
- Select a language for the TTS:
- UK English Female
- UK English Male
- US English Female
- US English Male
- Australian Female
- Australian Male
- Language selected: (auto detect) - EN
Play all audios:
Covid vaccine uptake has confounded observers. Following months of public clamour over slow supply, vaccines are now abundant. But in the meantime it seems that many who could not wait for
their arrival no longer want any. Public health officials looking for the right policy tool might want to dust off the 1957 issue of the British Medical Journal. In the 1950s public health
officials in Scotland contended with a grave medical risk: tuberculosis. X-rays were not yet a routine procedure and the general public was slow to take advantage of screening procedures.
Through rolling out a suite of policy measures, Glasgow health officials scored a world record in single-month X-ray uptake — over 700,000 patients, discovering 1,600 active cases. They owed
their success to meticulous planning. An information campaign ran over a period of 18 months in diverse media channels: the BBC, the press, and even in cinemas. And one unconventional
inducement might account for the extraordinary response, namely a weekly prize draw. There were several prizes, the most glamorous one an Austin A-35 — a classic family car of the late
1950s. Andrew Barber and Jeremy West, two economists at the University of California, cite this precedent in their analysis of a vaccination incentive programme that ran during May and June
2021 in Ohio. Under the terms of Vaxx-a-Million, any Ohio citizen who received a single vaccination was eligible to enter a weekly prize draw in one of two categories: adults for $1 million
cash and teenagers for a full university scholarship. Granted, a free lottery ticket likely will spur some members of the public to get their jab. Compared to the modest Austin A-35 offered
to Glaswegian TB patients, the Vaxx-a-Million programme seems an extravaganza. One would like to see what Ohio’s taxpayers got in return for a programme outlay of $5.6 million. Barber and
West have run the numbers and show that the money was well spent. The prospect of a lottery win galvanised public interest in Ohio. From inception of the programme, vaccination rates
increased. Over the month, uptake exceeded base case forecasts by some 82,000. To put the cost of $68 per person into context, the federal government already pays $80 in direct subsidy per
full vaccination. Even better news comes from examining savings on medical costs. The increase in vaccinations reduced infections by 1.3 per cent and avoided 5,000 ICU patient-days. Some
takeaways from Ohio’s Vaxx-a-Million could be trialled in the UK. First, many members of the British public may feel more comfortable with entering a prize draw than with entering a
vaccination booth. Lotteries are a staple of British popular culture and National Lottery draws are a TV fixture. Second, devolved administrations could determine how much of a reward should
be put into the prize pot, and different results might yield pointers about how best to tweak amounts. Last but not least, Ohio’s offer of free university tuition has been tailored to
appeal to young people heading for higher education, the very age group where vaccine hesitancy seems to be particularly high. Given that public officials are subject to rigorous scrutiny of
their spending proposals, it might take time for a British vaccination lottery to appear. But in that case, there is nothing to stop the private sector from coming forward with lottery
schemes of their own. A MESSAGE FROM THEARTICLE _We are the only publication that’s committed to covering every angle. We have an important contribution to make, one that’s needed now more
than ever, and we need your help to continue publishing throughout the pandemic. So please, make a donation._