Variability of extragalactic x-ray jets on kiloparsec scales

feature-image

Play all audios:

Loading...

ABSTRACT Unexpectedly strong X-ray emission from extragalactic radio jets on kiloparsec scales has been one of the major discoveries of Chandra, the only X-ray observatory capable of


sub-arcsecond-scale imaging. The origin of this X-ray emission, which appears as a second spectral component from that of the radio emission, has been debated for over two decades. The most


commonly assumed mechanism is inverse-Compton upscattering of the cosmic microwave background by very low-energy electrons in a still highly relativistic jet. Under this mechanism, no


variability in the X-ray emission is expected. Here we report the detection of X-ray variability in the large-scale jet population, using a novel statistical analysis of 53 jets with


multiple Chandra observations. Taken as a population, we find that the distribution of _P_ values from a Poisson model is strongly inconsistent with steady emission, with a global _P_ value


of 1.96 × 10−4 under a Kolmogorov–Smirnov test against the expected uniform (0, 1) distribution. These results strongly imply that the dominant mechanism of X-ray production in


kiloparsec-scale jets is synchrotron emission by a second population of electrons reaching multi-teraelectronvolt energies. X-ray variability on the timescale of months to a few years


implies extremely small emitting volumes much smaller than the cross-section of the jet. Access through your institution Buy or subscribe This is a preview of subscription content, access


via your institution ACCESS OPTIONS Access through your institution Access Nature and 54 other Nature Portfolio journals Get Nature+, our best-value online-access subscription $29.99 / 30 


days cancel any time Learn more Subscribe to this journal Receive 12 digital issues and online access to articles $119.00 per year only $9.92 per issue Learn more Buy this article * Purchase


on SpringerLink * Instant access to full article PDF Buy now Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout ADDITIONAL ACCESS OPTIONS: * Log in * Learn about


institutional subscriptions * Read our FAQs * Contact customer support SIMILAR CONTENT BEING VIEWED BY OTHERS POWERFUL EXTRAGALACTIC JETS DISSIPATE THEIR KINETIC ENERGY FAR FROM THE CENTRAL


BLACK HOLE Article Open access 30 October 2020 RESOLVING ACCELERATION TO VERY HIGH ENERGIES ALONG THE JET OF CENTAURUS A Article 17 June 2020 GAMMA-RAY FLARES FROM RELATIVISTIC MAGNETIC


RECONNECTION IN THE JET OF THE QUASAR 3C 279 Article Open access 21 August 2020 DATA AVAILABILITY All observations used in this study are publicly available. In particular, the Chandra X-Ray


Observatory archive can be accessed on the web at https://cda.harvard.edu/chaser/. Radio observations with NRAO facilities are available at https://data.nrao.edu, ACTA observations from


https://atoa.atnf.csiro.au/. Extensive tables of reduced data necessary to repeat these analyses are available as supplementary Excel files, further described in Supplementary Section 3.g


CODE AVAILABILITY The analysis software used in this study for reducing astronomical data is described in Methods and publicly available from the respective observatories. The statistical


analysis is fully described in Methods and can be repeated using any software suitable for data analysis, such as R or Python. REFERENCES * Reddy, K., Georganopoulos, M., Meyer, E. T.,


Keenan, M. & Kollmann, K. E. Offsets between X-ray and radio components in X-ray jets: the AtlasX. _Astrophys. J. Suppl. Ser._ 265, 8 (2023). * Schwartz, D. A. et al. Chandra discovery


of a 100 kiloparsec X-ray jet in PKS 0637-752. _Astrophys. J. Lett._ 540, 69–72 (2000). Article  ADS  Google Scholar  * Chartas, G. et al. The Chandra X-Ray Observatory resolves the X-ray


morphology and spectra of a jet in PKS 0637-752. _Astrophys. J._ 542, 655–666 (2000). Article  ADS  Google Scholar  * Tavecchio, F., Maraschi, L., Sambruna, R. M. & Urry, C. M. The X-ray


jet of PKS 0637-752: inverse Compton radiation from the cosmic microwave background? _Astrophys. J. Lett._ 544, L23–L26 (2000). Article  ADS  Google Scholar  * Celotti, A., Ghisellini, G.


& Chiaberge, M. Large-scale jets in active galactic nuclei: multiwavelength mapping. _Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc._ 321, L1–L5 (2001). Article  ADS  Google Scholar  * Marshall, H. L. et al.


A flare in the jet of Pictor A. _Astrophys. J. Lett._ 714, L213–L216 (2010). Article  ADS  Google Scholar  * Hardcastle, M. J. et al. Deep Chandra observations of Pictor A. _Mon. Not. R.


Astron. Soc._ 455, 3526–3545 (2016). Article  ADS  Google Scholar  * Thimmappa, R. et al. Chandra imaging of the western hotspot in the radio galaxy Pictor A: image deconvolution and


variability analysis. _Astrophys. J._ 903, 109 (2020). * Hardcastle, M. J. et al. The nature of the jet-driven outflow in the radio galaxy 3C 305. _Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc._ 424, 1774–1789


(2012). Article  ADS  Google Scholar  * Hardcastle, M. J., Massaro, F. & Harris, D. E. X-ray emission from the extended emission-line region of the powerful radio galaxy 3C 171. _Mon.


Not. R. Astron. Soc._ 401, 2697–2705 (2010). Article  ADS  Google Scholar  * Feigelson, E. D. et al. The X-ray structure of Centaurus A. _Astrophys. J._ 251, 31–51 (1981). Article  ADS 


Google Scholar  * Kraft, R. P. et al. Chandra observations of the X-ray jet in Centaurus A. _Astrophys. J._ 569, 54–71 (2002). Article  ADS  Google Scholar  * Wilson, A. S., Young, A. J.


& Shopbell, P. L. Chandra observations of Cygnus A: magnetic field strengths in the hot spots of a radio galaxy. _Astrophys. J. Lett._ 544, L27–L30 (2000). Article  ADS  Google Scholar 


* Harris, D. E. et al. Flaring X-ray emission from HST-1, a knot in the M87 jet. _Astrophys. J. Lett._ 586, L41–L44 (2003). Article  ADS  Google Scholar  * Hardcastle, M. J. & Croston,


J. H. The Chandra view of extended X-ray emission from Pictor A. _Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc._ 363, 649–660 (2005). Article  ADS  Google Scholar  * Georganopoulos, M., Kazanas, D., Perlman, E.


& Stecker, F. W. Bulk Comptonization of the cosmic microwave background by extragalactic jets as a probe of their matter content. _Astrophys. J._ 625, 656–666 (2005). Article  ADS 


Google Scholar  * Georganopoulos, M., Perlman, E. S., Kazanas, D. & McEnery, J. Quasar X-ray jets: gamma-ray diagnostics of the synchrotron and inverse Compton hypotheses: the case of 3C


273. _Astrophys. J. Lett._ 653, L5–L8 (2006). Article  ADS  Google Scholar  * Alves, E. P., Zrake, J. & Fiuza, F. Efficient nonthermal particle acceleration by the kink instability in


relativistic jets. _Phys. Rev. Lett._ 121, 245101 (2018). Article  ADS  Google Scholar  * Marshall, H. L. et al. A Chandra survey of quasar jets: first results. _Astrophys. J. Suppl. Ser._


156, 13–33 (2005). Article  ADS  Google Scholar  * Zhu, S. F., Brandt, W. N., Wu, J., Garmire, G. P. & Miller, B. P. Investigating the X-ray enhancements of highly radio-loud quasars at


_z_ > 4. _Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc._ 482, 2016–2038 (2019). ADS  Google Scholar  * Marshall, H. L. et al. An X-ray imaging survey of quasar jets: testing the inverse Compton model.


_Astrophys. J. Suppl. Ser._ 193, 15 (2011). Article  ADS  Google Scholar  * Marshall, H. L. et al. An X-ray imaging survey of quasar jets: the complete survey. _Astrophys. J._ 856, 66


(2018). Article  ADS  Google Scholar  * Worrall, D. M. et al. Inverse-Compton scattering in the resolved jet of the high-redshift quasar PKS J1421-0643. _Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc._ 497,


988–1000 (2020). Article  ADS  Google Scholar  * Schwartz, D. A. et al. Two candidate high-redshift X-ray jets without coincident radio jets. _Astrophys. J._ 904, 57 (2020). Article  ADS 


Google Scholar  * Ighina, L. et al. Direct observation of an extended X-ray jet at _z_ = 6.1. _Astron. Astrophys._ 659, A93 (2022). * Meyer, E. T. et al. The origin of the X-ray emission in


two well-aligned extragalactic jets: the case for IC/CMB. _Astrophys. J. Lett._ 883, L2 (2019). Article  ADS  Google Scholar  * Breiding, P. et al. Fermi non-detections of four X-ray jet


sources and implications for the IC/CMB mechanism. _Astrophys. J._ 849, 95 (2017). Article  ADS  Google Scholar  * Breiding, P. et al. A multiwavelength study of multiple spectral component


jets in AGN: testing the IC/CMB model for the large-scale-jet X-ray emission. _Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc._ 518, 3222–3250 (2023). Article  ADS  Google Scholar  * Dermer, C. D. On the beaming


statistics of gamma-ray sources. _Astrophys. J. Lett._ 446, L63 (1995). Article  ADS  Google Scholar  * Georganopoulos, M., Kirk, J. G. & Mastichiadis, A. The beaming pattern and


spectrum of radiation from inverse Compton scattering in blazars. _Astrophys. J._ 561, 111–117 (2001). Article  ADS  Google Scholar  * Harris, D. E., Cheung, C. C., Stawarz, Ł., Biretta, J.


A. & Perlman, E. S. Variability timescales in the M87 jet: signatures of _E_2 losses, discovery of a quasi period in HST-1, and the site of TeV flaring. _Astrophys. J._ 699, 305–314


(2009). Article  ADS  Google Scholar  * Snios, B. et al. Variability and proper motion of X-ray knots in the jet of Centaurus A. _Astrophys. J._ 871, 248 (2019). Article  ADS  Google Scholar


  * Giannios, D., Uzdensky, D. A. & Begelman, M. C. Fast TeV variability in blazars: jets in a jet. _Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc._ 395, L29–L33 (2009). Article  ADS  Google Scholar  *


Mossman, A., Stohlman, O., Cheung, T., Harris, D. E. & Massaro, F. _XJET: X-Ray Emission from Extragalactic Radio Jets_ https://hea-www.harvard.edu/XJET/ (2015). * Garmire, G. P. et al.


Advanced CCD imaging spectrometer (ACIS) instrument on the Chandra X-ray Observatory. _Proc. SPIE_ 4851, 28–44 (2003). * Fruscione, A. et al. CIAO: Chandra’s data analysis system. _Proc.


SPIE_ 6270, 62701V (2006). * McMullin, J. P., Waters, B., Schiebel, D., Young, W., & Golap, K. in _Astronomical Data Analysis Software and Systems XVI_ Vol. 376 (eds Shaw, R. A. et al.)


127–130 (ASP, 2007). * HI4PI Collaboration et al. HI4PI: a full-sky H i survey based on EBHIS and GASS. _Astron. Astrophys._ 594, A116 (2016). * Fraser, D. A. S., Reid, N. & Sartori, N.


Accurate directional inference for vector parameters. _Biometrika_ 103, 625–639 (2016). Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar  * Davison, A. C. & Reid, N. The tangent exponential


model. Preprint at https://arxiv.org/abs/2106.10496 (2021). * Davison, A. C., Fraser, D. A., Reid, N. & Sartori, N. Accurate directional inference for vector parameters in linear


exponential families. _J. Am. Stat. Assoc._ 109, 302–314 (2014). Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar  Download references ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The following grant funding is acknowledged:


Chandra Archival Grant 16700615 (E.T.M.), ADAP grant NNX15AE55G (E.T.M.) and NSF grant 1714380 (E.T.M.), as well as support from the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of


Canada, grant ID RGPIN-2020-05897 (Y.T. and N.R.). This research was made possible through use of data obtained from the Chandra Data Archive and the Chandra Source Catalog, and software


provided by the Chandra X-Ray Center (CXC) in the application packages CIAO and sherpa. The Australia Telescope Compact Array is part of the Australia Telescope National Facility, which is


funded by the Australian Government for operation as a national facility managed by CSIRO. We acknowledge the Gomeroi people as the traditional owners of the observatory site. This paper


makes use of the following ALMA data sets: 2012.1.00688.S, 2016.1.01481.S. ALMA is a partnership of ESO (representing its member states), NSF (USA) and NINS (Japan), together with NRC


(Canada), MOST and ASIAA (Taiwan), and KASI (Republic of Korea), in cooperation with the Republic of Chile. The Joint ALMA Observatory is operated by ESO, AUI/NRAO and NAOJ. The NRAO is a


facility of the National Science Foundation operated under cooperative agreement by Associated Universities, Inc. AUTHOR INFORMATION AUTHORS AND AFFILIATIONS * Department of Physics,


University of Maryland, Baltimore County, Baltimore, MD, USA Eileen T. Meyer, Aamil Shaik, Karthik Reddy, Markos Georganopoulos, Nat DeNigris & Max Trevor * Department of Mathematics,


Imperial College London, London, UK Yanbo Tang * Department of Statistical Sciences, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada Nancy Reid * School of Earth and Space Exploration,


Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ, USA Karthik Reddy * The William H. Miller III Department of Physics and Astronomy, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA Peter Breiding & 


Marco Chiaberge * Space Telescope Science Institute for the European Space Agency, Baltimore, MD, USA Marco Chiaberge * Department of Aerospace, Physics and Space Sciences, Florida Institute


of Technology, Melbourne, FL, USA Eric Perlman & Devon Clautice * SETI Institute, Mountain View, CA, USA William Sparks * Space Telescope Science Institute, Baltimore, MD, USA William


Sparks * Department of Astronomy, University of Massachusetts Amherst, Amherst, MA, USA Nat DeNigris * Department of Physics, University of Maryland, College Park, College Park, MD, USA Max


Trevor Authors * Eileen T. Meyer View author publications You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar * Aamil Shaik View author publications You can also search for this


author inPubMed Google Scholar * Yanbo Tang View author publications You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar * Nancy Reid View author publications You can also search for


this author inPubMed Google Scholar * Karthik Reddy View author publications You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar * Peter Breiding View author publications You can


also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar * Markos Georganopoulos View author publications You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar * Marco Chiaberge View author


publications You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar * Eric Perlman View author publications You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar * Devon Clautice


View author publications You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar * William Sparks View author publications You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar *


Nat DeNigris View author publications You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar * Max Trevor View author publications You can also search for this author inPubMed Google


Scholar CONTRIBUTIONS E.T.M. conceived the project, developed the data analysis methods, contributed to the multiwavelength data analysis and wrote the paper. A.S. carried out the X-ray data


analysis with contributions from E.T.M., K.R., P.B., N.D., D.C. and M.T. Y.T. and N.R. contributed the statistical analysis methods and expertise. K.R. and P.B. contributed to the data


analysis and interpretation. M.G. contributed to the interpretation and theoretical implications. All authors contributed to the editing of the paper and interpretation of results.


CORRESPONDING AUTHOR Correspondence to Eileen T. Meyer. ETHICS DECLARATIONS COMPETING INTERESTS The authors declare no competing interests. PEER REVIEW PEER REVIEW INFORMATION _Nature


Astronomy_ thanks the anonymous reviewers for their contribution to the peer review of this work. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION PUBLISHER’S NOTE Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to


jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. EXTENDED DATA EXTENDED DATA FIG. 1 Histogram of the single-region p-values for the full sample of 155 regions. The


distribution shows an excess at low values relative to the expected uniform (0, 1) distribution, indicating variability in the population. EXTENDED DATA FIG. 2 HISTOGRAM OF THE PERCENT


DIFFERENCE OF EACH EPOCH SOURCE RATE FROM \(\BAR{\MU }\) FOR ALL REGIONS. Including all epochs on all regions, there are 545 distinct observations. The distribution has a mean of 1.02% and a


standard deviation of 28.5%. The mean of the absolute value of the percent difference is 18%. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION Supplementary Figs. 1–5, Table 1, Methods,


Discussion and description of Supplementary Tables 2–5. SUPPLEMENTARY DATA 1 Supplementary Tables 2–5. RIGHTS AND PERMISSIONS Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other


partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this


article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law. Reprints and permissions ABOUT THIS ARTICLE CITE THIS ARTICLE Meyer, E.T., Shaik, A., Tang, Y. _et


al._ Variability of extragalactic X-ray jets on kiloparsec scales. _Nat Astron_ 7, 967–975 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41550-023-01983-1 Download citation * Received: 17 May 2022 *


Accepted: 27 April 2023 * Published: 29 May 2023 * Issue Date: August 2023 * DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41550-023-01983-1 SHARE THIS ARTICLE Anyone you share the following link with will


be able to read this content: Get shareable link Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article. Copy to clipboard Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt


content-sharing initiative