Strong vacuum squeezing from bichromatically driven kerrlike cavities: from optomechanics to superconducting circuits

ABSTRACT Squeezed light, displaying less fluctuation than vacuum in some observable, is key in the flourishing field of quantum technologies. Optical or microwave cavities containing a Kerr

nonlinearity are known to potentially yield large levels of squeezing, which have been recently observed in optomechanics and nonlinear superconducting circuit platforms. Such Kerr-cavity

squeezing however suffers from two fundamental drawbacks. First, optimal squeezing requires working close to turning points of a bistable cycle, which are highly unstable against noise thus

rendering optimal squeezing inaccessible. Second, the light field has a macroscopic coherent component corresponding to the pump, making it less versatile than the so-called squeezed vacuum,

characterised by a null mean field. Here we prove analytically and numerically that the bichromatic pumping of optomechanical and superconducting circuit cavities removes both limitations.

This finding should boost the development of a new generation of robust vacuum squeezers in the microwave and optical domains with current technology. SIMILAR CONTENT BEING VIEWED BY OTHERS

SQUEEZED VACUUM INTERACTION WITH AN OPTOMECHANICAL CAVITY CONTAINING A QUANTUM WELL Article Open access 07 March 2022 BROADBAND SQUEEZED MICROWAVES AND AMPLIFICATION WITH A JOSEPHSON

TRAVELLING-WAVE PARAMETRIC AMPLIFIER Article 09 February 2023 STRONG MICROWAVE SQUEEZING ABOVE 1 TESLA AND 1 KELVIN Article Open access 18 May 2024 INTRODUCTION Quantum fluctuations are

perhaps one of the most fascinating consequences of the quantum nature of light. Even in its ground state –the vacuum– the electromagnetic field exhibits fluctuations, which are the analogue

of the zero-point fluctuations of a quantum mechanical harmonic oscillator. Being a constitutive part of the field, quantum fluctuations cannot be removed and manifest as nontechnical

–quantum– noise in optical experiments. Yet they can be engineered via interactions, as allowed by the pertinent Heisenberg uncertainty relations. A useful way to characterise quantum

fluctuations of light is in terms of the quadratures of the electromagnetic field. Considering a single mode for simplicity, with annihilation and creation operators denoted by _a_ and _a_†,

we define a quadrature1 as _q_θ = _ae_−_iθ_ + _a_†_e__iθ_. Experimentally, quadratures are measured via homodyne detection, where the problem light and an intense laser beam of the same

frequency (the local oscillator) are combined in a beam-splitter and the difference between the intensities of the two output ports is measured. The quadrature angle θ is selected by varying

the phase of the local oscillator. Two orthogonal quadratures form a canonical pair, with commutator [_q_θ, _q_θ+π/2] = 2_i_ and verify the Heisenberg uncertainty relation Δ_q_θ Δ_q_θ+π/2 ≥

 1. For the vacuum Δ_q_θ = 1 for all θ, which sets the so-called standard quantum limit; laser light, ideally represented by coherent states, is ultimately limited by such

(phase-independent) uncertainty level. On the contrary squeezed states of light1,2 display a phase-dependent quadrature uncertainty, there being a “squeezing angle” θ = θs for which is

minimum and less than 1, while . Squeezed light plays a central role in the fields of quantum information with continuous variables3,4 and precision measurement5,6, hence disposing of a

variety of squeezing sources is relevant. While optical parametric oscillators, working close to their oscillation threshold, are the best squeezers so far (the present benchmark7 is 12.7 dB

squeezing, or 95% reduction of vacuum noise), recent experiments with optomechanical (OM) and superconducting circuit (SCC) cavities point to their place in this context8,9,10,11,12: OM

cavities have demonstrated 1.7 dB squeezing10 (32% reduction) and SCC cavities have reached 10 dB squeezing (90% reduction)12. The generation of strong squeezing in these systems is based on

the existence of a bistable cycle2,13,14,15,16, that appears due to the particular intensity-dependent nonlinearity. At the turning points of bistability a strong reduction of the

fluctuations takes place in one quadrature of the light field; however, this squeezing generation presents two handicaps: working close to the turning points makes the system highly unstable

against noise2,17 and the presence of a macroscopic mean field corresponding to the pump makes it less versatile than a squeezed vacuum state1,2. Unlike OM and SCC cavities, optical

parametric oscillators generate a squeezed vacuum whose optimum is reached close to the parametric oscillation threshold, which does not suffer from the discontinuity problems of bistable

loops. Such differences come from the different underlying physics in each case: while optical parametric oscillators are based on effective three-photon, or second order, interactions, the

quoted experiments in OM and SCC cavities rely on effective four-photon, or third order–Kerr–interactions. Light squeezing generation is a very active area of research, including single-atom

sources18 and multi-mode configurations19,20,21. As well squeezing of matter waves has been considered22,23 and, very especially, of mechanical oscillators in OM

systems24,25,26,27,28,29,30. The Kerr effect modifies the refractive index of a medium proportionally to the circulating light intensity (it is a nonlinear optical effect), modifying

accordingly the optical thickness of the medium. It is modelled by the Hamiltonian2,13 , where _a_ is the photon annihilation operator and _K_ is the Kerr coupling constant. When a Kerr

medium is placed inside a cavity (be it optical or microwave for our purposes), a shift of the resonances is produced porportionally to the intracavity photon number _a_†_a_, in which case

_K_ is the frequency shift per photon. The Kerr nonlinearity (and, in general, the four-wave mixing), is at the roots of classic squeezing experiments in quantum optics31, but its

implementation has suffered from parasistic effects (e.g. spontaneous emission in atomic gases) that degrade the quality of squeezing. Clean implementations of the Kerr effect are observed

in SCC containing Josephson junctions (due to their nonlinear inductance)12,32,33, where _H_Kerr is the simplest interaction Hamiltonian. In OM systems, where electromagnetic and mechanical

degrees of freedom interact, the Kerr interaction is effective as follows. The standard OM cavity model, which successfully accounts for most of the experiments to date34, involves a single

cavity mode and a single mechanical oscillator (of frequency ωm) interacting via radiation pressure. The corresponding interaction Hamiltonian reads34 _H_OM = −_ħg_0_xa_†_a_, where _x_ is

the displacement of the mechanical oscillator from its equilibrium, measured in units of its zero-point fluctuation amplitude (_x_zpf) and _g_0 is the cavity resonance shift for a mechanical

amplitude of _x_zpf (so-called vacuum OM coupling strength34)(Supplementary Information). Kerr and OM cavities are analogous15,16,35 because the radiation pressure force _F_RP ≡ 

−∂_H_OM/∂_x_ = _ħg_0_a_†_a_ displaces the movable mechanical element proportionally to the intracavity photon number _a_†_a_, similarly to the optical cavity length variation occuring in

cavities containing optical Kerr media. _H_OM describes a large variety of OM cavities, including suspended micromirrors and membranes, microtoroids, defected photonic crystals, nanorods,

etc34. The rationale behind this work is threefold. First, OM and SCC cavities can behave as Kerr cavities. Second, there is a recent prediction that Kerr cavities driven by two close

frequencies36,37 do not show the classic bistable response of monochromatic driving15,16,17,34,38,39, but instead undergo a degenerate four-wave mixing bifurcation where the (non-injected)

mean frequency starts oscillating spontaneously, similarly to the optical parametric oscillator threshold. Finally there is a well-known relationship between bifurcations and squeezing in

optical cavities13. Therefore in this work we consider both OM and SCC Kerrlike cavities driven by bichromatic fields. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION MODEL When the two driving frequencies, which we

denote by ωL ± Ω, are sufficiently close to the same cavity resonance frequency ωcav, a single cavity mode is excited. Hence the corresponding SCC Kerr-cavity model coincides with the

standard one12,14,32,33, the only difference being in the form of the driving. As well, as shown in the Methods Section, the OM model reduces to a Kerrlike model when the mechanical

resonance frequency ωm is simultaneously much larger than the cavity photon damping rate which we denote by 2κ (resolved-sideband limit) and the modulation frequency Ω, in which case the

mechanical dynamics can be adiabatically eliminated. Considering the injection of two equally intense coherent lines, of normalised amplitudes (_P_ is the total power coupled to the cavity),

the Heisenberg-Langevin equation for the field, in a rotating frame at frequency ωL, reads where Δ = (ωL − ωcav) is the detuning between the (non-injected) mid-frequency of the driving and

the cavity frequency, _K_ is the Kerr coefficient of the SCC cavity32 or is an effective Kerr coupling constant in the OM case and Θ(_t_) is a noise term: in the SCC case with _a_in(_t_) a

white Gaussian quantum noise coming from vacuum fluctuations entering the cavity; in the OM case , being _x__T_ the mechanical displacement fluctuation caused by zero-point and thermal

agitation (Methods Section). Equation (1) provides a unified description of SCC and OM cavities. It can be considered as the model equation for a Josephson amplifier14,32 or as an

approximation for the OM cavity under the conditions set above, whose validity will be assessed later. Modulated OM cavities have been considered in the literature in order to obtain

interesting mechanical effects40,41,42,43, which occur when the modulation frequency Ω is a multiple of the mechanical frequency ωm. However we anticipate that such “harmonic” driving does

not lead to light squeezing. Next we analyse the dynamics of (1) in the semiclassical and linear approximations as usual: we split the operators into a mean field part, 〈_a_〉 = α(_t_), plus

a fluctuation, i.e. _a_ = α(_t_) + _δa_ and disregard nonlinear terms in the fluctuations. MEAN FIELD SOLUTION The mean field equation reads , which has been studied in the context of

optical pattern formation36,37. This equation admits periodic solutions of the form , which we call base solutions as they exist always. Note that they do not contain a constant term (_k_ ≠

0), meaning that there is no mean field at the optical frequency ωL; hence the type of squeezing we describe next around ωL is squeezed vacuum. αbase(_t_) can be computed numerically and can

be a complicated function of time in general. In order to gain analytical insight we consider the limit Ω ≫ κ,|Δ|, in which case (Supplementary Information). The intracavity mean photon

number in the base state is which shows a linear dependence with the injection power ε2 and hence no bistability. The base solution needs not be stable for all parameter settings, as a

standard linear stability analysis reveals (Methods Section and Supplementary Information): for (red detuning side), αbase(_t_) becomes unstable between a lower and an upper injection power.

Expressed in terms of a normalised injection parameter μ ≡ _Kε_2/κΩ2, αbase(_t_) is unstable for μ↓ < μ < μ↑, where defines a “tongue” on the plane μ − Δ/κ (Fig. 1). Just at μ = μ↓ or

μ = μ↑, a bifurcation gives rise to the emergence of a constant, bias component on top of αbase(_t_). Such component corresponds to an emission line at ωL, which comes from the degenerate

four-wave mixing process (ωL + Ω) + (ωL − Ω) → ωL + ωL. As a consequence the new component at ωL is phase locked to the base solution, displaying phase bistability between two opposite phase

values36,37, as it happens in the degenerate optical parametric oscillator above threshold. We have verified this prediction by numerical integration of the Kerrlike model (1) as well as of

the complete OM model without approximations, under different parametric conditions, finding very good quantitative agreement (Fig. 1). SPECTRUM OF SQUEEZING Our actual goal is to

demonstrate strong vacuum squeezing at the degenerate four-wave mixing bifurcation, in particular when it is approached from outside the instability tongue. As there the mean field at

frequency ωL is null, the squeezing we describe next corresponds to a squeezed vacuum. The quantity of interest is the so-called squeezing spectrum1,2 _S_θ(ω), which measures the noise power

spectral density (spectral variance) of the light quadrature _q_θ ≡ _e_−_iθ__a_ + _e__iθ__a_† leaving the cavity, at a noise frequency ω. It is normalised so that in the vacuum state _S_ = 

1, while if _S_(ω_s_) < 1 there is squeezing at the noise frequency ω_s_ (_S_ = 0 marks perfect squeezing: no fluctuation at all). The spectrum _S_θ(ω) is measured experimentally by

homodyning1,2,8,9,10,12 the light leaving the cavity with a strong local oscillator signal of frequency ωL. ANALYTICAL PREDICTION As shown in the Supplementary Information, , where comes

from the field vacuum fluctuations, while comes from mechanical fluctuations and is present only in the OM case. Just at the bifurcation (μ = μ↑ or μ = μ↓), the strongest squeezing is

observed as expected. Its optimum value, obtained by adjusting the quadrature angle θ, follows from where (remind: ), the subscript corresponds to μ = μ↑↓, respectively, _n__T_ ≡ 

[exp(ħωm/_k_B_T_) − 1]−1 is the mean number of thermal phonons at temperature _T_, with _k_B the Boltzmann constant and _Q_m is the mechanical resonance quality factor. _S_vac has been

computed ignoring thermal photons. This is an excellent approximation in the optical domain and in the microwave domain at cryogenic temperatures. If thermal photons are considered the

expression for _S_vac reads as in (4), but multiplied by (1 + 2_n__L_), where _n__L_ ≡ [exp(ħωL/_k_B_T_) − 1]−1 is the mean number of thermal photons. Perfect squeezing is ideally predicted

in the SCC case at zero noise frequency, _S_optimum(0) = 0, with a bandwidth equal to 2κ. In the OM case _S_optimum(0) > 0 because . Nevertheless _S_optimum(0) can be much less than 1 in

the OM case because of the large values of _Q_m ~ 105 − 106 attained in experiments34. Large _n__T_ values are obviously deleterious, however they can be made very small (_n__T_ ≪ 1) via the

so-called sideband cooling34,44,45,46, which has been used to improve optical squeezing in recent OM experiments10. It is interesting to note that our result for the optimum squeezing

attainable (4) coincides with the one that can be obtained in the usual Kerr-like systems with monochromatic driving, see the Methods Section. However the physical situation is very

different in both cases: while in the bichromatic case analysed here _S_optimum is reached at a continuous bifurcation point, in the monochromatic case it requires to work at the turning

points of the bistable cycle, with all the associated problems discussed above. Another important difference is that in the monochromatic case the squeezing is produced at the injection

frequency, where there is a strong mean field present. NUMERICAL RESULTS In order to check that the different approximations used do not lead to artificially low levels of noise reduction,

we have computed _S_θ(ω) numerically from the full OM and the Kerr model equations using realistic parameter values (Supplementary Information), finding excellent agreement as shown in Fig.

2. In the SCC cavity case the results point to a monotonic improvement of the squeezing as Ω is increased. In the OM case the mechanical resonance plays a clear role: the effect is lost for

modulation frequencies Ω close to ωm/2 and is clearly degraded as Ω approaches ωm. These phenomena have their roots in the fact that the driving force acting on the mechanical element is the

photon number given in (2). Thus, for Ω = ωm/2 a resonant forcing of the mechanical oscillator occurs (1:1 resonance) and for Ω = ωm the mechanical element is driven at twice its frequency

(2:1 resonance), known as parametric resonance. So, high levels of squeezing of light are predicted for Ω < ωm, excluding the regions around Ω = ωm/2 and Ω = ωm where the effect is lost;

while for Ω > ωm the scenario completely changes and a different theoretical description is needed. CONCLUSIONS In summary, we have shown that a bichromatic driving of a Kerr-like system,

such as an optomechanical cavity or a nonlinear superconducting circuit, can produce a strong reduction of the fluctuations for one quadrature of the electromagnetic field. The bichromatic

driving produces a change of the bistable behaviour that happens with a monochromatic driving to a kind of degenerate four-wave mixing process, where the injected signals at frequencies ωL +

 Ω and ωL − Ω give rise to a component at the non-injected frequency ωL, (ωL + Ω) + (ωL − Ω) → ωL + ωL, at the bifurcation given by (3), see Fig. 1. When approaching the bifurcation from

outside the “tongue” (Fig. 1), we have shown that there is a strong optical quadrature squeezing when homodying the output field with a local oscillator at frequency ωL. As, outside the

“tongue”, there is no mean field at that frequency, the predicted squeezing corresponds to a vacuum squeezing. The system has independent noise terms coming from electromagnetic vacuum field

fluctuations and from mechanical thermal fluctuations in the OM case, so the spectrum of squeezing can be decomposed as (eq. (4)). When the best squeezing is reached, at the bifurcation and

for ω = 0, the vacuum part becomes null _S_optimum(0) = 0 and the mechanical part in the OM case is very small even for a moderate number of thermal phonons, due to the high mechanical

quality factors (_Q_m) that can be attained in the experiments. METHODS OM KERRLIKE MODEL For the optomechanical case we begin with the usual Langevin equations, but with a bicrhomatic

driving where the overdot indicates time derivative. Here _a_in(_t_) and η(_t_) are white Gaussian noises of zero mean, whose only non-null two-time correlations read where _n__T_ = 

[exp(ħωm/_k_B_T_) − 1]−1 is the mean number of thermal phonons at temperature _T_, with _k_B the Boltzmann constant. This form for the mechanical noise correlator is valid in the mechanical

high-Q limit (_Q_m = ωm/γm ≫ 1), which we assume. The equations for the mechanical element (5, 6) can be formally solved in the Fourier domain, obtaining that where is the Fourier transform

of the driving force and is the mechanical susceptibility. In the limit ωm ≫ κ, Ω the Fourier transform of the radiation pressure force term 2_g_0_a_†_a_, contains only low frequencies as

compared to ωm, since the cavity acts as a low-pass filter of width 2κ, so for this term we can make the approximation χm(ω) → χm(0) = 1 in equation (10). Thus, the displacement can be

written as _x_ = 2_g_0_a_†_a_/ωm + _x__T_ where _x__T_ is a fluctuation due to the mechanical noise with autocorrelation . After substitution of _x_ in the field equation (7), the

optomechanical Kerr-like approximation (eq. (1)) for our model is obtained. For more details see the Supplementary Information. FLUCTUATION DYNAMICS The equations for the fluctuations _δa_ =

 _a_ − αbase(_t_) and are obtained trivially from equation (1) and by neglecting the nonlinear fluctuating terms, as well as the fast oscillating terms at 2Ω, in a kind of a rotating wave

approximation. As discussed in the Supplementary Information the dynamical fluctuation equations can be cast in matrix form as: with a noise term, where the first part is common in both

problems (SCC and OM systems) and the second term only appear in the OM case. Note that equation (11) corresponds to a parametric process in which μ plays the role of a parametric gain and

also of an extra detuning. The stability analysis of the base solution follows by analysing the eigenvalues of the coefficient matrix in (11), which read . When at least one of these

eigenvalues becomes positive the base solution becomes unstable. The region of instability is given by the μ↑↓ parameter, computed making λ+ = 0. THE MONOCHROMATIC DRIVING CASE The usual OM

and SCC Kerr-like with monochromatic driving are described by a similar equation to (1), but changing the driving part , giving with the same definitions as in the Model Section. Its

corresponding mean field equation reads _dα_/_dt_ = −κα + _i_(Δ + _K_|α|2)α + ε, whose steady state solutions αs can be easily computed making _dα_/_dt_ = 0. Thus, the intracavity mean

photon number is identified as 〈_a_†_a_〉 = |αs|2 = _I_s. The system presents a bistable behaviour for . There is an interval of the driving intensity where there are two stable intracavity

mean photon number solutions for the same value of the driving intensity. These two stable branches of solutions are connected by an unstable branch. The system destabilizes at the turning

points of the bistable cycle given by and it is in these points where the best squeezing is obtained. The fluctuation dynamics is given too by equation (11) but with the following changes:

i) μ = (_K_/κ)_I_s and ii) the noise term being . COMPUTATION OF THE SPECTRUM OF SQUEEZING To compute the spectrum of squeezing we need to solve the system of equations for the fluctuation

dynamics. We note that the left eigenvectors of the coefficient matrix in (11) can be written, near the bifurcation, as , where θ+ = −θ−. Thus projecting equation (11) onto from the left

yields decoupled equations for the intracavity quadrature fluctuations , where is the corresponding quadrature vacuum noise and is the mechanical noise coupled to that quadrature. Note that

either θ± should be zero (amplitude quadrature) mechanical noise would have no effect on that quadrature, as is well known for radiation pressure driven optomechanics. We are interested in

the spectral variance, called squeezing spectrum, of the outgoing detected quadrature, FORMULA, which is calculated from the two-time correlations , After straightforward algebra can be

written as where the last term is only valid for the OM case, with From equation (17) it can be seen that in the OM case the correlator is not stationary, due to the last term corresponding

to the mechanical noise. Thus, the spectrum of squeezing has to be computed using the following definition47 where _T_ is the measurement time. As shown in the Supplementary Information

_S_(ω) can be worked out analytically. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION HOW TO CITE THIS ARTICLE: Garcés, R. and de Valcárcel, G. J. Strong vacuum squeezing from bichromatically driven Kerrlike

cavities: from optomechanics to superconducting circuits. _Sci. Rep._ 6, 21964; doi: 10.1038/srep21964 (2016). REFERENCES * Drummond, P. D. & Ficek, Z. (eds.) Quantum Squeezing

(Springer, Berlin, 2004). * Walls, D. F. & Milburn, G. J. Quantum Optics (Springer, Berlin, 2008). * O’Brien, J. L., Furusawa, A. & Vučković, J. Photonic quantum technologies. Nature

Photon. 3, 687–695 (2009). ADS  Google Scholar  * Braunstein, S. L. & van Loock, P. Quantum information with continuous variables. Rev. Mod. Phys. 77, 513–578 (2005). ADS  MathSciNet 

MATH  Google Scholar  * Aasi, J. et al. Enhanced sensitivity of the LIGO gravitational wave detector by using squeezed states of light. Nature Photon. 7, 613–619 (2013). ADS  CAS  Google

Scholar  * Taylor, M. A. et al. Biological measurement beyond the quantum limit. Nature Photon. 7, 229–233 (2013). ADS  CAS  Google Scholar  * Eberle, T. et al. Quantum enhancement of the

zero-area Sagnac interferometer topology for gravitational wave detection. Phys. Rev. Lett. 104, 251102 (2010). ADS  PubMed  Google Scholar  * Brooks, D. W. C. et al. Non-classical light

generated by quantum-noise-driven cavity optomechanics. Nature 488, 476–480 (2012). ADS  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar  * Safavi-Naeini, A. H. et al. Squeezed light from a silicon

michromecanical resonator. Nature 500, 185–189 (2013). ADS  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar  * Purdy, T. P., Yu, P.-L., Peterson, R. W., Kampel, N. S. & Regal, C. A. Strong optomechanical

squeezing of light. Phys. Rev. X 3, 031012 (2013). Google Scholar  * Mavalvala, N. & Corbitt, T. Vibrating membrane puts a squeeze on light. Physics 6, 95 (2013). Google Scholar  *

Castellanos-Beltran, M. A. et al. Amplification and squeezing of quantum noise with a tunable Josephson metamaterial. Nature Phys. 4, 929–931 (2008). ADS  Google Scholar  * Collet, M. J.

& Walls, D. F. Squeezing spectra for nonlinear optical systems. Phys. Rev. A 32, 2887–2892 (1985). ADS  Google Scholar  * Yurke, B. & Buks, E. Performance of cavity-parametric

amplifiers, employing Kerr nonlinearites, in the presence of two-photon loss. J. Lightwave Technol. 24, 5054–5066 (2006). ADS  Google Scholar  * Fabre, C. et al. Quantum-noise reduction

using a cavity with a movable mirror. Phys. Rev. A 49, 1337–1343 (1994). ADS  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar  * Mancini, S. & Tombesi, P. Quantum noise reduction by radiation pressure.

Phys. Rev. A 49, 4055–4065 (1994). ADS  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar  * Siddiqi, I. et al. RF-driven Josephson bifurcation amplifier for quantum measurement. Phys. Rev. Lett. 93, 207002

(2004). ADS  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar  * Ourjoumtsev, A., Kubanek, A., Koch, M., Sames, C., Pinkse, P. W. H., Rempe, G., Murr, K. et al. Observation of squeezed light from one atom

excited with two photons. Nature 474, 623–626 (2011). ADS  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar  * Patera, G., Treps, N., Fabre, C. & de Valcárcel, G. J. Quantum theory of synchronously pumped

type I optical parametric oscillators: characterization of the squeezed supermodes. Eur. Phys. J. D 56, 123–140 (2010). ADS  CAS  Google Scholar  * Roslund, J., de Araújo, R. M., Jiang, S.,

Fabre, C. & Treps, N. Wavelength-multiplexed quantum networks with ultrafast frequency combs. Nature Photon. 8, 109–112 (2014). ADS  CAS  Google Scholar  * Embrey, C. S., Turnbull, M.

T., Petrov, P. G. & Boyer, V. Observation of localized multi-spatial-mode quadrature squeezing. Phys. Rev. X 5, 31004 (2015). Google Scholar  * Jing, H., Chen, J.-L. & Ge, M.-L.

Squeezing effects of an atom laser: Beyond the linear model. Phys. Rev. A 65, 15601–115604 (2001). Google Scholar  * Johnsson, M. T., Dennis, G. R. & Hope, J. J. Squeezing in

Bose-Einstein condensates with large numbers of atoms. New J. Phys. 15, 123024 (2013). ADS  Google Scholar  * Jähne, K., Genes, C., Hammerer, K., Wallquist, M., Polzik, E. S. & Zoller,

P. Cavity-assisted squeezing of a mechanical oscillator. Phys. Rev. A 79, 063819 (2009). ADS  Google Scholar  * Kemiktarak, U., Durand, M., Metcalfe, M. & Lawall, J. Mode competition and

anomalous cooling in a multimode phonon laser. Phys. Rev. Lett. 113, 030802 (2014). ADS  PubMed  Google Scholar  * Jing, H., Özdemir, S. K., Lü, X.-Y., Zhang, J., Yang, L. & Nori, F.

PT-symmetric phonon laser. Phys. Rev. Lett. 113, 053604 (2014). ADS  PubMed  Google Scholar  * Lü, X.-Y., Wu, Y., Johansson, J. R., Jing, H., Zhang, J. & Nori, F. Squeezed optomechanics

with phase-matched amplification and dissipation. Phys. Rev. Lett. 114, 093602 (2015). ADS  PubMed  Google Scholar  * Wollman, E. E. et al. Quantum squeezing of motion in a mechanical

resonator. Science 349, 952–955 (2015). ADS  MathSciNet  CAS  PubMed  MATH  Google Scholar  * Lecocq, F., Clark, J. B., Simmonds, R. W., Aumentado, J. & Teufel, J. D. Quantum

nondemolition measurement of a nonclassical state of a massive object. Phys. Rev. X 5, 041037 (2015). CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar  * Pirkkalainen, J.-M., Damskägg, E.,

Brandt, M., Massel, F. & Sillanpää, M. A. Squeezing of quantum noise of motion in a micromechanical resonator. Phys. Rev. Lett. 115, 243601 (2015). ADS  PubMed  Google Scholar  *

Slusher, R. E., Hollberg, L. W., Yurke, B., Mertz, J. C. & Valley, J. F. Observation of squeezed states generated by four-wave mixing in an optical cavity. Phys. Rev. Lett 55, 2409

(1985). ADS  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar  * Bourassa, J., Beaudoin, F., Gambetta, J. M. & Blais A. Josephson-junction-embedded transmission-line resonators: from Kerr medium to in-line

transmon. Phys. Rev. A 86, 013814 (2012). ADS  Google Scholar  * Kirchmair, G. et al. Observation of quantum state collapse and revival due to the single-photon Kerr effect. Nature 495,

205–209 (2013). ADS  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar  * Aspelmeyer, M., Kippenberg, T. J. & Marquardt, F. Cavity optomechanics. Rev. Mod. Phys. 86, 1391–1452 (2014). ADS  Google Scholar  *

Aldana, S., Bruder, C. & Nunnenkamp, A. Equivalence between an optomechanical system and a Kerr medium. Phys. Rev. A 88, 043826 (2013). ADS  Google Scholar  * de Valcárcel, G. J. &

Staliunas, K. Phase-bistable Kerr cavity solitons and patterns. Phys. Rev. A 87, 043802 (2013). ADS  Google Scholar  * de Valcárcel, G. J., Martínez-Quesada, M. & Staliunas, K. Phase

bistable pattern formation in oscillatory systems via rocking: applications to nonlinear optical systems. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. A 372, 20140008 (2014). ADS  PubMed  Google Scholar  * Dorsel,

A., McCullen, J. D., Meystre, P., Vignes, E. & Walther, H. Optical bistability and mirror confinement induced by radiation pressure. Phys. Rev. Lett. 51, 1550–1553 (1983). ADS  Google

Scholar  * Meystre, P., Wright, E. M., McCullen, J. D. & Vignes, E. Theory of radiation-pressure-driven interferometers. J. Opt. Soc. Am. B. 2, 1830–1840 (1985). ADS  CAS  Google Scholar

  * Hertzberg, J. B. et al. Back-action-evading measurements of nanomechanical motion. Nature Phys. 6, 213–217 (2010). ADS  CAS  Google Scholar  * Mari, A. & Eisert, J. Gently modulating

optomechanical systems. Phys. Rev. Lett. 103, 213603 (2009). ADS  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar  * Liao, J.-Q. & Law, C. K. Parametric generation of quadrature squeezing of mirrors in

cavity optomechanics. Phys. Rev. A 83, 033820 (2011). ADS  Google Scholar  * Pontin, A. et al. Squeezing a thermal mechanical oscillator by stabilized parametric effect on the optical

spring. Phys. Rev. Lett. 112, 023601 (2014). ADS  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar  * Wilson-Rae, I., Nooshi, N., Zwerger, W. & Kippenberg, T. J. Theory of ground state cooling of a

mechanical oscillator using dynamical backaction. Phys. Rev. Lett. 99, 093901 (2007). ADS  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar  * Marquardt, F., Chen, J. P., Clerk, A. A. & Girvin, S. M. Quantum

theory of cavity-assisted sideband cooling of mechanical motion. Phys. Rev. Lett. 99, 093902 (2007). ADS  PubMed  Google Scholar  * Schliesser, A., Rivière, R., Anetsberger, G., Arcizet, O.

& Kippenberg, T. J. Resolved-sideband cooling of a micromechanical oscillator. Nature Phys. 4, 415–419 (2008). ADS  CAS  Google Scholar  * Gea-Banacloche, J. et al. Treatment of the

spectrum of squeezing based on the modes of the universe. I. Theory and a physical picture. Phys. Rev. A 41, 369–380 (1990). ADS  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar  Download references

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS We thank E. Roldán and C. Navarrete-Benlloch for discussions and critical reading of the manuscript. R.G. acknowledges funding from the VALi+d programme of the Generalitat

Valenciana (Grant ACIF/2013/205). This work was supported by the Ministerio de Economa y Competitividad of the Spanish Government and by the European Union FEDER (Projects FIS2011-26960 and

FIS2014-60715-P). AUTHOR INFORMATION AUTHORS AND AFFILIATIONS * Departament d’Òptica, Facultat de Física, Universitat de València, Dr. Moliner 50, Burjassot (Valencia), 46100, Spain Rafael

Garcés & Germán J. de Valcárcel Authors * Rafael Garcés View author publications You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar * Germán J. de Valcárcel View author

publications You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar CONTRIBUTIONS G.J.d.V. envisaged and supervised the work. R.G. and G.J.d.V. derived the analytical predictions and

performed the numerical simulations. Both authors discussed the results and contributed to the final manuscript. ETHICS DECLARATIONS COMPETING INTERESTS The authors declare no competing

financial interests. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION RIGHTS AND PERMISSIONS This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in the credit line; if the material is not

included under the Creative Commons license, users will need to obtain permission from the license holder to reproduce the material. To view a copy of this license, visit

http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ Reprints and permissions ABOUT THIS ARTICLE CITE THIS ARTICLE Garcés, R., de Valcárcel, G. Strong vacuum squeezing from bichromatically driven

Kerrlike cavities: from optomechanics to superconducting circuits. _Sci Rep_ 6, 21964 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1038/srep21964 Download citation * Received: 08 October 2015 * Accepted: 03

February 2016 * Published: 26 February 2016 * DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/srep21964 SHARE THIS ARTICLE Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content: Get

shareable link Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article. Copy to clipboard Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative