The media and bias | The Week

Sadly, “objective journalism” is “stone cold dead,” said Michael Graham in the _Boston Herald_, “sacrificed on the altar of service to Barack Obama.” A recent Pew study found that 57 percent

of John McCain’s recent media coverage has been negative, while only 14 percent has been positive. For Obama, it was 36 percent positive, 29 percent negative. Unsurprisingly, Pew also found

that only 8 percent of Americans think reporters are “objective and not favoring either candidate.” The problem with a study like that, said John Riley in _Newsday_ online, is “it can’t

tell you whether the coverage tilt was deserved, or undeserved.” If one candidate has run a good campaign and the other a poor one, “should the differences be balanced with equivalent

coverage?” That isn’t the media’s job. True enough, said John Harris and Jim VandeHei in _Politico_, and McCain is “getting hosed in the press” largely because his campaign has been “going

quite poorly.” But there’s also bias at work, just not “ideological favoritism.” Political reporters “obsess about personalities,” process, and momentum—they care about the “horse race,” not

“who would do more for world peace or tax cuts.” SUBSCRIBE TO THE WEEK Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives. SUBSCRIBE &

SAVE SIGN UP FOR THE WEEK'S FREE NEWSLETTERS From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox. From our morning

news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox. A free daily email with the biggest news stories of the day – and the best

features from TheWeek.com