Short-term intracavernous self-injection treatment of psychogenic erectile dysfunction secondary to sexual performance anxiety in unconsummated marriages

INTRODUCTION Erectile dysfunction (ED), the inability to achieve and/or maintain an erection sufficient for satisfactory sexual intercourse is traditionally considered an age dependent male

dysfunctional disorder, resulting from the physiological changes associated with the aging process [1]. Previous surveys demonstrated an age associated 3-fold increased probability of ED in

men between ages 20–60 [2]. However, in recent multinational studies, the prevalence of ED in young men (under 40) has been shown to be as high as 30% [3]. The hemodynamic changes associated

with achieving an erection are dependent on the seamless synergistic interplay between healthy psychologic, neurologic, endocrinologic, metabolic, and vascular factors [4]. In younger men

without vascular risk factors, psychogenic ED is generally considered to be the main etiology of ED [5, 6]. Psychogenic ED is predominantly or exclusively due to psychologic or interpersonal

factors including: sexual performance anxiety, global anxiety, relationship and social factors, depression, guilt and fear [6, 7]. Physicians treating patients with psychogenic ED in

certain conservative societies frequently face situations that are uniquely related to the specific culture and family attitudes. Newly married couples in conservative societies may have

limited premarital sexual experiences. The men might be under a significant amount of stress, which affects their ability to achieve an erection leading to unconsummated marriage, a

condition in which newly married couples are unable to achieve penile-vaginal intercourse for variable periods despite the couple’s desire and numerous attempts. Moreover, when psychogenic

ED is left unresolved, fear of failure may preclude future attempts, frequently resulting in a vicious cycle of sexual performance anxiety, often with the cessation of all sexual activity

and increased distancing within the relationship [5, 8]. One of the many benefits of intracavernous injection (ICI) therapy, it is a purely physiological treatment that offers an almost

instant natural erection; this alone reduces anxiety in patients with a substantial psychogenic component in their ED [9]. In the case series presented herein we assessed the success of

at-home use of self-injected ICI treatment following diagnosis of psychogenic ED, secondary to sexual performance anxiety, in young men from traditional Muslim communities who reported on

unconsummated marriages. OUR OBSERVATION This case series conducted between 2017 and 2019 evaluated ICI treatment in 12 patients, average age 30 (range 20–45 years), at the Clinic for Sexual

Health at Hillel Yaffe, a university affiliated Medical Center in Northern Israel serving a population of half a million residents, 40% of which are Muslim, Christian and Druze Arabs. The

medical and sexual history of all patients was recorded. All young men from traditional Muslim communities reported on unconsummated marriages and sought treatment on an average of 18 months

(range 1–3 years) after their wedding. All but one had no sexual experience before marriage. Our cohort of patients were young healthy men; thus, no additional lab or other tests were

conducted. According to the data collected, none of the patients had difficulty achieving an erection prior to penetration. A clear history of full rigid morning or night erections and

having a healthy libido was reported in all but 2 patients. One of these patients did not engage in masturbation, thus, all but one patient reached ejaculation. In all 12 men, the etiology

for the diagnosis of ED was psychogenic, without vascular risk factors. All patients were treated for psychogenic ED secondary to sexual performance anxiety. All patients failed to respond

to repeated trials on phosphodiesterase type 5 (PDE5) inhibitors. Nine of 12 patients on treatment with PDE5 inhibitors achieved an erection that was lost before penetration. All couples

were offered and refused sex therapy. Seven patients were smokers and two of the couples were in consanguineous marriages (related cousins). PSYCHOGENIC ED SECONDARY TO SEXUAL PERFORMANCE

ANXIETY TREATMENT WITH ICI Of note, all of the patients participating in our study were highly motivated to succeed. For this study, the treatment procedure was according to the following

ICI therapy protocol: After the initial in-clinic training session with a demonstration of the self-injection technique on a model of a penis and detailed explanations on the sterilization

and injection technique, patients were sent home with one 1 ml syringe fitted with “27Gx1/2” needle prepared and ready for use, with the appropriate concentration of low dosage combination

of papaverine and alprostadil. According to the ICI protocol starting with 0.5 ml solution that contains 6 mg papaverine and 6 mcg alprostadil. If a satisfactory erection was not achieved,

at the second treatment session the dose was titrated to 1 ml. solution of 12 mg of papaverine and 12 mcg of alprostadil. Following self-injection at home, the patients were instructed to

wait 15–20 min for response and only then to engage in sexual intercourse. Treatment and outcomes: Seven of the twelve (58.3%) patients reported achieving good erection after one treatment

with ICI self-injected at home that led to successful sexual intercourse with penetration, thus experiencing immediate success. The remaining 5/12 (41.6%) required one additional ICI

treatment after several weeks with a titrated dose, to report good erection and experience successful sexual intercourse with penetration. No side effects, as priapism, were noted in any of

the cases. This can be explained by the low dosages that were used, even when the titration was higher. Follow-up data was available for all patients. Following 1 to 2 ICI treatments all

patients reported on resumption of spontaneous erections and were able to end the cycle of sexual performance anxiety and engage in continued sexual intercourse without the need for further

treatment. On follow-up it was observed that 8/12 (75%) of the couples conceived within an average of 8 months (range 2–24 months) and went on to have a normal pregnancy. OUR PERSPECTIVE

During recent years the Clinic of Sexual Health has focused on treatment of younger men from traditional Muslim communities diagnosed with psychogenic ED, secondary to sexual performance

anxiety. All of the men in the current case series had no sexual experience (apart from one previously married) and all reported on unconsummated marriages and sought treatment on an average

of 18 months (range 1–3 years) after their wedding. In unresolved psychogenic ED the vicious cycle of sexual performance anxiety frequently results in the loss of sexual or affectionate

interaction, which is associated with increased performance demands and interpersonal distress [5, 8]. In these cases of psychogenic ED, following previous treatment failure with PDE5

inhibitors, we offered the couples a simple, inexpensive, short term intervention: a brief course of ICI of vasoactive drugs. Patients reported good erection after one to two treatments with

intracavernous self-injection leading to successful sexual intercourse. Due to successful ICI therapy, our patients experienced resumption of spontaneous erections, most probably due to the

resolution of performance anxiety [10], therefore they no longer had need for further treatment. Thus, they effectively ended the cycle of sexual performance anxiety, which led in these

couples to an improved sexual quality of life. As such, ICI therapy may have, in addition to improving their sexual life, also contributed to their quality of life, possibly even preempting

feelings of marriage failure and depression [6]. Societies in which couples have enough opportunity for premarital sex, rarely report on unconsummated marriage. In contrast, in traditional

and conservative societies, premarital sex is strictly prohibited and is considered scandalous and an insult to the family honor [11], therefore, the majority of current publications on

unconsummated marriage originate from Eastern or Middle Eastern countries as Iran [11, 12], Turkey [13], Tunisia [14], and Egypt [15, 16]. Indeed, in many of these reports, psychogenic ED

was considered to be the major etiological factor of unconsummated marriage, secondary to performance anxiety. Previous similar studies with young males from traditional conservative

populations diagnosed with ED also recognized secondary sexual performance anxiety, thus chose ICI therapy. While we demonstrated that a brief course (1-2 self-injections) of ICI was

sufficient in all patients to overcome the psychogenic barriers of sexual performance anxiety, other studies with similar populations reported up to 30% required 3 or 4 ICI treatments [11,

14]. One study with a similar in clinic ICI self-injection training and dose titration protocol reported 46 (64%) patients required up to 3 months of weekly self-injections, and 15(21%)

continued up to a year [15]. Notably, in our clinic we practice extreme caution in dosing and the chosen protocol used for ICI was with a 1 ml syringe fitted with a small “27Gx1/2” needle to

minimize the pain of injection and limit the chance of bleeding. Moreover, treatment was with the lowest effective dosages in order to avoid side effects. Of note, the relatively young age

and healthy status of the study group who were also highly motivated toward success from the initial training on self-injection. Indeed, the majority of our ICI therapy patients used 0.5 ml

solution of combination therapy 6 mg papaverine and 6 mcg alprostadil and only in 5 patients ICI therapy required titration up to 1 ml solution of 12 mg of papaverine and 12 mcg of

alprostadil. Consequently, in our study the use of short-term low dose ICI was also quite safe. There were no events of side effects, as priapism, in the any of the patients. However, in

stark contrast to our ICI self-injected low dose protocol, in other studies, in all cases ICI was injected by the urologist in the clinic (as the majority of patients came from remote rural

areas) and therefore the patients were instructed to go home immediately to attempt intercourse. Thus, significant differences were notable between ICI protocols, as the injections had to be

titrated to relatively higher dosages so that the patients could reach home and attempt intercourse before detumescence occurred. Indeed, the reports of higher dosages of intracavernous

vasoactive drugs used were of papaverine 20 mg titrated to 40 mg [13] or up to 60 mg papaverine [14] or a mean dose of 70 mg papaverine or combination therapy of 10 mg phentolamine with

papaverine 40-mg [13] up to 120 mg[12]. Consequently, due to the higher dosages of intracavernous vasoactive agents used in these studies often high rates of side effects, as prolonged

erection and priapism (49%) and pain (47%) were reported [11, 12, 16]. Although the gold standard, treatment of psychogenic ED in sex therapy, is often a long, expensive process, which may

result in treatment failure, often due to social and interpersonal factors, as the lack of the couples’ acceptance and compliance [5]. Consequently, very few studies in the literature, among

a similar population, reported on compliance with sessions of sex therapy, resulting in various degrees of successful outcomes: from success of concomitant sex therapy with PDE5 inhibitors

[13], to partial success in only 10 of 57 couples [14], while others reported all patients began ICI therapy following failed sex therapy [15]. In our experience, the cultural acceptance of

joint couple therapy was greatly compromised in our study population leading to refusal in all patients to participate. Similar noncompliance was stated in other studies on couples from

traditional societies [11, 12]. Indeed, the Iranian urologist who conducted these two large studies claims ICI should be regarded as first-line treatment in cases of unconsummated marriages,

instead of prolonged, expensive psychotherapy, since deep, complex psychological problems were most probably not a major cause in the vast majority of cases. Moreover, ICI creates a very

rapid response and had shown a curative effect in the majority, without any need for maintenance therapy [11, 12]. LIMITATIONS The small size of our study group is the main limitation.

Although, good success rates were noted in our trial, further follow-up is needed to determine the recurrence rate of the problem and if a brief course of ICI is sufficient to overcome the

psychogenic barriers. CONCLUSION In these cases of unconsummated marriages due to psychogenic ED, secondary to sexual performance anxiety in young healthy men, we found that short-term

treatment (1–2 self-injections) with low dose intracavernous pharmacotherapy was a safe, simple, inexpensive and effective alternative in cases of previous treatment failure with PDE5

inhibitors. Moreover, due to successful ICI therapy the patients experienced resumption of spontaneous erections, with the resolution of the cycle of sexual performance anxiety. In addition

to improving their sexual life, it may also have contributed to their quality of life, possibly even preempting feelings of marriage failure and depression. REFERENCES * National Institutes

of Health. Consensus development conference statement on impotence. Int J Impot Res. 1993;5:181–284. * Kubin M, Wagner G, Fugl-Meyer AR. Epidemiology of erectile dysfunction. Int J Impot

Res. 2003;15:63–71. Article  CAS  Google Scholar  * Nguyen HMT, Gabrielson AT, Hellstrom WJG. Erectile dysfunction in young men-a review of the prevalence and risk factors. Sex Med Rev.

2017;5:508–20. Article  Google Scholar  * Leung AC, Christ GJ, Melman A Physiology of penile erection and pathophysiology of erectile dysfunction. In: Lue TF (ed.). Atlas of male sexual

dysfunction. Current Medicine Group: London, 2004, pp 1–25. * Rosen RC. Psychogenic erectile dysfunction. Classification and management. Urol Clin North Am. 2001;28:269–78. Article  CAS 

Google Scholar  * Bodie JA, Beeman WW, Monga M. Psychogenic erectile dysfunction. Int J Psychiatry Med. 2003;33:273–93. Article  Google Scholar  * McMahon CG. Current diagnosis and

management of erectile dysfunction. Med J Aust. 2019;210:469–76. Article  Google Scholar  * Yafi FA, Jenkins L, Albersen M, Corona G, Isidori AM, Goldfarb S, et al. Erectile dysfunction. Nat

Rev Dis Prim. 2016;2:16003. Article  Google Scholar  * Lue TF Evaluation and nonsurgical management of erectile dysfunction and priapism. in Walsh PC, Retik AB, Vaughn ED, Wein AJ, eds.

_Campbell’s urology_ Philadelphia: Saunders 1998;1181–214. * Kandeel FR, Koussa VK, Swerdloff RS. Male sexual function and its disorders: physiology, pathophysiology, clinical investigation,

and treatment. Endocr Rev. 2001;22:342–88. Article  CAS  Google Scholar  * Zargooshi J. Unconsummated marriage: clarification of aetiology; treatment with intracorporeal injection. BJU Int.

2000;86:75–79. Article  CAS  Google Scholar  * Zargooshi J. Male sexual dysfunction in unconsummated marriage: long-term outcome in 417 patients. J Sex Med. 2008;5:2895–903. Article  Google

Scholar  * Shamloul R. Management of honeymoon impotence. J Sex Med. 2006;3:361–6. Article  Google Scholar  * Nabil Mhiri M, Smaoui W, Bouassida M, Chabchoub K, Masmoudi J, Hadjslimen M, et

al. Unconsummated marriage in the Arab Islamic world: Tunisian experience. Sexologies. 2013;22:e71–76. Article  Google Scholar  * Ghanem H, Sherif T, Adbel-Gawad T, Asaad T. Short term use

of intracavernous vasoactive drugs in the treatment of persistent psychogenic erectile dysfunction. Int J Impot Res. 1998;10:211–4. Article  CAS  Google Scholar  * Badran W, Moamen N, Fahmy

I, El-Karaksy A, Abdel-Nasser TM, Ghanem H. Etiological factors of unconsummated marriage. Int J Impot Res. 2006;18:458–63. Article  CAS  Google Scholar  Download references AUTHOR

INFORMATION AUTHORS AND AFFILIATIONS * Department of Urology, Hillel Yaffe Medical Center, Hadera, Israel Ghalib Lidawi, Mohsin Asali, Muhammad Majdoub & Ronen Rub Authors * Ghalib

Lidawi View author publications You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar * Mohsin Asali View author publications You can also search for this author inPubMed Google

Scholar * Muhammad Majdoub View author publications You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar * Ronen Rub View author publications You can also search for this author

inPubMed Google Scholar CORRESPONDING AUTHOR Correspondence to Ghalib Lidawi. ETHICS DECLARATIONS CONFLICT OF INTEREST The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest. ADDITIONAL

INFORMATION PUBLISHER’S NOTE Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. RIGHTS AND PERMISSIONS OPEN ACCESS This

article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as

you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party

material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s

Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder.

To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. Reprints and permissions ABOUT THIS ARTICLE CITE THIS ARTICLE Lidawi, G., Asali, M., Majdoub, M. _et al._

Short-term intracavernous self-injection treatment of psychogenic erectile dysfunction secondary to sexual performance anxiety in unconsummated marriages. _Int J Impot Res_ 34, 407–410

(2022). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41443-020-00399-z Download citation * Received: 25 October 2020 * Revised: 23 November 2020 * Accepted: 02 December 2020 * Published: 18 February 2021 *

Issue Date: August 2022 * DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41443-020-00399-z SHARE THIS ARTICLE Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content: Get shareable link

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article. Copy to clipboard Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative