Metformin may improve the outcome of patients with colorectal cancer and type 2 diabetes mellitus partly through effects on neutrophil extracellular traps

ABSTRACT BACKGROUND Although metformin reduces the risk of cancer-related mortality in patents with type 2 diabetes, the mechanism of its anti-cancer effects has not been fully understood.

METHOD Impact of metformin on survival was examined in patients who underwent curative colectomy for colorectal cancer (CRC). The effects of metformin in neutrophil extracellular traps

(NETs) were examined with in-vitro experiments and multiplex immunohistochemistry of surgically resected CRC specimens. RESULTS Prior intake of metformin prolonged relapse-free (_P_ = 0.036)

and overall survival (_P_ = 0.041) in 289 patients with T2DM to the comparable levels to those of 1576 non-diabetic patients. Metformin reduced the production of NETs stimulated with

lipopolysaccharide or HT-29 colon cancer cells to 60% of control. Neutrophils markedly suppressed the chemotactic migration of activated T cells in an NET-dependent manner, which was

reversed by metformin treatment up to approximately half of the migration without neutrophils. Immunohistochemical analysis revealed a significant association between metformin intake and a

reduction in the numbers of tumor-associated neutrophils (TANs) and NETs. Simultaneously, metformin intake was found to increase the presence of CD3(+) and CD8(+) tumor-infiltrating T cells

(TILs), particularly at the tumor-invasion front, especially in areas with fewer TANs and NETs. CONCLUSION Metformin suppresses the diabetes-associated enhancement of NET formation, which

can augment the infiltration of TILs in CRC tissues. The anti-tumor effect of metformin in patients with T2DM may be, at least partly, attributable to the inhibition of NETs. SIMILAR CONTENT

BEING VIEWED BY OTHERS NEUTROPHIL OXIDATIVE STRESS MEDIATES OBESITY-ASSOCIATED VASCULAR DYSFUNCTION AND METASTATIC TRANSMIGRATION Article 03 May 2021 CD71 EXPRESSING CIRCULATING NEUTROPHILS

SERVE AS A NOVEL PROGNOSTIC BIOMARKER FOR METASTATIC SPREAD AND REDUCED OUTCOME IN PANCREATIC DUCTAL ADENOCARCINOMA PATIENTS Article Open access 10 September 2024 MICROBIOME DYSBIOSIS,

NEUTROPHIL RECRUITMENT AND MESENCHYMAL TRANSITION OF MESOTHELIAL CELLS PROMOTES PERITONEAL METASTASIS OF COLORECTAL CANCER Article 18 February 2025 INTRODUCTION Type 2 diabetes mellitus

(T2DM) is the most common chronic and metabolic disease, and growing evidence supports a biologic or physiologic link between T2DM and cancer [1]. Many epidemiologic studies have

demonstrated that T2DM increases the risk of development and mortality for various cancers, including colorectal cancer (CRC) [2,3,4]. Key contributors to tumorigenesis and tumor progression

include hyperglycemia, insulin resistance, and increased levels of insulin and insulin-like growth factors as well as increased adipocytokines associated with obesity [2, 3, 5]. Recent

studies have also suggested that anti-diabetic agents can greatly influence tumor behavior in diabetic patients with cancer [6, 7]. In particular, metformin is well known to reduce the

incidence of cancer development and cancer-related mortality, although the degree of reduction varies among types of cancer [8,9,10,11]. In preclinical studies, metformin directly suppressed

tumor cell survival and proliferation through 5-AMP-activated protein kinase (AMPK)-dependent and -independent mechanisms [12,13,14]. More recent studies suggest that the anti-tumor effects

of metformin are largely dependent on the enhancement of host immune responses against cancer [15, 16]. In murine studies, metformin upregulated T cell-mediated immune responses [17,18,19]

and mediated the repolarization of macrophages from the M2 to the M1 phenotype in the tumor microenvironment [18, 20, 21], thus potentially inhibiting tumor growth. Furthermore, metformin

has been shown to downregulate programmed cell death receptor ligand 1 in tumor cells, thereby enhancing T-cell mediated cytotoxicity [22,23,24]. However, the mechanisms underlying how

metformin modulates the host immune system remain to be elucidated. Neutrophil extracellular traps (NETs) are complex structures composed of unfolded DNA that is decorated with histones,

proteases, and granular and cytosolic proteins. NETs are recognized as an important antimicrobial mechanism to immobilize and kill pathogens [25]. Recent studies suggest that NETs promote

tumor progression and metastasis by capturing circulating tumor cells [26,27,28], inducing epithelial–mesenchymal transition (EMT) [29], awakening dormant cancer cells [30], and stimulating

cancer-associated thrombosis [31]. In addition, NET markers are markedly elevated in the circulating blood of patients with T2DM [32,33,34,35]. This finding suggests that neutrophils in

diabetic patients are more likely to produce NETs than those in non-diabetic people, and this difference in NET production might be mechanically associated with the incidence and progression

of cancer. Therefore, in the current study, we examined the effects of metformin on NET formation in human samples. MATERIALS AND METHODS MONOCLONAL ANTIBODIES (MABS), REAGENTS AND CELL

LINE MAbs to CD3 (dilution, 1:150) and CD66b (dilution, 1:600) were purchased from Thermo Fisher Scientific (Waltham, MA), mAb to CD8α (dilution, 1:2000) from Proteintech Group (Rosemont,

IL), and mAb to histone H3 (Cit-H3, dilution, 1:500) from Abcam (Cambridge, United Kingdom). Signal enhancer HIKARI for Immunostain Solution B, antibody dilution buffer, and blocking

solution One-Histo (catalog no. 06349-64) were purchased from Nacalai Tesque (Kyoto, Japan). Lipopolysaccharide (LPS) and metformin hydrochloride were purchased from Sigma–Aldrich (St.

Louis, MO) and Wako Chemical (Tokyo, Japan), respectively. To bind extracellular DNA components, SYTOX Green was purchased from Thermo Fisher Scientific. Detailed were expressed in

supplementary Table 2. The human colon cancer cell line, HT-29, was obtained from the RIKEN cell bank (Tsukuba, Japan). The cells were expanded by the culture with Dulbecco’s Modifed Eagle

Medium (DMEM) supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS), 100 units/ml penicillin and 100 mg/ml streptomycin as well as 5 mg/ml Plasmocin (INVIVOGEN, SanDiego, CA) to prevent mycoplasma

infection. Subsequently, these cells were cryopreserved in liquid nitrogen. Upon thawing, we verified the absence of mycoplasma contamination in the newly thawed cells. For our experiments,

we exclusively employed cells that had undergone fewer than two passages to minimize phenotypic variation. While we did not perform additional genomic authentication, we assessed the

identity of the thawed cells through visual inspection and growth curve analysis. and stored in liquid nitrogen. To limit phenotypic drift, cells passaged fewer than three times were used

for the experiment. PATIENTS AND SAMPLES From April 2010 through March 2021, 1865 patients with Stage I to III colorectal cancer (CRC) underwent radical colectomy with curative intent in the

Department of Surgery, Jichi Medical University Hospital (Tochigi, Japan). Of these, 289 patients (15.5%) had T2DM at the time of surgery, and 62 of these 289 patients (21.5%) were

receiving metformin. The remaining 1576 patients with CRC comprised the T2DM-free group. Data for gender, age, medical history, treatment of diabetes, surgical procedure, preoperative

laboratory test results, pathologic evaluation (histologic tumor type, depth of tumor, nodal metastasis, vascular invasion, and lymphatic invasion) and postoperative outcomes were extracted

from the electronic medical record after the patient provided written informed consent. This study was approved by the Institutional Review Board of Jichi University Hospital (approval no.,

clinic A21-064) and was conducted in accordance with the guiding principles of the Declaration of Helsinki. Among the 62 surgically resected CRC tumors from patients treated with metformin,

the most recent 40 specimens were used for immunostaining. In addition, samples from 40 patients who did not receive metformin were selected from among 221 cases through propensity score

matching and used as a control group for immunostaining. Gender, age, tumor site, histologic type, pT category, pN category, pStage, lymphatic invasion, venous invasion, and use of adjuvant

therapy were selected for score matching. NET FORMATION ASSAY NET formation was evaluated by using neutrophils purified from the peripheral blood of healthy donors, as described previously

[36]. In brief, after dextran sedimentation, leukocyte-enriched plasma was overlaid on Ficoll–Hypaque solution (Cytiva, Uppsala, Sweden) and centrifuged at 800 g for 15 min. The bottom

layers were collected and washed twice with PBS containing 0.02% EDTA. Red blood cells were removed with RBC Lysis Buffer (BioLegend, San Diego, CA), and remaining cells were washed twice

with PBS containing 0.02% EDTA. The polymorphonuclear leukocyte fractions, which comprised ≥95% neutrophils, were used for following experiments. Neutrophils were adjusted to 1 × 106 cells

per well by using serum-free RPMI1640 medium, seeded into 6-well plates (Thermo Scientific, Seoul, Korea), and incubated with LPS (final concentration, 5 µg/ml) at 37 °C for 2 h; metformin

(maximum final concentration, 100 µM) was added to some wells. To assess NET production, SYTOX Green nucleic acid stain (final concentration, 50 nM; Thermo Fisher Scientific) was added to

wells, and plates were read by using a fluorescence stereomicroscope (model BZ8000, Keyence, Osaka, Japan). To quantify NET, cells that showed the characteristic SYTOX Green strand staining

were counted, and the ratio of NET cells to total neutrophil count was calculated for 3 randomly selected fields. MIGRATION ASSAY Chemotactic migration of activated T cells was evaluated by

using a two-chamber system with 3-µm–pore Transwell inserts (Corning, Corning, NY). Peripheral blood mononuclear cells from healthy volunteers were cultured for 5 to 7 d in RPMI 1640

containing recombinant interleukin 2 (final concentration, 10 ng/l; Thermo Fisher Scientific) and 10% fetal bovine serum on plates coated with anti-CD3 mAb. Activated T cells were labeled

with calcein-AM (Thermo Fisher Scientific) and resuspended in DMEM containing 0.1% bovine serum albumin. HT-29 human colorectal carcinoma cells (1 × 104 cells per well) were cultured in a

24-well culture plate containing DMEM supplemented with 10% fetal calf serum. After cells became confluent, the medium in each well was replaced with 500 μl DMEM supplemented with 0.1%

bovine serum albumin. Activated T cells (1 × 105 cells per well) were seeded into the culture inserts, which were placed in the lower chamber containing the HT-29 cells. In some wells,

neutrophils were preincubated with DNAse I (100 U/ml) or metformin (100 μM) for 30 min and added to culture inserts containing activated T cells. After 2 h, the cells that had transmigrated

to the lower chamber were recovered and counted by using flow cytometry, as described previously [37]. In brief, the culture inset was removed, and the cells that had migrated into the lower

chamber were collected in a FACS tube, washed with 2 ml PBS, resuspended in 300 μl PBS, acquired for 1 min during a 60 μl/min run of flow cytometry, and counted as the number of

calcein-positive T cells. As a 10% control, 1 × 104 cells were added to the lower chamber and counted in the same way, and percentage migration was calculated against the 10% control value.

MULTIPLEX IMMUNOHISTOCHEMISTRY AND IMAGE PROCESSING AND ANALYSIS All specimens were fixed in formalin, embedded in paraffin, cut into sections (thickness, 4 µm), and then used for multiplex

immunohistochemistry. The staining protocol has been described previously [38]. In brief, after deparaffinization, the sections were stained with hematoxylin for 1 min, followed by

whole-tissue scanning (OlyVIA SlideView VS200, Olympus, Tokyo, Japan). After imaging, endogenous peroxidases were blocked in 0.3% hydrogen peroxide for 30 min. For antigen retrieval, the

sections were processed by microwaving in 10 mM sodium citrate buffer (pH 6.0) for 10 min. After incubation with a blocking agent (Blocking One Histo) for 10 min at room temperature to

prevent nonspecific binding, the sections were incubated with primary antibodies for 30 min at room temperature, thoroughly washed with Tris-buffered saline containing 0.1% Tween 20, and

stained (Histofine Simple Stain PO(M) Kit for Rabbit or Mouse, Nichirei, Tokyo, Japan). Primary antibody binding was visualized by using an ImmPACT AMEC Red Substrate Kit (Vector

Laboratories, Newark, CA), and sections were scanned (OlyVIA SlideView VS200). Stained slides were then dehydrated through an alcohol gradient (90% ethanol, 80% ethanol, and 70% ethanol; 2 

min at each concentration) until no visible 3-amino-9-ethylcarbazole reaction product remained. After rehydration, antibodies were eluted by incubating sections in 10 mM sodium citrate

buffer (pH 6.0) for 10 min by using the microwave method. Complete stripping of antibodies and signals was confirmed throughout all cycles (Supplementary Fig. 1). The sections were then

stained from the blocking step with another antibodies. To validate the specificity of the antibody and confirm signal removal between sequential immunohistochemical staining steps, we

employed two types of negative controls, i.e, conventional negative control slides treated with 2.5% goat serum in PBS without the addition of primary antibodies and additional sequential

IHC negative controls. After chromogenic sequential immunohistochemical staining, each image was converted to digitized pseudo-colored image. Those images were sequentially co-registered to

ensure precise alignment of cell features at the single-pixel level, utilizing the CellProfiler version 2.1.1 pipeline ‘Alignment Batch.cppipe,’ available under General Public License

version 2.0 according to the manufacturer’s recommendation. Finally, all the images were merged using ImageJ Fiji (National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD) (Supplementary Fig. 2). To

assess cell density cells, we counted the cells present in 3 randomly selected regions of interest (0.5 × 0.5 mm2) of tumor stroma. Analysis was blinded with respect to clinical outcomes by

3 investigators. STATISTICAL ANALYSIS Statistical analyses were performed by using Prism 9 (GraphPad Software, San Diego, CA). Statistical differences in clinical and pathologic factors

between groups were evaluated by using the Mann–Whitney _U_ test or Fisher’s exact test. Survival was calculated according to the Kaplan–Meier method, and differences were evaluated by using

the log-rank test. In all analyses, the standard for significant difference was set as _P_ < 0.05. RESULTS THE OUTCOME OF CRC PATIENTS WITH T2DM DIFFERS DEPENDING ON THEIR METFORMIN

TREATMENT We first examined the impact of metformin intake on the cancer-associated outcomes of patients with T2DM who underwent curative surgery for CRC. Relapse-free survival (RFS; Fig. 

1a) and overall survival (OS; Fig. 1c) were significantly shorter in the 289 patients who had T2DM at surgery than in the 1576 patients who did not (RFS: HR = 1.444, 1.023–2.040, _P_ = 

0.036, OS:HR = 1.576, 1.018–2.436, _P_ = 0.041). However, the CRC-associated outcomes of the diabetic patients differed markedly depending on whether they received metformin. Among the 289

patients with CRC and T2DM, 62 were being treated with metformin at the time of surgery. These 62 patients were younger and had higher HbA1c levels than the 227 diabetic patients without

metformin treatment (Table 1), but none of the other factors differed significantly between these groups. Both RFS and OS after CRC were significantly shorter in the 227 diabetic patients

without metformin treatment than in the 1576 without T2DM (RFS: HR = 1.904, 1.300–2.790, _P_ = 0.001, OS: HR = 1.857, 1.145–3.011, _P_ = 0.012). In contrast, RFS after surgery for CRC was

significantly longer for the metformin-treated diabetic patients than for those without metformin (HR = 2.655, 1.381–5.105, _P_ = 0.003) and even tended to be better as compared with those

without T2DM although not significantly (_P_ = 0.203) (Fig. 1b). Furthermore, the OS curve for metformin-treated patients with T2DM who underwent surgery for CRC was nearly parallel to that

of their nondiabetic peers (Fig. 1d). Multivariate analysis with cox regression method showed that metformin use was an dependent prognostic factor in the whole patients (Supplementary Table

 2). METFORMIN INHIBITS THE PRODUCTION OF NETS INDUCED BY LPS Fluorescence microscopy after SYTOX green staining revealed many thread-like NET structures among human neutrophils that had

been stimulated with LPS in vitro. The addition of metformin (10 to 100 μM) to the neutrophil cultures reduced NET formation in a dose-dependent manner up to 60% of control (Fig. 2a, b).

METFORMIN RESTORES THE NEUTROPHIL-INHIBITED CHEMOTACTIC MIGRATION OF ACTIVATED T CELLS TO HT-29 CELLS Although they showed little spontaneous migration, activated T cells robustly migrated

to HT-29 cells cultured in the lower chamber of the two-chamber system (Fig. 3a). However, adding neutrophils to the upper chamber completely inhibited the chemotactic migration of the T

cells to the lower chamber containing HT-29 cells. Migration was recovered by adding DNAse I to the neutrophil–T cell chamber to degrade NETs. Similarly, preincubation of neutrophils in 100 

μM metformin restored T cell migration to the same level as seen after DNAse I treatment (Fig. 2c). Labeling T cells with PKH26 and staining the membranes of culture inserts with SYTOX Green

at the end of the migration assay revealed that many T cells remained in close contact with NETs that formed in the upper chamber (Fig. 2d, left panel). This finding indicates that HT-29

cells stimulate the production of NETs, which physically trap the T cells and thus inhibit their chemotactic migration. However, preincubating neutrophils in 100 μM metformin markedly

decreased the number of NETs present (Fig. 2d, right panel), suggesting that metformin restores T cell migration by inhibiting NET formation. METFORMIN INTAKE DECREASES THE NUMBER OF

TUMOR-ASSOCIATED NEUTROPHILS (TANS) AND NETS IN CRC TISSUES FROM PATIENTS WITH T2DM To examine whether metformin intake alters the tumor immune microenvironment, we used multicolor

immunohistochemistry to evaluate the density of neutrophils and NET formation at the invasive tumor front of surgically resected CRC tissue. Using propensity score matching among the

diabetic patients with CRC who had been treated with or without metformin, we selected 40 patients from each group who underwent surgery during the same period (Table 2). TANs were defined

as green-stained cells that expressed CD66b mainly at the cell membrane (Fig. 3a). Among TANs, cells that showed red staining for Cit-H3 in the nuclear area were defined as NETs. The density

of TANs was significantly lower in metformin(+) tumor tissue (Median, 100.0 TANs/0.5 × 0.5 mm2; range, 34.0–322.3) than in metformin(−) samples (Median, 169.7 TANs/0.5 × 0.5 mm2; range,

36.0–340.3; _P_ < 0.001) (Fig. 3a, b). Similarly, the density of NETs was lower in metformin(+) tumors (Median, 12.3 cells/ 0.5 × 0.5 mm2; range, 0–42.7) than in metformin(−) samples

(Median, 27.3; range, 7.3–76.0; _P_ < 0.001), with a lower proportion of NETs among total TANs (metformin(+): median, 18.7%; range, 2.0–34.3%; metformin(−): median, 20.3%; range, 0–26.7%;

_P_ < 0.01) (Fig. 3a, c, d). METFORMIN INTAKE INCREASES THE NUMBER OF TUMOR INFILTRATING T CELLS (TILS) IN CRC WITH T2DM We immunostained the same specimens as for the TAN analysis with

mAbs to CD3 and CD8 to examine tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs). CD3(+) T cells were visualized as green signals, whereas yellow signals in the dual-stain imaging represented

CD8(+)CD3(+) cells (Fig. 3e). The density of CD3(+) TILs was significantly higher in metformin(+) samples (Median, 148.7 cells/0.5 × 0.5 mm2; range, 77.2–326.8) than in metformin(–) tumors

(Median, 121.9 cells/0.5 × 0.5 mm2; range, 28.6–229.8; _P_ < 0.05) (Fig. 3e, f). Likewise, the number of CD8(+) TILs was increased more prominently in metformin(+) tumors (Median, 101.1

cells/0.5 × 0.5 mm2; range, 49.4–225.2) than in metformin(–) tissue (Median, 59.9 cells/0.5 × 0.5 mm2; range, 13.6–170.4; _P_ < 0.001) (Fig. 3g). Finally, the ratio of CD8(+):CD3(+) TILs

was significantly higher in metformin(+) tumors (Median, 67.9%; range, 35.8–82.9%) than in metformin(–) specimens (Median, 50.7%; range, 32.9–81.4%; _P_ < 0.001) (Fig. 3h). THE

DISTRIBUTION PATTERN OF TILS IS OPPOSITE TO THOSE OF TANS AND NETS Using a multiple image processing strategy, we next examined the spatial distribution of TILs in the same CRC tumor

specimens as evaluated earlier. In most tumor samples, CD3(+)CD8(+) TILs were mainly detected in areas where TANs and NETs were sparse, whereas relatively few TILs infiltrated in areas with

abundant TANs and NETs (Fig. 4a). When we examined the correlation of the densities of TANs, NETs, and TILs in all 80 tumor samples from T2DM(+) patients treated for CRC, the density of

CD8(+) TILs showed weak inverse correlation with that of TANs (_r_ = −0.224, _P_ = 0.023) (Fig. 4b). Similarly, the density of CD8(+) TILs was inversely related to that of NETs, but was

somewhat stronger than for TANs (_r_ = −0.300, _P_ = 0.0074) (Fig. 4c). DISCUSSION In addition to its anti-diabetic effects, metformin has various pharmacologic properties, including

anti-oxidative, anti-inflammatory, and anti-cancer effects [39]. In particular, the results of numerous epidemiologic studies support metformin’s anti-tumor effect [8,9,10,11]. In the

current study, we confirmed that concomitant diabetes worsened the RFS and OS of patients who received curative surgery for CRC. However, metformin intake before surgery remarkably improved

the CRC-associated outcomes of diabetic patients to a level equal to (OS) or even better (RFS) than that of non-diabetic patients. Unraveling the anti-tumor effect of metformin has been

approached from many directions. Recent experimental reports suggest that the anti-tumor properties of metformin are largely dependent on the enhancement of host immune responses

[15,16,17,18, 20,21,22,23,24]. However, the mechanisms underlying these immunomodulatory effects are not fully elucidated. Neutrophils are the most abundant cell type among circulating

leukocytes and they play crucial roles not only in the innate immune system but also in the adaptive immune response against cancer [40, 41]. Neutrophil responses to infection—including

chemotaxis, phagocytosis, and the intracellular production of reactive oxygen species (ROS) production—are dysregulated in patients with T2DM, thus resulting in increased chronic and

recurrent infections [42, 43]. In contrast, the generation of NETs and pro-inflammatory cytokines are upregulated in diabetic patients, causing damage by perpetuating inflammation

[32,33,34,35]. A recent study demonstrated that metformin reduces the generation of ROS via the PKC–NADPH oxidase pathway, thereby inhibiting PMA-induced formation of NETs [44]. In the

current study, we demonstrated that metformin suppresses the production of NETs induced by LPS or through co-culture with HT-29 cells in vitro. These results suggest that metformin reduces

ROS production by various stimuli, thus inhibiting NET formation. In migration experiments, we found that the co-culture of neutrophils with HT-29 colon cancer cells in a double-chamber

system induced abundant NET formation; these NETs efficiently trapped activated T cells and strongly inhibited their chemotactic migration. We recently reported that activated neutrophils

strongly inhibit the chemotaxis of activated T cells to CXCL11 through various mechanisms, including H2O2 generation, CXCL11 degradation, and physical trapping [45]. The results of the

current study are consistent with our previous study and strongly suggest that tumor cells induce NET production, which suppresses the infiltration of effector T cells into tumor tissue.

This suppression of T cell influx might be an important component of tumor immune escape and an additional means by which NETs promote tumor progression. In fact, Teijeira et al. have

recently demonstrated that NETs can wrap tumor cells and shield them from cytotoxicity by obstructing their contact with cytotoxic immune cells [46]. More importantly, the addition of

metformin largely restored the chemotactic migration of activated T cells and reduced NET formation. Immunohistochemical results clearly showed that the densities of TANs and NETs were

reduced in the CRC tissues of diabetic patients who were treated with metformin. This finding agrees with the results of other recent studies indicating that the presence of NETs in the

tumor site correlates with worse prognosis in various types of cancers including gastric [47], pancreatic [48], and cervical [49] cancers. In contrast and as described in our previous study

[50], the densities of CD3(+) and CD8(+) TILs were significantly increased in diabetic CRC patients treated with metformin. In the current study, we also found that TILs were particularly

prominent in areas where NETs were rare and that the density of TILs was negatively correlated with those of TANs and NETs in the entire subset of patients evaluated. The

immunohistochemistry data are completely consistent with the results of the in vitro experiments and strongly suggest that metformin might increase TILs by reducing NET formation in CRC

tissue. This study is constrained by certain limitations as it is a single-center, retrospective study with a limited number of patients. However, when interpreted in conjunction with the in

vitro experimental findings, it suggests that metformin may have the potential to mitigate the accumulation of TANs and NETs in diabetic patients. This, in turn, could bolster the

infiltration of effector T cells and bring about a significant transformation in the tumor microenvironment, shifting it from an immunosuppressive state to an immunocompetent one. Recent

clinical studies have suggested the efficacy of metformin as an anticancer agent, especially when provided in combination with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) [51, 52]. These findings

seem reasonable, because the clinical efficacy of ICIs is highly dependent on TIL density [53, 54]. In another study, metformin suppressed NET formation and inhibited the development of

pancreatic cancer in obese mice [55]. Together, these results suggest to us that the anti-tumor effect of metformin is dependent, at least partly, on the inhibition of NETs. In fact,

metformin is attracting much attention as a candidate for drug reposition for NET-related vascular [56, 57] and neurodegenerative [58, 59] diseases. REFERENCES * Bonagiri PR, Shubrook JH.

Review of associations between type 2 diabetes and cancer. Clin Diabetes. 2020;38:256–65. Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar  * Orgel E, Mittelman SD. The links between insulin

resistance, diabetes, and cancer. Curr Diab Rep. 2013;13:213–22. Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar  * Gallagher EJ, LeRoith D. Diabetes, antihyperglycemic medications and

cancer risk: smoke or fire? Curr Opin Endocrinol Diabetes Obes. 2013;20:485–94. Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar  * Zhu B, Wu X, Wu B, Pei D, Zhang L, Wei L. The relationship between

diabetes and colorectal cancer prognosis: a meta-analysis based on the cohort studies. PLoS One. 2017;12:e0176068. Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar  * Klil-Drori AJ, Azoulay

L, Pollak MN. Cancer, obesity, diabetes, and antidiabetic drugs: is the fog clearing? Nat Rev Clin Oncol. 2017;14:85–99. Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar  * Walker JJ, Johnson JA, Wild

SH. Diabetes treatments and cancer risk: the importance of considering aspects of drug exposure. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2013;1:132–9. Article  PubMed  Google Scholar  * Sen S, He Y,

Koya D, Kanasaki K. Cancer biology in diabetes. J Diabetes Investig. 2014;5:251–64. Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar  * Evans JM, Donnelly LA, Emslie-Smith AM, Alessi DR,

Morris AD. Metformin and reduced risk of cancer in diabetic patients. BMJ. 2005;330:1304–5. Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar  * Noto H, Goto A, Tsujimoto T, Noda M. Cancer

risk in diabetic patients treated with metformin: a systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS One. 2012;7:e33411. Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar  * Pollak MN.

Investigating metformin for cancer prevention and treatment: the end of the beginning. Cancer Discov. 2012;2:778–90. Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar  * Dulskas A, Patasius A,

Linkeviciute-Ulinskiene D, Zabuliene L, Urbonas V, Smailyte G. Metformin increases cancer specific survival in colorectal cancer patients-National cohort study. Cancer Epidemiol.

2019;62:101587. Article  PubMed  Google Scholar  * Del Barco S, Vazquez-Martin A, Cufí S, Oliveras-Ferraros C, Bosch-Barrera J, Joven J, et al. Metformin: multi-faceted protection against

cancer. Oncotarget. 2011;2:896–917. Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar  * Kamarudin MNA, Sarker MMR, Zhou JR, Parhar I. Metformin in colorectal cancer: molecular mechanism,

preclinical and clinical aspects. J Exp Clin Cancer Res. 2019;38:491. Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar  * Misirkic Marjanovic MS, Vucicevic LM, Despotovic AR, Stamenkovic

MM, Janjetovic KD. Dual anticancer role of metformin: an old drug regulating AMPK dependent/independent pathways in metabolic, oncogenic/tumorsuppresing and immunity context. Am J Cancer

Res. 2021;11:5625–43. PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar  * Kim K, Yang WH, Jung YS, Cha JH. A new aspect of an old friend: the beneficial effect of metformin on anti-tumor immunity. BMB

Rep. 2020;53:512–20. Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar  * Ma R, Yi B, Riker AI, Xi Y. Metformin and cancer immunity. Acta Pharmacol Sin. 2020;41:1403–9. Article  CAS 

PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar  * Eikawa S, Nishida M, Mizukami S, Yamazaki C, Nakayama E, Udono H. Immune-mediated antitumor effect by type 2 diabetes drug, metformin. Proc Natl

Acad Sci USA. 2015;112:1809–14. Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar  * Uehara T, Eikawa S, Nishida M, Kunisada Y, Yoshida A, Fujiwara T, et al. Metformin induces

CD11b+-cell-mediated growth inhibition of an osteosarcoma: implications for metabolic reprogramming of myeloid cells and anti-tumor effects. Int Immunol. 2019;31:187–98. Article  CAS  PubMed

  Google Scholar  * Kunisada Y, Eikawa S, Tomonobu N, Domae S, Uehara T, Hori S, et al. Attenuation of CD4(+)CD25(+) regulatory T cells in the tumor microenvironment by Metformin, a type 2

diabetes drug. EBioMedicine. 2017;25:154–64. Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar  * Chiang CF, Chao TT, Su YF, Hsu CC, Chien CY, Chiu KC, et al. Metformin-treated cancer cells

modulate macrophage polarization through AMPK-NF-kappaB signaling. Oncotarget. 2017;8:20706–18. Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar  * Wang JC, Sun X, Ma Q, Fu GF, Cong LL, Zhang

H. et al. Metformin’s antitumour and anti-angiogenic activities are mediated by skewing macrophage polarization. J Cell Mol Med. 2018;22:3825–36. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcmm.13655. Article

  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar  * Cha JH, Yang WH, Xia W, Wei Y, Chan LC, Lim SO, et al. Metformin promotes antitumor immunity via endoplasmic-reticulum-associated degradation

of PD-L1. Mol Cell. 2018;71:606–20.e607. Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar  * Han Y, Li CW, Hsu JM, Hsu JL, Chan LC, Tan X, et al. Metformin reverses PARP

inhibitors-induced epithelial-mesenchymal transition and PD-L1 upregulation in triple-negative breast cancer. Am J Cancer Res. 2019;9:800–15. CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar  *

Xue J, Li L, Li N, Li F, Qin X, Li T, et al. Metformin suppresses cancer cell growth in endometrial carcinoma by inhibiting PD-L1. Eur J Pharmacol. 2019;859:172541. Article  CAS  PubMed 

Google Scholar  * Brinkmann V, Reichard U, Goosmann C, Fauler B, Uhlemann Y, Weiss DS, et al. Neutrophil extracellular traps kill bacteria. Science. 2004;303:1532–5. Article  CAS  PubMed 

Google Scholar  * Cools-Lartigue J, Spicer J, Najmeh S, Ferri L. Neutrophil extracellular traps in cancer progression. Cell Mol Life Sci. 2014;71:4179–94. Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed

Central  Google Scholar  * Tohme S, Yazdani HO, Al-Khafaji AB, Chidi AP, Loughran P, Mowen K, et al. Neutrophil extracellular traps promote the development and progression of liver

metastases after surgical stress. Cancer Res. 2016;76:1367–80. Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar  * Lee W, Ko SY, Mohamed MS, Kenny HA, Lengyel E, Naora H. Neutrophils

facilitate ovarian cancer premetastatic niche formation in the omentum. J Exp Med. 2019;216:176–94. Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar  * Zhu T, Zou X, Yang C, Li L, Wang

B, Li R, et al. Neutrophil extracellular traps promote gastric cancer metastasis by inducing epithelial‑mesenchymal transition. Int J Mol Med. 2021;48:127. Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed

Central  Google Scholar  * Albrengues J, Shields MA, Ng D, Park CG, Ambrico A, Poindexter ME, et al. Neutrophil extracellular traps produced during inflammation awaken dormant cancer cells

in mice. Science. 2018;361:eaao4227. Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar  * Demers M, Wagner DD. NETosis: a new factor in tumor progression and cancer-associated thrombosis.

Semin Thromb Hemost. 2014;40:277–83. Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar  * Fadini GP, Menegazzo L, Rigato M, Scattolini V, Poncina N, Bruttocao A, et al. NETosis delays

diabetic wound healing in mice and humans. Diabetes. 2016;65:1061–71. Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar  * Carestia A, Frechtel G, Cerrone G, Linari MA, Gonzalez CD, Casais P, et al.

NETosis before and after hyperglycemic control in type 2 diabetes mellitus patients. PLoS One. 2016;11:e0168647. Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar  * Menegazzo L, Ciciliot S,

Poncina N, Mazzucato M, Persano M, Bonora B, et al. NETosis is induced by high glucose and associated with type 2 diabetes. Acta Diabetol. 2015;52:497–503. Article  CAS  PubMed  Google

Scholar  * Miyoshi A, Yamada M, Shida H, Nakazawa D, Kusunoki Y, Nakamura A, et al. Circulating neutrophil extracellular trap levels in well-controlled type 2 diabetes and pathway involved

in their formation induced by high-dose glucose. Pathobiology. 2016;83:243–51. Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar  * Tamura K, Miyato H, Kanamaru R, Sadatomo A, Takahashi K, Ohzawa H, et

al. Neutrophil extracellular traps (NETs) reduce the diffusion of doxorubicin which may attenuate its ability to induce apoptosis of ovarian cancer cells. Heliyon. 2022;8:e09730. Article 

CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar  * Bleul CC, Fuhlbrigge RC, Casasnovas JM, Aiuti A, Springer TA. A highly efficacious lymphocyte chemoattractant, stromal cell-derived factor 1

(SDF-1). J Exp Med. 1996;184:1101–9. Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar  * Saito A, Kitayama J, Horie H, Koinuma K, Kawashima R, Ohzawa H, et al. Dipeptidyl peptidase (DPP)-4 inhibitor

impairs the outcomes of patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus after curative resection for colorectal cancer. Cancer Res Commun. 2021;1:106–14. Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google

Scholar  * Malaekeh-Nikouei A, Shokri-Naei S, Karbasforoushan S, Bahari H, Baradaran Rahimi V, Heidari R, et al. Metformin beyond an anti-diabetic agent: a comprehensive and mechanistic

review on its effects against natural and chemical toxins. Biomed Pharmacother. 2023;165:115263. Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar  * Coffelt SB, Wellenstein MD, de Visser KE. Neutrophils

in cancer: neutral no more. Nat Rev Cancer. 2016;16:431–46. Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar  * Nicolas-Avila JA, Adrover JM, Hidalgo A. Neutrophils in homeostasis, immunity, and

cancer. Immunity. 2017;46:15–28. Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar  * Giovenzana A, Carnovale D, Phillips B, Petrelli A, Giannoukakis N. Neutrophils and their role in the

aetiopathogenesis of type 1 and type 2 diabetes. Diab Metab Res Rev. 2022;38:e3483. Article  CAS  Google Scholar  * Dowey R, Iqbal A, Heller SR, Sabroe I, Prince LR. A bittersweet response

to infection in diabetes; targeting neutrophils to modify inflammation and improve host immunity. Front Immunol. 2021;12:678771. Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar  *

Menegazzo L, Scattolini V, Cappellari R, Bonora BM, Albiero M, Bortolozzi M, et al. The antidiabetic drug metformin blunts NETosis in vitro and reduces circulating NETosis biomarkers in

vivo. Acta Diabetol. 2018;55:593–601. Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar  * Tamura K, Miyato H, Kanamaru R, Sadatomo A, Takahashi K, Ohzawa H, et al. Activated neutrophils inhibit

chemotactic migration of activated T lymphocytes to CXCL11 by multiple mechanisms. Cell Immunol. 2023;384:104663. Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar  * Teijeira Á, Garasa S, Gato M, Alfaro

C, Migueliz I, Cirella A, et al. CXCR1 and CXCR2 chemokine receptor agonists produced by tumors induce neutrophil extracellular traps that interfere with immune cytotoxicity. Immunity.

2020;52:856–71.e858. Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar  * Zhang Y, Hu Y, Ma C, Sun H, Wei X, Li M, et al. Diagnostic, therapeutic predictive, and prognostic value of neutrophil

extracellular traps in patients with gastric adenocarcinoma. Front Oncol. 2020;10:1036. Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar  * Jin W, Xu HX, Zhang SR, Li H, Wang WQ, Gao HL, et

al. Tumor-infiltrating NETs predict postsurgical survival in patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. Ann Surg Oncol. 2019;26:635–43. Article  PubMed  Google Scholar  * Yan B, Dai X,

Ma Q, Wu X. Stromal neutrophil extracellular trap density is an independent prognostic factor for cervical cancer recurrence. Front Oncol. 2021;11:659445. Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed

Central  Google Scholar  * Saito A, Kitayama J, Horie H, Koinuma K, Ohzawa H, Yamaguchi H, et al. Metformin changes the immune microenvironment of colorectal cancer in patients with type 2

diabetes mellitus. Cancer Sci. 2020;111:4012–20. Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar  * Martin-Castillo B, Pernas S, Dorca J, Álvarez I, Martínez S, Pérez-Garcia JM, et al.

A phase 2 trial of neoadjuvant metformin in combination with trastuzumab and chemotherapy in women with early HER2-positive breast cancer: the METTEN study. Oncotarget. 2018;9:35687–704.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar  * Afzal MZ, Dragnev K, Sarwar T, Shirai K. Clinical outcomes in non-small-cell lung cancer patients receiving concurrent metformin and immune

checkpoint inhibitors. Lung Cancer Manag. 2019;8:LMT11. Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar  * Gonzalez-Ericsson PI, Stovgaard ES, Sua LF, Reisenbichler E, Kos Z, Carter

JM, et al. The path to a better biomarker: application of a risk management framework for the implementation of PD-L1 and TILs as immuno-oncology biomarkers in breast cancer clinical trials

and daily practice. J Pathol. 2020;250:667–84. Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar  * Presti D, Dall'Olio FG, Besse B, Ribeiro JM, Di Meglio A, Soldato D. Tumor infiltrating

lymphocytes (TILs) as a predictive biomarker of response to checkpoint blockers in solid tumors: a systematic review. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol. 2022;177:103773. Article  PubMed  Google Scholar

  * Wang G, Gao H, Dai S, Li M, Gao Y, Yin L, et al. Metformin inhibits neutrophil extracellular traps-promoted pancreatic carcinogenesis in obese mice. Cancer Lett. 2023;562:216155. Article

  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar  * Triggle CR, Marei I, Ye K, Ding H, Anderson TJ, Hollenberg MD, et al. Repurposing metformin for vascular disease. Curr Med Chem. 2023;30:3955–78. Article 

CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar  * Hashemi P, Pezeshki S. Repurposing metformin for covid-19 complications in patients with type 2 diabetes and insulin resistance.

Immunopharmacol Immunotoxicol. 2021;43:265–70. Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar  * Agostini F, Masato A, Bubacco L, Bisaglia M. Metformin repurposing for Parkinson disease therapy:

opportunities and challenges. Int J Mol Sci. 2021;23:398. Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar  * Charpignon ML, Vakulenko-Lagun B, Zheng B, Magdamo C, Su B, Evans K, et al.

Causal inference in medical records and complementary systems pharmacology for metformin drug repurposing towards dementia. Nat Commun. 2022;13:7652. Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central 

Google Scholar  Download references ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS This work was supported by the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (22K08901, 22H03152). We thank Professor T. Niki for his

thoughtful advice regarding immunohistochemistry evaluation. We also thank N. Nishiaki, J. Shinohara, H. Hatakeyama, and I. Nieda for their excellent technical and clerical contributions.

AUTHOR INFORMATION AUTHORS AND AFFILIATIONS * Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Jichi Medical University, Shimotsuke, Japan Akira Saito, Koji Koinuma, Hideyo Miyato, Hisanaga Horie, 

Hiroshi Kawahira, Toshiki Mimura, Joji Kitayama & Naohiro Sata * Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Jichi Medical University, Shimotsuke, Japan Rie Kawashima * Department of

Clinical Oncology, Jichi Medical University, Shimotsuke, Japan Hideyuki Ohzawa & Hironori Yamaguchi Authors * Akira Saito View author publications You can also search for this author

inPubMed Google Scholar * Koji Koinuma View author publications You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar * Rie Kawashima View author publications You can also search for

this author inPubMed Google Scholar * Hideyo Miyato View author publications You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar * Hideyuki Ohzawa View author publications You can

also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar * Hisanaga Horie View author publications You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar * Hironori Yamaguchi View author

publications You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar * Hiroshi Kawahira View author publications You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar * Toshiki

Mimura View author publications You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar * Joji Kitayama View author publications You can also search for this author inPubMed Google

Scholar * Naohiro Sata View author publications You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar CONTRIBUTIONS AS, HO, HM and JK conceived and designed the experiments and

performed the experiments. KK, HH, RK, TM and HK provided the colon cancer samples and performed experiments. HY, NS, and JK wrote the main manuscript. All authors reviewed the manuscript.

CORRESPONDING AUTHOR Correspondence to Joji Kitayama. ETHICS DECLARATIONS COMPETING INTERESTS The authors declare no competing interests. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION PUBLISHER’S NOTE Springer

Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION RIGHTS AND PERMISSIONS OPEN

ACCESS This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format,

as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third

party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the

article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright

holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. Reprints and permissions ABOUT THIS ARTICLE CITE THIS ARTICLE Saito, A., Koinuma, K., Kawashima,

R. _et al._ Metformin may improve the outcome of patients with colorectal cancer and type 2 diabetes mellitus partly through effects on neutrophil extracellular traps. _BJC Rep_ 1, 20

(2023). https://doi.org/10.1038/s44276-023-00022-w Download citation * Received: 19 September 2023 * Revised: 20 October 2023 * Accepted: 25 October 2023 * Published: 12 December 2023 * DOI:

https://doi.org/10.1038/s44276-023-00022-w SHARE THIS ARTICLE Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content: Get shareable link Sorry, a shareable link is not

currently available for this article. Copy to clipboard Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative