
- Select a language for the TTS:
- UK English Female
- UK English Male
- US English Female
- US English Male
- Australian Female
- Australian Male
- Language selected: (auto detect) - EN
Play all audios:
ABSTRACT Plant viruses evolves diverse strategies to overcome the limitations of their genomic capacity and express multiple proteins, despite the constraints imposed by the host translation
system. Broad bean wilt virus 2 (BBWV2) is a widespread viral pathogen, causing severe damage to economically important crops. It is hypothesized that BBWV2 RNA2 possesses two alternative
in-frame translation initiation codons, resulting in the production of two largely overlapping proteins, VP53 and VP37. In this study, we aim to investigate the expression and function of
VP53, an N-terminally 128-amino-acid-extended form of the viral movement protein VP37, during BBWV2 infection. By engineering various recombinant and mutant constructs of BBWV2 RNA2, here we
demonstrate that VP53 is indeed expressed during BBWV2 infection. We also provide evidence of the translation of the two overlapping proteins through ribosomal leaky scanning. Furthermore,
our study highlights the indispensability of VP53 for successful systemic infection of BBWV2, as its removal results in the loss of virus infectivity. These insights into the translation
mechanism and functional role of VP53 during BBWV2 infection significantly contribute to our understanding of the infection mechanisms employed by fabaviruses. SIMILAR CONTENT BEING VIEWED
BY OTHERS INHIBITION OF POTATO LEAFROLL VIRUS MULTIPLICATION AND SYSTEMIC TRANSLOCATION BY SIRNA CONSTRUCTS AGAINST PUTATIVE ATPASE FOLD OF MOVEMENT PROTEIN Article Open access 16 December
2020 TOWARDS PLANT RESISTANCE TO VIRUSES USING PROTEIN-ONLY RNASE P Article Open access 12 February 2021 VISUAL TRACKING OF VIRAL INFECTION DYNAMICS REVEALS THE SYNERGISTIC INTERACTIONS
BETWEEN CUCUMBER MOSAIC VIRUS AND BROAD BEAN WILT VIRUS 2 Article Open access 04 May 2023 INTRODUCTION Plant viruses are obligate parasitic pathogens that rely on living cells and host
machineries for their replication and propagation. To express their proteins, plant viruses are entirely dependent on the host eukaryotic translation system, which typically translates only
the first open reading frame (ORF) in an mRNA1. This dependence poses a significant challenge for plant viruses, as most of them have compact genomes consisting of a single or a few RNA or
DNA molecules encoding multiple viral proteins2. Consequently, to overcome this limitation and express multiple proteins, viruses have evolved diverse strategies, such as genome
segmentation, subgenomic RNA production, polyprotein processing, ribosomal leaky scanning, internal ribosome entry, ribosomal frameshifting, stop codon read-through, etc.1,3,4,5. Broad bean
wilt virus 2 (BBWV2) is a widely distributed viral pathogen that exhibits a broad host range and poses a significant threat to numerous economically important crops, including various legume
species6. In recent years, BBWV2 has emerged as a prevalent virus, displaying increasing incidence and severity in several horticultural crops in Korea, such as pepper, Chinese yam, and
sesame7,8,9. Extensive studies have identified numerous strains and isolates of BBWV2 infecting various plant species, enabling the determination of their genome sequences8,10,11. Population
genetic analyses conducted on these BBWV2 strains and isolates have provided insights into the high evolutionary plasticity of the BBWV2 genome, contributing to genetic and pathogenic
diversification8,12. BBWV2 belongs to the genus _Fabavirus_ in the family _Secoviridae_, which comprises 106 virus species13. The genome of the members in the family _Secoviridae_ consists
of one or two linear positive-sense RNA molecules that encode polyproteins. Upon translation, these polyproteins are subsequently processed into functional mature proteins13. The BBWV2
genome is composed of two single-stranded RNA molecules, RNA1 and RNA2, which are ~5960 and 3600 nucleotides (nt) in length, respectively6. BBWV2 RNA1 contains a single ORF that encodes a
single polyprotein precursor. This precursor undergoes proteolytic cleavage to yield five mature proteins: protease cofactor (Co-Pro), NTP-binding motif, viral genome-linked protein,
protease (Pro), and RNA-dependent RNA polymerase (Fig. 1a). Similar to other related viruses in the family _Secoviridae_, such as cowpea mosaic virus (CPMV) and bean pod mottle virus
(BPMV)14,15,16, BBWV2 RNA2 is hypothesized to encode two largely overlapping polyproteins using two alternative in-frame initiation codons (at nucleotide positions 236 and 620); however,
this has not yet been demonstrated experimentally (Fig. 1a). These two polyproteins, which differ only at their N-termini, are processed twice at the same cleavage sites, finally yielding
four mature proteins: the large and small coat proteins (LCP and SCP, respectively), a putative larger N-terminal protein of 53 kDa, designated as VP53 (with an unknown function), and the
smaller N-terminal protein of 37 kDa, designated as VP37, which functions as the viral movement protein (Fig. 1a). In vivo expression and function of VP37 have been demonstrated in previous
studies17,18,19. VP37 has been shown to form tubules in the plasmodesmata (PD) that mediate the tubule-guided cell-to-cell movement of BBWV2 virions17,18. In addition, VP37 has the ability
to bind single-strand nucleic acids and suppress RNA silencing 20,21. However, it has not been demonstrated whether VP53, the N-terminally 128-amino-acid-extended form of VP37, is truly
expressed during viral replication and required for successful infection of BBWV2. In our previous studies, we generated infectious cDNA clones of BBWV2 RNA1 and RNA2 using a T-DNA-based
binary vector that can be delivered into plant cells via Agrobacterium-mediated inoculation (agroinfiltration)6,22,23. In the present study, utilizing this BBWV2 infectious cDNA clone
system, we generated various recombinant and mutant constructs of BBWV2 RNA2 to examine whether VP53 is expressed from RNA2 and necessary for BBWV2 infection. Our results showed that VP53
was detectably expressed during BBWV2 infection, although its accumulation level was significantly lower than that of VP37. Furthermore, the removal of the N-terminal non-overlapping region
of VP53 from RNA2 resulted in the loss of infectivity of the virus. Together, our results suggest that VP53 is essential for BBWV2 infectivity. RESULTS GFP TAGGING OF BBWV2 RNA2 AT THE
C-TERMINUS OF VP53/VP37 DOES NOT IMPAIR VIRUS INFECTIVITY We first sought to examine whether tagging at the C-termini of VP53 and VP37 affects virus infectivity. To this end, we generated a
BBWV2 RNA2 construct tagged with GFP by engineering the C-terminal region of VP53/VP37 of pBBWV2-R2-OE (Fig. 1b)23. The engineered construct, named pBBWV2-R2-53/37-GFP, contained the VP53
and VP37 cistrons fused in-frame with GFP, thereby expressing VP53-GFP and VP37-GFP, respectively, during virus replication. To evaluate the infectivity and GFP expression of
pBBWV2-R2-53/37-GFP, we inoculated _N. benthamiana_ plants with a mixture of _Agrobacterium_ cultures containing pBBWV2-RP1-R1 and pBBWV2-R2-53/37-GFP (this combination was designated as
BBWV2-53/37-GFP). _N. benthamiana_ plants inoculated with BBWV2-53/37-GFP exhibited vein chlorosis and leaf malformation symptoms in systemic leaves, whereas wild-type (wt) BBWV2
(pBBWV2-RP1-R1 + pBBWV2-RP1-R2) induced very mild symptoms (Fig. 1c), although no significant difference in viral RNA accumulation was observed between wt BBWV2 and BBWV2-53/37-GFP
(Supplementary Fig. S1). Inoculated plants were observed using a FOBI fluorescence imaging system at 6 dpi. Strong GFP signals were observed in the systemic leaves of the plants inoculated
with BBWV2-53/37-GFP (Fig. 1c). RT-PCR detection confirmed that the plants inoculated with BBWV2-53/37-GFP were systemically infected. Our results revealed that GFP tagging at the C-terminus
of VP53/VP37 did not significantly impair the infectivity of BBWV2 and remained stable during virus replication. SUBCELLULAR DISTRIBUTION OF BBWV2 VP37 AND VP53 IN PLANT CELLS VP37 is
likely to localize in the PD because VP37 forms tubule structures in the PD17,18. However, the subcellular distribution of VP37 and VP53 in the BBWV2-infected cells has not yet been
examined. Thus, to address this, we observed the leaf tissues infected with BBWV2-53/37-GFP using confocal microscopy. The GFP signals were observed as punctate spots along the cell
periphery, reminiscent of PD localization (Fig. 1d). These spots co-localized with aniline blue-stained callose, which serves as a PD marker, indicating that VP37-GFP and/or VP53-GFP
expressed from BBWV2-53/37-GFP localize to the PD (Fig. 1d). However, this approach was unable to differentiate the subcellular localization of VP37 and VP53 because both proteins were
expressed as GFP-fusion proteins in the cells infected with BBWV2-53/37-GFP. To overcome this limitation, we utilized an alternative approach wherein VP37-GFP and VP53-GFP were individually
expressed in the leaves of _N. benthamiana_ plants using an _Agrobacterium_-mediated transient expression system24. Results are summarized in Fig. 2. Notably, VP37-GFP predominantly
accumulated in the PD, as evidenced by its colocalization with aniline blue-stained callose. In contrast, VP53-GFP was observed as large inclusions in the cytoplasm, without showing specific
localization in the PD. The distinct subcellular localization of VP37 and VP53 was particularly intriguing because the C-terminal three-fourths of VP53 correspond to VP37. Based on these
findings, we concluded that the GFP signals observed in the PD of the cells infected with BBWV2-53/37-GFP were specifically attributed to VP37-GFP (Fig. 1d). VP53 IS EXPRESSED DURING BBWV2
INFECTION Since GFP tagging of BBWV2 RNA2 at the C-terminus of VP53/VP37 did not impair virus infectivity (Fig. 1), we generated another BBWV2 RNA2 construct tagged with a Flag epitope at
the C-terminus of VP53/VP37 (Fig. 3a). The engineered construct, named pBBWV2-R2-53/37-Flag, was expected to express VP53-Flag and VP37-Flag during virus replication (Fig. 3a). To evaluate
the infectivity of pBBWV2-R2-53/37-Flag and the expression of VP53-Flag and VP37-Flag, we inoculated _N. benthamiana_ plants with a mixture of _Agrobacterium_ cultures containing
pBBWV2-RP1-R1 and pBBWV2-R2-53/37-Flag (this combination was designated as BBWV2-53/37-Flag). BBWV2-53/37-Flag induced similar mild symptoms in _N. benthamiana_ plants as wt BBWV2,
indicating that BBWV2-53/37-Flag is fully infectious and has the same virulence as wt BBWV2. We next examined the accumulation levels of VP53-Flag and VP37-Flag during virus infection. Total
proteins were extracted from the symptomatic leaves of _N. benthamiana_ plants infected with BBWV2-53/37-Flag and analyzed by Western blotting using anti-Flag antibodies. Our analysis
clearly detected both VP53-Flag and VP37-Flag at the expected size (Fig. 3b). VP53-Flag accumulated to a barely detectable level, while the accumulation level of VP37-Flag was much higher
than that of VP53-Flag (Fig. 3b). Furthermore, a gel fragment corresponding to the molecular weight of VP53-Flag (~53 kDa) was excised from the SDS-PAGE gel, that separated the total protein
extracted from _N. benthamiana_ leaves infected with BBWV2-53/37-Flag. Subsequently, the excised gel fragment was subjected to in-gel digestion using trypsin followed by LC-MS/MS analysis.
The analysis identified several peptide sequences corresponding to the N-terminal VP53 sequence, which does not overlap with VP37 (Supplementary Fig. S2). These results demonstrated that
both VP53 and VP37 were translated from BBWV2 RNA2 and raised the possibility that the AUG codons for VP53 and VP37 may differ in their translation initiation efficiency. However, we cannot
rule out other possibilities, such as differences in protein folding and accessibility to the Flag epitope, or variations in protein stability between VP53 and VP37. Because the accumulation
levels of VP53 and VP37 were significantly different, we investigated the sequence contexts of the start codons for VP53 and VP37. Our analyses revealed that the nucleotide sequences around
the start codon for VP37 were highly conserved among BBWV2 isolates, whereas some variations existed for VP53. (Fig. 3c, d); however, no significant conservation was observed among
fabaviruses and comoviruses (Supplementary Fig. S3). Furthermore, the contexts around both the VP53 and VP37 start codons [G(U/C)UGUAAUGCG and GAAAUCAUGA(G/A), respectively] were predicted
to be unfavorable for eukaryotic ribosome recognition [cf. the consensus AUG context in higher plants: aA(A/C)aAUGGC] (Fig. 3c, d)25,26. The efficiency of a certain start codon can be
influenced by the RNA secondary structures located upstream and downstream of the start codon27,28. Therefore, we performed RNA structure analyses for the sequences surrounding the VP53 and
VP37 start codons. Our analyses revealed that the VP53 start codon was located within a strong stem-loop RNA structure (Fig. 3e). In contrast, weak stem-loop RNA structures were predicted
immediately upstream and downstream of the VP53 start codon (Fig. 3f). VP53 IS REQUIRED FOR SYSTEMIC INFECTION OF BBWV2 To examine the requirement and function of VP53 and VP37 in BBWV2
infection, we generated BBWV2 RNA2 mutant constructs in which specific nucleotide mutations were introduced into the initiation codon for VP53 or VP37, leading to the disruption of their
expression. As depicted in Fig. 4a, pBBWV2-R2-53/37A620G-GFP contained an A-to-G substitution at nucleotide position 620, resulting in the loss of the ATG initiation codon for VP37.
Consequently, the virus would be incapable of expressing VP37, while still retaining the capability to express VP53, except for a single amino acid substitution [methionine (ATG) to valine
(GTG)] at amino acid position 129. In contrast, pBBWV2-R2-53G238A/37-GFP and pBBWV2-R2-53ATG236TAA/37-GFP contained mutations at nucleotide positions 238 and 236–238, respectively (Fig. 4a).
The former had a G-to-A substitution at position 238, while the latter had an ATG-to-TAA substitution at positions 236–238. Thus, these viruses lost the ATG initiation codon for VP53,
rendering them capable of expressing VP37 but not VP53. _N. benthamiana_ plants were agroinfiltrated with pBBWV2-RP1-R1 and either pBBWV2-R2-53/37A620G-GFP, pBBWV2-R2-53G238A/37-GFP, or
pBBWV2-R2-53ATG236TAA/37-GFP (these combinations were designated as BBWV2-53/37A620G-GFP, BBWV2-53G238A/37-GFP, and BBWV2-53ATG236TAA/37-GFP, respectively). To assess the infectivity of the
mutant viruses, the inoculated plants were examined using a FOBI fluorescence imaging system at 8 dpi. While BBWV2-53/37-GFP successfully established systemic infection, BBWV2-53/37A620G-GFP
was unable to infect plants (Fig. 4b), indicating that VP37 is essential for systemic infection of BBWV2. In contrast, out of the 12 plants inoculated with BBWV2-53G238A/37-GFP, ten plants
exhibited systemic infection. In addition, five out of the 12 plants inoculated with BBWV2-53ATG236TAA/37-GFP displayed systemic infection. Virus infection of the inoculated plants was
verified through RT-PCR detection (Supplementary Fig. S4). To evaluate the replication competence of the BBWV2 RNA2 mutants, we performed strand-specific RT-qPCR analysis to detect
replication-specific (-)-strand RNAs. Total RNA was isolated from the leaves infiltrated with BBWV2-53/37-GFP, BBWV2-53/37A620G-GFP, BBWV2-53G238A/37-GFP, or BBWV2-53ATG236TAA/37-GFP at 2
dpi and analyzed by strand-specific RT-qPCR. Although BBWV2-53/37A620G-GFP failed to establish systemic infection, this mutant accumulated a significant amount of (-)-strand RNA1 and RNA2
during the early replication phase (Fig. 4c, d), indicating that VP37 is indispensable for systemic infection. In contrast, BBWV2-53G238A/37-GFP and BBWV2-53ATG236TAA/37-GFP exhibited a
relatively lower accumulation of (-)-strand RNA1 and RNA2 compared to BBWV2-53/37-GFP (Fig. 4c, d), suggesting that VP53 may function in BBWV2 replication. These unexpected results prompt us
to suspect that the introduced mutations were insufficient to disrupt the expression of VP53, and that there might be minimal translation at the non-AUG codons, such as GUG and AUA. We next
sought to examine whether the nucleotide mutations in the initiation codon for VP53 and VP37 effectively led to the impairment of VP53 and VP37 expression, respectively. To this end, we
engineered pBBWV2-R2-53/37-Flag to introduce either an A-to-G substitution at nucleotide position 620 or an ATG-to-TAA substitution at positions 236-238 (Fig. 5a). The resulting mutant
constructs, named pBBWV2-R2-53/37A620G-Flag and pBBWV2-R2-53ATG236TAA/37-Flag, were agroinfiltrated along with pBBWV2-RP1-R1 into _N. benthamiana_ plants (these combinations were designated
as BBWV2-53/37A620G-Flag and BBWV2-53ATG236TAA/37-Flag). Virus infection of the inoculated plants was determined by observing symptom development on the systemic leaves (Fig. 5b) and
confirmed by RT-PCR detection. Similar to the GFP-tagged BBWV2 mutants (Fig. 4), BBWV2-R2-53/37A620G-Flag exhibited an inability to infect the plants, while 6 out of the 12 plants inoculated
with BBWV2-53ATG236TAA/37-Flag exhibited systemic infection (Fig. 5b). To examine the expression of VP53-Flag and VP37-Flag from the mutant viruses, total proteins were extracted at 6 dpi
from the infiltrated leaves of the tested plants, as well as the symptomatic upper leaves of _N. benthamiana_ plants infected with BBWV2-53ATG236TAA/37-Flag. These protein samples were then
subjected to Western blot analysis using an anti-Flag antibody. In the inoculated leaves with BBWV2-R2-53/37A620G-Flag, no accumulation of VP37-Flag was observed, but a smaller protein band
with an approximate size of 33 kDa was detected (Fig. 5c). This finding suggests that the A-to-G substitution at nucleotide position 620 effectively impaired VP37 expression (at least,
translation at this non-AUG codon did not appear to occur at a detectable level), and that translation occurred at a next downstream ATG codon (probably at nucleotide positions 749-751). In
contrast, the accumulation of VP53-Flag was detected in both the inoculated and upper systemic leaves of _N. benthamiana_ plants infected with BBWV2-53ATG236TAA/37-Flag (Fig. 5c, d). These
results revealed that the mutations in the ATG initiation codon for VP53 did not effectively hinder the expression of VP53. To determine the underlying reason for this finding, we examined
whether the substitution mutations into the ATG initiation codon for VP53 are retained in the genomes of progeny viruses. The RNA2 genomic sequences of progeny viruses recovered by RT-PCR
from the systemic leaves infected with BBWV2-53G238A/37-GFP, BBWV2-53ATG236TAA/37-GFP, or BBWV2-53ATG236TAA/37-Flag were analyzed. The results showed that the G-to-A substitution at position
238 was restored to G in three individual progenies obtained from _N. benthamiana_ plants infected with BBWV2-53G238A/37-GFP (Fig. 6a). More interestingly, in all analyzed progenies that
were obtained from _N. benthamiana_ plants infected with BBWV2-53ATG236TAA/37-GFP or BBWV2-53ATG236TAA/37-Flag, the ATG-to-TAA substitution at positions 236-238 remained intact (Fig. 6b).
However, a new G-to-A substitution at position 257 emerged in these progenies, leading to the creation of a novel ATG codon in-frame with VP53 (Fig. 6b). Based on these findings, it can be
inferred that the translation initiation codon for VP53 has the potential to be restored or newly created through spontaneous mutations during virus replication. As an alternative approach
to determine the requirement of VP53 in BBWV2 infection, we engineered two additional BBWV2 RNA2 mutant constructs, named pBBWV2-R2-∆53N1-GFP and pBBWV2-R2-∆53N2-GFP (Fig. 7a).
pBBWV2-R2-∆53N1-GFP involved the deletion of a significant genomic region corresponding to the N-terminus of VP53, resulting in the expression of a 17 amino acid peptide instead of the
full-length VP53 (Fig. 7a). pBBWV2-R2-∆53N2-GFP contained the deletion of the entire N-terminal VP53 sequence, which does not overlap with VP37 (Fig. 7a). To evaluate the infectivity of
these mutant viruses, _N. benthamiana_ plants were agroinfiltrated with pBBWV2-RP1-R1 and either pBBWV2-R2-∆53N1-GFP or pBBWV2-R2-∆53N2-GFP (these combinations were designated as
BBWV2-∆53N1-GFP and BBWV2-∆53N2-GFP, respectively). The infectivity of the mutant viruses was assessed by examining the inoculated plants using a FOBI fluorescence imaging system at 8 dpi.
While all the plants inoculated with BBWV2-53/37-GFP showed systemic infection, none of the plants inoculated with BBWV2-∆53N1-GFP and BBWV2-∆53N2-GFP were infected (Fig. 7b). Virus
infection of the inoculated plants was confirmed through RT-PCR detection. The replication competence of the mutant viruses was assessed through the detection of replication-specific
(-)-strand RNAs. Total RNA was isolated from the leaves infiltrated with BBWV2-53/37-GFP, BBWV2-∆53N1-GFP, or BBWV2-∆53N2-GFP at 2 dpi and analyzed by strand-specific RT-qPCR. Both mutants
accumulated significantly reduced levels of (-)-strand RNA1 compared to BBWV2-53/37-GFP (Fig. 7c). More interestingly, the accumulation of (-)-strand RNA2 was dramatically diminished in both
mutants (Fig. 7d). Consistently, Western blot analysis of the leaf samples infiltrated with BBWV2-∆53N1-GFP and BBWV2-∆53N2-GFP using anti-GFP antibodies revealed no detectable accumulation
of VP37-GFP (Fig. 7e). Collectively, our results suggest the potential roles of VP53 in the replication of both RNA1 and RNA2 as well as viral systemic infection. THE C-TERMINUS OF VP53,
WHICH OVERLAPS WITH VP37, IS DISPENSABLE FOR ITS FUNCTION IN FACILITATING THE SYSTEMIC INFECTION OF BBWV2 To further explore the minimal region required for the function of VP53 in
facilitating BBWV2 systemic infection, we first engineered a hybrid construct between pBBWV2-R2-∆53N1-GFP and pBBWV2-R2-OE. Consequentially, this hybrid construct, named pBBWV2-R2-∆53N1-OE,
contained both a gene insertion cassette between the VP37 and LCP cistrons and a deletion identical with that introduced in pBBWV2-R2-∆53N1-GFP (Fig. 8a). Using pBBWV2-R2-∆53N1-OE, we
created a series of BBWV2 recombinant RNA2 constructs capable of expressing either the full-length VP53 or its C-terminal deletions from the gene insertion cassette (Fig. 8a). The
recombinant RNA2 constructs were agroinfiltrated along with pBBWV2-RP1-R1 into _N. benthamiana_ plants. Virus infection of the inoculated plants was determined by observing symptom
development on the systemic leaves (Supplementary Fig. S5) and confirmed by RT-PCR detection. All the plants inoculated with BBWV2-∆53N1-VP53, BBWV2-∆53N1-VP53∆C1, BBWV2-∆53N1-VP53∆C2, or
BBWV2-∆53N1-VP53∆C3 displayed systemic infection (Supplementary Fig. S5). In particular, BBWV2-∆53N1-VP53, BBWV2-∆53N1-VP53∆C1, and BBWV2-∆53N1-VP53∆C2 induced more severe symptoms (i.e.,
leaf size reduction, stunting, and vein yellowing) than wt BBWV2 and BBWV2-∆53N1-VP53∆C3 in _N. benthamiana_ plants (Supplementary Fig. S5). However, none of the plants inoculated with
BBWV2-∆53N1-VP53∆C4 were infected (Supplementary Fig. S5). We also examined the accumulation levels of the BBWV2 recombinant viruses in systemically infected leaves. Total RNA was isolated
from the upper symptomatic leaves of plants infected with wt BBWV2, BBWV2-∆53N1-VP53, BBWV2-∆53N1-VP53∆C1, BBWV2-∆53N1-VP53∆C2, or BBWV2-∆53N1-VP53∆C3 at 10 dpi and analyzed by RT-qPCR. The
accumulation levels of both RNA1 and RNA2 of BBWV2-∆53N1-VP53, BBWV2-∆53N1-VP53∆C1, and BBWV2-∆53N1-VP53∆C2 were significantly higher compared to those of wt BBWV2 and BBWV2-∆53N1-VP53∆C3
(Fig. 8b, c). However, no significant difference in viral RNA accumulation was observed among BBWV2-∆53N1-VP53, BBWV2-∆53N1-VP53∆C1, and BBWV2-∆53N1-VP53∆C2 (Fig. 8b, c). In addition,
although the VP53 deletion mutant comprising amino acids 1 to 84 could support systemic infection of the virus (Supplementary Fig. S5), its activity in facilitating viral RNA accumulation
was significantly diminished (Fig. 8b, c). The elevated accumulation of viral RNAs in BBWV2-∆53N1-VP53 could be associated with the enhanced expression level of VP53, because VP53 expressed
from the gene insertion cassette would be produced at an equivalent molar concentration as VP37 via proteolytic cleavage of the polyprotein. To examine this possibility, we generated an
additional BBWV2 RNA2 hybrid construct containing a Flag tag at the C-terminus of VP37, named pBBWV2-R2-∆53N1-F-OE (Fig. 9a). Using pBBWV2-R2-∆53N1-F-OE, we engineered a BBWV2 recombinant
RNA2 construct denoted as pBBWV2-R2-∆53N1-F-VP53:Flag, enabling the expression of VP53 with a Flag tag (Fig. 9a). _N. benthamiana_ plants inoculated with BBWV2-∆53N1-F-VP53:Flag exhibited
systemic infection (Fig. 9b). As expected, Western blot analysis demonstrated a substantial elevation in the accumulation of VP53 when expressed from the gene insertion cassette (i.e.,
BBWV2-∆53N1-F-VP53:Flag) (Fig. 9c). Collectively, our results revealed that the C-terminal region of VP53, which overlaps with VP37, could be deleted without impairing its ability in
facilitating systemic infection and viral RNA accumulation of BBWV2. DISCUSSION The translation of viral proteins is a multifaceted process that viruses have evolved to overcome the
limitations imposed by host translation systems and ensure efficient expression of their genetic information1. Most viruses possess compact genomes with limited coding capacity,
necessitating the expression of multiple proteins from a single RNA molecule2. Overcoming this limitation is crucial for successful viral replication and propagation. One mechanism employed
by viruses to express multiple proteins is ribosomal leaky scanning1,5,29,30. This process allows translation initiation to occur at non-canonical start codons, bypassing the conventional
requirement for translation initiation at the first AUG codon. Thus, by utilizing ribosomal leaky scanning, viruses can translate downstream ORFs and effectively facilitate the expression of
additional viral proteins. The phenomenon of dual initiation of translation has been extensively studied in various viruses, including comoviruses (i.e., CPMV and BPMV) in the family
_Secoviridae_14,15,31. Comoviruses exhibit high similarities with fabaviruses in terms of their genome size/structure, capsid composition, and virion morphology 32. However, the limited
amino acid sequence similarity (typically less than 30%) between comoviruses and fabaviruses justifies their classification into distinct genera33. Comoviruses are seed-borne and primarily
transmitted by beetles in the family _Chrysomelidae_, whereas fabaviruses are transmitted by aphids and do not exhibit seed transmission33. In addition, while comoviruses usually have narrow
host ranges, including several legume species, fabaviruses exhibit wide host ranges among dicotyledonous and some families of monocotyledonous plants34. In vitro and in vivo analyses
demonstrated that translation initiation from both the first and the second AUG codons of CPMV RNA2 produces two largely overlapping polyproteins, with molecular weights of ~105 kDa and 95
kDa15,31. A previous study revealed that scanning ribosomes could bypass the AUG codon at nucleotide position 161 for the 105 kDa protein and initiate translation for the 95 kDa protein at
the downstream AUG codon at nucleotide position 512 of CPMV RNA231. Furthermore, it was shown that the 351 nucleotide sequence located between the two initiation codons possessed the
capacity to direct ribosomes to initiate translation at a downstream start codon31. Based on these findings, it has been suggested that CPMV utilizes both leaky scanning and internal
ribosomal entry mechanisms for the translation of RNA2. However, it has remained uncertain whether similar mechanisms are employed by fabaviruses. In this study, we utilized infectious cDNA
constructs of wt BBWV2 and its derivatives to examine the expression of VP53 during BBWV2 infection and to assess its functional role in BBWV2 infection. Genetic manipulation of infectious
cDNA constructs of RNA viruses using the 35 S promoter and binary vectors has been widely employed to study the molecular biology of plant RNA viruses35,36,37,38. In this methodology, the 35
S promoter serves to generate initial viral RNA transcripts in inoculated plant leaves. The initial viral RNA transcripts are then translated and utilized as templates to initiate virus
replication. Subsequently, the virus replicates under natural virus infection conditions, particularly in upper systemically infected leaves. Based on this approach, we demonstrated that
BBWV2 RNA2 is translated to express two largely overlapping mature proteins, VP53 and VP37, during virus replication (Fig. 3b). Interestingly, the accumulation level of VP53 was found to be
significantly lower than that of VP37 (Fig. 3b). In contrast, when VP53 was expressed from the gene insertion cassette (i.e., BBWV2-∆53N1-F-VP53:Flag), the accumulation level of VP53 was
observed to be nearly equivalent to that of VP37 (Fig. 9c). These findings suggest the possibility of a difference in translation efficiency between VP53 and VP37. The translation of varying
quantities of viral proteins from a single viral mRNA is a typical phenomenon attributed to ribosomal leaky scanning because the efficiency of translation initiation at each AUG is
influenced by the strength of the surrounding sequence context1,5,29,30. In higher plants, the optimal context includes most importantly an A at -3 and a G at +4 [cf. the consensus AUG
context in higher plants: aA(A/C)aAUGGC; AUG itself corresponds to nucleotides +1 to +3]25,26. If the context of the first AUG on the viral mRNAs is suboptimal, leaky scanning may occur39.
Sequence analysis revealed that the start codon of both VP53 and VP37 were in suboptimal contexts; however, the context of the VP53 start codon having a G at -3 and a C at +4 is likely
weaker than that of the VP37 start codon having an A at -3 and an A at +4 (Fig. 3c and d)25,26. Furthermore, as is well known in the ribosome shunting mechanism, which is a common feature
among members of the family _Caulimoviridae_, ribosomes can bypass stem-loops containing AUG codons and reinitiate scanning at the 3’ end of the stem-loops39,40. Interestingly, RNA structure
analysis predicted that the VP53 start codon is located within a strong stem-loop RNA structure (Fig. 3e). In contrast, the VP37 start codon was predicted to be positioned between weak
stem-loop RNA structures (Fig. 3f). The efficiency of translation initiation at a potential initiation codon can be enhanced when a stem-loop RNA structure is present immediately downstream
of the initiation codon, thereby causing ribosomes to stall on the initiation codon27,41,42. These findings suggest that ribosomal leaky scanning, resulting from the low translation
efficiency at the VP53 start codon, could facilitate the initiation of translation at the next downstream start codon for VP37. This hypothesis is supported by the observation that the
accumulation level of VP53 was considerably lower than that of VP37 (Fig. 3b). We are currently conducting a separate study to further characterize the functional significance of the
stem-loop RNA structures, which were predicted near the AUG start codons for VP53 and VP37, in regulating the translation efficiency of VP53 and VP37. The BBWV2 recombinant viruses, namely
BBWV2-∆53N1-VP53, BBWV2-∆53N1-VP53(1-298), and BBWV2-∆53N1-VP53(1-128), remained fully infectious despite lacking the genomic region between the initiation codons for VP53 and VP37, which
corresponds to the N-terminus of VP53 (Fig. 8 and Supplementary Fig. S5). These results suggest that the nucleotide sequences (at positions 242-578) between the two initiation codons are
dispensable for VP37 translation. However, we cannot exclude the possibility that deleting the N-terminal region may affect the translation efficiency of VP37 by altering its 5’-untranslated
region. In addition, we showed that an A-to-G substitution at nucleotide position 620 of BBWV2 RNA2 led to the disruption of VP37 translation but resulted in the translation of a smaller 33
kDa protein, likely initiated at the next downstream ATG (at nucleotide positions 749-751) (Fig. 5c). This observation provides additional support for the phenomenon of ribosomal leaky
scanning during the translation of BBWV2 RNA2. Collectively, our findings imply that BBWV2 is likely to lack the internal ribosomal entry capacity within the genome region between the AUG
codons for VP53 and VP37, indicating that ribosomal leaky scanning serves as the primary mechanism in VP37 translation. Plant virus MPs play a pivotal role in enabling the cell-to-cell and
systemic movement of the viruses43. While the MPs of various virus species are known to predominantly localize to the cell periphery and PD, the subcellular distribution of MPs can vary
among different virus species43,44. Consequently, investigating the subcellular distribution of MPs is important to understand the mechanisms underlying the intracellular and intercellular
virus movement. As expected, our confocal microscopic observation revealed that VP37 predominantly localized to the PD both in BBWV2-infected cells and when ectopically expressed via
agroinfiltration (Figs. 1d and 2). This localization pattern indicates that the majority of VP37 proteins are likely associated with the formation of tubule structures within the PD.
Furthermore, it appears that the VP37-GFP fusion protein retains its competence for tubule formation because BBWV2-53/37-GFP, which encodes VP37-GFP, exhibited successful systemic infection
(Fig. 1c). In contrast, our observations revealed that VP53, despite being an N-terminally extended form of VP37, formed large cytoplasmic inclusions (Fig. 2). It is likely that the
inclusion formation of VP53 was an artifact resulting from its ectopic overexpression via agroinfiltration because the accumulation level of VP53 during virus replication was found to be
extremely low (Fig. 3b). The discrepancy in the subcellular localization and accumulation levels between VP53 and VP37 suggests that VP53 may possess distinct structural functional
properties compared to VP37 within the context of BBWV2 infection. Meanwhile, tagging with GFP at the C-terminus of VP53/VP37, but not with Flag, resulted in the enhancement of viral symptom
severity in _N. benthamiana_ plants (Figs. 1c and 4b). However, neither GFP- nor Flag-tagging affected the accumulation levels of viral RNAs (Supplementary Fig. S1). A previous study showed
that the C-terminal motif of VP53/VP37 is responsible for the alteration of symptom severity in BBWV245. A single amino acid substitution at the C-terminus of VP53/VP37 altered the
pathogenicity of BBWV2-RP1 (a mild strain) to induce severe symptoms in _N. benthamiana_ and pepper plants45. As the size of GFP (243 amino acids) is considerably larger than that of Flag (8
amino acids), GFP-tagging at the C-terminus of VP53/VP37 may affect the C-terminal protein structures of VP53/VP37 and/or the accessibility of other interacting partner proteins,
potentially resulting in the enhancement of the symptom severity of BBWV2. Further studies involving a comparative analysis of the protein structures of VP53 and VP37 are needed to elucidate
their specific roles and functions in the viral replication cycle and pathogenicity. In this study, we have successfully demonstrated that VP53 is crucial for facilitating systemic
infection of BBWV2. Interestingly, our findings also revealed that the function of VP53 is distinct from that of VP37, as most of the VP37 region could be deleted from VP53 without
compromising virus replication and infectivity (Fig. 8 and Supplementary Fig. S5). The requirement of VP53 in virus replication and systemic infection was further highlighted by the
restoration of the G-to-A substitution at position 238 and the occurrence of the compensatory G-to-A mutation at position 257 generating a new start codon downstream of the original one
(Fig. 6). In addition, the new start codon that begins at position 257 would produce an N-terminally 7-amino-acid-truncated form of VP53 (Fig. 6b). Therefore, it is possible that the
translation efficiency of the sequence context of the new start codon may differ from that of the original start codon for VP53. Indeed, the accumulation level of VP53 in the leaves infected
with the progenies of BBWV2-53ATG236TAA/37-Flag appeared to be slightly higher than that in the leaves infected with BBWV2-53/37-Flag (Fig. 5d). Meanwhile, the A-to-G substitution at
nucleotide position 620 was not restored despite the mutant virus BBWV2-R2-53/37A620G-Flag was actively replicated in the inoculated leaves (Fig. 5c). In addition, the original mutations
engineered into BBWV2-53ATG236TAA/37-GFP and BBWV2-53ATG236TAA/37-Flag were present in all progeny viruses obtained from systemically infected leaves (Fig. 6b). Interestingly, a previous
study demonstrated that BPMV P58, a counterpart of BBWV2 VP53, is required _in cis_ for RNA2 replication14. In this study, we observed that the BBWV2 RNA2 mutants, unable to express VP53,
exhibited significant reductions in viral replication (Fig. 7c, d). Conversely, the increased expression of VP53 from the gene insertion cassette resulted in an elevated accumulation of both
RNA1 and RNA2, consequently exacerbating symptom severity (Figs. 8, 9c and Supplementary Fig. S5). Therefore, our results suggest that BBWV2 VP53 may function in facilitating BBWV2 RNA
replication. Our study provides important insights into the expression and function of VP53 and VP37 during BBWV2 infection. The findings presented herein emphasize the distinct subcellular
localization of these proteins and their differential contribution to virus infectivity. Our mutational analyses revealed that VP53 and VP37 are translated from BBWV2 RNA2 via ribosomal
leaky scanning. In particular, we demonstrated the requirement of VP53 in the replication and systemic infection of BBWV2. Understanding the roles of individual viral proteins is essential
for unraveling the molecular mechanisms underlying viral replication and pathogenesis, ultimately facilitating the development of strategies for virus control and crop protection. METHODS
GENERATION OF THE RECOMBINANT AND MUTANT CONSTRUCTS OF BBWV2 RNA2 A modified cDNA clone of BBWV2-RP1 RNA2 pBBWV2-R2-OE23; was engineered to generate various BBWV2 RNA2 recombinant and mutant
constructs. A 1361-bp DNA fragment comprising the C-terminal half of VP53 (from the _Nco_I site) and the green fluorescent proteon (GFP) coding sequence was synthesized (Macrogen, Korea)
and inserted into the pBBWV2-R2-OE vector, which was digested with _Nco_I and _Avr_II (Fig. 1b). The resulting construct was named pBBWV2-R2-53/37-GFP (Fig. 1b). Similarly, a 659-bp DNA
fragment comprising the C-terminal half of VP53 (from the _Nco_I site) and a Flag epitope sequence (GACTACAAGGACGACGATGACAAG) was synthesized (Macrogen, Korea) and inserted into
pBBWV2-R2-OE, which was digested with _Nco_I and _Avr_II (Fig. 3a). The resulting construct was named pBBWV2-R2-53/37-Flag (Fig. 3a). To introduce specific nucleotide substitution mutations
into the initiation codon for VP53 or VP37, we modified pBBWV2-R2-53/37-GFP and pBBWV2-R2-53/37-Flag based on a fusion-PCR-based site-directed mutagenesis strategy using overlapping primers
(Supplementary Table S1)46. To construct a cDNA clone of BBWV2 recombinant RNA2, which includes the deletion of a significant genomic region corresponding to the N-terminus of VP53
(nucleotide positions 242-578), we employed a fusion-PCR-based cloning strategy using overlapping primers (Supplementary Table S1). Briefly, the 5′ genomic region of BBWV2 RNA2 from
nucleotide 1 to 241 was amplified using pBBWV2-R2-53/73-GFP as a template and the corresponding primers (Supplementary Table S1; BBWV2R2-5E-Fw + ∆53N1-Rv). The genomic region of BBWV2 RNA2
from nucleotide 579 to the 3′ end was amplified using pBBWV2-R2-53/73-GFP as a template and the corresponding primers (Supplementary Table S1; ∆53N1-Fw + pBBWV2-R2-3E-KpnI-Rv). These PCR
products were then used as templates in a subsequent fusion-PCR, using the corresponding primers (Supplementary Table S1; BBWV2R2-5E-Fw + pBBWV2-R2-3E-KpnI-Rv). The resulting PCR product was
cloned into between the _Stu_I and _Kpn_I sites in the pCass-Rz vector, as described in our previous study 23,47. The resulting construct was named pBBWV2-R2-∆53N1-GFP (Fig. 7a). An
additional cDNA clone of BBWV2 recombinant RNA2, which includes the deletion of the entire N-terminal VP53 sequence (nucleotide positions 236-619) that does not overlap with VP37, was
generated by a similar fusion-PCR-based strategy using overlapping primers (Supplementary Table S1). The resulting construct was named pBBWV2-R2-∆53N2-GFP (Fig. 7a). The construction of
pBBWV2-R2-∆53N1-OE, which contains a gene insertion cassette between the VP37 and LCP cistrons and the identical deletion in the VP53 N-terminus as introduced in pBBWV2-R2-∆53N1-GFP, was
performed as follows: the genomic region of BBWV2 RNA2 from nucleotide 1002 (the _Nco_I site) to the 3’ end was obtained by digesting pBBWV2-R2-OE with _Nco_I and _Kpn_I23. The resulting
fragment was cloned into the _Nco_I and _Kpn_I sites in pBBWV2-R2-∆53N1-GFP (Figs. 7a, 8a). The generation of BBWV2 recombinant RNA2 constructs capable of expressing either the full-length
VP53 or its C-terminal deletions from the gene insertion cassette was performed as follows: the full-length VP53 and its C-terminal deletions were amplified using corresponding primer pairs
(Supplementary Table S1). The resulting PCR products were digested with _Bgl_II and _Avr_II and inserted into pBBWV2-R2-∆53N1-OE, which was digested with _Bgl_II and _Avr_II (Fig. 8a). To
construct pBBWV2-R2-∆53N1-F-OE, a 713-bp DNA fragment comprising the C-terminal half of VP53 (from the _Nco_I site), a Flag epitope sequence, and an additional Pro cleavage sequence was
synthesized (Macrogen, Korea) and inserted into the pBBWV2-R2-∆53N1-OE, which was digested with _Nco_I and _Bgl_II (Fig. 9a). The generation of pBBWV2-R2-∆53N1-F-VP53:Flag, capable of
expressing the full-length VP53 tagged with a Flag epitope from the gene insertion cassette, was performed as follows: the full-length VP53 containing a Flag epitope sequence at the
C-terminus was amplified using the corresponding primer (VP53-BglII-Fw + VP53-Flag-AvrII-Rv; Supplementary Table S1). The resulting PCR products were digested with _Bgl_II and _Avr_II and
inserted into pBBWV2-R2-∆53N1-F-OE, which was digested with _Bgl_II and _Avr_II (Fig. 9a). Plasmid DNAs of the generated constructs were transformed into the _Agrobacterium_ strain EHA105.
GENERATION OF CONSTRUCTS FOR THE ECTOPIC EXPRESSION OF GFP-FUSED VP37 AND VP53 The PZP-GFP vector, which enables _in planta_ expression of green fluorescence protein (GFP) via
_Agrobacterium_-mediated infiltration (agroinfiltration)24. The coding sequences of VP53 and VP37 were amplified by PCR using the appropriate primer sets (Supplementary Table S1) and
inserted in-frame upstream of the GFP gene in the PZP-GFP vector utilizing _Stu_I and _Spe_I sites. The resulting constructs were named PZP-VP53-GFP and PZP-VP37-GFP, respectively. Plasmid
DNAs of the generated constructs were transformed into the _Agrobacterium_ strain EHA105. PLANT GROWTH, VIRAL SOURCES, INOCULATION, AND TISSUE STAINING _Nicotiana benthamiana_ plants were
cultivated in an insect-free growth chamber under controlled conditions with a photoperiod of 16 h of light at 26 °C and 8 h of darkness at 24 °C. Full-length cDNA clones of BBWV2-RP1 and
its derivative constructs generated in this study were used as viral sources and inoculated via agroinfiltration into leaves of two-week-old _N. benthamiana_ plants23,45,48. For
agroinfiltration, T-DNA-based binary vector constructs were transformed into _Agrobacterium_ strain EHA105. Agrobacteria harboring each plasmid constructs were grown at 30 °C overnight in
YEP medium containing kanamycin (100 µg/mL) and acetosyringon (20 μM). The Agrobacteria were harvested by centrifugation at 3000 rpm for 10 min, resuspended in the infiltration buffer (MS
salts, 10 mM MES, pH 5.6, 200 μM acetosyringon) to 0.5 OD600, and incubated at 30 °C for 4 h. _Agrobacterium_ cultures were infiltrated onto the abaxial surface of leaves of _N. benthamiana_
plants using a 1-ml syringe. In each inoculation experiment, we conducted three independent experiments, each involving a minimum of three plants per viral construct. To stain the PD, _N.
benthamiana_ leaves were infiltrated and incubated with a solution of 0.1 mg/ml aniline blue (Sigma-Aldrich, USA) for 30 min49. FLUORESCENCE IMAGING The visualization of GFP fluorescence
signals in living plants was performed using a FOBI fluorescence imaging system (NeoScience, Korea) equipped with a blue light source (excitation at 470 nm) and an emission filter (530 nm
short-pass), which effectively eliminates auto-fluorescence signals from chlorophyll22. Cellular fluorescence signals in plant leaf tissues were observed using a Leica SP8 laser-scanning
confocal microscope (Leica, Germany) equipped with specific laser/filter combinations for GFP (excitation at 488 nm, detection between 510 and 550 nm), aniline blue (excitation at 405 nm,
detection between 460 and 500 nm), and chloroplasts (excitation at 568 nm, detection between 580 and 620 nm). WESTERN BLOT ANALYSIS Total protein was extracted from _N. benthamiana_ leaves
using TRIzol (Invitrogen, USA) following the manufacturer’s protocol. Proteins were separated by 10% SDS-PAGE and subsequently transferred onto a polyvinylidene difluoride membrane. The
membrane was then probed with either anti-Flag or anti-GFP antibodies (Invitrogen, USA). For visualization of the antigens, a secondary antibody conjugated to horseradish peroxidase
(Sigma-Aldrich, USA) was used with the Amhersham ECL Western Blotting Detection System (GE Healthcare Life Sciences, USA). LIQUID CHROMATOGRAPHY COUPLED WITH TANDEM MASS SPECTROMETRY
(LC-MS/MS) ANALYSIS Total protein extracted from _N. benthamiana_ leaves infected with BBWV2-53/37-Flag was separated by 10% SDS-PAGE. A gel fragment corresponding to the molecular weight of
VP53-Flag (~53 kDa) was excised from the gel and subjected to in-gel digestion using trypsin followed by LC-MS/MS analysis. The entire LC-MS/MS analysis was performed at Yonsei Proteome
Research Center (Seoul, South Korea). Briefly, LC was performed using an Easy n-LC 1000 system (Thermo Fisher Scientific, USA). Peptide separation was performed using a C18-nanobore column
(150 mm × 0.1 mm, 3-μm pore size, Agilent, USA). LTQ-Orbitrap mass spectrometry (Thermo Fisher, USA) was used to identify and quantify peptides. Xcalibur (version 2.1, Thermo Fisher
Scientific, USA) was used to generate peak lists. The peak lists were identified by searching the National Center for Biotechnology Information database using the MASCOT search engine
(http://www.matrixscience.com, Matrix Science, USA). SEQUENCE ANALYSES Sequence alignments of various virus isolates were generated using ClustalW implemented in MEGA X software50 and
analyzed using WebLogo to obtain consensus sequences surrounding translation initiation sites51. RNA secondary structures were predicted using RNAfold52. RNA EXTRACTION, VIRUS DETECTION,
SEQUENCING, AND QUANTIFICATION RNA extraction was performed using the PureLink RNA Mini kit (Ambion, USA) following the manufacturer’s protocol. To verify systemic infection of the
inoculated plants with BBWV2, total RNA was extracted from the upper uninoculated leaves of the plants and analyzed by RT-PCR using a BBWV2 -specific primer pair
(5′-CAGAGAAGTGGTTGGTCCCGTG-3′ and 5′-ATGGGAGGCTAGTGACCTACG-3′)11. The 5′ genomic regions of progeny viruses derived from the nucleotide substitution mutant viruses were amplified by RT-PCR
using an appropriate primer pair (5′-ACAAACAGCTTTCGTTCCGAAA-3′ and 5′-GTAGCTAGGAACGTTCTTGCT-3′). The resulting PCR products were subsequently subjected to Sanger sequencing. The sequence
data were analyzed using ClustalW implemented in MEGA X software50. To quantify the accumulation levels of (+)-strand BBWV2 RNAs, RT followed by quantitative PCR (RT-qPCR) was performed
using the 2X SYBR Green Real-Time PCR Smart mix (Solgent, Korea) and iCycler iQ5 detection system (Bio-Rad, USA) with the following specific primers: BBWV2-R1-Fw (5′-TCACAGGTTATGCCGCTTGT-3′)
and BBWV2-R1-Rv (5′-TCACTCGTCCCAAGCTGTTC-3′) for BBWV2 (+)-strand RNA1 detection; BBWV2-R2-Fw (5′-CCAGAGAAGTGGTTGGTCCC-3′) and BBWV2-R2-Rv (5′-TCCAACAGGTAATGCCCACC-3′) for BBWV2 (+)-strand
RNA2 detection22. Strand-specific RT-qPCR was performed to quantify the accumulation levels of (-)-strand BBWV2 RNAs. Briefly, cDNAs of (-)-strand RNA1 and RNA2 were synthesized using
SuperScript IV (Invitrogen, USA) with tagged RT primer: tag-R1(-)-RT (5′-GCTGGAATTCGCGGTTAAATCACAGGTTATGCCGCTTGT-3′) for cDNAs synthesis of (-)-strand RNA1 and tag-R2(-)-RT
(5′-GCTGGAATTCGCGGTTAAACCAGAGAAGTGGTTGGTCCC-3′) for cDNAs synthesis of (-)-strand RNA2. Each tagged RT primer contains a non-BBWV2 sequence (boldface) at the 5′ end. The resulting cDNA was
purified using the GENECLEAN Turbo kit (MP Biomedicals, USA) to remove residual tagged RT primers and then subjected to qPCR. qPCR was performed using the Luna Universal qPCR Master Mix
(NEB, USA) and iCycler iQ5 detection system with the following specific primers: tagPR (5′-GCTGGAATTCGCGGTTAAA-3′) and BBWV2-R1-Rv for BBWV2 (-)-strand RNA1 detection; tagPR and BBWV2-R2-Rv
for BBWV2 (-)-strand RNA2 detection. The actin gene was analyzed as an internal reference control using Nb-actin-qRT-Fw (5′-CGAGGAGCATCCAGTCCTCT-3′) and Nb-actin-qRT-Rv
(5′-GTGGCTGACACCATCACCAG-3′) to normalize the results of RT-qPCR and strand-specific RT-qPCR assays. Three biological and three technical replicates were analyzed per sample. STATISTICS AND
REPRODUCIBILITY All experimental results in the manuscript are representatives of three independent experiments. Each experiment was performed using at least three plants per condition.
Statistically significant differences among experimental groups were analyzed using one-way ANOVA with Tukey’s HSD test (_P_ < 0.05). The mean ± SD of three replications is shown, and
each column represents one group with at least nine plants. REPORTING SUMMARY Further information on research design is available in the Nature Portfolio Reporting Summary linked to this
article. DATA AVAILABILITY The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article/Supplementary material. The source data behind the graphs can be found in
Supplementary Data 1. Uncropped blots can be found in Supplementary Fig. S6. All other data are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request. REFERENCES * Jaafar, Z. A.
& Kieft, J. S. Viral RNA structure-based strategies to manipulate translation. _Nat. Rev. Microbiol._ 17, 110–123 (2019). Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar * Roossinck, M. J.
Mechanisms of plant virus evolution. _Annu. Rev. Phytopathol._ 35, 191–209 (1997). Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar * Miras, M., Miller, W. A., Truniger, V. & Aranda, M. A.
Non-canonical translation in Plant RNA viruses. _Front. Plant Sci._ 8, 494 (2017). Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar * Kneller, E. L., Rakotondrafara, A. M. & Miller, W.
A. Cap-independent translation of plant viral RNAs. _Virus Res._ 119, 63–75 (2006). Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar * Kozak, M. Pushing the limits of the scanning mechanism for
initiation of translation. _Gene_ 299, 1–34 (2002). Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar * Kwak, H.-R. et al. A determinant of disease symptom severity is located in RNA2 of
Broad bean wilt virus 2. _Virus Res._ 211, 25–28 (2016). Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar * Kwon, S.-J., Cho, I.-S., Yoon, J.-Y., Choi, S.-K. & Choi, G.-S. First report of Broad
bean wilt virus 2 in Dioscorea opposita Thunb. in Korea. _Plant Dis._ 100, 538 (2016). Article Google Scholar * Kim, M.-H., Kwak, H.-R., Choi, B., Kwon, S.-J. & Seo, J.-K. Genetic
plasticity in RNA2 is associated with pathogenic diversification of broad bean wilt virus 2. _Virus Res._ 304, 198533 (2021). Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar * Kwak, H. R. et al.
Genetic compositions of Broad bean wilt virus 2 Infecting Red Pepper in Korea. _Plant Pathol. J._ 29, 274–284 (2013). Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar * Ferrer, R. M.,
Ferriol, I., Moreno, P., Guerri, J. & Rubio, L. Genetic variation and evolutionary analysis of broad bean wilt virus 2. _Arch. Virol._ 156, 1445–1450 (2011). Article CAS PubMed Google
Scholar * Kwak, H. R. et al. Molecular characterization and variation of the Broad bean wilt virus 2 isolates based on analyses of complete genome sequences. _Plant Pathol. J._ 29, 397–409
(2013). Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar * Han, S. J. et al. Viral strain-specific activation of pathogen-associated molecular pattern-triggered immunity enhances
symptom severity in Broad Bean wilt virus 2 infection. _Front. Plant Sci._ 12, 746543 (2021). Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar * Fuchs, M. et al. ICTV virus taxonomy profile:
secoviridae 2022. _J. Gen. Virol._ 103, 001807 (2022). Article CAS Google Scholar * Lin, J. et al. The bean pod mottle virus RNA2-encoded 58-kilodalton protein P58 is required in cis for
RNA2 accumulation. _J. Virol._ 88, 3213–3222 (2014). Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar * Wellink, J., Verver, J. & van Kammen, A. Mutational analysis of AUG codons of
cowpea mosaic virus M RNA. _Biochimie_ 75, 741–747 (1993). Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar * Van Bokhoven, H. et al. Cis- and trans-acting elements in cowpea mosaic virus RNA
replication. _Virology_ 195, 377–386 (1993). Article PubMed Google Scholar * Xie, L. et al. Mutual association of Broad bean wilt virus 2 VP37-derived tubules and plasmodesmata obtained
from cytological observation. _Sci. Rep._ 6, 21552 (2016). Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar * Liu, C. et al. The VP37 protein of Broad bean wilt virus 2 induces
tubule-like structures in both plant and insect cells. _Virus Res._ 155, 42–47 (2011). Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar * Liu, C., Meng, C., Xie, L., Hong, J. & Zhou, X.
Cell-to-cell trafficking, subcellular distribution, and binding to coat protein of Broad bean wilt virus 2 VP37 protein. _Virus Res._ 143, 86–93 (2009). Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
* Kong, L., Wang, Y., Yang, X., Sunter, G. & Zhou, X. Broad bean wilt virus 2 encoded VP53, VP37 and large capsid protein orchestrate suppression of RNA silencing in plant. _Virus
Res._ 192, 62–73 (2014). Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar * Qi, Y. J., Zhou, X. P., Huang, X. Z. & Li, G. X. In vivo accumulation of Broad bean wilt virus 2 VP37 protein and its
ability to bind single-stranded nucleic acid. _Arch. Virol._ 147, 917–928 (2002). Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar * Kwon, M. J. et al. Visual tracking of viral infection dynamics
reveals the synergistic interactions between cucumber mosaic virus and broad bean wilt virus 2. _Sci. Rep._ 13, 7261 (2023). Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar * Choi, B.
et al. A plant virus-based vector system for gene function studies in pepper. _Plant Physiol._ 181, 867–880 (2019). Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar * Seo, J. K., Kwon,
S. J. & Rao, A. L. A physical interaction between viral replicase and capsid protein is required for genome-packaging specificity in an RNA virus. _J. Virol._ 86, 6210–6221 (2012).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar * Lutcke, H. A. et al. Selection of AUG initiation codons differs in plants and animals. _EMBO J._ 6, 43–48 (1987). Article CAS PubMed
PubMed Central Google Scholar * Joshi, C. P., Zhou, H., Huang, X. & Chiang, V. L. Context sequences of translation initiation codon in plants. _Plant Mol. Biol._ 35, 993–1001 (1997).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar * Clyde, K. & Harris, E. RNA secondary structure in the coding region of dengue virus type 2 directs translation start codon selection and is
required for viral replication. _J. Virol._ 80, 2170–2182 (2006). Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar * Kozak, M. Downstream secondary structure facilitates recognition of
initiator codons by eukaryotic ribosomes. _Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA_ 87, 8301–8305 (1990). Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar * Ryabova, L. A., Pooggin, M. M. & Hohn,
T. Translation reinitiation and leaky scanning in plant viruses. _Virus Res._ 119, 52–62 (2006). Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar * Hinnebusch, A. G. Structural insights into the
mechanism of scanning and start codon recognition in eukaryotic translation initiation. _Trends Biochem. Sci._ 42, 589–611 (2017). Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar * Verver, J., Le
Gall, O., Van Kammen, A. & Wellink, J. The sequence between Nucleotide-161 and nucleotide-512 of cowpea mosaic virus-M Rna is able to support internal initiation of translation invitro.
_J. Gen. Virol._ 72, 2339–2345 (1991). Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar * Sanfacon, H. et al. Secoviridae: a proposed family of plant viruses within the order Picornavirales that
combines the families Sequiviridae and Comoviridae, the unassigned genera Cheravirus and Sadwavirus, and the proposed genus Torradovirus. _Arch. Virol._ 154, 899–907 (2009). Article CAS
PubMed Google Scholar * Koh, L. H., Cooper, J. I. & Wong, S. M. Complete sequences and phylogenetic analyses of a Singapore isolate of broad bean wilt fabavirus. _Arch. Virol._ 146,
135–147 (2001). Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar * Thompson, J. R. et al. ICTV virus taxonomy profile: secoviridae. _J. Gen. Virol._ 98, 529–531 (2017). Article CAS PubMed PubMed
Central Google Scholar * Mori, M., Mise, K., Kobayashi, K., Okuno, T. & Furusawa, I. Infectivity of plasmids containing brome mosaic virus cDNA linked to the cauliflower mosaic virus
35S RNA promoter. _J. Gen. Virol._ 72, 243–246 (1991). Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar * Boyer, J. C. & Haenni, A. L. Infectious transcripts and cDNA clones of RNA viruses.
_Virology_ 198, 415–426 (1994). Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar * Sun, K. et al. Rapid construction of complex plant RNA virus infectious cDNA clones for agroinfection using a yeast-E.
coli-agrobacterium shuttle vector. _Viruses_ 9, 332 (2017). * Blawid, R. & Nagata, T. Construction of an infectious clone of a plant RNA virus in a binary vector using one-step Gibson
Assembly. _J. Virol. Methods_ 222, 11–15 (2015). Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar * Firth, A. E. & Brierley, I. Non-canonical translation in RNA viruses. _J. Gen. Virol._ 93,
1385–1409 (2012). Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar * Thie´ beauld, O., Pooggin, M. M. & Ryabova, L. A. Alternative translation strategies in plant viruses. _Plant
Viruses_ 1, 1–20 (2007). Google Scholar * Madhugiri, R. et al. Structural and functional conservation of cis-acting RNA elements in coronavirus 5’-terminal genome regions. _Virology_ 517,
44–55 (2018). Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar * Pooggin, M. M., Ryabova, L. A., He, X., Futterer, J. & Hohn, T. Mechanism of ribosome shunting in Rice tungro bacilliform
pararetrovirus. _RNA_ 12, 841–850 (2006). Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar * Lucas, W. J. Plant viral movement proteins: agents for cell-to-cell trafficking of viral
genomes. _Virology_ 344, 169–184 (2006). Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar * Lazarowitz, S. G. & Beachy, R. N. Viral movement proteins as probes for intracellular and intercellular
trafficking in plants. _Plant Cell_ 11, 535–548 (1999). Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar * Seo, J. K. et al. Movement protein of broad bean wilt virus 2 serves as a
determinant of symptom severity in pepper. _Virus Res._ 242, 141–145 (2017). Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar * Charlier, N. et al. A rapid and convenient variant of fusion-PCR to
construct chimeric flaviviruses. _J. Virol. Methods_ 108, 67–74 (2003). Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar * Heo, K. J. et al. Newly emerged resistance-breaking variants of cucumber
mosaic virus represent ongoing host-interactive evolution of an RNA virus. _Virus Evol._ 6, veaa070 (2020). Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar * Seo, J. K., Kwon, S. J., Choi,
H. S. & Kim, K. H. Evidence for alternate states of Cucumber mosaic virus replicase assembly in positive- and negative-strand RNA synthesis. _Virology_ 383, 248–260 (2009). Article CAS
PubMed Google Scholar * Xu, B. et al. A calmodulin-like protein regulates plasmodesmal closure during bacterial immune responses. _N. Phytol._ 215, 77–84 (2017). Article CAS Google
Scholar * Kumar, S., Stecher, G., Li, M., Knyaz, C. & Tamura, K. MEGA X: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis across computing platforms. _Mol. Biol. Evol._ 35, 1547–1549 (2018).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar * Crooks, G. E., Hon, G., Chandonia, J. M. & Brenner, S. E. WebLogo: a sequence logo generator. _Genome Res._ 14, 1188–1190 (2004).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar * Lorenz, R. et al. ViennaRNA package 2.0. _Algorithms Mol. Biol._ 6, 26 (2011). Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Download references ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS This research was supported in part by grants from Agenda Program (PJ015308) funded by the Rural Development Administration of Korea, Basic Science
Research Program (NRF-2022R1A2C1004728) funded by the National Research Foundation of Korea, and 2023 Research Grant Program (A100-20230040) funded by Seoul National University. AUTHOR
INFORMATION Author notes * These authors contributed equally: Myung-Hwi Kim, Boram Choi. AUTHORS AND AFFILIATIONS * Department of Agricultural Biotechnology, Seoul National University,
Seoul, 08826, Republic of Korea Myung-Hwi Kim & Jang-Kyun Seo * Institutes of Green Bio Science and Technology, Seoul National University, Pyeongchang, 25354, Republic of Korea Boram
Choi, Sun-Jung Kwon, Jin-Ho Kang & Jang-Kyun Seo * Department of International Agricultural Technology, Seoul National University, Pyeongchang, 25354, Republic of Korea Seok-Yeong Jang,
Ji-Soo Choi, Sora Kim, Yubin Lee, Jin-Ho Kang & Jang-Kyun Seo * Department of Horticulture, Jeonbuk National University, Jeonju, 54896, Republic of Korea Suejin Park Authors * Myung-Hwi
Kim View author publications You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar * Boram Choi View author publications You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar *
Seok-Yeong Jang View author publications You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar * Ji-Soo Choi View author publications You can also search for this author inPubMed
Google Scholar * Sora Kim View author publications You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar * Yubin Lee View author publications You can also search for this author
inPubMed Google Scholar * Suejin Park View author publications You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar * Sun-Jung Kwon View author publications You can also search for
this author inPubMed Google Scholar * Jin-Ho Kang View author publications You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar * Jang-Kyun Seo View author publications You can also
search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar CONTRIBUTIONS J.K.S. designed the experiments and supervised the project; M.H.K., B.C., S.Y.J., J.S.C., S.K., Y.L., S.P. and S.J.K. performed
the experiments; M.H.K., B.C., S.J.K., J.H.K. and J.K.S. analyzed the data; M.H.K., B.C., S.J.K. and J.K.S. wrote and revised the manuscript. CORRESPONDING AUTHOR Correspondence to Jang-Kyun
Seo. ETHICS DECLARATIONS COMPETING INTERESTS The authors declare no competing interests. PEER REVIEW PEER REVIEW INFORMATION _Communications Biology_ thanks the anonymous reviewers for
their contribution to the peer review of this work. Primary Handling Editors: David Favero. A peer review file is available. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION PUBLISHER’S NOTE Springer Nature remains
neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION PEER REVIEW FILE SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION DESCRIPTION OF ADDITIONAL
SUPPLEMENTARY FILES SUPPLEMENTARY DATA 1 REPORTING SUMMARY RIGHTS AND PERMISSIONS OPEN ACCESS This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which
permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to
the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless
indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or
exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. Reprints
and permissions ABOUT THIS ARTICLE CITE THIS ARTICLE Kim, MH., Choi, B., Jang, SY. _et al._ The VP53 protein encoded by RNA2 of a fabavirus, broad bean wilt virus 2, is essential for viral
systemic infection. _Commun Biol_ 7, 462 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1038/s42003-024-06170-0 Download citation * Received: 17 November 2023 * Accepted: 09 April 2024 * Published: 16 April
2024 * DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s42003-024-06170-0 SHARE THIS ARTICLE Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content: Get shareable link Sorry, a shareable
link is not currently available for this article. Copy to clipboard Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative