of identity,

belonging, and solidarity among them (Portes, 1998). Numerous commentators have explored the impact of social networks on labor mobility and earnings, and all agree that social networks

positively impact the group of rural migrants (Granovetter, 1973; Portes, 1998; Ye and Zhou, 2010; Kipgen and Panda, 2019). On the other hand, rural migrants are often left at a disadvantage

in the urban labor market due to problems such as education, a dualistic labor market system, and information asymmetry (Wu, 2007; Rye and Andrzejewska, 2010; Chan and Wei, 2019). There is

still a gap between their income and local urban residents (Wu, 2007). Moreover, their lack of formal representation and language barriers make it difficult for them to negotiate effectively

with employers, leaving rural migrants usually in a weak position in wage negotiations (Rye and Andrzejewska, 2010). Rural migrants in large cities fail to achieve the same treatment as

urban residents regarding labor and employment, public services, and social security (Zhu, 2016). The situation of rural migrants in China is similar to that described by migrant

segmentation and assimilation theory in the United States. However, this gap is narrowing, and although they have some characteristics of urban workers, they still retain some peasant

characteristics and culture (Yao, 2019; Chan and Wei, 2019). THEORETICAL FRAMEWORK The neoclassical school of economics extends the traditional theory of individual rational choice to the

group and macro level by studying earnings and wage discrimination in labor (Becker, 1993). The school argues that market mechanisms and market forces are determinants of wages and the

allocation of labor resources, that wages reflect the true price of a labor force, and that the equilibrium real wage level is equal to the marginal productivity of labor. However, labor

mobility between different sectors is hampered by internal labor markets and other institutional factors, creating labor market segmentation (Pfeffer and Cohen, 1984; Zhou, 1997b). This

makes the labor market inefficient, and workers’ earnings may vary considerably (Pfeffer and Cohen, 1984). Such differences are partly due to factors that cannot be observed or measured but

have an impact on productivity and, more often, due to differences in the bargaining power of labor in the market and differences in human capital (Becker, 1962; Mincer, 1958; Mincer, 1974).

Schultz (1961) first introduced the human capital theory and attributed the substantial increase in workers’ wages to the investment in human capital. Mincer’s research found that

individuals’ education, training, and work experience can be considered an investment. Based on this, he proposed the classic model for studying human capital theory—Mincer equation (Mincer,

1958, 1974). Countries can promote economic development through investment and accumulation of human capital, and workers can increase individual productivity and labor market

competitiveness through investment and accumulation of human capital, thus increasing their wages (Mincer, 1958, 1974; Becker, 2009). Mincer (1958) included factors such as years of

education and work experience into the model to quantify the effect of human capital on wage levels and proposed the Mincer equation. This equation suggests that all else being equal,

individuals with more years of education and years of work experience typically have higher wage levels. In addition, the regression coefficients can be used to measure the extent to which

each variable affects the level of wages. Mincer’s findings profoundly impacted subsequent research in labor economics and became one of the models commonly used by researchers to analyze

issues such as income disparity and returns to education in the labor market. The human capital theory provides a theoretical basis for studying mobility phenomena with fellow townsmen and

ethnic agglomeration. It has been argued that migrants are more economically rewarded for engaging in the ethnic economy or working for the same ethnic employer (Zhang and Xie, 2013b).

Ethnic agglomeration provides migrants with relatively equal economic opportunities and higher employment income (Castles, 2002; Portes and Rumbaut, 2006; Damm, 2009). Many studies have

confirmed that migrant agglomerations create different levels of human capital spillovers depending on the quality of human capital within the community (Ye, 2021). Ethnic agglomeration not

only provides migrants with social support and solidarity but also provides migrant employers and self-employed individuals with informal access to resources such as labor, capital, and

markets to engage in economic activities (Portes and Bach, 1985; Zhang and Xie, 2013a, 2013b). In addition, agglomeration economies provide migrants with employment opportunities beyond the

secondary labor market and protection from discrimination in the external labor market (Light, 1984; Semyonov, 1988). Similarly, the aggregation of Chinese rural migrants from the same

county is a social network established according to the birthplace of rural migrants (the place of origin marked by the household registration system), which has similar characteristics to

ethnic group aggregation (Zhang and Xie, 2013a, 2013b; Wei, 2016; Chen, 2019; Ye, 2021). However, the mobility with fellow townsmen of Chinese rural migrants is not only a spatial gathering

of specific migrant worker groups from the same county but also a manifestation of the mobility characteristics of common labor migration and work. Rural migrants often rely on networks in

their urban-rural migration (Zhang and Xie, 2013a; Ye and Zhou, 2010; Ye, 2021). Employers often use the network of fellow townsmen among migrants to recruit and manage employees (Lee,

1998). The use of social ties for fellow townsmen by both migrant workers and employers leads to the consolidation and expansion of the network of fellow townsmen, one consequence of which

is the clustering of migrant workers from the same place of origin in terms of work or residence (Lee, 1998; Zhang and Xie, 2013b). It has been found that employers and managers are more

likely to hire and promote rural migrant employees from the same hometown and to offer better jobs to them and that frequent reciprocal activities among employees from the same hometown are

more likely to occur (Zhang and Xie, 2013b). Such reciprocal activities among fellow townsmen help to reduce rural migrants’ vulnerability in job search and enhance their wage bargaining

power (Li and Deng, 2021). Thus, rural migrants move with their townsmen, increasing employment, social resources, and economic opportunities. Rural migrants who move with their townsmen can

obtain more resources, assistance, and protection from the network of fellow townsmen than those who move solitarily, so the first hypothesis of this study is: HYPOTHESIS 1: Rural migrants

who move with their fellow townsmen receive higher wages than those who move solitarily. Social networks are about collections of resources, relationships, and rewards. Actors use social

network mechanisms to secure their interests based on their membership in social networks or other social structures (Portes, 1998). Rural-urban migration can lead to higher incomes and

better job opportunities, as well as access to social and educational resources provided by the city, thus increasing the income and living standards of the migrant and their family (Lyu et

al., 2019; Lagakos, 2020; Selod and Shilpi, 2021). As a resource allocation method, social networks can save costs and give people resources not available in formal channels, improve network

members’ quantity, quality, and speed of access to information, and significantly reduce information asymmetry (Dekker and Engbersen, 2014). Rural migrants working in cities are also

profoundly affected by this ethnic agglomeration, especially by social networks. Therefore, the following hypothesis can be deduced: HYPOTHESIS 2: Rural migrants moving with their fellow

townsmen are more likely to have access to more information and thus increase their wages. Related research has found that unions are fighting for greater job security for workers, helping

to raise workers’ wages without reducing their chances of sustaining employment (Bellmann and Emmerich, 1992). Human capital is an important indicator of the wage bargaining power of workers

(Mincer, 1958, 1974; Becker, 1962). In actual negotiations, low- and medium-skilled workers do not have significant wage bargaining power, while high-skilled workers have some wage

bargaining power (Cahuc et al., 2006). In the Chinese context, the idea of “love and support from townsmen” has historical roots, a common culture, and ethnic ties to make a network of

townsmen an important social relationship for rural migrants in the inflow area. The organization of this cross-regional social network is mainly in the form of hometown associations and

other organizations, which are connected through the registration and activities of hometown associations. To a certain extent, such social networks can change the disadvantageous position

of individual rural migrants in facing employers and provide resource support and risk sharing for rural migrants (Li and Deng, 2021). Strong ties with social organizations significantly

increase wage bargaining power and optimize the outcome of wage negotiation (Seidel, et al., 2000). Based on hometown associations and other social organizations, the network of fellow

townsmen can enhance the wage bargaining power of rural migrants, thus enhancing their wages. Therefore, the following hypothesis can be deduced: HYPOTHESIS 3: Rural migrants who move with

fellow townsmen are likelier to have stronger wage bargaining power and acquire higher wages. METHODOLOGY DATA ACQUISITION AND PROCESSING This paper used the 2017 China Migrants Dynamic

Survey (CMDS) data from the National Health Commission of the People’s Republic of China (NHCPRC), obtained through a large-scale national floating population sampling survey. This is

currently a large-scale authoritative database for studying the migration problem in China. The CMDS 2017 data was conducted among the migrant population aged 16 years or older who are not

currently in their hometown county but have been living in the inflow area for more than one month. We requested the CMDS 2017 data from the Migrant Population Service Center of NHCPRC and

received their official formal reply. We signed a data usage agreement with them to use this data to pursue our research. This data is selected in this paper mainly for the following

reasons: First, the database is initiated and organized by the NHCPRC, with a nationwide sample survey, and the data are authoritative and widely used in the research on migrant workers in

China. Second, the database is relatively comprehensive, and the data are more authoritative and professional. The survey contains basic information on rural migrants’ households and

population, mobility and employment characteristics, as well as health care and social integration, which provides sufficient variables and data for the empirical study of this paper. Third,

the survey scale and coverage of the CMDS 2017 data are large, and the representativeness of the data is relatively high. The total survey sample is close to 170,000, and the survey data is

sampled using a stratified, multi-stage, proportional-to-size PPS sampling method, making the survey results highly representative of China and its domestic provinces and municipalities.

Notwithstanding the many strengths of this data, there are some limitations. The data used in this paper are the cross-section survey data of the migrant population, but to a certain extent,

our research using the CMDS 2017 data may suffer from a lack of timeliness of the data. Meanwhile, since the CMDS 2017 data only includes the group of rural migrants who move across

counties (outgoing rural migrants), it does not include the group of rural migrants who move only within their own counties (local rural migrants). However, our study focuses on the effect

of mobility with townsmen on rural migrants’ wages. The lack of data on local rural migrants does not affect this paper’s study of outgoing rural migrants’ wages. In addition, since the

database’s problem is whether rural migrants move together with townsmen when they first migrate, the sample cannot cover all rural migrants who move together with townsmen. According to

China’s National Bureau of Statistics’ criteria for the definition of rural migrants and combined with the related research literature (Li and Li, 2007; Zhu, 2016), this paper limits the

sample of rural migrants to: the nature of the household registration is agricultural household registration, rural transfer household registration, and the resident household registration.

The flow time of the rural labor force is more than six months, and the age limit is 16–60. The dependent variable of this study is the wages of rural migrants. Thus, the samples with the

employment status of “employer,” “self-employed worker,” and “other,” and the samples with negative wages are deleted. Finally, this article only retains the samples in the questionnaire

that coincide with “this movement time” and “the first time to leave the place of household registration” to exclude the interference of multiple flows. After deleting samples with missing

values for key variables, 16,699 valid samples were finally obtained. VARIABLES AND DEFINITIONS DEPENDENT VARIABLE The dependent variable in this paper is the wages of rural migrants.

Following Mincer (1958, 1974), Xie and Gough (2011), Zhang and Xie (2013a, 2013b), and Liu and Wang (2023), this variable is obtained from the questionnaire “Your salary/net income from the

previous month (or last employment)” and logarithmically processed the raw data of wages. INDEPENDENT VARIABLE Based on the data on the first flow of rural migrants provided by the CMDS 2017

database, the independent variable of this paper is set as “whether this rural migrant is moving or not with fellow townsmen in the first flow”. This variable is obtained through the

following processing: according to the questionnaire of the CMDS 2017 database, the samples of rural migrants who answered that they did not move with their townsmen for the first time are

assigned as 0. The samples who answered that they move with their townsmen for the first time but also with their spouse/parents/parents-in-law/children/siblings/relatives or classmates are

assigned 0. The samples of rural migrants who only move with their townsmen are designated as 1. After processing, we can get samples that move only with fellow townsmen for the first time

to avoid interference caused by flow experience and other unobservable factors. CONTROL VARIABLES This paper’s control variables include personal characteristics and job characteristics

variables of rural migrants. Following Mincer (1958), Damm (2009), Xie and Gough (2011), Zhang and Xie (2013a, 2013b), Ye (2021), and Liu and Wang (2023), individual characteristics of our

research include years of education, work experience, gender, marriage, and the membership of the Chinese Communist Party (CCP). Among them, the number of years of schooling is calculated

according to the education level of rural migrants in the questionnaireFootnote 1. Work experience is obtained by subtracting the time in 2017 when the rural migrants started their current

jobFootnote 2. The gender variable is obtained by assigning a male value of 1 and a female a value of 0. The marriage variable is to assign the value of first marriage, remarriage, and

cohabitation to 1, and the other assignments to 0. The variable of CCP membership is obtained by assigning CCP members a value of 1 and others as 0. Job characteristics include industry,

occupation, ownership, and inflow region of the rural migrants. The industry is divided into the primary, secondary, producer, and consumer services industriesFootnote 3, and the consumer

services industry is taken as the control group. Occupations are divided into white-collar, business services, consumer services, blue-collar, and non-fixed occupationsFootnote 4, and the

control group is the non-fixed occupations. Ownership is divided into state-owned enterprises, private enterprises, foreign-capital enterprises, and enterprises of other ownershipFootnote 5,

and enterprises of other ownership are used as the control group. The inflow regions are divided into eastern, central, western, and northeastern regionsFootnote 6, with the northeast

region as the control group. MODEL SPECIFICATION This paper analyzes the impact of mobility with fellow townsmen on rural migrants’ wages by constructing an extended Mincer equation, and the

model is as follows: $$Lnwage_i = \beta _0 + \beta _1flow_i + + \beta _2edu_i + \beta _3\exp _i + \beta _3{{{\mathrm{exp}}}}_i^2 + \delta X_i + \varepsilon _i$$ Where, _i_ represents the

individual rural migrant; _Lnwage__i_ is the logarithm of individual _i_’s wages; _β_0 is the intercept term, _flow__i_ is whether individual _i_ move with his fellow townsmen, and _β_1 is

its estimation coefficient; X is other characteristic vectors that affect individual _i_, including a series of control variables such as gender and occupation, and _δ_ is the estimation

coefficient vector of control variables; _ε__i_ is a random error of the model. ESTIMATION TECHNIQUES First of all, this study uses descriptive statistics to understand the statistical

characteristics of rural migrants. Secondly, in the benchmark regression section, this paper uses the ordinary least squares (OLS) method to explore the relationship between mobility with

fellow townsmen and the wages of rural migrants in China. Finally, to verify the robustness of the conclusion, this paper also adopts the propensity score matching method (PSM) to correct

the possible selection bias. It’s a method of simulating random experiments. It estimates the probability of an individual receiving treatment through the characteristic variables of

samples. Then it matches the samples of the treated group and the control group so that the characteristics of the two groups of samples are as close as possible to estimate the treatment

effect. The average treatment effect of the treated group (ATT) is calculated as follows: $$\begin{array}{l}E\left( {\left. {Y_i} \right|D_i = 1} \right) - E\left( {\left. {Y_i} \right|D_i =

0} \right) = E\left( {\left. {Y_{1i}} \right|D_i = 1} \right) - E\left( {\left. {Y_{0i}} \right|D_i = 0} \right)\\ = \underbrace {E\left( {\left. {Y_{1i}} \right|D_i = 1} \right) - E\left(

{\left. {Y_{0i}} \right|D_i = 1} \right)}_{ATT} + \underbrace {E\left( {\left. {Y_{0i}} \right|D_i = 1} \right) - E\left( {\left. {Y_{0i}} \right|D_i = 0}

\right)}_{Selection\,bias}\end{array}$$ Among them, the formula in the first line on the right of the equal sign is ATT. When PSM performs sample matching based on observable variables, the

result of the selection bias component is 0. At this time, the average difference between the treatment group and the control group is ATT. EMPIRICAL ANALYSIS DESCRIPTIVE STATISTICS Table 1

shows the results of descriptive statistical analysis about rural migrants who move with their townsmen and rural migrants who are not in terms of each characteristic variable. It can be

seen from the data in the table that the average logarithmic wages of rural migrants who move with their townsmen is 8.164, which is higher than that of rural migrants who move without their

townsmen at 8.012. The mean difference test shows that this difference is significant at the significance level of 1%. The median logarithmic wages of rural migrants who move with their

townsmen is 8.161, which is higher than the median logarithmic wages of rural migrants who move without their townsmen at 8.001. This indicates that there is indeed a significant difference

in wages between the two groups of rural migrants. Regarding other variables, rural migrants who move with their townsmen have fewer years of education than rural migrants who do not move

with their townsmen. Their work experience is more abundant than rural migrants who do not move with their townsmen. Regarding gender, the proportion of rural male migrants who move with

their townsmen is about 10 percentage points higher than that of rural migrants who do not move with their townsmen. The proportion of married rural migrants is about 20 percentage points

lower than that of rural migrants who do not move with the same townsmen. Regarding political identity, the proportion of party members in the two groups is low and not much different. From

the industry perspective, rural migrants who move with their townsmen have the highest proportion in the secondary industry, while rural migrants who do not move with their townsmen account

for the highest proportion in the service industry. From the perspective of occupation, consumer services and blue-collar occupations are the most important occupations of the two groups, of

which rural migrants who move with their townsmen are mainly blue-collar occupations, and rural migrants who are not move with their townsmen are mainly consumer services occupations. From

the ownership perspective, the employment enterprises in both groups are mainly private enterprises, accounting for 70%, but the proportion of rural migrants who move with their townsmen is

slightly higher than that of rural migrants who are not. The proportion of rural migrants who do not move with the same townsmen is higher in state-owned enterprises. From the perspective of

inflow regions, the eastern region is the most important inflow region of the two groups, followed by the western region, and the central and northeastern regions account for a relatively

low proportion. REGRESSION RESULTS After describing the statistics, this paper further uses an econometric model to analyze the impact of rural mobility on the wages of rural migrants.

Columns (1) to (3) of Table 2 report regression results after sequentially increasing the control variables. Among them, column (1) returns to the single variable of township mobility, and

the results show that compared with rural migrants who are not in the same township, the wages of rural migrants in the same township are higher. However, other factors may be interfered

with at this time and cause inaccurate estimates, so this paper further controls other factors that may affect income. The results of column (2) show that after increasing the individual

characteristic variables of rural migrants, the mobility of rural migrants can still significantly increase the wages of rural migrants. Column (3) further increases the characteristics of

industries, occupations, ownership, and inflow regions. The results show that although the estimated coefficient of township mobility has decreased, it is still significant at the level of

1%, indicating that the conclusion that township mobility significantly increases the wages of rural migrants has not changed, reflecting the robustness of the estimated results. In terms of

other control variables, the estimates in column (3) show that an increase in years of schooling and work experience increases the wages of rural migrants and that work experience has an

inverted U-shaped effect on the wages of rural migrants. Men and married rural migrants have higher wages than women and unmarried rural migrants. The estimation results of the control

variables are consistent with the theoretical expectations and other existing studies, which shows that the estimates are credible. CORRECTION OF SELECTION BIAS The results of the regression

found a significant positive impact of the mobility with fellow townsmen on the wages of rural migrants, but the estimation process may face the problem of selection bias. The rural

migrants who choose to go out to work with the same townsmen and the rural migrants who stay in the local area may have some differences in themselves. These different characteristics may

lead to selection bias, and the linear relationship between the dependent and independent variables is not always true. The potential error in the model specification may also make the

estimation results biased. Based on the above considerations, this paper uses the propensity score matching method (PSM) to solve these problems. In addition to the variables used for

benchmark regression, the covariate variables used for matching have also added the “parent flow status” variableFootnote 7. The migrant worker who has been out of the county (rural

migrant’s hometown) with at least one parent is set to 1. The migrant worker who has not been out of the house by both parents is assigned a value of 0, regardless of the answer “flow since

birth” and sample who “can’t remember”. Different matching methods are used to ensure the robustness of the results. Table 3 shows the results of the tendency score matching, and the average

treatment effect of the treated group (ATT) obtained by the three matching methods is positive and significant at the significance level of 1%, which shows that after correcting the

possible selection bias and model setting bias, the improvement effect of the mobility with fellow townsmen on the wages of rural migrants still exist significantly. This further validates

the conclusions drawn in the regression. ROBUSTNESS TEST The above analysis concludes that the mobility of rural migrants with the same townsmen positively and significantly impacts their

wages. When rural migrants go out to work, the social relationship network from their parents may also have an impact on rural migrants. In other words, the reason why rural migrants go out

to work with their townsmen is that the wage level is higher is probably not due to the mobility with the townsmen but because of the social relationship network brought about by their

parents’ experience of rural migrants is transmitted to rural migrants from generation to generation, thus affecting their wages. To exclude this influence from the parents, this article

deletes the sample of rural migrants in the sample who have both parents or either parent has the experience of going out to work. It does not consider the samples that answer “I was born as

a migrant” and “can’t remember clearly.” After processing, the sample of rural migrants whose parents have not had the experience of going out to work is obtained. Table 4,1(1) returns to

this part of the sample, and the results show that the positive impact of rural migrants’ rural mobility on their wages is still significant after excluding the impact of the social

relationship network brought about by the parents’ migrant work, which further shows that the previous conclusion is stable. After excluding the influence of parents, there is still a

problem that the flow time does not match the time to obtain income. If rural migrants first went out to work many years ago, is it not credible to use the wages/net income of the last month

(or the last employment) at the time of the survey to define whether rural migrants were migrant workers at that time. For example, when a migrant worker first moved in 2000, and the

independent variable in this paper is the wages/net income of the last month (or last employment) obtained from the CMDS 2017 survey data, the causal relationship between the first migration

in 2000 and the income in 2017 may be in doubt. To verify the conclusion of this paper, based on excluding the impact of rural migrants’ parents’ going out to work, this paper further

retains the samples with the first flow time of nearly five years. That is, rural migrants with the first flow time of 2012 and 2016, to narrow the time between this flow time and the survey

time. Column (2) of Table 4 regresses the samples that have been moving for nearly five years. The results show that the earning level of rural migrants who moved with their townsmen from

2012 to 2016 is significantly higher than that of rural migrants who did not move with their fellow townsmen. To further verify the above results, column (3) of Table 4 only regresses the

samples whose current flow time is 2016. The results show that the wages of rural migrants who flow with their townsmen for the first time in 2016 are higher than that of rural migrants who

did not move with their fellow townsmen in 2016, which shows that after excluding the mismatch between the flow time and income, the conclusion that the migration with their townsmen

significantly improves the wages of rural migrants is still tenable. MECHANISM ANALYSIS The previous analysis shows that the movement of the same townsmen will significantly increase the

wages of rural migrants, so why can the flow with the same townsmen increase the wages of rural migrants, and what is the mechanism behind it? Next, this paper will analyze the impact

mechanism of rural mobility on the wages of rural migrants from the perspective of information search and wage negotiation. INFORMATION SEARCH MECHANISM As a country that values the

tradition of “relationships”, the network of “social relationships” is prevalent in China and has the function of sending information (Zhang et al., 2015). This can enhance communication

between network members, while rural migrants can obtain mobility information and resources through the network of fellow townsmen in their outflow areas, establish social networks and

obtain employment information (Zhang and Xie, 2013a, 2013b). Fellow townsmen can directly transmit employment information such as enterprise wages and benefits, working conditions, rent, and

living costs to rural migrants (Liang, 2016). It reduces the time and search costs of rural migrants to find jobs, thereby helping rural migrants to find more suitable jobs. Therefore, this

paper argues that the contact among rural migrants and the mobility with fellow townsmen can weaken the information asymmetry in the job search process of the urban labor market through the

network of fellow townsmen, reduce the difficulty of job search, and enable rural migrants to find more suitable jobs, thus bringing a premium for wages. To test this idea, this paper

defines the network variable of fellow townsmen based on “Who do you contact most in your spare time locally”. In this paper, we assign a value of 1 to the sample answering that they are

most in contact with their fellow townsmen most in the local area. Thus, other assignments are 0, and we adopt the mediation effect model to this question (Wen et al., 2004). The estimation

results of the mediation effect model in Table 5 show that the township network variable has a significant positive impact on the wages of rural migrants. There is also a significant

positive relationship between mobility with fellow townsmen and the hometown network, which shows that mobility with fellow townsmen promotes establishing the network relationship between

the rural migrants who come from the same county in the urban labor market. The information search function of this “relationship” network can enrich the employment information of rural

migrants, thereby bringing a wage premium. This shows that mobility with fellow townsmen increases the wages of rural migrants through the information search mechanism. WAGE NEGOTIATION

MECHANISM Studies have shown that the bargaining power of both employers and employees plays an important role in wage decisions (Blanchard and Giavazzi, 2003). In the Chinese context, the

idea of townsmen “getting closer and supporting each other” has historical origins, so the network of fellow townsmen has become an important social relationship of rural migrants where they

move. To a certain extent, this network of fellow townsmen can change the weak position of individual rural migrants in the face of employers and provide resource support and risk sharing

for rural migrants (Li and Deng, 2021). Thereby it enhances the wage bargaining ability of rural migrants, which in turn affects the wages of rural migrants. This cross-regional social

network forms an organization tied to townsmen, mainly in organizations such as the “hometown association” (Li and Deng, 2021). Therefore, this paper assigns the sample answer “participated

in the activities organized by the hometown association locally” to 1, and the others are assigned 0. And use this variable to characterize the wage bargaining ability of rural migrants

using the mediation effect model (Wen et al., 2004) for analysis. The estimated results of Table 6 show that the bargaining power variable significantly increases the wages of rural

migrants. At the same time, there is a significant positive relationship between the movement with fellow townsmen and the wage bargaining ability of rural migrants. This shows that the

movement with fellow townsmen has improved their wage bargaining power by promoting the participation of rural migrants in the hometown association, making it more likely that rural migrants

will gain the initiative in wage negotiations with their employers, thereby obtaining higher wages. HETEROGENEITY ANALYSIS Considering that the mobility of rural migrants from the same

county may be affected by different occupations, this paper analyzes the heterogeneity of the impact of the movement of rural migrants in different occupations on the wages of rural

migrants. The results of Table 7 show that in business services, consumer services, and blue-collar occupations, mobility with fellow townsmen can play a role in increasing the wages of

rural migrants. However, in the white-collar occupation, the impact of mobility with fellow townsmen on the wages of rural migrants is not statistically significant. The possible reason is

that white-collar occupations mainly include the heads of state organs, CCP, mass organizations, state-owned enterprises and institutions, professional and technical personnel, civil

servants, clerks, and related personnel in China. The occupational requirements of such occupations are generally higher, and the recruitment of employees is mainly through an open and

strict selection mechanism. Thus, the impact of fellow townsmen on the wages of these occupations is very small. However, occupations such as housekeeping, cleaning, courier, construction,

etc., have relatively low requirements. Compared with rural migrants who are not moving with fellow townsmen, there is a more obvious phenomenon of ethnic agglomeration and acquaintance

introduction (Zhang and Xu, 2011; Huang, 2013; Lian and Li, 2019). The hometown association expands the collection of individual information and resources, which can compensate for the lack

of individual bargaining power caused by the low level of human capital (Chen, 2019). Table 8 further demonstrates the heterogeneity of ownership and generations. For rural migrants working

in foreign-capital enterprises, mobility with fellow townsmen has not significantly increased their wages. However, for state-owned and private enterprises, the movement with fellow townsmen

will significantly increase the wages of rural migrants, especially in private enterprises; this positive impact is more prominent. This may be due to the prevalence of employees being

recommended by acquaintances or employed by employer-selected groups in private enterprises (Chen, 2001). From the perspective of intergenerational differencesFootnote 8, mobility with

fellow townsmen significantly positively impacts the wages of the two generations of rural migrants. However, compared with the new generation of rural migrants, the effect of mobility with

fellow townsmen on the wages of the older rural migrants is more obvious. The older generation of rural migrants in the city still continues their traditional circle of communication

centered on blood and geography (Li, 2013), while the new generation of rural migrants is disconnected from traditional rural social relations, and their values are more self-centered (Zhang

and Jiang, 2016). And their ability and integration into the city are more potent than those of the older generation of rural migrants. The proportion of white-collar rural migrants is also

higher than that of the older generation of rural migrants, so the impact of mobility with fellow townsmen on the wages of rural migrants is weaker than that of the older generation of

rural migrants. This paper further examines the impact of rural migrants moving with other different groups among fellow townsmen on their wages. Table 9 shows the specific results. As seen

from Table 9, moving with parents, children, or spouses has not significantly increased the wages of rural migrants. This may be because rural migrants often prefer stable jobs for family

care. When they are on the move with their spouses, parents, or children, and the salary level of stable jobs is generally lower than that of poorly stable employment, so rural migrants

prefer to obtain a relatively stable job at the expense of part of their wages (Li et al., 2018). CONCLUSIONS AND DISCUSSION CONCLUSIONS This paper uses the data from the 2017 China Migrants

Dynamic Survey to study the relationship between the mobility of rural migrants and their wages. The results show that mobility with fellow townsmen significantly increases the wages of

rural migrants. It is still valid after using the Propensity Score Matching method to correct the selection bias of the sample and excluding the interference from the parents’ outgoing

mobility and longer periods of labor mobility, which suggests that the conclusion of this paper is stable and plausible. On the one hand, the reason for the above phenomenon is that mobility

with fellow townsmen has enhanced the information search ability of rural migrants, alleviated the problem of information asymmetry in the process of rural migrants’ job search, and

provided information convenience for rural migrants to find more suitable jobs, thus bringing about a premium for wages. On the other hand, the mobility of rural migrants through the network

of fellow townsmen has enhanced the ability of rural migrants to negotiate wages, making it more likely that rural migrants will receive higher wages in negotiations with employers.

Heterogeneity analysis from the perspective of occupation, employment unit type, and generational level found that for white-collar occupations with higher work requirements, the impact of

mobility with fellow townsmen on the wages of rural migrants is not obvious. In contrast, rural migrants’ mobility with fellow townsmen significantly impacts their wages in business

services, consumer services, and blue-collar occupations. From the perspective of employment unit type, the movement of rural migrants in foreign-capital enterprises cannot enable rural

migrants to obtain higher incomes. However, the mobility with fellow townsmen in state-owned and private enterprises has significantly increased the wages of rural migrants, of which the

role of wage increase in private enterprises is more prominent. From an intergenerational point of view, mobility with fellow townsmen has a stronger positive impact on the wages of the

older generation of rural migrants. Further analysis shows that when moving with spouses, parents, and children, rural migrants may choose stable jobs to care for their families and “give

up” part of their wages. DISCUSSION Although the data in this paper comes from China, the findings have obvious reference value and significance for the study of wages of rural migrants

globally, especially in developing countries. It is well known that China is the largest developing country in the world, and Chinese rural migrants are highly representative. The link

between rural migrants’ mobility and wage improvement in China is also the research focus on rural migrants’ migration and mobility in most developing countries. Studying the labor mobility

of Chinese rural migrants has implications for a series of underdeveloped countries and regions in the world to promote urbanization and increase the wages of rural migrants. In addition,

this mobility pattern with fellow townsmen has similarities and higher replication value in East Asia and Southeast Asia areas, which are deeply influenced by Confucian culture. This paper’s

research has some applicability to the study of labor mobility in the areas above and can provide possible references in this field. Considering that the issue of rural migrants’ wages is a

systematic, comprehensive, and huge scientific research project, this study still has some limitations. First of all, this paper only examines the impact of the first flow of rural migrants

on their wages. This paper does not discuss the influence of the secondary flow of rural migrants. This also points out the direction for our next work: to explore the impact of the second

flow of rural migrants on wages and the difference between the first and second flows. Secondly, this paper used the cross-section data of the migrant population in 2017, and the timeliness

of the data needs to be enhanced. In addition, due to the limitation of existing research data, especially the scarcity of panel data, the dynamic effect of mobility with fellow townsmen on

the wages of rural migrants still needs to be further discussed. Promoting the urbanization of the agricultural transfer population is the primary task of China’s new urbanization

construction, and realizing the economic assimilation of rural migrants is the key content. The results of this paper show that mobility with fellow townsmen has increased the wages of rural

migrants through the information transmission mechanism and wage negotiation mechanism. It is difficult for rural migrants to obtain job search information from official channels. Thus,

they rely on informal information channels such as hometown networks and acquaintance introductions to seek jobs. Meanwhile, the lack of labor rights protection mechanisms for rural migrants

forces them to rely on their fellow townsmen and townsmen association to protect their rights. Therefore, in the future, in promoting urbanization, it is necessary to improve the employment

service system for rural migrants. It is recommended to build a government employment service information network platform and broaden the formal channels for rural migrants’ information

search by introducing employment intermediaries, holding special job fairs for rural migrants, and building labor cooperation bases so that rural migrants can obtain job recruitment

information more conveniently and effectively. In addition, it is necessary to improve the protection mechanism for the rights and interests of rural migrants and realize the comprehensive

coverage of the labor rights protection system for rural migrants. And further protect the legitimate rights and interests of rural migrants by improving the labor dispute mediation and

arbitration system, unblocking the “green channel” for rural migrants’ rights protection, and introducing trade unions and social welfare organizations. DATA AVAILABILITY The data used in

this article can be found in the National Health Commission of the People’s Republic of China (NHCPRC) database, but a data use agreement with the data provider is required. The China

Migrants Dynamic Survey (CMDS) data use agreement states that our study will strictly comply with confidentiality obligations, protect and respect the respondents in the survey data obtained

from the NHCPRC by properly storing the study data, and shall not disclose, distribute, or transfer the data in part or in whole (including in converted form) to any other third party in

any form without permission. The datasets used and analyzed during the current study are not publicly available due to confidentiality obligations of the agreement. However, anyone wishing

to access the data may visit the NHCPRC database website (https://www.chinaldrk.org.cn/wjw/#/home) and obtain permission to use the data through a reasonable request. NOTES * The sample with

an education level of no schooling is converted to 0 years of education, primary schools are converted to 6 years of education, junior high schools are converted to 9 years of education,

high schools are converted to 12 years of education, university specialties are converted to 15 years of education, undergraduates are converted to 16 years of education, and graduate

students are converted into 19 years of education. * Work experience units are years and are calculated by: [(2017 - year of start of this job) ×12 + (5 - month of start of this job)] ÷12. *

Agriculture, forestry, animal husbandry and fishery set as the primary industry; Mining, manufacturing, thermal production and supply of thermal coal, and construction set as secondary

industries; Transportation, warehousing and postal services, finance, information transmission, software and information technology services, scientific research and technical services,

leasing and business services industry set as producer services industry; Wholesale and retail, accommodation and catering, real estate, water conservancy, environment and public facilities

management, resident services, repair and other services, education, health and social work, culture, sports and entertainment, public administration, social security and social organization

set as the living services industry. * Responsible persons of state organs, CCP and mass organizations, enterprises and public institutions, professional and technical personnel, civil

servants, clerks and relevant personnel are white-collar occupations; Doing business and selling are commercial services; Catering, housekeeping, cleaning, security, decoration, courier and

other commercial and service personnel for the life service industry; Agricultural, forestry, animal husbandry, fishery, water conservancy production personnel, production, transportation,

construction, other production and transportation equipment operators and related personnel for blue-collar occupations; No fixed occupation and other job types of the sample are set for

non-fixed occupations. * State organs, public institutions, state-owned and state-controlled enterprises, collective enterprises, associations/private organizations as state-owned units;

Joint-stock/associated enterprises, private enterprises, individual industrial and commercial households are private enterprises; Hong Kong, Macao and Taiwan wholly-owned enterprises, wholly

foreign-owned enterprises and Sino-foreign joint ventures are foreign-funded enterprises; Other types are set as other ownership. * It is divided according to the standards of the China’s

National Bureau of Statistics. * This variable was derived from the questionnaire “Did your parents have any experience of working/doing business outside the home before you first moved/went

out”. * According to the common practice of the existing literature, rural migrants are divided into the older generation of rural migrants and the new generation of rural migrants in 1980.

REFERENCES * Alba R, Nee V (1997) Rethinking assimilation theory for a new era of immigration. Int Migr Rev 31(4):826–874 Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar  * Becker GS (1962) Investment

in human capital: A theoretical analysis. J Polit Econ 70(5):9–49 Article  Google Scholar  * Becker GS (1993) Nobel lecture: The economic way of looking at behavior. J Polit Econ

101(3):385–409 Article  Google Scholar  * Becker GS (2009) Human capital: A theoretical and empirical analysis, with special reference to education. Univ of Chicago press * Bellmann L,

Emmerich K (1992) Union bargaining, wage differentials and employment. Labour 6(2):19–30 Article  Google Scholar  * Bertrand M, Luttmer EF, Mullainathan S (2000) Network effects and welfare

cultures. Q J Econ 115(3):1019–1055 Article  Google Scholar  * Blanchard O, Giavazzi F (2003) Macroeconomic effects of regulation and deregulation in goods and labor markets. Q J Econ

118(3):879–907 Article  MATH  Google Scholar  * Bonacich E (1987) “Making it” in America: a social evaluation of the ethics of immigrant entrepreneurship. Sociol Perspect 30(4):446–466

Article  Google Scholar  * Cahuc P, Postel-Vinay F, Robin JM (2006) Wage bargaining with on-the-job search: Theory and evidence. Econometrica 74(2):323–364 Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google

Scholar  * Castles S (2002) Migration and community formation under conditions of globalization. Int Migr Rev 36(4):1143–1168 Article  Google Scholar  * Castles S (2003) Towards a sociology

of forced migration and social transformation. Sociology 37(1):13–34 Article  Google Scholar  * Chan KW, Wei Y (2019) Two systems in one country: the origin, functions, and mechanisms of the

rural-urban dual system in China. Eurasian Geogr Econ 60(4):422–454 Article  Google Scholar  * Chen L (2001) On Family Culture and Zhejiang Enterprise Organization. Econ Rev 111(5):120–124

Google Scholar  * Chen Y (2019) The Impact of Hometown Gathering on Rural migrants of Ethnic Minorities Along the Border: Income Level and Status Gain. Chin J Popul Sci 191(2):87–98 Google

Scholar  * Damm AP (2009) Ethnic enclaves and immigrant labor market outcomes: Quasi-experimental evidence. J Labor Econ 27(2):281–314 Article  Google Scholar  * Dekker R, Engbersen G (2014)

How social media transform migrant networks and facilitate migration. Global Netw 14(4):401–418 Article  Google Scholar  * Eriksson K (2020) Ethnic enclaves and immigrant outcomes:

Norwegian immigrants during the Age of Mass Migration. Eur Rev Econ Hist 24(3):427–446 Article  Google Scholar  * Fei HT, Fei X, Hamilton GG, Zheng W (1992) From the soil: The foundations of

Chinese society. Univ of California Press * Granovetter MS (1973) The strength of weak ties. Am J Sociol 78(6):1360–1380 Article  Google Scholar  * Huang Z (2013) Self-Production

Resumption: Neglected Forms of Labor: Two Types of Chinese Experiences from Peri-urban Farmland and Construction Sites. Youth Stud 2013(1):39–48 Google Scholar  * Kim YY (2017)

Cross-cultural adaptation. Oxford research encyclopedia of communication * Kipgen T, Panda B (2019) Migrants and Their Social Networks: A Study of Kuki Migrants in Delhi. Sociol Bulletin

68(3):342–356 Article  Google Scholar  * Lagakos D (2020) Urban-rural gaps in the developing world: Does internal migration offer opportunities? J Econ Perspect 34(3):174–192 Article  Google

Scholar  * Lee CK (1998) Gender and the South China miracle: Two worlds of factory women. Univ of California Press * Lewin-Epstein N, Semyonov M (1994) Sheltered labor markets, public

sector employment, and socioeconomic returns to education of Arabs in Israel. Am J Sociol 100(3):622–651 Article  Google Scholar  * Li C, Wan H, Tian Z (2018) Mobility for education: The

Impact of Education Policy Reform on rural migrants’ mobility. J Fin Trade Econ 39(1):132–146 CAS  Google Scholar  * Li P, Li W (2007) Economic status and social attitudes of rural migrants

in China. China World Econ 15(4):1–16 Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar  * Li Q (2013) An empirical analysis of the intergenerational differences in the collective action participation of

rural migrants: Based on survey data from the Pearl River Delta. Academics 182(7):172–181 Google Scholar  * Li S, Deng R (2021) Rural customs and subjective life quality of rural migrants:

Empirica research based on dynamic monitoring data of floating population. J Fin Econ 47(11):109–123 Google Scholar  * Lian S, Li Y (2019) Research on the influencing factors of urban

courier brother’s willingness to stay: An investigation based on the perspective of self-determination theory. Contemp Youth Stud 362(5):25–31 Google Scholar  * Liang H (2013) Interpersonal

communication networks and urban integration of rural migrants in the process of information society. China Popul-Resources Envir 23(1):111–118 Google Scholar  * Liang H (2016) The

Occupational Search Process of Rural migrants and Its Impact on Occupational Upward Mobility: Based on search and matching theory. Agric Tech Econ 250(2):63–72 Google Scholar  * Light I

(1984) Immigrant and ethnic enterprise in North America. Ethnic Racial Stud 7(2):195–216 Article  Google Scholar  * Lin S, Wu F, Liang Q, Li Z, Guo Y (2022) From hometown to the host city?

Migrants’ identity transition in urban China. Cities 122:103567 Article  Google Scholar  * Liu Q, Wang Y (2023) City size, social networks and rural migrants’ job search. Fin Trade Econ

44(3):150–164 CAS  Google Scholar  * Luo T, Xu F (2010) The problem of rural migrants living in the same hometown from the perspective of social work. Fujian Tribune 219(8):145–150 Google

Scholar  * Lyu H, Dong Z, Roobavannan M, Kandasamy J, Pande S (2019) Rural unemployment pushes migrants to urban areas in Jiangsu Province. China. Palgr Commun 5(1):1–12 Google Scholar  *

Mai X, Wang J (2022) Situational differences, migratory duration, and social integration of internal migrants in urban China. Cities 125:103596 Article  Google Scholar  * Massey DS (1986)

The settlement process among Mexican migrants to the United States. Am Sociol Rev 51(5):670–684 Article  Google Scholar  * Mincer J (1958) Investment in human capital and personal income

distribution. J Polit Econ 66(4):281–302 Article  ADS  Google Scholar  * Mincer J (1974) Schooling, Experience, and Earnings. Hum Behav Social Institutions No. 2 * Nagel CR (2002)

Geopolitics by another name: Immigration and the politics of assimilation. Polit Geogr 21(8):971–987 Article  Google Scholar  * Pfeffer J, Cohen Y (1984) Determinants of internal labor

markets in organizations. Admin Sci Quart 29(4):550–572 Article  Google Scholar  * Portes A, Zhou M (1993) The new second generation: segmented assimilation and its variants. Ann Am Acad

Polit Ss 530(1):74–96 Article  Google Scholar  * Portes A (1998) Social capital: Its origins and applications in modern sociology. Annu Rev Sociol 24(1):1–24 Article  Google Scholar  *

Portes A, Bach RL (1985) Latin journey: Cuban and Mexican immigrants in the United States. Univ of California Press * Portes A, Rumbaut RG (2006) Immigrant America: a portrait. Univ of

California Press * Rumbaut RG (1997) Paradoxes (and orthodoxies) of assimilation. Sociol Perspect 40(3):483–511 Article  Google Scholar  * Rye JF (2018) Labour migrants and rural change: The

“mobility transformation” of Hitra/Frøya, Norway, 2005–2015. J Rural Stud 64:189–199 Article  Google Scholar  * Rye JF, Andrzejewska J (2010) The structural disempowerment of Eastern

European migrant farm workers in Norwegian agriculture. J Rural Stud 26(1):41–51 Article  Google Scholar  * Schultz TW (1961) Investment in human capital. Am Econ Rev 51(1):1–17 Google

Scholar  * Seidel MDL, Polzer JT, Stewart KJ (2000) Friends in high places: The effects of social networks on discrimination in salary negotiations. Admin Sci Quart 45(1):1–24 Article 

Google Scholar  * Selod H, Shilpi F (2021) Rural-urban migration in developing countries: Lessons from the literature. Reg Sci Urban Econ 91:103713 Article  Google Scholar  * Semyonov M

(1988) Bi-ethnic labor markets, mono-ethnic labor markets, and socioeconomic inequality. Am Sociol Rev 53(2):256–266 Article  Google Scholar  * UN D (2015) World urbanization prospects: The

2014 revision. United Nations Department of Econ and Social Affairs, Popul Division: New York, NY, USA, 41 * Wei W (2016) A study on the income effect of self-selection, career development

and rural migrants gathering in the same village. Sociol Stud 31(5):164–188 Google Scholar  * Wen Z, Zhang L, Hou J, Liu H (2004) Mediation effect test procedure and its application. Chin J

Psychol 36(5):614–620 Google Scholar  * Wu X (2007) Household registration system and intergenerational occupational mobility in China. Sociol Stud 132(6):38–65 Google Scholar  * Xie Y,

Gough M (2011) Ethnic enclaves and the earnings of immigrants. Demography 48(4):1293–1315 Article  PubMed  Google Scholar  * Yao S (2019) Peasants Entering cities: Individual and collective

rights. Theor Invest 209(4):145–150 Google Scholar  * Ye J (2021) Enclaves and Migrant Workers’ Income: Evidence from CLDS. J East China Normal University (Philosophy and Social Science

Edition) 53(2):146–163 Google Scholar  * Ye J, Zhou Y (2010) Social capital conversion and rural migrants’ earnings - Evidence from a survey of rural migrants in Beijing. Manag World

205(10):34–46 Google Scholar  * Zhang B, Hu J, Fan C (2015) Social Network, Information Access and Household Entrepreneurial Income: An Empirical Study Based on the Perspective of

Urban-Rural Differences in China. Econ Rev 192(2):52–67 Google Scholar  * Zhang C, Xie Y (2013a) Place of origin and labour market outcomes among rural migrants in urban China. Urban Stud

50(14):3011–3026 Article  ADS  Google Scholar  * Zhang C, Xie Y (2013b) The Power of Townsmen: The Impact of Townsmen Gathering on Rural migrants’ Wages. Chin J Sociol 33(1):113–135 ADS 

Google Scholar  * Zhang H, Jiang L (2016) The “delocalization” and “risk” of the new generation of rural migrants under the individualized change. Chin Youth Stud 239(1):49–56 Google Scholar

  * Zhang L, Xu A (2011) Protection of rights and interests of domestic workers and social support: A case study of Shanghai domestic service. J Social Sci 366(2):83–90 Google Scholar  *

Zhou M (1997a) Growing up American: the challenge confronting immigrant children and children of immigrants. Annu Rev Sociol 23(1):63–95 Article  Google Scholar  * Zhou M (1997b) Segmented

assimilation: issues, controversies, and recent research on the new second generation. Int Migr Rev 31(4):975–1008 Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar  * Zhu P (2016) Residential

segregation and employment outcomes of rural rural migrants in China. Urban Stud 53(8):1635–1656 Article  Google Scholar  Download references FUNDING This research was granted by the

National Statistical Science Research Program of China (2022LY053), the Innovation Program of Postgraduate Education of Guangdong Province (2023JGXM_065), the Program of Educational

Commission of Guangdong Province (2020ZDZX1025), and the Guangzhou Philosophy and Social Science Project (2021GZYB06). AUTHOR INFORMATION AUTHORS AND AFFILIATIONS * School of Economics,

Guangdong University of Finance and Economics, Guangzhou, 510320, China Fanqiang Meng, Zhihui Liu & Miraj Ahmed Bhuiyan * Party School of C.P.C Taixing Committee, Taizhou, 225400, China

Hao Lin Authors * Fanqiang Meng View author publications You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar * Zhihui Liu View author publications You can also search for this author

inPubMed Google Scholar * Hao Lin View author publications You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar * Miraj Ahmed Bhuiyan View author publications You can also search for

this author inPubMed Google Scholar CONTRIBUTIONS FM: Supervising; ZL: Data analysis; HL: Data curation, Software analysis; MAB: Proofread. CORRESPONDING AUTHOR Correspondence to Miraj

Ahmed Bhuiyan. ETHICS DECLARATIONS COMPETING INTERESTS The authors declare no competing interests. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION PUBLISHER’S NOTE Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to

jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. RIGHTS AND PERMISSIONS OPEN ACCESS This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International

License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source,

provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons

license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by

statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit

http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. Reprints and permissions ABOUT THIS ARTICLE CITE THIS ARTICLE Meng, F., Liu, Z., Lin, H. _et al._ The impact of labor mobility with fellow

townsmen on the wages of rural migrants: evidence from China. _Humanit Soc Sci Commun_ 10, 376 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-023-01795-8 Download citation * Received: 23 November

2022 * Accepted: 24 May 2023 * Published: 05 July 2023 * DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-023-01795-8 SHARE THIS ARTICLE Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this

content: Get shareable link Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article. Copy to clipboard Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative