Brexit, covid and the failure of panglossian optimism  | thearticle

Pick one hundred people at random from across the country and chances are you’d have a fairly equal spread of optimists and pessimists. Of the two, optimism is generally regarded as the

preferred outlook. To be optimistic is to be sunny, chirpy — a positive person. The optimist gets things done because they regard the future as worth fighting for. Most high-profile

politicians today, certainly in Britain and especially in the Conservative Party, would describe themselves as optimists. But it’s a tag that carries more significance than they recognise.

The convinced optimist, who not only assumes that it will all come good in the end, but who bases their entire outlook on that Panglossian assumption, is a person who finds themself slotted

into a very narrow channel of thought. The hardened optimist knows that we all face bumps in the road, but it’s nothing we can’t deal with. Because to be optimistic is to be optimistic about

the human ability to overcome. As such, the optimist tends to be fairly ambivalent about the threat of climate change. It’s a problem, sure, but a bit of grit and perseverance will see us

through. The optimist usually doesn’t worry so much about financial markets either, or signs of economic slowdown. It’s notable that Matt Ridley, the former chairman of Northern Rock, which

crashed so disastrously in 2008, wrote a book called _The Rational Optimist. _The market is the optimists’ great tool. It is self-correcting. It will take care of everything. As for society,

the optimist doesn’t see division, and what division there is, is of little real significance. Yes, there may be inequality, but that only encourages people to strive harder — meaning that,

for the optimist, inequality actually drives beneficial change. As Boris Johnson put it in a speech back in 2013: “I don’t believe that economic equality is possible; indeed, some measure

of inequality is essential for the spirit of envy and keeping up with the Joneses that is, like greed, a valuable spur to economic activity.” As for the ongoing confusions over Brexit: yes,

the Northern Ireland protocol is a bit of a tangle, but the simplest way to deal with it is by “tearing up” the Protocol — Johnson’s own words. Only a crazed optimist would consider doing

this without considering the reaction of the EU. At this point optimism is actually giving way to irrationality. The empty shelves in supermarkets? A temporary blip. The increased likelihood

that Brexit will break up the United Kingdom? The optimist doesn’t see it. The vaccine rollout in Britain was a success and the optimist will make much of it, while ignoring the fact that

Britain had one of the highest death rates in the world, and the current death rate per million is still the highest in western Europe. A recent report on the Government’s handling of the

pandemic by a cross-party group of MPs concluded that “decisions on lockdowns and social distancing during the early weeks of the pandemic — and the advice that led to them — rank as one of

the most important public health failures the United Kingdom has ever experienced”. The Government’s supporters are also generally optimistic, which of course is only natural. A show of

pessimism rebounds on the Government’s own record. If things are bad, it can only be the Government’s fault. But there comes a point when both optimism — and pessimism — can shade into

delusion. The deluded pessimist thinks the system is rigged against them and concludes that someone must be responsible for that rigging. The question then is, _who_? Jeremy Corbyn, deeply

pessimistic about Britain and British society, pushed Labour towards this question. In response, a section of his followers resurrected some of the most poisonous anti-Semitic tropes of all.

Too much pessimism can be both delusional and destructive. The same is true of the optimist. Boris Johnson has been blinded by optimism, with disastrous results. As Covid ripped through

Europe, Johnson refused to lock down, claiming there was no need. It was the classic response of the optimist. The bad thing over _there_ could surely never come and affect us over _here_.

Number 10 dithered. At the time, in March 2020, I wrote about the Government’s lack of action, which it then justified on the basis that it was following the guidance of its public health

experts. “What gives serious cause for concern,” I wrote, “is that the corresponding experts in many neighbouring countries have looked at the exact same scientific evidence and data, and

have come to very different conclusions.” Johnson’s pathological optimism prevented him from addressing a fact that seemed obvious, even to me, someone completely ignorant on all matters of

public health: that most other nations were reacting very differently to Covid. But the Prime Minister, an instinctive optimist, thought it would all be alright in the end. The pandemic

wouldn’t hit Britain with the same ferocity as it had Italy and elsewhere. He was wrong. Optimism, for all its positive associations, ended up costing lives. Thousands of them. So when you

hear Rishi Sunak, the Chancellor, tell the Conservative Party conference that he harbours “an unshakeable optimism about the future”, or when you hear Johnson describe his politics as

“radical and optimistic Conservatism”, it’s worth remembering that optimism is not quite the unalloyed good they think it is. What we want, now more than ever, are not optimists or

pessimists, but _realists_, people who are not swelled by personal conviction, but who are genuine sceptics, that is to say people who appreciate the value of doubt, particularly self-doubt,

and whose minds are flexible enough to adapt when circumstances require them to go beyond the bounds of simple gut instinct. But we don’t have a government of realists. Instead, we have a

government of optimists, led by a pathological optimist. Brexit and Covid have been too much for them. Optimism has failed. (_This article has been corrected. It previously stated that

Britain has the highest Covid rate in Europe. It should have specified Western Europe_.) A MESSAGE FROM THEARTICLE _We are the only publication that’s committed to covering every angle. We

have an important contribution to make, one that’s needed now more than ever, and we need your help to continue publishing throughout the pandemic. So please, make a donation._