
- Select a language for the TTS:
- UK English Female
- UK English Male
- US English Female
- US English Male
- Australian Female
- Australian Male
- Language selected: (auto detect) - EN
Play all audios:
WHAT’S GOOD FOR CAREGIVERS … Most family caregivers have heard too many times that they need to take care of themselves through scheduling and protecting time for self-care activities, such
as respite, physical exercise, enjoying nature, seeing friends, and eating and sleeping well. They already know without repeatedly being told that self-care offers replenishment to make them
more resilient and effective. But few caregivers will practice self-care if they think this is a zero-sum game in which care they give themselves subtracts from the total amount of care
available for their care receivers. They must be convinced those family members will benefit, too. … MAY BE GOOD FOR CARE RECEIVERS Few care receivers like being dependent upon their
caregivers because it makes them feel diminished and childlike. They also worry and feel guilty about how their caregivers are being affected by caring for them. While in many instances they
can no longer handle certain tasks and must rely on others, there are occasions when, with more time and effort, they can do something for themselves, but their caregivers have completed
the job already. When caregivers say no, they may in fact be providing care receivers with the chance to act with greater independence. Perhaps Kim can tell her mother she does not have the
time to take her to the supermarket, and then coach her with ordering groceries online to be delivered to her house. Or she could ask her mother to get a ride to the doctor’s office from one
of her church’s volunteers, thereby meeting two objectives — making her appointment and socializing with a fellow congregant. SEPARATE THE MEANS FROM THE ENDS Caregivers can say no to a
specific task and remain fully committed to caregiving and a family member’s well-being. The difference is that they have made a commitment to caring for that family member, not to a
specific way of caring for them, such as managing all tasks on their own. Kim, for instance, could decide to organize family members to pay for a cleaning service to tidy up her mother’s
house, regardless of whether her mother would prefer that Kim do it. There is no neglect nor love lost there. WRAP ‘NO’ IN PRACTICALITIES Most of the time, caregivers do not need to be so
direct or harsh as to tell a care receiver, “I refuse to do that for you.” Instead, saying no should be undertaken in a spirit of partnership by saying, “What is the best way for us to get
this task done?” What is generally “best” is what works logistically and emotionally for both the care receiver and caregiver. That often means letting caregivers delegate tasks to others
with a minimum of guilt, knowing they are still fulfilling their responsibilities.