Who should be madder at chris christie — democrats or republicans?

New Jersey Gov. Chris Christie (R) managed to anger Republicans and Democrats at the same time on Tuesday, when he called for an Oct. 16 special election to fill the seat of Democratic Sen.

Frank Lautenberg, who died Monday. Democrats accused Christie of playing politics by keeping the seat off the ballot in November, when he's up for re-election. The Dems say Christie

wants to be sure that he wouldn't be hurt by an expected surge in Democratic interest in the Senate vote, as Newark Mayor Cory Booker (D) has made it clear he wants the seat. The GOP

wanted Christie to appoint a Republican to serve through the 2014 midterms, because that would have given them another reliable vote in the Senate for a whole year. Christie insisted there

was no partisan calculus behind his decision. "The political purpose is to give the people a voice," Christie said. "The issues facing the United States Senate are too

important not to have an elected representative making those decisions." Neither party appeared satisfied with his explanation, though. Which side does the governor's decision to

hold a snap election really hurt more? Josh Kraushaar at _National Journal_ suggests it might be Republicans, as they are the ones truly fuming. Not only is Christie refusing to appoint a

conservative to serve through 2014, but he is signaling he wants to appoint someone who doesn't plan to run to keep the job. That, Kraushaar says, leaves little time for some other

Republican to mount a credible challenge to likely Democratic candidate Booker, who is campaigning to be the first African-American to be elected statewide in New Jersey. SUBSCRIBE TO THE

WEEK Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives. SUBSCRIBE & SAVE SIGN UP FOR THE WEEK'S FREE NEWSLETTERS From our morning

news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox. From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of

The Week delivered directly to your inbox. Senate Democrats are probably quite pleased that Christie didn't cut into their narrow majority by naming a conservative to fill the reliably

liberal Lautenberg's seat through next year. But not all Democrats are happy, particularly those in New Jersey. Booker will have to reverse a pledge to serve out his current term if he

wants to run this year, an awkward reversal. But Zeke J. Miller at _TIME_ suggests the real loser here is state Sen. Barbara Buono, the Democrat who is challenging the popular Christie in

November and could have used the turnout boost expected had the charismatic Booker been on the November ballot. Both sides are right about one thing — Christie's move probably helps

_him_. Sean Trende at _Real Clear Politics_ points out that if Christie had interpreted New Jersey's fuzzy law to mean that he could install a GOP stalwart to serve through next year,

he would have faced a bitter Democratic lawsuit that would have hurt his reelection bid in his deep blue state, as well as his presidential prospects in 2016. And by holding the special

election in October rather than November, Trende says, he's increasing his chances of not just winning, but winning big, which would be _good_ for his party. A free daily email with the

biggest news stories of the day – and the best features from TheWeek.com