Fast immuno-labeling by electrophoretically driven infiltration for intact tissue imaging

feature-image

Play all audios:

Loading...

ABSTRACT Recently developed tissue clearing techniques, where the tissue is embedded within a hydrogel, have revolutionized our ability to resolve fine cellular structures in nearly intact


tissues. However, the slow rate of penetration of antibodies within this hydrogel-tissue matrix has become a significantly limiting factor in many experiments, as thick tissues often require


weeks to months to be adequately labeled. Increasing the pore size of this matrix has been investigated as a possible solution, but with only modest success. Here, we have systematically


examined the diffusional behavior of antibodies and other typically used immuno-labels within this hydrogel-tissue matrix and, surprisingly, found that infiltration occurs at rates similar


to those of diffusion in free solution. Therefore, changing the pore size of the matrix would be expected to afford only limited improvement and, instead, some means of active transport is


necessary. We show that an electrophoretically-driven approach decreases the delivery time of antibodies by more than 800-fold over simple diffusion, without incurring structural damage.


These results, together with the high quality of the images obtained with this method, demonstrate the advantage of this approach, thus significantly broadening the practical range of


samples that can now be investigated by whole-mount tissue clearing methods. SIMILAR CONTENT BEING VIEWED BY OTHERS ACCELERATED CLEARING AND MOLECULAR LABELING OF BIOLOGICAL TISSUES USING


MAGNETOHYDRODYNAMIC FORCE Article Open access 12 August 2021 TUTORIAL: PRACTICAL CONSIDERATIONS FOR TISSUE CLEARING AND IMAGING Article 21 May 2021 EXPANDED VACUUM-STABLE GELS FOR


MULTIPLEXED HIGH-RESOLUTION SPATIAL HISTOPATHOLOGY Article Open access 07 July 2023 INTRODUCTION Tissue clearing techniques1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8, especially the recently developed CLARITY1, have


enabled a nearly complete transformation of intact tissues into optically transparent and macromolecule permeable gel-like assemblies without incurring any changes to their native structure.


The power of these approaches has already been demonstrated with the successful three-dimensional imaging of whole-mount organs, such as the brain, kidney, heart, lung and intestine, using


conventional immunofluorescence labeling9. The simplicity, convenience and effectiveness of such methods are widely anticipated to lead to a greater understanding of the intricate


relationships between the variety of cells that compose complex tissues and organs10,11. However, despite this incredible potential, the widespread application of these approaches has been


limited by the notoriously slow penetration of antibodies into the cross-linked tissue. For example, to achieve a uniform labeling of a 5 mm whole-mount mouse brain, more than three weeks is


required for each primary and secondary antibody1. Hence, when imaging multiple epitopes, these approaches become practically untenable. Since the antibodies move through the samples by


simple diffusion, it has been assumed that the pore size of the hydrogel-tissue matrix critically limits antibody infiltration. Studies in which the pore size was changed by varying the


cross-linker density have been undertaken, but with only limited improvement in delivery rate9. In this paper, we have used hydrogel-embedded mouse brain sections prepared with CLARITY as a


standard specimen and systematically examined the diffusional behavior of immuno-labels of different sizes. Such an understanding enables a prediction of the optimal duration for labeling in


a typical experiment. Unexpectedly, we find that the diffusional constants of the labels infiltrating the tissue-hydrogel matrix are no more than four times lower than in free solution.


This observation suggests that increasing the pore size of the hydrogel may not, in fact, afford significant improvement in delivery rates. Instead, some means of active transport is


required. We thus investigated an electrophoretic approach and found that even at moderate applied electric fields, significantly accelerated delivery rates can be achieved without any


change or distortion to the cellular structure. We expect this simple protocol will significantly broaden the range of specimens that can now be practically investigated with intact tissue


clearing techniques. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION MEASUREMENTS OF MACROMOLECULAR DIFFUSION IN HYDROGEL-EMBEDDED TISSUE To monitor the diffusional behavior of various molecules in a cross-linked


hydrogel-tissue matrix, we developed an imaging-based strategy in which the one-dimensional diffusional profile of fluorescently labeled molecules from the edge of the specimen is determined


with confocal microscopy (Fig. 1a). To ensure that the measurements were obtained from samples similar to those in typical experiments, we investigated 500 μm-thick sections of clarified


adult mouse brain prepared following the standard CLARITY protocol (Fig. S1)12. To date, four different types of immuno-constructs (namely IgG, F(ab’)2, Fab and nanobody) have been commonly


used for immuno-histochemical staining. We thus studied the diffusional properties of fluorescently-labeled versions of these molecules, which range in size from 14 kDa for the nanobody to


150 kDa for IgG. Since the fluorescence intensity is proportional to the molecular concentration, the images reveal the temporal and spatial variation of the molecular concentration in the


tissue section, as shown in Fig. 1b–d. To reduce the effect of local variations, an averaged profile was generated by summing the vertical sections of the confocal images (see the Methods


section). As shown in Fig. 2a,b, the intensity profiles at all times are well behaved and monotonic. Overall, we found that these curves are well described by Fick’s law of one-dimensional


diffusion in a uniform medium13, despite local variations in the detailed structure of these sections: where n(x,t) is the molecular concentration at time t and position x, _erfc_ is the


complementary error function, n0 is the initial concentration and D is the diffusion coefficient. From these fittings, one can determine the diffusion coefficient, from which the time


required to achieve a desired label concentration at a particular tissue depth can be predicted. We note, though, that this measured diffusion coefficient is better described as an


“apparent” diffusion coefficient owing to significant structural variations that cause heterogeneous diffusion on a finer scale. Still, this measure should enable at least a useful


first-estimate, particularly as there is generally no other _a priori_ indicator for this parameter. Figure 2a shows the fitted diffusion curves of IgG at 1, 20, 40 and 60 minutes and the


curves of IgG, F(ab’)2, Fab and the nanobody are plotted after normalization in Fig. 2b. The calculated diffusion coefficients are summarized in Table 1 along with the diffusion coefficients


of these molecules measured in free solution (phosphate buffer, pH 7.4)14. As expected, this hydrogel-like matrix does restrict diffusion of the molecules15. This is most apparent for the


intact IgG, the largest molecule of the immuno-labels, which exhibits a diffusion coefficient of 1.1 × 10−7 cm2/s, four times lower than that in free solution (4.4 × 10−7 cm2/s). Hence,


while limiting, the difference from free solution in this matrix is only marginal. Thus, it follows that even if the pore size of the matrix were significantly enlarged, the improvement in


the labeling time would be moderate at best. The discrepancy between diffusion in this matrix and in free solution further diminishes as the size of the molecule decreases (Table 1). For the


newly developed nanobody, the hydrogel-like matrix imposed essentially no restriction on movement, as the measured diffusion coefficient is virtually the same as that expected in free


solution (12 × 10−7 cm2/s and 13 × 10−7 cm2/s, respectively). Although the diffusion of this nanobody is faster than IgG as expected, the full infiltration of a 3 mm-thick tissue section


with this nanobody would still require more than a day (Fig. 3). As nanobodies are the smallest immuno-labels presently available, any further reduction in incubation time would require


external forces to accelerate the delivery process. Further, the application of such external forces would be of great advantage if also applicable for intact IgG, for which there exists a


more widely available repertoire of useful labels developed against a broad range of epitopes. ELECTROPHORETICALLY DRIVEN FAST IMMUNO-LABELING OF CLARIFIED TISSUES We explored whether a


simple constant electric field would prove sufficient to enhance the delivery rate of antibodies, taking advantage of their net charge16. However, it is also clear that there are likely


molecules within the tissue-matrix that also carry net charge and so it is also possible that local structures sustain stretching or compression under application of this field. Thus, it is


important to find proper conditions under which significantly faster diffusion can be achieved without incurring noticeable damage to the local structure. For this purpose, we constructed a


chamber in which two platinum wires are used as electrodes to apply a DC electric field across the 500 μm-thick brain section (Fig. S2). As shown in Fig. 4, the improvement in the delivery


rate for IgG in these sections is dramatic: in only 30 minutes, the IgG molecules penetrated the entire ~4 mm section at an external voltage of 25 V. Without the external field, the extent


of movement owing to passive diffusion of the IgG molecules is negligible. In fact, based on the measured diffusion coefficients (Table 1), the same level of movement by passive diffusion


would require ~410 h, about 800-fold longer than that observed under the electric field. With such an improved rate, even multiple rounds of labeling should be achievable in a single day.


Although a higher field may further shorten the labeling time, we observed significant increases in temperature beyond a reasonable range with greater electric fields. Based on our


experiments, the upper limit of the applied field should be less than 30 V. Using this method, we further examined whether local structures sustain any observable damage under this electric


field. To this end, we investigated brain sections from a transgenic mouse in which Thy1-YFP was engineered to express exclusively within the brain17. As shown in Fig. 5, the structures


observed with standard labeling are virtually indistinguishable from those prepared with the electrophoretically-driven approach (compare with Fig. S1). This demonstrates that with


sufficiently low applied voltages, tissue structures retain their original form and local stretching or compression is not significant. Furthermore, signals from the antibody against YFP


were highly correlated with those from YFP (Fig. 5). This agreement and the observed uniformity of the antibody signal indicate that our method can indeed be used as an effective approach in


place of passive diffusion. In summary, we have demonstrated a dramatic reduction in the delivery time of immuno-labels within clarified tissues by applying a relatively low external DC


field to actively drive the molecules into the tissue. The delivery rates with this method greatly exceeded those obtained by simply using smaller antibody fragments (such as F(ab’)2 and


Fab) under passive diffusion. Such an electrophoretic approach produced similar labeling results compared with passive diffusion and caused no measurable structural alterations or damage to


the tissue. Thus, with this simple improvement, the efficiency and utility of CLARITY for a broader range of intact samples are enhanced, especially when multiple targets are investigated at


a higher depth. METHODS ANIMALS This study was carried out in strict accordance with the guidelines for the care and use of laboratory animals established by the Animal Use and Care


Committee of the Shanghai Committee on Animal Care. Animal surgical procedures were approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (IACUC) at Shanghai Jiao Tong University,


Shanghai, China (Permit Number: SYXK (Shanghai) 2012–0017). CLEARING THE MOUSE BRAIN WITH CLARITY The mouse brains were clarified following the clearing protocol of CLARITY12. Briefly, adult


mice (6-8 weeks old, stock number: 003782) were anaesthetized and perfused transcardially with the hydrogel monomer solution (HMS), a mixture of 4% (wt) PFA, 4% (wt/vol) acrylamide, 0.05%


(wt/vol) bis-acrylamide, 0.25% (wt/vol) VA044 and PBS. Then, the brains were extracted and incubated in the HMS at 4°C for 2 days. The specimen in HMS was degassed to remove residual oxygen


using a standard vacuum pump, desiccation chamber and a nitrogen gas supply. The conical tube containing the specimen was kept at 37 °C for 3 hours to polymerize hydrogel monomers. The


embedded brain was coronally sectioned on a vibratome (Leica, Germany). Brain sections were then passively cleared using a 4% SDS solution at 37 °C for 2 weeks to completely remove the


lipids. The clarified brain sections were then immersed in a 0.5 M sodium borate buffer (pH 8.5) at 37 °C for 24 h to thoroughly remove the remaining SDS. ANTIBODY LABELING AND IMAGING OF


THE CLARIFIED SAMPLE The clarified sections were incubated with antibodies conjugated with the fluorescent dye Dylight650 (1:100, gbdl650, Chromotek) (0.5 M sodium borate, pH 8.5 with 0.1%


(wt/vol) Triton X-100) at 37 °C for 5 h followed by washing in the same 0.5 M sodium borate/Triton buffer at 37 °C for 5 h. Before imaging, the immunolabeled section was further incubated in


FocusClear (CelExplorer Labs) for 30 min. Imaging was performed using a Nikon A1Si confocal microscope with a CFI Plan Apo 10 × objective (NA = 0.45, W.D. = 4.0 mm). All image processing


was conducted with NIS-Elements (Nikon Instruments Inc., Tokyo, Japan). ANTIBODIES USED IN THE PASSIVE DIFFUSION AND ELECTROPHORETIC MEASUREMENTS The IgG (Alexa Fluor 647 goat anti-rabbit


IgG (H + L), A21245) was purchased from Life Technologies Corp. (New York, USA). The F(ab’)2 (Anti-rabbit IgG (H + L), F(ab’)2 Fragment, Alexa Fluor 647 Conjugate, 4414S) was obtained from


Cell Signaling Technology Inc. (Massachusetts, USA). The Fab was produced from the above IgG using the Pierce Fab Micro Preparation Kit (44685, Thermo Scientific). The nanobody


(GFP-Booster_DyLight650, gbdl650) was purchased from Chromotek GmbH (Planegg-Martinsried, Germany). The final concentration of all molecules was 36 μM. MEASUREMENT OF PASSIVE DIFFUSION


PROFILES A 500-μm thick clarified brain section was placed between two coverslips using BluTack putty clay as a spacer. This assembly was fixed in a 35 mm petri dish using cyanoacrylate


glue. Mountgel was used to seal three sides of the section assembly to ensure that molecules can only diffuse in the tissue in one direction. Confocal images were acquired every 10 min. The


recorded fluorescence images were processed by subtracting the background, followed by vertical summation of the signals to generate a one dimensional diffusion curve. The normalized


diffusion curves were fitted to Equation (1) and the “apparent” diffusion coefficient was obtained. EXTERNAL ELECTRICAL FIELD DRIVEN ANTIBODY DELIVERY AND IMMUNO-LABELING The brain section


assembly was prepared following the same procedure as that used for passive diffusion measurements, except for the Mountgel sealing. Two platinum electrodes (267201-2G, Sigma) were placed on


each side of the section with a separation distance of about 2.2 cm from each other. The antibody delivery process with or without an external electrical field was monitored in real time by


confocal microscopy. Image processing was the same as that presented above. Immuno-labeling of the transgenic mouse brain sections was performed using an anti-GFP antibody (1:333 dilution


in 0.1 M sodium borate (pH 8.5), A31852, GFP Rabbit IgG Antibody Fraction, Alexa Fluor 647 Conjugate, Life Technologies Corp), by first applying a voltage of 25 V for 30 min, followed by an


incubation period of 1.5 h, then washing the sample with 0.1 M sodium borate (pH 8.5) and finally applying a voltage of 25 V for 30 min to drive the free antibodies from the tissue.


ADDITIONAL INFORMATION HOW TO CITE THIS ARTICLE: Li, J. _et al_. Fast immuno-labeling by electrophoretically driven infiltration for intact tissue imaging. _Sci. Rep._ 5, 10640; doi:


10.1038/srep10640 (2015). REFERENCES * Chung, K. et al. Structural and molecular interrogation of intact biological systems. Nature 497, 332–337 (2013). Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar  *


Becker, K., Jährling, N., Saghafi, S., Weiler, R. & Dodt, H. Chemical clearing and dehydration of GFP expressing mouse brains. PLoS One 7, e33916 (2012). Article  ADS  CAS  Google


Scholar  * Ertürk, A. et al. Three-dimensional imaging of solvent-cleared organs using 3DISCO. Nature Protocols 7, 1983–1995 (2012). Article  Google Scholar  * Kuwajima, T. et al. ClearT: a


detergent- and solvent-free clearing method for neuronal and non-neuronal tissue. Development 140, 1364–1368 (2013). Article  CAS  Google Scholar  * Ke, M., Fujimoto, S. & Imai, T.


SeeDB: a simple and morphology-preserving optical clearing agent for neuronal circuit reconstruction. Nat. Neurosci. 16, 1154–1161 (2013). Article  CAS  Google Scholar  * Hama, H. et al.


Scale: a chemical approach for fluorescence imaging and reconstruction of transparent mouse brain. Nat. Neurosci. 14, 1481–1488 (2011). Article  CAS  Google Scholar  * Susaki, E. A. et al.


Whole-brain imaging with single-cell resolution using chemical cocktails and computational analysis. Cell 157, 726–739 (2014). Article  CAS  Google Scholar  * Dodt, H. et al.


Ultramicroscopy: three-dimensional visualization of neuronal networks in the whole mouse brain. Nature Methods 4, 331–336 (2007). Article  CAS  Google Scholar  * Yang, B. et al. Single-Cell


Phenotyping within Transparent Intact Tissue through Whole-Body Clearing. Cell 158, 945–958 (2014). Article  CAS  Google Scholar  * Chung, K. & Deisseroth, K. CLARITY for mapping the


nervous system. Nature Methods 10, 508–513 (2013). Article  CAS  Google Scholar  * Crosetto, N., Bienko, M. & van Oudenaarden, A. Spatially resolved transcriptomics and beyond. Nature


Reviews Genetics 16, 57–66 (2015). Article  CAS  Google Scholar  * Tomer, R., Ye, L., Hsueh, B. & Deisseroth, K. Advanced CLARITY for rapid and high-resolution imaging of intact tissues.


Nature Protocols 9, 1682–1697 (2014). Article  CAS  Google Scholar  * Bokshtein, B. S., Mendelev, M. I. & Srolovitz, D. J. Thermodynamics and kinetics in materials science [165–170]


(Oxford University Press, New York, 2005). * Saltzman, W. M., Radomsky, M. L., Whaley, K. J. & Cone, R. A. Antibody diffusion in human cervical mucus. Biophys. J. 66, 508–515 (1994).


Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar  * Pluen, A., Netti, P. A., Jain, R. K. & Berk, D. A. Diffusion of macromolecules in agarose gels: comparison of linear and globular configurations.


Biophys. J. 77, 542–552 (1999). Article  CAS  Google Scholar  * Lehermayr, C., Mahler, H., Mäder, K. & Fischer, S. Assessment of net charge and protein–protein interactions of different


monoclonal antibodies. J. Pharm. Sci. 100, 2551–2562 (2011). Article  CAS  Google Scholar  * Feng, G. et al. Imaging neuronal subsets in transgenic mice expressing multiple spectral variants


of GFP. Neuron 28, 41–51 (2000). Article  CAS  Google Scholar  Download references ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS We thank Prof. Zilong Qiu of Institute of Neuroscience, Chinese Academy of Sciences, for


his kind donation of Thy1-YFP transgenic mice. The authors are also grateful to the generous support by Nikon Instruments (Shanghai) Co., Ltd. This work was supported by the National Science


Foundation of China (Grant No. 60907044, 11374207, 31370750 and 21273148), Bio-ID Center and SJTU Cross-Disciplinary Research Fund in Medicine and Engineering (Grant No. YG2012MS23). AUTHOR


INFORMATION AUTHORS AND AFFILIATIONS * Shanghai Center for Systems Biomedicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, 200240, China Jun Li * School of Biomedical Engineering, Shanghai


Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, 200240, China Daniel M. Czajkowsky, Xiaowei Li & Zhifeng Shao * State Key Laboratory for Oncogenes & Related Genes, Shanghai Jiao Tong University,


Shanghai, 200240, China Zhifeng Shao Authors * Jun Li View author publications You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar * Daniel M. Czajkowsky View author publications You


can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar * Xiaowei Li View author publications You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar * Zhifeng Shao View author


publications You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar CONTRIBUTIONS J.L. performed the experiments. D.M.C. contributed to the design of the experiment and co-wrote the


manuscript. X.L. and Z.S. supervised the project and co-wrote the manuscript. ETHICS DECLARATIONS COMPETING INTERESTS The authors declare no competing financial interests. ELECTRONIC


SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL SUPPORTING INFORMATION RIGHTS AND PERMISSIONS This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. The images or other third party


material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in the credit line; if the material is not included under the Creative Commons


license, users will need to obtain permission from the license holder to reproduce the material. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ Reprints


and permissions ABOUT THIS ARTICLE CITE THIS ARTICLE Li, J., Czajkowsky, D., Li, X. _et al._ Fast immuno-labeling by electrophoretically driven infiltration for intact tissue imaging. _Sci


Rep_ 5, 10640 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1038/srep10640 Download citation * Received: 08 February 2015 * Accepted: 22 April 2015 * Published: 27 May 2015 * DOI:


https://doi.org/10.1038/srep10640 SHARE THIS ARTICLE Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content: Get shareable link Sorry, a shareable link is not currently


available for this article. Copy to clipboard Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative