Spectroscopic evidence of odd frequency superconducting order

ABSTRACT Spin filter superconducting S/I/N tunnel junctions (NbN/GdN/TiN) show a robust and pronounced Zero Bias Conductance Peak (ZBCP) at low temperatures, the magnitude of which is

several times the normal state conductance of the junction. Such a conductance anomaly is representative of unconventional superconductivity and is interpreted as a direct signature of an

odd frequency superconducting order. SIMILAR CONTENT BEING VIEWED BY OTHERS NANOSCALE SPIN ORDERING AND SPIN SCREENING EFFECTS IN TUNNEL FERROMAGNETIC JOSEPHSON JUNCTIONS Article Open access

02 May 2024 THE EFFECTS OF DISORDER IN SUPERCONDUCTING MATERIALS ON QUBIT COHERENCE Article Open access 16 April 2025 ANOMALOUS JOSEPHSON COUPLING AND HIGH-HARMONICS IN NON-CENTROSYMMETRIC

SUPERCONDUCTORS WITH _S_-WAVE SPIN-TRIPLET PAIRING Article Open access 28 September 2022 INTRODUCTION In the context of paired electrons in superconductors (S), Pauli exclusion requires the

electron pair to be odd in exchange in either spin, momentum, time (frequency) or across all three parameters. Spin singlet (odd spin) Cooper pairs are the standard carriers in conventional

superconductors. Although much rarer, there is strong evidence for odd momentum (odd parity) superconductivity in Sr2RuO4 and in UPt1,2,3 and in artificially engineered hybrid structures4.

So far, only indirect5,6 or weak7 signatures of odd frequency superconductivity has been obtained at S/F interfaces. It is now widely accepted that odd _frequency_ Cooper pairs can be

generated at the interface of superconductors and ferromagnets. Where there is a region of inhomogeneous magnetization8,9,10, such pairs acquire a net spin and hence are immune to pair

breaking due to the internal exchange field of the ferromagnet and can traverse distances much longer than the relevant singlet coherence length. Strong, but indirect evidence for the

existence of such superconductivity has mainly been obtained through indirect measurements such as a long-ranged supercurrent5,6,11 or proximity effect12. Odd frequency Cooper-pairing should

also give rise to an unconventional (non-BCS like) density of states (DOS) in the superconductor with an enhanced DOS at the Fermi level13,14,15. Evidence for such a DOS has recently been

obtained via scanning tunnelling measurements of the local DOS of a Nb film proximity-coupled to a diffusive Ho layer7 but, because this has to be performed on an interface remote from that

which is generating the odd-frequency pairing, only localized weak spectroscopic signatures of odd frequency pairing were detected. In parallel with the work on diffusive ferromagnets,

superconducting tunnel junctions with ferromagnetic insulator (FI) barriers have recently shown a range of intriguing effects, such as the appearance of a Josephson current with an

unconventional pure second harmonic current-phase relation independent of a 0−π transition16, and an interfacial exchange field in the S layer17, which suggest that odd-frequency pairing is

also being generated at the S/FI interface. Indeed, it has been very recently suggested in a theoretical study18 that strong odd-frequency pairing exists in Meservey-Tedrow type experiments

with FIs19 that show Zeeman split DOS. In this work, we present differential conductance measurements of NbN/GdN/TiN tunnel junctions, where GdN serves the purpose of both a spin active

interface as well as a tunnel barrier - enabling direct measurement of the spatially averaged tunnelling DOS at the S/FI interface. The measured ZBCPs in such differential conductance

measurements are larger by at least an order of magnitude than reported for diffusive systems, and hence provide definitive evidence for an odd frequency superconductivity at S/FI

interfaces. TiN was chosen as the metallic layer because an all nitride stack is required for the stability of GdN. Moreover, as stated later in this paper, one of the theoretical

requirements for the observation of ZBCPs necessitates the choice of a metal, which has a Fermi vector largely different from superconducting NbN. Other possible metallic candidates like Au,

Al and Cu have comparable Fermi vector as that of NbN. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION EXPREIMENTAL In Fig. 1, we show the temperature dependence of resistance of a 3 nm GdN junction. The

spin-filter effect is clearly visible from the decrease in junction resistance below 33 K as exchange splitting of the conduction band lowers the transmission probability of one spin channel

in comparison to the other20. A sharp drop in resistance is observed below 14 K due to the superconducting transition of the NbN layer. Below 14 K, the observed rise in low bias resistance

is due to the opening of the NbN gap and freezing out of sub-gap conductance. This rise of resistance below 14 K is reflective of a decreasing sub-gap resistance _R__S_ to normal state

resistance _R__n_ ratio at low temperatures, and is therefore a signature of good quality junctions21. The drop in resistance below 4 K is due to the evolution of a zero bias conductance

peak. To confirm the non-superconducting nature of the TiN used in these experiments, the temperature dependence of the resistance of un-patterned films of TiN/GdN grown in the same

deposition run as that of the junctions, is shown in the bottom inset to Fig. 1. This shows no detectable superconducting transition above 1.6 K (the temperature limit of the cryostat used

for Resistance vs Temperature (RT) measurements). We observed that a wide range of properties can be obtained in TiN films by altering the nitrogen concentration. In order to obtain

non-superconducting TiN, we have tuned the nitrogen concentration (8%) in the sputtering gas mixture. In Fig. 2, we show the differential conductance curves of a junction with a 3 nm GdN

barrier. The curves clearly show the emergence of a strong ZBCP as the junction is cooled to low temperatures. Identical characteristics have been found in all eight junctions on the same

chip, and similar characteristics have also been found in all 8 junctions on the same chip of a thinner 2 nm GdN thickness tunnel junction which has spin-polarization (_P_)~65% at 4 K. The

ZBCP in all junctions is extremely robust, reproducible, and independent of magnetic field history. The behaviour of these S/I/N junctions at temperatures above which the ZBCP disappears

(>3 K), is well understood and has been addressed in detail in a previous publication17. It has been theoretically predicted that for spin active interfaces, in the tunnelling limit, a

subgap state appears due to spin-dependent phase-shifts22. This interface state is manifested via strong conductance peaks at a voltages _eV_ = ± Δ0cos(_ϑ_/2) where _ϑ_ is the spin-dependent

phase shift that is present due to the FI. For _ϑ_ = _π_ the state is pinned to the Fermi level (zero bias). The appearance of this interface state is intimately linked to odd-frequency

pairing13. ZBCPs are known to occur in several superconducting systems and for a variety of underlying physical mechanisms4,23,24,25. A ZBCP analogous to our experiment observation is the

case of d-wave superconductors24, which occurs due to the sign change of the order parameter at regions in the a–b plane. For s-wave superconductors, analogous phenomenon can be observed for

sign change of the spin dependent phase shift due to the FI which translates to a phase shift of _π_. Such strong phase shifts26,27 can be obtained when (a) quasiparticles normal to the

interface are the major contributors to the transport process, (b) when spin polarization by the barrier is high, (c) when the barrier profile is not sharp. All the above conditions are met

by an NbN/GdN/TiN tunnel junction system, especially that of high spin polarization. An order of magnitude difference between Fermi vectors of NbN28 and TiN29 results in quasiparticles

normal to the interface being the major contributors to the transport. A previous study has shown that NbN/GdN barrier is different from a conventional box type potential barrier, as a

Schottky barrier forms at the NbN/GdN interface20. The fact that all the conditions for obtaining a large spin-dependent phase-shift at the interface are met, taken in conjunction with the

fact that the conductance spectra demonstrate a ZBCP is a clear indication that this phase-shift is likely to have a value very close to _π_. THEORETICAL MODEL The experimental data in Fig.

2 can be modelled by the theoretical conductance of an S/FI/N structure with a spin-dependent phase-shift close to _π_, as shown in Fig. 3. The conductance for a ballistic S/FI/N structure

has been studied previously22, and we have followed their analysis when fitting our experimental data. In the tunneling limit, we neglect the suppression of the superconducting order

parameter and use the following expression for the current density across the junction where _T (E_) = tanh[_β(E_ + _eV_)/2] − tanh[_β(E_ − _eV_)/2]. The following quantities have been

defined in Eq. (1): _D = D_↑ + _D_↓, _J__N_ is the current density when the superconductor is in its normal state (_J__N_ ∝ _D_), _D_σ and _R_σ are the probability coefficients for

transmission and reflection of spin σ carriers, respectively, _β_ = (_k__B__T_)−1, _V_ is the applied voltage, _T_ is the temperature, _E_ is the quasiparticle energy, ∆ is the

superconducting gap, ϑ is the spin-dependent phase-shift due to the magnetic barrier, and For the theoretically simulated conductance plots, we have differentiated Eq. (1) with respect to

voltage and normalized the conductance against the normal-state conductance obtained at large voltages _eV_ ≫ ∆. To model inelastic scattering, we have incorporated a Dynes parameter via the

relation _E → E_ + iΓ where Γ provides the quasiparticles with a finite lifetime. The model also accounts for the large difference in tunnelling probability for majority and minority

carriers, as expected for a strongly polarized FI. The temperature-evolution of the conductance spectra matches only qualitatively: the ZBCP vanishes experimentally more rapidly with

temperature than in the theory, the reason for this is unclear. However, it must be noted that the temperature dependence of ZBCP is consistent with previous experimental observations of

qualitatively similar origins of ZBCP. STM measurements of LDOS in Nb/Ho systems (due to odd frequency triplet superconductivity) observed the ZBCP disappearing at 660 mk7 – far below the

superconducting transition of Nb used in the experiment (_T_c,Nb~6.6 _K_, please refer to supplementary information section of ref. 7), while ZBCPs in YBCO (originating due to sign change of

order parameter in d-wave superconductors) were only observed until 40 K and 60 K (_T_c,YBCO~90 _K_) in refs 24 and 30 respectively. We therefore assume that the temperature dependence

arises due to aspects of theory which have not been fully understood. CONCLUSIONS We have not seen oscillatory behaviour in the intensity of ZBCPs with the application of magnetic field,

thus ruling out the possibility of attributing the observed ZBCP to possible Majorana bound states4. ZBCPs occurring due to Kondo effects, on application of an external magnetic field,

should separate out to a double peak structures31. The strong intensity of the ZBCP (3.5 times the normal state conductance) rules out other possibilities like de Gennes-Saint-James

resonances23 or a pin hole mediated junction which in accordance to the BTK theory32 should give rise to a maximum ZBCP intensity of twice the normal state conductance. ZBCPs could also

occur due to the TiN layer turning superconducting thus facilitating a critical current. However, the monotonic field-suppression and the observation of the ZBCP at high magnetic fields

clearly indicate that Josephson effects do not cause the ZBCPs. Moreover, the top inset to Fig. 1 – shows that the ZBCPs start to evolve at 2.8 K, 3.8 K and 3.6 K for 3 nm, 2 nm and 1 nm

barrier thicknesses respectively. Since the TiN layer for all these films were grown without breaking the vacuum and with the same plasma, this non-monotonic behaviour cannot be related to

any possible superconductivity in TiN. However, such temperature dependence again points to an incomplete understanding of theoretical origins for ZBCPs for unconventional superconducting

orders. For a more detailed analysis - which rules out superconductivity in TiN layer – please refer to the supplementary information section. Hence, none of the above possibilities are

suitable in explaining the observed ZBCPs in our experiment. The ZBCPs in NbN/GdN/TiN tunnel junctions therefore clearly establish an unconventional non-BCS type DOS indicating odd frequency

superconductivity evolving at NbN/GdN interfaces. The current discovery of odd frequency pairing is not only relevant in understanding superconductivity beyond the conventional scope of BCS

theory; but also firmly establishes FIs as important material systems for developing active devices for superconducting spintronics33. METHODS The trilayered films of NbN/GdN/TiN are grown

without breaking the vacuum in an ultra high vacuum chamber, by means of reactive dc magnetron sputtering in an atmosphere of Argon and Nitrogen. TiN is here grown as a (non-superconducting)

metallic layer. Mesa type tunnel junctions were fabricated from sputtered tri-layered films by means of a fabrication procedure described elsewhere21. The only difference was that instead

of plasma etching, TiN had to be Ar ion milled controllably. Measurements were performed using a 3He dip probe in a closed cycle liquid helium cooled variable temperature insert capable of

cooling down to 0.3 K. Spin polarization was calculated from resistance vs temperature measurements using a procedure described in a previous publication16. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION HOW TO

CITE THIS ARTICLE: Pal, A. _et al_. Spectroscopic evidence of odd frequency superconducting order. _Sci. Rep._ 7, 40604; doi: 10.1038/srep40604 (2017). PUBLISHER'S NOTE: Springer Nature

remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. REFERENCES * Ishida, K. et al. Spin-triplet superconductivity in Sr2RuO4 identified by

17O Knight shift. _Nature_ 396, 658–660 (1998). Article  CAS  ADS  Google Scholar  * Luke, G. M. et al. Time-Reversal Symmetry Breaking Superconductivity in Sr2RuO4. _Nature_ 394, 558–561

(1998). Article  CAS  ADS  Google Scholar  * Dalichaouch, Y. et al. Impurity scattering and triplet superconductivity in UPt3. _Phys. Rev. Lett._ 75, 3938–3941 (1995). Article  CAS  ADS 

Google Scholar  * Mourik, V. et al. Signatures of Majorana Fermions in Hybrid Superconductor-Semiconductor Nanowire Devices. _Science (80)_. 336, 1003–1007 (2012). Article  CAS  ADS  Google

Scholar  * Robinson, J. W. A., Witt, J. D. S. & Blamire, M. G. Controlled injection of spin-triplet supercurrents into a strong ferromagnet. _Science_ 329, 59–61 (2010). Article  CAS 

ADS  Google Scholar  * Khaire, T. S., Khasawneh, M. A., Pratt, W. P. & Birge, N. O. Observation of Spin-Triplet Superconductivity in Co-Based Josephson Junctions. _Phys. Rev. Lett._ 104,

137002 (2010). Article  ADS  Google Scholar  * Di Bernardo, A. et al. Signature of magnetic-dependent gapless odd frequency states at superconductor/ferromagnet interfaces. _Nat. Commun._

6, 8053 (2015). Article  CAS  ADS  Google Scholar  * Bergeret, F. S., Volkov, A. F. & Efetov, K. B. Odd triplet superconductivity and related phenomena in superconductor-ferromagnet

structures. _Rev. Mod. Phys._ 77, 1321–1373 (2005). Article  CAS  ADS  Google Scholar  * Buzdin, A. I., Mel’nikov, A. S. & Pugach, N. G. Domain walls and long-range triplet correlations

in SFS Josephson junctions. _Phys. Rev. B_ 83, 144515 (2011). Article  ADS  Google Scholar  * Eschrig, M. Spin-polarized supercurrents for spintronics: a review of current progress. _Reports

Prog. Phys_. 78, 104501 (2015). Article  ADS  Google Scholar  * Keizer, R. S. et al. A spin triplet supercurrent through the half-metallic ferromagnet CrO2. _Nature_ 439, 825–7 (2006). CAS

  ADS  PubMed  Google Scholar  * Singh, A., Voltan, S., Lahabi, K. & Aarts, J. Colossal Proximity Effect in a Superconducting Triplet Spin Valve Based on the Half-Metallic Ferromagnet

CrO2. _Phys. Rev. X_ 5, 21019 (2015). Google Scholar  * Tanaka, Y. & Golubov, A. A. Theory of the Proximity Effect in Junctions with Unconventional Superconductors. _Phys. Rev. Lett._

98, 37003 (2007). Article  CAS  ADS  Google Scholar  * Linder, J., Yokoyama, T., Sudbø, A. & Eschrig, M. Pairing Symmetry Conversion by Spin-Active Interfaces in Magnetic

Normal-Metal–Superconductor Junctions. _Phys. Rev. Lett._ 102, 107008 (2009). Article  ADS  Google Scholar  * Linder, J., Sudbø, A., Yokoyama, T., Grein, R. & Eschrig, M. Signature of

odd-frequency pairing correlations induced by a magnetic interface. _Phys. Rev. B_ 81, 214504 (2010). Article  ADS  Google Scholar  * Pal, A., Barber, Z. H., Robinson, J. W. A. &

Blamire, M. G. Pure second harmonic current-phase relation in spin-filter Josephson junctions. _Nat. Commun._ 5, 3340 (2014). Article  ADS  Google Scholar  * Pal, A. & Blamire, M. G.

Large interfacial exchange fields in a thick superconducting film coupled to a spin-filter tunnel barrier. _Phys. Rev. B_ 92, 180510(R) (2015). Article  ADS  Google Scholar  * Linder, J.

& Robinson, J. W. A. Strong odd-frequency correlations in fully gapped Zeeman-split superconductors. _Sci. Rep_. 5, 15483 (2015). Article  CAS  ADS  Google Scholar  * Tedrow, P. M.,

Tkaczyk, J. E. & Kumar, A. Spin-Polarized Electron Tunneling Study of an Artificially Layered Superconductor with Internal Magnetic Field: EuO-Al. _Phys. Rev. Lett._ 56, 1746–1749

(1986). Article  CAS  ADS  Google Scholar  * Pal, A., Senapati, K., Barber, Z. H. & Blamire, M. G. Electric-Field-Dependent Spin Polarization in GdN Spin Filter Tunnel Junctions. _Adv.

Mater._ 25, 5581–5 (2013). Article  CAS  Google Scholar  * Blamire, M. G., Pal, A., Barber, Z. H. & Senapati, K. Spin filter superconducting tunnel junctions. _In Proc. SPIE_ 8461,

84610J (2012). Article  ADS  Google Scholar  * Zhao, E., Löfwander, T. & Sauls, J. A. Nonequilibrium superconductivity near spin-active interfaces. _Phys. Rev. B_ 70, 134510 (2004).

Article  ADS  Google Scholar  * Giazotto, F. et al. Resonant Transport in Nb/GaAs/AlGaAs Heterostructures: Realization of the de Gennes–Saint-James Model. _Phys. Rev. Lett._ 87, 216808

(2001). Article  CAS  ADS  Google Scholar  * Lesueur, J., Greene, L. H., Feldmann, W. L. & Inam, A. Zero bias anomalies in YBa2Cu3O7 tunnel junctions. _Phys. C Supercond_. 191, 325–332

(1992). Article  CAS  ADS  Google Scholar  * Sasaki, S. et al. Topological Superconductivity in CuxBi2Se3. _Phys. Rev. Lett._ 107, 217001 (2011). Article  ADS  Google Scholar  * Grein, R.,

Löfwander, T. & Eschrig, M. Inverse proximity effect and influence of disorder on triplet supercurrents in strongly spin-polarized ferromagnets. _Phys. Rev. B_ 88, 54502 (2013). Article

  ADS  Google Scholar  * Grein, R., Löfwander, T., Metalidis, G. & Eschrig, M. Theory of superconductor-ferromagnet point-contact spectra: The case of strong spin polarization. _Phys.

Rev. B_ 81, 94508 (2010). Article  ADS  Google Scholar  * Chockalingam, S. P., Chand, M., Jesudasan, J., Tripathi, V. & Raychaudhuri, P. Superconducting properties and Hall effect of

epitaxial NbN thin films. _Phys. Rev. B_ 77, 214503 (2008). Article  ADS  Google Scholar  * Chawla, J. S., Zhang, X. Y. & Gall, D. Effective electron mean free path in TiN(001). _J.

Appl. Phys._ 113, (2013). * Greene, L. H. et al. Planar tunneling spectroscopy of high-temperature superconductors: Andreev bound states and broken symmetries. _Phys. C Supercond_. 387,

162–168 (2003). Article  CAS  ADS  Google Scholar  * Goldhaber-Gordon, D. et al. Kondo effect in a single-electron transistor. _Nature_ 391, 156–159 (1998). Article  CAS  ADS  Google Scholar

  * Blonder, G., Tinkham, M. & Klapwijk, T. Transition from metallic to tunneling regimes in superconducting microconstrictions: Excess current, charge imbalance, and supercurrent

conversion. _Phys. Rev. B_ 25, 4515–4532 (1982). Article  CAS  ADS  Google Scholar  * Linder, J. & Robinson, J. W. A. Superconducting spintronics. _Nat. Phys._ 11, 307–315 (2015).

Article  CAS  Google Scholar  Download references ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS This work of A.P. and M.G.B. was partially supported by an ERC Advanced Investigators Grant ‘Superspin’. M.E. and M.G.B.

acknowledges financial support from the EPSRC grant EP/N017242/1. M.E. also acknowledges funding from the Lars Onsager committee during his stay as Lars Onsager Professor at NTNU. J.A.O. and

J.L. acknowledge funding via the “Outstanding Academic Fellows” programme at NTNU, the COST Action MP-1201 and the Research Council of Norway Grant numbers 205591, 216700, and 240806. The

authors acknowledge helpful discussions with Jason Robinson. AUTHOR INFORMATION AUTHORS AND AFFILIATIONS * Department of Materials Science, University of Cambridge, 27 Charles Babbage Road,

Cambridge, CB3 0FS, United Kingdom Avradeep Pal & M. G. Blamire * Department of Physics, NTNU, Norwegian University, Trondheim, N-7491, Norway J. A. Ouassou & J. Linder * Department

of Physics, SEPnet and Hubbard Theory Consortium, Royal Holloway, University of London, Egham, TW20 0EX, Surrey, United Kingdom M. Eschrig Authors * Avradeep Pal View author publications You

can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar * J. A. Ouassou View author publications You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar * M. Eschrig View author

publications You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar * J. Linder View author publications You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar * M. G. Blamire View

author publications You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar CONTRIBUTIONS M.G.B. and A.P. designed the experiment. A.P. grew the films, fabricated the devices and

performed the measurements. J.A.O., M.E. and J.L. did the theoretical modelling. All authors contributed equally to writing the manuscript. CORRESPONDING AUTHORS Correspondence to Avradeep

Pal or J. Linder. ETHICS DECLARATIONS COMPETING INTERESTS The authors declare no competing financial interests. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION (DOC 1817 KB) RIGHTS AND

PERMISSIONS This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s

Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in the credit line; if the material is not included under the Creative Commons license, users will need to obtain permission from the

license holder to reproduce the material. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ Reprints and permissions ABOUT THIS ARTICLE CITE THIS ARTICLE Pal,

A., Ouassou, J., Eschrig, M. _et al._ Spectroscopic evidence of odd frequency superconducting order. _Sci Rep_ 7, 40604 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1038/srep40604 Download citation *

Received: 11 October 2016 * Accepted: 30 November 2016 * Published: 20 January 2017 * DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/srep40604 SHARE THIS ARTICLE Anyone you share the following link with will

be able to read this content: Get shareable link Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article. Copy to clipboard Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt

content-sharing initiative