Investigating the factors affecting ict integration of in-service teachers in henan province, china: structural equation modeling

feature-image

Play all audios:

Loading...

ABSTRACT The integration of Information and Communication Technology (ICT) can significantly improve teaching and learning outcomes, but various factors determine the degree to which ICT is


integrated into educational practices. This study used quantitative methodology to examine four key factors that impact in-service teachers’ ICT integration and how they interact with each


other. Data was collected through snowball sampling from 685 in-service teachers in Henan Province, China. Using partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM), the study


analyzed four factors from the Technology Acceptance Model 3 (TAM 3) and the Will-Skill-Tool model (WST model): attitudes (AT), self-efficacy (SE), digital competence (DC), and digital tools


utilization (DTU). The findings revealed that all four elements exerted a noteworthy influence on the integration of ICT by in-service instructors. Meanwhile, attitudes, digital competence,


and digital tools utilization have a mediating effect in this research. Additionally, the study examined how gender, age, and teaching experience influence these factors and ICT


integration. The findings revealed that females exhibit higher levels of positive attitudes and digital competence than males, while teachers aged 31–35 years have stronger digital


abilities, digital tool use, and ICT integration compared to younger or older teachers. Furthermore, teachers with less than three years of teaching experience exhibit significantly stronger


attitudes, self-efficacy, digital competence, and ICT integration than those with more than ten years of experience. The implication of the study provides valuable insights for designing


effective ICT-based instruction and developing teacher education and educational technology programs aimed at promoting ICT integration in the classroom. SIMILAR CONTENT BEING VIEWED BY


OTHERS THE USE OF ICT IN TEACHING BY SPECIAL EDUCATION TEACHERS IN SICHUAN, CHINA: DETERMINANTS AND SOLUTIONS TO CHALLENGES Article Open access 10 February 2025 THE ROLE OF LANGUAGE


TEACHERS’ PERCEPTIONS AND ATTITUDES IN ICT INTEGRATION IN HIGHER EDUCATION EFL CLASSES IN CHINA Article Open access 14 February 2025 ASSESSING THE FACTORS INFLUENCING THE INTENTION TO USE


INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY IMPLEMENTATION AND ACCEPTANCE IN CHINA’S EDUCATION SECTOR Article Open access 19 February 2024 INTRODUCTION The adoption of information and


communications technology (ICT) in the education sector has sparked concerns. It is deemed necessary to utilize ICT in education to transform the outdated educational system (LeTendre,


2022). Despite instructors’ proficiency and comfort with ICT, their active utilization of it remains limited and supplementary (Pham and Sampson, 2022). Scholars have shown considerable


interest in studying the impact of ICT on educational systems, especially in developing nations such as China (Li et al., 2022; Pokhrel and Chhetri, 2021; Tsegay et al., 2022). Some


researchers have investigated specific obstacles that impede teachers from implementing ICT in the classroom, while others have employed technology-adoption models to address potential


reasons behind teachers’ hesitance to incorporate ICT in their teaching practices (Dolighan and Owen, 2021; Ogalo et al., 2022). Recognizing the belief that enhancing ICT in schools will


have extensive pedagogical and educational benefits for educators and students alike, efforts have been made to upgrade the necessary technological infrastructure and ICT-based tools for


instruction and learning (Wang and Zhao, 2022). Nonetheless, there exists a risk of disillusionment with the promised advantages of integrating ICT in the classroom (Kumar et al., 2022).


Consequently, it is crucial to ascertain why and under what circumstances ICT integration proves to be an effective instructional tool. When implemented appropriately in educational


settings, the integration of ICT can serve as a valuable tool to support and enhance the learning process. The active involvement of teachers is fundamental to ensure the effective


integration of ICT in the classroom (Seufert et al., 2021). The use of ICT by teachers plays a significant role in students’ learning outcomes, as it not only enhances their motivation but


also enables them to utilize ICT more proficiently (Aidoo et al., 2022). Scholars have thus conducted investigations to identify the factors that either facilitate or hinder teachers’


incorporation of ICT into their teaching practices. Several factors associated with ICT use have been recognized, encompassing attitudes, self-efficacy, prior experience with ICT, and


competencies in ICT (Busse et al., 2022). Despite considerable efforts to support teachers in integrating ICT into their classroom practices by identifying these facilitating and inhibiting


factors, the existing literature indicates that teachers seldom utilize ICT (Cabero-Almenara et al., 2021). The implementation of information technology in education is fraught with numerous


challenges. Many teachers simply transfer their classroom teaching materials to online courses without considering personalized guidance, student engagement, and ultimately fail to achieve


effective teaching outcomes. These concerns revolve around finding ways to enhance the synergy between technology and education, including facilitating independent student learning,


improving teacher training, and successfully integrating online teaching models (Zhou et al., 2020). Despite the adoption of certain policies, only a limited number of teachers in China,


with varying levels of professional experience, have received sufficient training on effectively incorporating technology in their classrooms. Insufficient utilization of technology by


teachers can impede students’ development and hinder their progress (Ma et al., 2019). Existing research on perceived barriers to the integration of technology in teaching has shown limited


emphasis on the underlying influencing factors (Lai et al., 2022; Liao et al., 2022). Moreover, there is a dearth of studies that specifically investigate the utilization of ICT-based


education by instructors (Lukas and Yunus, 2021). Additionally, the majority of previous research has predominantly relied on a singular model of technology acceptability, with only a few


studies successfully integrating both models (Lu and Xie, 2022). Consequently, there is a pressing need to acquire a deeper comprehension of the factors that influence teachers’ adoption of


ICT. This understanding is essential for enhancing their capabilities and fostering effective teacher-student interaction with technology. The primary objective of this study is to


investigate two research questions. (1) What are the associations among attitudes, self-efficacy, digital competence, digital tools utilization, and ICT integration among in-service


teachers? (2) What association exists between the demographic characteristics of in-service teachers, such as age, gender, and teaching experience, and their impact on ICT integration?


LITERATURE REVIEW THEORETICAL FRAMEWORK The underlying theoretical foundations are derived from the Technology Acceptance Model 3 (TAM 3) and the Will-Skill-Tool model (WST model) in this


investigation. TAM 3 is a theoretical framework that delves into the factors and processes related to the acceptance and practical utilization of new technology among individuals from


diverse backgrounds (Venkatesh and Bala, 2008). On the other hand, the WST model encompasses three essential components—will, skill, and tool—that are indispensable for the successful


integration of digital technology into classroom practices (Christensen and Knezek, 2008). Both TAM 3 and the WST model explore the factors influencing the actual usage of technology in


real-world settings, although they adopt distinct approaches. While TAM 3 focuses on the cognitive aspects associated with the widespread adoption of new technologies, the WST model


concentrates on more intricate elements that impact the integration of ICT. The process of adoption presents formidable challenges, necessitating substantial exertion in the examination and


evaluation of its impact on educators. Consequently, it is imperative to employ these theories as a conceptual framework to foster a comprehensive and comprehensive comprehension of ICT


integration among teachers. This can be accomplished by monitoring pertinent characteristics, including attitudes, self-efficacy, digital competence, and digital tools utilization, in


conjunction with the TAM3 model and the WST model. The subsequent phase involves academic inquiry into how these characteristics exert influence on the adoption of ICT among instructors


currently in service. ATTITUDES Numerous research studies have presented evidence of a favorable influence of attitudes on the integration of ICT, emphasizing the significance of teachers


maintaining a positive stance when utilizing ICT efficiently and creatively (Bariu & Chun, 2022; Ursavaş et al., 2019; Verma et al., 2018). Multiple investigations have explored the


associations between teachers’ attitudes, their digital competency, and their digital tools utilization (Al-dheleai et al., 2019; Pozas and Letzel, 2021; Štemberger and Konrad, 2021).


Findings have revealed that teachers’ perspectives exert a substantial impact on their level of digital competence and the extent to which they utilize digital resources. Notably,


instructors possessing ICT skills demonstrated enthusiasm for integrating ICT into their teaching practices. Moreover, teachers’ attitudes regarding the adoption of digital technology in


education emerged as a pivotal predictor of their proficiency level. Teachers’ viewpoints concerning the integration of ICT into their instructional practices are shaped by various factors,


encompassing but not limited to age, gender, and teaching experience. Mannila et al. (2018) postulated a connection between a teacher’s age group and their attitude toward ICT integration in


the classroom, a trend observed across both male and female educators. Furthermore, Kalra (2018) discovered that novice teachers displayed a more optimistic perspective on the utilization


of ICT in teaching when compared to their more seasoned counterparts. However, several studies have found no discernible disparity in the use of ICT or attitudes among instructors based on


gender, age, or experience level (Semerci and Aydin, 2018; Ikwuka et al., 2020). Consequently, it is discernible that teachers’ attitudes wield a substantial influence on their digital


proficiency, enabling them to adeptly employ digital tools and incorporate ICT. Moreover, the variables of gender, age, and teaching experience within the educator cohort possess the


potential to exert discernible effects on the various facets associated with ICT integration. SELF-EFFICACY The preceding studies presented in this discourse provide substantiation for the


positive association between teachers’ self-efficacy and their attitudes toward ICT integration (Yada et al., 2022). However, it is worth noting that certain studies have also established


the absence of a relationship between teachers’ self-efficacy and their attitudes (Arhin et al., 2022; Coban and Atasoy, 2019). Data gleaned from multiple studies imply that teachers’


self-efficacy plays a role in shaping their digital competence when it comes to ICT integration (Hatlevik and Hatlevik, 2018; Peciuliauskiene et al., 2022). Nevertheless, it should be


acknowledged that Backfisch et al. (2021) discovered that digital competence does not exert an influence on self-efficacy. Limited research attention has been dedicated to examining the


nexus between self-efficacy and digital tools utilization during ICT integration. Alhassan (2017) affirmed the significant impact of teachers’ self-efficacy on digital tools utilization.


Furthermore, some studies have suggested that there is no discernible disparity concerning the influence of age, gender, teaching experience, and self-efficacy on ICT integration (Baroudi


and Shaya, 2022; Dolighan and Owen, 2021). Nevertheless, it is important to highlight that specific researchers have confirmed divergent results (Şen and Yildiz, 2022; Šabić et al., 2021).


DIGITAL COMPETENCE There is emerging evidence suggesting a significant association between digital competence and the integration of ICT. It is suggested that educators require further


development of their digital teaching skills (Dwiono et al., 2018; Fominykh et al., 2021; Méndez et al., 2022). Additionally, several studies have corroborated the impact of self-efficacy


and attitudes on digital competence. Teachers who perceive themselves as lacking self-efficacy or holding unfavorable attitudes often demonstrate reduced self-confidence, subsequently


affecting their digital competence and their ability to provide optimal learning opportunities for their students (Mannila et al., 2018; Ogodo et al., 2021). Limited research has been


conducted on the correlation between digital competence and gender and age. Lucas et al. (2021) discovered that females exhibit lower levels of digital competence compared to males, while


younger teachers demonstrate higher competence in utilizing digital technologies than their older counterparts. Conversely, Zhou et al. (2021) argued that gender and age have a minimal


impact on digital competence. DIGITAL TOOLS UTILIZATION ICT devices encompass a range of technological tools including computers, laptops, printers, scanners, software programs, data


projectors, and interactive teaching devices (Nuhu and Onojah, 2021). These tools form a repertoire of modern technologies that enhance the efficient transmission of information,


transforming people’s information retrieval capabilities and shaping their interpersonal engagements (Lavrenova et al., 2020). Numerous research investigations have provided empirical


evidence supporting the direct influence of digital tools on the integration of ICT among teachers (Al-Maroof and Salloum, 2020; Antonietti et al., 2022; Fearnley and Amora, 2020). The


incorporation of ICT has become an essential prerequisite for the advancement of educational initiatives and policies. By equipping teachers with comprehensive training, ICT resources enable


them to refine their digital competencies and enhance the teaching-learning process through dynamic and innovative approaches (Amhag et al., 2019). Consequently, the utilization of ICT


tools enhances the effectiveness of teaching and learning endeavors. Moreover, the exploration of how a teacher’s age, gender, or teaching experience influences their digital tools


utilization remains a relatively understudied area. To summarize, Fig. 1 illustrates the conceptual framework underpinning this study. METHODOLOGY RESEARCH DESIGN In this research, a


statistical technique called partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM) is utilized to establish a framework that combines the third version of TAM3 and the WST model. The


aim is to forecast and clarify the various elements that impact the integration of ICT among teachers currently employed in the education sector. The proposed framework investigates the


correlation between ICT integration and four key variables under examination: attitudes (AT), self-efficacy (SE), digital competence (DC), and digital tools utilization (DTU). SAMPLING AND


DATA COLLECTION For this research, a group of teachers in Henan Province, China, was selected as the sample, as the study focused on examining the integration of ICT among educators in


developing countries. Henan Province, being a resource-rich Chinese province with a significant teacher population, was deemed representative of typical developing nations. The sampling


technique employed was snowball sampling, a probability-based approach. The researchers contacted 20 in-service teachers from various public schools in Henan Province, who were then


responsible for collecting data from a minimum of 40 other in-service instructors. The survey was conducted over four weeks, starting from December 2022, and concluding in January 2023. An


online platform was utilized to distribute 800 questionnaires, resulting in the collection of 720 valid responses. This sample size was considered sufficient to represent the overall


population, ensuring the study’s reliability (Hair et al., 2019). Participants who voluntarily provided informed consent also shared demographic details, such as gender, age, and teaching


experience. Strict measures were taken to uphold the confidentiality of the information provided, adhering to ethical standards set by the study. The sample encompasses all the valid


submissions received through the online platform. After eliminating outliers and missing data, the dataset was narrowed down to 685 usable responses. In terms of gender distribution, males


accounted for 30.7% of the participants, while females constituted 69.3%. The majority of instructors were below the age of 45, with only 14.2% being older. Among the participants, 62.5% had


less than three years of teaching experience, whereas a mere 2% had accumulated over 30 years of expertise (refer to Table 1). RESEARCH INSTRUMENT To collect the necessary data, a


questionnaire was employed to predict the factors that influence the integration of ICT among in-service teachers. The questionnaire consisted of multiple components, namely attitudes (AT),


self-efficacy (SE), digital competence (DC), digital tools utilization (DTU), and ICT integration (ICTI), all of which were integral to the proposed model. A 5-point Likert scale was


utilized to gauge the responses, ranging from “strongly disagree” to “strongly agree,” allowing for effective factor measurement. The questionnaire items were adapted and modified from


previous studies, ensuring their relevance and appropriateness. Furthermore, all constructs within the questionnaire demonstrated a commendable level of reliability, as evidenced by the


satisfactory Cronbach’s alpha value of 0.95 (refer to Table 2 for further details). RESULTS In this study, a resampling technique involving 5000 subsamples is utilized in conjunction with


the smart PLS 3.3.3 algorithm. PLS-SEM proves to be a suitable alternative to covariance-based structural equation modeling when there is limited prior knowledge about the relationships


within the structural model or the measurement of its components. The primary aim of employing the PLS method is to predict indicators by expanding the sets of components. If the objective


is to forecast essential target constructs or identify key constructs, PLS-SEM should be the preferred choice. Additionally, PLS-SEM is the optimal approach for research endeavors


characterized by exploration or an extension of an existing structural theory (Hair et al., 2019). MEASUREMENT MODEL When assessing a measurement model, the key criteria to consider are


reliability and validity. Table 3 presents the results of the reliability test, which was conducted to assess the consistency of the items within the constructs. To examine the convergent


validity and discriminant validity of the construct, the validity test was carried out, and the findings are displayed in Tables 4 and 5. Table 3 provides Cronbach’s alpha value for each


latent component, which serves as an indicator of its internal consistency. The results indicated that all latent constructs were deemed reliable as their Cronbach’s alpha values surpassed


the threshold of 0.6. Notably, values ranging between 0.7 and 0.8 are considered satisfactory, while those falling within the 0.7 to 0.9 range are deemed acceptable (Hair et al., 2019).


Additionally, all latent constructs exhibited loading values exceeding 0.7, which signifies that the number of items remained consistent from the beginning to the end for each construct.


According to the findings presented in Table 3, the AVE (Average Variance Extracted) values exceeded 0.5, as indicated by previous research, and the composite reliability surpassed 0.7 for


all constructs (Hair et al., 2019). Consequently, it was determined that the constructs exhibited convergent validity. To assess the discriminant validity of the measures, the Fornell and


Larcker approach, as well as the Heterotrait-Monotrait Ratio (HTMT) method, were employed (Hair et al., 2019). In this approach, the square root of the AVE of each latent construct was


compared to the correlations between different latent constructs. Notably, all diagonal values in Tables 4 and 5 were greater than the other correlation values, thus satisfying the


requirement for discriminant validity. STRUCTURAL MODEL The evaluation of the structural model comprises a series of five steps. The initial step involves testing for multicollinearity and


assessing the variance inflation factor (VIF) among all endogenous constructs. In the second step, the t-value and _p_-value are evaluated. The third stage entails examining the Coefficient


of Determination (R2), while the fourth step focuses on effect size (f2). Finally, the model’s prediction ability is assessed through the fifth step, which involves determining the Q2 value.


To begin with, there are no issues of multicollinearity, as all VIF values of predictors in the model are below 5, which is considered satisfactory for evaluating the model (Hair et al.,


2019). The researchers employed inner VIF scores since all factors within the model are reflective rather than formative. The findings of the inner VIF scores for the model’s predictors can


be seen in Table 6. Furthermore, in this study, the researchers utilized a bootstrapping sampling technique with 5000 iterations of a subsample to test the structural model. The R square,


effect sizes (f2), and Q square are presented in Table 7. In terms of the model’s predictive potential, the blindfolding technique was employed, revealing that the model exhibits predictive


power, as indicated by the Q2 values of all endogenous constructs exceeding 0, as displayed in Table 7. The findings of the path analysis are presented in Table 8 and Fig. 2. The results


reveal significant relationships between various factors among in-service teachers. First, attitudes of in-service teachers significantly influence their digital competence (AT->DC: β = 


0.503, _p_ < 0.01), digital tools utilization (AT->DTU: β = 0.326, _p_ < 0.01), and ICT integration (AT->ICTI: β = 0.296, _p_ < 0.01). Furthermore, attitudes indirectly impact


ICT integration through digital competence and digital tools utilization, with significant and positive effects (AT->DC->ICTI, AT->DTU->ICTI: _p_ < 0.01). Second, the


self-efficacy of in-service teachers significantly influences their attitudes (SE->AT: β = 0.535, _p_ < 0.01), digital competence (SE->DC: β = 0.200, _p_ < 0.01), digital tools


utilization (SE->DTU: β = 0.181, _p_ < 0.01), and ICT integration (SE->ICTI: β = 0.174, _p_ < 0.01). Additionally, self-efficacy indirectly influences ICT integration through


attitudes, digital competence, and digital tools utilization, with significant and positive effects (SE->AT->ICTI, SE->DC->ICTI, SE->DTU->ICTI: _p_ < 0.01). Moreover,


in-service teachers’ digital competence has a significant impact on their utilization of digital tools (DC->DTU: β = 0.266, _p_ < 0.01) and ICT integration (DC->ICTI: β = 0.223, _p_


 < 0.01). Furthermore, digital competence indirectly influences ICT integration through digital tools utilization, with a significant and positive effect (DC->DTU->ICTI: _p_ < 


0.01). Lastly, in-service teachers’ digital tools utilization significantly influences ICT integration (DTU->ICTI: β = 0.156, _p_ < 0.01). To assess the model’s in-sample predictive


capacity, the researchers conducted a test on the coefficient of determination (R2). In this evaluation, the R2 values for the endogenous constructs were examined, and they are categorized


as weak, moderate, or substantial when the R2 value reaches 0.25, 0.50, or 0.75, respectively (Hair et al., 2019). The results, as depicted in Table 7, indicate that attitudes exhibit


limited power in the model, while other variables demonstrate moderate power. Effect sizes (f2) were also considered, with values greater than 0.02, 0.15, and 0.35 indicating modest, medium,


and large effects, respectively. In Table 7, it can be observed that attitudes (f2 = 0.302) have a strong effect size on digital competence, while self-efficacy (f2 = 0.401) has a notable


effect size on attitudes. However, when creating f2 for ICT integration, all four predictors (attitudes, self-efficacy, digital competence, digital tools utilization) yielded small effect


sizes. In terms of the model’s predictive potential, the blindfolding technique indicated that the proposed model possesses predictive power, as the Q2 values for all endogenous constructs


surpass 0, as displayed in Table 7. DESCRIPTIVE FINDINGS The findings related to research question 2, which focuses on the impact of gender, age, and teaching experience on the ICT


integration of in-service teachers, are presented in Tables 9–11 and Figs. 3–5. To investigate whether there are statistically significant differences in instructors’ perspectives on ICT


usage based on their age and teaching experience, we employed a one-way ANOVA followed by the LSD (least significant difference) post-hoc test. For gender, as it is a binary category, no


post-hoc analysis was required. Before conducting the ANOVA, Levene’s test was utilized to assess the homogeneity of variance among the cases. The results of Levene’s test revealed that the


distribution is parametric, indicating that the assumption of normality holds. Regarding gender, the results indicate that there are no significant differences between teachers’


self-efficacy, digital tools utilization, and ICT integration based on their gender (_p_ > 0.05). However, there is a significant difference in attitudes and digital competence between


male and female in-service teachers (_p_ > 0.05). Females tend to have more positive attitudes and higher digital competence compared to males. In terms of age, the findings reveal that


there are no significant differences in attitudes and self-efficacy among teachers of different age groups (_p_ > 0.05). However, significant differences exist in digital competence,


digital tools utilization, and ICT integration based on age (_p_ < 0.05). In-service teachers aged 31–35 years exhibit significantly stronger digital abilities, utilize digital tools more


effectively, and integrate ICT better than those aged 20–30 years or older than 35 years. Regarding teaching experience, no significant difference was found in the utilization of digital


tools among in-service teachers (_p_ > 0.05). However, significant differences exist in attitudes, self-efficacy, digital competence, and ICT integration based on teaching experience.


Teachers with less than three years of experience demonstrate significantly stronger attitudes, self-efficacy, digital competence, and ICT integration compared to teachers with more than 10


years of experience. DISCUSSION Numerous scholars have conducted extensive research to address educational development challenges, specifically related to the integration of ICT in the


education sector. This particular study employed structural equation modeling (SEM) to analyze the factors influencing the integration of ICT among in-service teachers in China. The study


adopted a conceptual model that combined TAM3 and WST models to uncover the factors that impact the ICT integration of in-service teachers. Attitudes, self-efficacy, digital competence, and


digital tools utilization were identified as key factors to enhance the understanding of the determinants influencing in-service teachers’ integration of ICT. Moreover, the findings


indicated that the model employed in the study was suitable, as the measures of reliability, convergent validity, Cronbach’s alpha, and discriminant validity all yielded satisfactory


results. Consequently, all paths were validated, confirming the significant and positive connections between the variables. The objective of this research was to evaluate the attitudes,


self-efficacy, digital competence, and digital tools utilization among teachers currently in service. These factors are considered essential in improving productivity and efficiency in the


integration of ICT, addressing the first research question. The extent to which ICT is fully utilized or underutilized in developing countries cannot be definitively determined. Consistent


with the findings of Bariu and Chun (2022) Ursavaş et al. (2019), and Verma et al. (2018), this study reveals that teachers’ attitudes significantly and positively impact their digital


competence, usage of digital tools and ICT integration. The study suggests that teachers’ positive attitudes play a significant role in encouraging students to engage with ICT in the


classroom, thereby supporting effective teaching. To promote global development, educational institutions in developing nations should encourage teachers to use computers, fostering positive


attitudes toward ICT. Furthermore, attitudes demonstrate a critical influence on ICT integration, as evidenced by their higher coefficient value compared to the other three components. The


study’s findings also indicate that self-efficacy significantly influences the attitudes, digital competence, digital tools utilization, and ICT integration of teachers currently in service.


This suggests that teachers with low self-efficacy may perceive ICT as difficult to use or less useful in their context. These results align with similar studies conducted by


Peciuliauskiene et al. (2022) and Yada et al. (2022), which highlight that higher self-efficacy among teachers leads to better attitudes, digital competence, digital tools utilization, and


ICT integration. Additionally, the study reveals that teachers’ digital competence positively impacts their usage of digital tools and ICT integration. This finding is consistent with the


research conducted by Dwiono et al. (2018), Fominykh et al. (2021), and Méndez et al. (2022), which emphasize the need for teachers to enhance their digital skills in teaching. Teachers who


possess greater digital competence are more adept at utilizing digital tools and integrating information technology. Therefore, schools and policymakers need to develop reasonable policies


that encourage teachers to enhance their digital capabilities, actively engage in digital technology training, improve their attitudes and self-efficacy in using digital technology, and


foster the acquisition of digital skills to effectively apply ICT in the classroom teaching and enhance teaching quality. Furthermore, the results confirm that teachers’ digital tools


utilization has a positive and significant impact on ICT integration. Lavrenova et al. (2020) propose that the introduction of modern digital tools and the application of various network


programs and platforms have greatly improved the efficiency of ICT integration. Convenient digital tools serve as the fundamental guarantee for successful ICT teaching, and the robust


development of digital tools will further facilitate effective ICT teaching methods. This research model aims to investigate the variations in factors influencing the integration of ICT


among in-service teachers concerning gender, age, and teaching experience, as addressed in research question 2. The findings indicate that gender does not have a significant impact on


teachers’ self-efficacy, digital tools utilization, and ICT integration, which aligns with the studies conducted by Baroudi and Shaya (2022) and Dolighan and Owen (2021). However, there is a


notable difference between in-service teachers’ attitudes and digital competence based on gender. In contrast to the findings of Ikwuka et al. (2020) and Semerci and Aydin (2018), females


tend to display higher levels of positive attitudes and digital competence compared to males. As the teaching profession is predominantly occupied by women and with China’s commitment to


gender equality in education, it is plausible that women exhibit stronger attitudes and digital skills. Consequently, there is no significant disparity between men and women in terms of


self-efficacy, digital tools utilization, and ICT integration, as China strives for gender equity in education. The findings indicate that there is no noteworthy distinction between


teachers’ attitudes and self-efficacy based on their age. However, a significant difference exists in terms of in-service teachers’ digital competence, digital tools utilization, and ICT


integration, aligning with the conclusions drawn by Şen and Yildiz (2022) and Šabić et al. (2021). Specifically, teachers aged 31–35 years exhibit notably stronger digital skills, greater


digital tools utilization, and higher proficiency in integrating ICT compared to individuals aged 20–30 years or above 35 years. Consequently, teachers in the approximate age range of 30


years can be considered the key drivers of digital teaching. When providing training to enhance digital technology skills, it is crucial to prioritize the capacity building of both younger


and older teachers. The findings further revealed that while there is no notable distinction in the utilization of digital tools among in-service teachers, a significant difference exists in


terms of their attitudes, self-efficacy, digital competence, and ICT integration based on their teaching experience, corroborating the findings of Baroudi and Shaya (2022) and Kalra (2018).


Specifically, teachers with less than three years of teaching experience demonstrate significantly stronger attitudes, self-efficacy, digital competence, and ICT integration compared to


those with more than 10 years of experience. It appears that teachers with greater experience may exhibit a decline in their utilization of ICT, potentially due to complacency or a reduced


drive to adopt new technologies. Conversely, teachers with less experience, who may be in the early stages of their careers, exhibit a stronger inclination to work and learn, resulting in


more efficient cultivation of their digital skills and applications. CONCLUSION This research introduces an innovative framework that merges the TAM3 and WST models, incorporating elements


of ICT integration that impact in-service teachers. Additionally, our model supports a portion of existing research that explores the factors affecting TAM3 and WST models. The objective was


to develop a robust framework within a contemporary context, emphasizing the factors that influence the adoption of ICT by in-service teachers in educational institutions, which are


recognized as vital contributors to the educational system. The findings of this study illustrate the interconnected relationship between teachers’ attitudes, self-efficacy, digital


competencies, and digital tools utilization, all of which have an impact on their integration of ICT. Based on our results, in-service teachers can enhance their effectiveness by optimizing


ICT content, collaboration strategies, and communication methods. Teachers recognize that fostering positive attitudes and self-efficacy, developing strong digital skills, and actively


employing digital tools are essential for successful ICT integration. Therefore, educational institutions should implement diverse approaches such as seminars, training programs, and other


methods to enhance these influential factors and promote the effective use of ICT in teaching. While this study provides innovative insights into the theoretical and practical aspects


impacting the ICT integration of in-service teachers, it is essential to acknowledge its limitations. Primarily, the generalizability of the findings is limited due to the exclusive focus on


data from China. Therefore, it is recommended that future research includes data from teachers in diverse countries to ensure broader applicability. Additionally, this study only examined


four influencing factors, and the quantitative analysis of these factors had certain limitations. Subsequent studies could address this gap by conducting a comparative analysis of the


factors influencing ICT integration among in-service teachers in different countries. DATA AVAILABILITY The datasets generated during and/or analyzed during the current study are available


from the corresponding author upon reasonable request. REFERENCES * Aidoo B, Macdonald MA, Vesterinen V-M, Pétursdóttir S, Gísladóttir B (2022) Transforming teaching with ICT using the


flipped classroom approach: dealing with COVID-19 pandemic. Educ Sci 12(6):421 Article  Google Scholar  * Al-dheleai YM, Baki R, Tasir Z, Al-rahmi WM (2019) What hinders the use of ICT among


academic staff at Yemen’s public universities? Int J Humanit Innov 2(1):7–12 * Alhassan R (2017) Exploring the relationship between web 2.0 tools self-efficacy and teachers’ use of these


tools in their teaching. J Educ Learn 6(4):217 Article  Google Scholar  * Al-Maroof RS, Salloum SA (2020) An integrated model of continuous intention to use of Google Classroom. In: Al-Emran


M, Shaalan K, Hassanien A (eds) Recent advances in intelligent systems and smart applications. Studies in systems, decision and control, Springer, Cham, pp 311–335.


https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-47411-9_18 * Amhag L, Hellström L, Stigmar M (2019) Teacher educators’ use of digital tools and needs for digital competence in higher education. J Digit


Learn Teach Educ 35(4):203–220 Article  Google Scholar  * Antonietti C, Cattaneo A, Amenduni F (2022) Can teachers’ digital competence influence technology acceptance in vocational


education? Comput Hum Behav 132:107266 Article  Google Scholar  * Arhin D, Kwakye K, Quaynor LQ, Boakye RO, Yeboah JA (2022) Influence of teachers’ self-efficacy and attitude towards the


integration of ICT into teaching and learning at the basic school level. Am J Educ Pract 6(1):36–45 Article  Google Scholar  * Backfisch I, Lachner A, Stürmer K, Scheiter K (2021)


Variability of teachers’ technology integration in the classroom: a matter of utility! Comput Educ 166:104159 Article  Google Scholar  * Banoglu K, Vanderlinde R, Yildiz R (2015)


Professional self-efficacy scale for information and computer technology teachers: validity and reliability study. Anthropol 20(1–2):22–32 Google Scholar  * Bariu TN, Chun X (2022) Influence


of teachers’ attitude on ICT implementation in Kenyan universities. Cogent Educ 9(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186x.2022.2107294 * Baroudi S, Shaya N (2022) Exploring predictors of


teachers’ self-efficacy for online teaching in the Arab World Amid COVID-19. Educ Inf Technol 27(6):8093–8110 Article  Google Scholar  * Busse J, Busse R, Schumann M (2022) Does technology


matter? How digital self-efficacy affects the relationship between ICT exposure and job dissatisfaction. In: Proceedings of the 55th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System


Sciences. University of Hawaii at Manoa, Honolulu. https://doi.org/10.24251/hicss.2022.759 * Cabero-Almenara J, Guillén-Gámez FD, Ruiz-Palmero J, Palacios-Rodríguez A (2021) Digital


competence of higher education professor according to DigCompEdu. Statistical research methods with ANOVA between fields of knowledge in different age ranges. Educ Inf Technol


26(4):4691–4708 Article  Google Scholar  * Christensen R, Knezek G (2008) Self-report measures and findings for Information Technology Attitudes and competencies. In: Voogt J, Knezek G (eds)


International Handbook of Information Technology in Primary and Secondary Education, vol 20. Springer, Boston, pp 349–365 * Coban O, Atasoy R (2019) An examination of relationship between


teachers’ self-efficacy perception on ICT and their attitude towards ICT usage in the classroom. Cypriot J Educ Sci 14(1):136–145 Article  Google Scholar  * Dolighan T, Owen M (2021) Teacher


efficacy for online teaching during the COVID-19 pandemic. Brock Educ J 30(1):95 Article  Google Scholar  * Dwiono R, Rochsantiningsih D, Suparno S (2018) Investigating the integration


level of Information and Communication Technology (ICT) in the English Language Teaching. Int J Lang Teach Educ 2(3):259–274 Article  Google Scholar  * Fearnley MR, Amora JT (2020) Learning


management system adoption in higher education using the Extended Technology Acceptance Model. IAFOR J Educ 8(2):89–106 Article  Google Scholar  * Fominykh M, Shikhova E, Soule MV, Perifanou


M, Zhukova D (2021) Digital competence assessment survey for language teachers. In: Zaphiris P, Ioannou A (eds) Learning and collaboration technologies: new challenges and learning


experiences. Springer, Cham, pp 264–282. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-77889-7_18 * Ghavifekr S, Rosdy WA (2015) Teaching and learning with technology: effectiveness of ICT integration


in schools. Int J Res Educ Sci 1(2):175 Article  Google Scholar  * Gutiérrez-Martín A, Pinedo-González R, Gil-Puente C (2022) ICT and media competencies of teachers. Convergence towards an


integrated MIL-ICT model. Comunicar 30(70):21–33 Article  Google Scholar  * Hair JF, Risher JJ, Sarstedt M, Ringle CM (2019) When to use and how to report the results of PLS-SEM. European


Business Review 31(1):2–24 Article  Google Scholar  * Hatlevik IKR, Hatlevik OE (2018) Examining the relationship between teachers’ ICT self-efficacy for educational purposes, collegial


collaboration, lack of facilitation and the use of ICT in teaching practice. Front Psychol 9:935 * Hernández-Ramos JP, Martínez-Abad F, García Peñalvo FJ, Esperanza Herrera García M,


Rodríguez-Conde MJ (2014) Teachers’ attitude regarding the use of ICT. A factor reliability and validity study. Comput Hum Behav 31:509–516 Article  Google Scholar  * Ikwuka OI, Onyali LC,


Olugbemi OP, Etodike CE, Igbokwe IC, Adigwe EJ (2020) Teachers’ attitude towards the use of ICT for quality instructional delivery in Onitsha North Secondary Schools, Anambra State, Nigeria.


Int J Acad Res Progress Educ Dev 9(3):1–11 * Kalra R (2018) Experienced and novice teachers’ awareness and attitudes towards ICT in language classroom: a study conducted in a Thai context.


Arab World Engl J 4(4):125–131 Article  ADS  Google Scholar  * Kumar V, Verma P, Mittal A, Tuesta Panduro JA, Singh S, Paliwal M, Sharma NK (2022) Adoption of ICTs as an emergent business


strategy during and following COVID-19 crisis: evidence from Indian MSMEs. Benchmarking: Int J. https://doi.org/10.1108/bij-11-2021-0685 * Lai X, Nie C, Huang S, Yao Y, Li Y, Dai X, Wang Y


(2022) Classes of problematic smartphone use and information and Communication Technology (ICT) self-efficacy. J Appl Dev Psychol 83:101481 Article  Google Scholar  * Lavrenova M, Lalak NV,


Molnar TI (2020) Preparation of future teachers for use of ICT in primary school. Revista Romaneasca Pentru Educatie Multidimensionala 12(1Sup1):185–195 Article  Google Scholar  * LeTendre G


(2022) Globalization and the impact of ICT on teacher’s work and professional status. In: The Palgrave Handbook of Teacher Education Research, Palgrave Macmillan, Cham, pp 1–22.


https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-59533-3_83-1 * Li X, Shaikh PA, Ullah S (2022) Exploring the potential role of higher education and ICT in China on green growth. Environ Sci Pollut Res Int


29(43):64560–64567 Article  PubMed  Google Scholar  * Liao CH, Chiang C-T, Chen I-C, Parker KR (2022) Exploring the relationship between computational thinking and learning satisfaction for


non-STEM college students. Int J Educ Technol High Educ 19(1):43 * Lu D, Xie Y-N (2022) Critical thinking cultivation in TESOL with ICT Tools: a systematic review. Comput Assist Lang Learn,


1–21. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2022.2033788 * Lucas M, Bem-Haja P, Siddiq F, Moreira A, Redecker C (2021) The relation between in-service teachers’ digital competence and personal


and contextual factors: what matters most. Comput Educ 160:104052 Article  Google Scholar  * Lukas BA, Yunus MM (2021) ESL teachers’ challenges in implementing e-learning during COVID-19.


Int J Learn Teaching Educ Res 20(2):330–348 Article  Google Scholar  * Ma M, Chen J, Zheng P, Wu Y (2019) Factors affecting EFL teachers’ affordance transfer of ICT resources in China.


Interact Learn Environ 30(6):1044–1059 Article  Google Scholar  * Mannila L, Nordén L-Å, Pears A (2018) Digital competence, teacher self-efficacy and training needs. In: Proceedings of the


2018 ACM Conference on International Computing Education Research, Association for Computing Machinery, New York, pp 78–85. https://doi.org/10.1145/3230977.3230993 * Méndez VG, Suelves DM,


Méndez CG, Mas JA (2022) Future teachers facing the use of technology for inclusion: a view from the digital competence. Educ Inf Technol. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-022-11105-5 * Nuhu


KM, Onojah AO (2021) Effect of webinar multimedia platform on students’ academic performance in selected Educational Technology Concepts in University of Ilorin. Indonesian J


Multidisciplinary Res 2(1):9–20. https://doi.org/10.17509/ijomr.v2i1.38622 Article  Google Scholar  * Ogalo MO, Omulando C, Barasa P (2022) Assessment of teachers’ technological and


pedagogical knowledge of integrating ICT in teaching English in secondary schools in Nairobi County, Kenya. Scholars J Arts Humanit Soc Sci 10(1):9–23 Article  Google Scholar  * Ogodo JA,


Simon M, Morris D, Akubo M (2021) Examining K-12 teachers’ digital competency and technology self-efficacy during COVID-19 pandemic. J High Educ Theory Pract 21(11).


https://doi.org/10.33423/jhetp.v21i11.4660 * Peciuliauskiene P, Tamoliune G, Trepule E (2022) Exploring the roles of Information Search and Information Evaluation Literacy and pre-service


teachers’ ICT self-efficacy in teaching. Int J Educ Technol High Educ 19(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-022-00339-5 * Pham ST, Sampson PM (2022) The development of artificial


intelligence in education: a review in context. J Comput Assist Learn 38(5):1408–1421 Article  Google Scholar  * Pokhrel S, Chhetri R (2021) A literature review on impact of COVID-19


pandemic on teaching and learning. High Educ Future 8(1):133–141 Article  Google Scholar  * Pozas M, Letzel V (2021) “Do you think you have what it takes?”—exploring predictors of


pre-service teachers’ prospective ICT use. Technol Knowl Learn 28:823–841 * Šabić J, Baranović B, Rogošić S (2021) Teachers’ self-efficacy for using information and communication technology:


the interaction effect of gender and age. Inform Educ 21:353–373 * Semerci A, Aydın MK (2018) Examining high school teachers’ attitudes towards ICT use in education. Int J Progress Educ


14(2):93–105 Article  Google Scholar  * Şen N, Yildiz Durak H (2022) Examining the relationships between English teachers’ lifelong learning tendencies with professional competencies and


technology integrating self-efficacy. Educ Inf Technol 27(5):5953–5988 Article  Google Scholar  * Seufert S, Guggemos J, Sailer M (2021) Technology-related knowledge, skills, and attitudes


of pre- and in-service teachers: the current situation and emerging trends. Comput Hum Behav 115:106552 Article  Google Scholar  * Štemberger T, Čotar Konrad S (2021) Attitudes towards using


digital technologies in education as an important factor in developing digital competence: the case of Slovenian student teachers. Int J Emerg Technol Learn 16(14):83 Article  Google


Scholar  * Tsegay SM, Ashraf MA, Perveen S, Zegergish MZ (2022) Online teaching during COVID-19 pandemic: teachers’ experiences from a Chinese University. Sustainability 14(1):568 Article 


CAS  Google Scholar  * Ursavaş ÖF, Yalçın Y, Bakır E (2019) The effect of subjective norms on preservice and in‐service teachers’ behavioural intentions to use technology: a multigroup


multimodel study. Br J Educ Technol 50(5):2501–2519 Article  Google Scholar  * Venkatesh V, Bala H (2008) Technology acceptance model 3 and a research agenda on interventions. Decis Sci


39(2):273–315 Article  Google Scholar  * Verma S, Bhattacharyya SS, Kumar S (2018) An extension of the technology acceptance model in the Big Data Analytics System Implementation


Environment. Inf Process Manag 54(5):791–806 Article  Google Scholar  * Wang Q, Zhao G (2021) ICT self‐efficacy mediates most effects of university ICT support on Preservice Teachers’ TPACK:


evidence from three normal universities in China. Br J Educ Technol 52(6):2319–2339 Article  Google Scholar  * Yada A, Leskinen M, Savolainen H, Schwab S (2022) Meta-analysis of the


relationship between teachers’ self-efficacy and attitudes toward inclusive education. Teaching and Teacher Education 109:103521 Article  Google Scholar  * Yildirim B, Akkuş A (2020)


Developing a scale to assess teachers’ perceptions towards using web 2.0 tools in lectures (TPUWL scale). Participatory Educational Research 7(3):124–138 Article  Google Scholar  * Zhou L,


Wu S, Zhou M, Li F (2020) ‘School’s out, but class’ on’, the largest online education in the world today: taking China’s practical exploration during the COVID-19 epidemic prevention and


control as an example. SSRN Electron J 4(2):501–519 Google Scholar  Download references AUTHOR INFORMATION AUTHORS AND AFFILIATIONS * Department of Curriculum & Instructional Technology,


Faculty of Education, University Malaya, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia Ran Peng, Rafiza Abdul Razak & Siti Hajar Halili Authors * Ran Peng View author publications You can also search for this


author inPubMed Google Scholar * Rafiza Abdul Razak View author publications You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar * Siti Hajar Halili View author publications You can


also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar CONTRIBUTIONS RP: writing—original draft preparation; RAR: writing—review and editing; SHH: supervision. CORRESPONDING AUTHOR


Correspondence to Rafiza Abdul Razak. ETHICS DECLARATIONS COMPETING INTERESTS The authors declare no competing interests. ETHICAL APPROVAL Approval was obtained from the Committee of Ethics


and Deontology of Research at the University Malaya and the Reference Number is UM. TNC2/UMREC_2298. INFORMED CONSENT The author has informed participants of the purpose of the research and


explained to them the way the data will be used. Therefore, informed consent was obtained from all participants and/or their legal guardians for participation in the study. ADDITIONAL


INFORMATION PUBLISHER’S NOTE Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION DATASET 1 RIGHTS


AND PERMISSIONS OPEN ACCESS This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in


any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The


images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not


included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly


from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. Reprints and permissions ABOUT THIS ARTICLE CITE THIS ARTICLE Peng, R., Razak,


R.A. & Halili, S.H. Investigating the factors affecting ICT integration of in-service teachers in Henan Province, China: structural equation modeling. _Humanit Soc Sci Commun_ 10, 380


(2023). https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-023-01871-z Download citation * Received: 05 February 2023 * Accepted: 16 June 2023 * Published: 06 July 2023 * DOI:


https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-023-01871-z SHARE THIS ARTICLE Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content: Get shareable link Sorry, a shareable link is not


currently available for this article. Copy to clipboard Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative