Fact check: is the former clinton foundation ceo missing?

feature-image

Play all audios:

Loading...

Claim: Former Clinton Foundation CEO Eric Braverman has gone "missing." Since at least October 2016, some social media users have been echoing the belief that former Clinton


Foundation CEO Eric Braverman is missing or in peril. Braverman, an attorney, headed the foundation from 2013 until he resigned that position in 2015. Braverman took to Twitter on 19 January


2017 to announce he had accepted a position with a California-based charity. He will take charge of the philanthropic arm of the Eric and Wendy Schmidt Foundation. > Thrilled to join 


@ericschmidt, @wenschmidt, and an amazing team as > we bring the power of people and technology together to improve > lives. >  > — Eric Braverman (@eric_braverman) January 19, 


2017 The Eric and Wendy Schmidt Family Foundation also posted the following statement to their web site: > The Eric and Wendy Schmidt Group today announced that Eric Braverman > has 


joined as President of the organization to oversee all > philanthropic and non-investment efforts for the Schmidts. Chuck > Chai remains President and Chief Investment Officer of the 


Hillspire > investment group. Maria Seferian continues to serve as General > Counsel across the Schmidt organization. >  > Eric Schmidt and Wendy Schmidt said: "Now more 


than ever, there is > important work to be done as we bring the power of both technology > and people together into networks that can help address this > century's greatest 


challenges. As we look to increase our impact, > Eric Braverman's insight into growing solutions that work and his > experience with leaders in government, philanthropy, and 


business > will be central to our efforts. We are very pleased to have Eric > working closely with us to direct our family office and to lead and > continue to innovate in our 


philanthropic efforts." Braverman is now > a member of the board of each active philanthropic entity, including > The Schmidt Ocean Institute and The 11th Hour Project. Rumors


regarding Braverman's whereabouts began swirling after a leaked document published via WikiLeaks showed his name mentioned in e-mails between Clinton staffers who believed he was


furtively releasing information about the foundation's financial doings. The only evidence offered, however, was his lack of social media use. > Eric Braverman, the Clinton 


Foundation CEO from 2013 until 2015, has > apparently been missing since October. His absence has fueled > speculations in the blogosphere but so far has been ignored by the > 


media. >  > Some speculate, with good reason, that Braverman may have gone into > hiding after an email mentioning his name was released by Wikileaks > on October 22 of this 


year. In the March 2015 email exchange, Center > for American Progress President Neera Tanden told Clinton campaign > manager and confidant John Podesta there was a mole within the


> Clinton Foundation. Podesta in his reply told Tanden the mole was > Braverman... >  > The last evidence of Braverman's public activity was October 12, > when he posted 


his last tweet on Twitter. (Usually he tweets about > once a month. His "husband," Neil Brown, hasn't tweeted since > August, although he rarely tweets.) I left a 


voicemail on > Braverman's personal phone and sent him an email, but received no > response. He is still listed as a lecturer at Yale University and, > contrary to some 


reports, there is a record of his lectures going > back several years. I contacted the press office and Braverman's > department at Yale and received no response. We found no


evidence that Braverman had ever gone missing. Although he has never contacted us directly, we found no evidence he had ever talked on the record to the media. When we called police


departments on the East Coast, where he was previously located, we found no evidence he was listed as a "missing person" by any law enforcement agency. The conspiracy theory that


the Clintons have killed or disappeared numerous people they find politically inconvenient has been swirling for decades, but it reached a new fever pitch during the 2016 presidential


election. On 24 October 2016, the conspiracy-mongering web site WhatDoesItMean.com started a false rumor claiming Braverman, an attorney and businessman, had applied for asylum in Russia


after his name was revealed in the WikiLeaks dump.