Hyperpolarized 13c pyruvate magnetic resonance spectroscopy for in vivo metabolic phenotyping of rat hcc

feature-image

Play all audios:

Loading...

ABSTRACT The in vivo assessment of tissue metabolism represents a novel strategy for the evaluation of oncologic disease. Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is a high-prevalence, high-mortality


tumor entity often discovered at a late stage. Recent evidence indicates that survival differences depend on metabolic alterations in tumor tissue, with particular focus on glucose


metabolism and lactate production. Here, we present an in vivo imaging technique for metabolic tumor phenotyping in rat models of HCC. Endogenous HCC was induced in Wistar rats by oral


diethyl-nitrosamine administration. Peak lactate-to-alanine signal ratios (L/A) were assessed with hyperpolarized magnetic resonance spectroscopic imaging (HPMRSI) after [1-13C]pyruvate


injection. Cell lines were derived from a subset of primary tumors, re-implanted in nude rats, and assessed in vivo with dynamic hyperpolarized magnetic resonance spectroscopy (HPMRS) after


[1-13C]pyruvate injection and kinetic modelling of pyruvate metabolism, taking into account systemic lactate production and recirculation. For ex vivo validation, enzyme activity and


metabolite concentrations were spectroscopically quantified in cell and tumor tissue extracts. Mean peak L/A was higher in endogenous HCC compared to non-tumorous tissue. Dynamic HPMRS


revealed higher pyruvate-to-lactate conversion rates (_k__pl_) and lactate signal in subcutaneous tumors derived from high L/A tumor cells, consistent with ex vivo measurements of higher


lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) levels in these cells. In conclusion, HPMRS and HPMRSI reveal distinct tumor phenotypes corresponding to differences in glycolytic metabolism in HCC tumor tissue.


SIMILAR CONTENT BEING VIEWED BY OTHERS IMAGING CANCER METABOLISM USING MAGNETIC RESONANCE Article Open access 11 January 2024 _REAL-TIME_ INSIGHT INTO IN VIVO REDOX STATUS UTILIZING


HYPERPOLARIZED [1-13C] _N_-ACETYL CYSTEINE Article Open access 09 June 2021 HYPERPOLARIZED 13C-GLUCOSE MAGNETIC RESONANCE HIGHLIGHTS REDUCED AEROBIC GLYCOLYSIS IN VIVO IN INFILTRATIVE


GLIOBLASTOMA Article Open access 11 March 2021 INTRODUCTION Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the sixth leading cause of cancer-related death worldwide, with over 780,000 deaths in 2018 and


over 840,000 new cases according to the Global Cancer Observatory1. Genetic and proteomic heterogeneity represent obstacles to therapy, limiting therapeutic choices in advanced stages2 and


rendering resection or transplantation the sole curative options. Recently, metabolic heterogeneity, i.e. the differential utilization of metabolites (mainly glucose) in tumor tissues, has


entered the spotlight as a potential diagnostic and therapeutic endpoint. The glucose metabolite lactate plays a central role in several tumor entities by promoting neoangiogenesis, tumor


invasion and immune evasion3,4,5,6. For example, head and neck tumors with high lactate production demonstrate a more aggressive phenotype7,8,9. In HCC, recent evidence supports the notion


of different metabolic subtypes10, which correlate with patient outcomes. This has been linked to alterations in concrete metabolic pathways and led to the testing of novel therapeutic


interventions aimed at such endpoints11. Due to multifocality and multimorbidity (in particular coagulopathy), biopsies are not always an option for the diagnosis or the longitudinal


monitoring of HCC. Current non-invasive imaging methods such as positron emission tomography (PET) can visualize and quantify the uptake of the glucose analogue 18F-fluordesoxyglucose


(18F-FDG) in tumor tissues, but do not permit the measurement of downstream metabolite utilization. Furthermore, although the uptake of 18F-FDG has been used for the prediction of tumor


grading in both humans and translational model systems and correlates with clinical outcome in HCC patients12, PET’s sensitivity in HCC detection is limited by elevated glucose uptake in the


surrounding liver tissue in patients with chronic liver disease13. Magnetic resonance spectroscopy and spectroscopic imaging (HPMRS(I)) after hyperpolarized [1-13C]pyruvate injection are


techniques for the real-time measurement of metabolic turnover, more specifically of lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) activity. Dynamic nuclear hyperpolarization enhances the nuclear magnetic


resonance (NMR) signal by four to five orders of magnitude, overcoming the limited sensitivity of conventional (thermally polarized endogenous signal) MRS(I)14 and the low natural abundance


of the MR-active 13C isotope in vivo. Pyruvate is particularly well suited for metabolic imaging, due to it being the end product of glycolysis and metabolized to alanine or lactate15,16.


Measurable changes in pyruvate conversion occur within [1-13C]pyruvate’s longitudinal relaxation time (_T_1, 30–40 s), making it suitable for in vivo hyperpolarized imaging17. In comparison


to PET, hyperpolarized MRSI achieves similar sensitivity for early therapy response assessment18. We here present the application of HPMRS(I) in a clinically relevant translational HCC model


and demonstrate its potential for the non-invasive subtyping of tumors based on detection and quantification of pyruvate utilization. MATERIAL AND METHODS ANIMAL MODELS AND PREPARATION


Animal experiments were approved by the local governmental committee for animal protection and welfare (Tierschutzbehörde Regierung von Oberbayern, Protocol Nr. 55.2-1-54-2532-25-2016). All


procedures were carried out in accordance with applicable laws and regulations. Two animal cohorts were employed in the study. Cohort A included 17 male Wistar rats (RccHan:WIST; six to


eight weeks old; Envigo; Re Schaijk, Netherlands), consisting of 13 rats in which HCCs were induced by oral administration of 0.01% diethyl-nitrosamine (DENA, SigmaAldrich) dissolved in


drinking water over ten weeks, as previously described19, and 4 healthy control rats. Cohort B consisted of ten male nude rats (Crl:NIH-Foxn1rnu; six to eight weeks old; Charles River,


Sulzfeld, Germany) in which subcutaneous tumors were implanted in each flank. Tumor screening in cohort A rats was performed by _T_2-weighted (_T_2w) anatomical imaging on a human 3 T


clinical MRI system (Philips Ingenia 3.0 T; Philips Medical, Amsterdam, Netherlands) as previously described12. Tumor screening in cohort B rats was performed by caliper measurement. Tumor


bearing animals were included in HPMRS(I) experiments once tumors reached ≥ 10 mm in diameter. TUMOR CELL LINES Cells were isolated from endogenous tumor tissue of cohort A animals by


homogenization in cell culture media (described below). The suspension was incubated (37 °C; 30 min) with Liberase TM (La Roche, Basel, Switzerland), filtered through a 100 µm cell filter


(BD Bioscience, Franklin Lakes, USA) and centrifuged (500 g; 5 min). After reaching confluence, cells were split 1:100. After single clones arose, they were separated with trypsin drenched


filter paper and transferred to 24-well plates for expansion. Two cell lines, isolated from a low and a high lactate/alanine ratio tumor, were used for further experiments. These two cell


lines (low: LA-L and high: LA-H) were expanded and frozen down at early passage. 1 × 106 tumor cells were subcutaneously implanted in each flank of Cohort B-animals. IN VITRO EXPERIMENTS ON


TUMOR CELL LINES Cells were cultivated in Dulbecco’s modified Eagle Medium (DMEM) containing L-glutamine (Biowest, Nuaillé, France), 10% fetal calf serum (Merck, Darmstadt, Germany), 1%


sodium pyruvate (Merck, Darmstadt, Germany), 1% non-essential amino acids (GE Healthcare, Chicago, USA) and 1% penicillin and streptomycin (PAN Biotech, Aidenbach, Germany) at 37 °C with 5%


CO2. LDH activity assays were performed in triplicates. 106 cells were lysed in radioimmunoprecipitation assay (RIPA) buffer (1 M Tris–HCl (pH 8), 1 M NaCl, Nonidet P40, sodium deoxycholate,


distilled water) and after centrifugation (4 °C; 5000 rpm; 15 min), LDH activity in the supernatant was determined photometrically (cobas c 701/702 system, Roche/Hitachi; LDH-activity:


LDHI2 (Lactate Dehydrogenase acc. to IFCC ver.2), Hoffmann—La Roche, Basel, Switzerland) following manufacturer’s instructions. Metabolic flux was measured using the _Seahorse_ assay, for


which cells were cultivated in DMEM media supplemented with 5 mM glucose, 4 mM glutamine, 10% FBS and 1% Pen/Strep. Real time measurement of the extracellular acidification rate was


performed on a _Seahorse_ XFe96 analyzer (Agilent Technologies Inc., Santa Clara, USA) using a _Seahorse_ XF glycolysis stress test kit (Agilent Technologies Inc., Santa Clara, USA)


following manufacturer’s instructions, with 104 cells per well in a 96 well plate in culture media. After the assay, the cells were fixed with 4% PFA and stained with DAPI nuclear dye.


Fluorescence was assessed using the XFe96 analyzer and used for normalization of the _Seahorse_ XF data (RFU, relative fluorescence unit normalization). EX VIVO EXPERIMENTS ON PRIMARY AND


TRANSPLANTED TUMOR EXTRACTS After euthanasia, tumors were removed rapidly and divided into two parts. One part was formalin-fixed for histopathological analyses, and the other was frozen in


liquid nitrogen and kept at -80 °C for further analyses. For enzyme activity measurements, 90–110 mg of tumor tissue were homogenized in 1 ml RIPA buffer (FastPrep-24 Tissue and Cell


Homogenizer, MP Biomedicals, Santa Ana, USA). After centrifuging, lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) and/or glutamate pyruvate transaminase (GPT) activity were determined photometrically (cobas c


701/702 system, Roche/Hitachi; LDH-activity: LDHI2 (Lactate Dehydrogenase acc. to IFCC ver.2) and GPT-activity: ALTPM (Alanine Aminotransferase acc. to IFCC with pyridoxal phosphate


activation), Hoffmann—La Roche, Basel, Switzerland) following manufacturer’s instructions. For 1H NMR spectroscopy of metabolite concentrations, 50–120 mg samples of tumor tissue were


homogenized in 4 ml/g methanol and 0.85 ml/g distilled water. After homogenization, 4 ml/g chloroform and 2 ml/g distilled water were added, mixed, incubated on ice (10 min) and centrifuged


(4 °C; 2000 g; 5 min). The polar phase of the probe was removed for lyophilization (Alpha 1–2 LDplus, Martin Christ Gefriertrocknungsanlagen GmbH, Osterode am Harz, Germany). Freeze-dried


specimens were resuspended in 590 μl distilled water and 10 μl deuterium. The proton NMR spectra were measured in a 300 MHz NMR spectrometer (7.04 T, Avance III HD 300 MHz Vertical Bore


Spectrometer, TUM chemistry department, Bruker Biospin, Germany) with a pulse-acquire sequence (16 scans + 2 dummy scans; flip angle 30°; repetition time (TR) 6.45 s; receive bandwidth 6 


kHz; acquisition time 5.45 s; FID-size 65,536 points; total scan time 1 min 56 s). For lactate and alanine quantification in tumor extracts, integrals over the assigned peak doublets of each


metabolite in the phased and baseline-corrected spectra were compared to the integral of 0.01 mM hydroquinone. (Supplementary Figure S1). To determine absolute concentrations, the


arithmetic sum of the 0.01 mM hydroquinone reference spectrum and the spectra of the probes were calculated with MNOVA (MestReNova, 10.0 Mestrelab Research, Santiago de Compostela, Spain).


HYPERPOLARIZATION OF [1-13C]PYRUVATE For hyperpolarization of pyruvate, a 30 mg mixture containing 14 M [1-13C]pyruvate (Merck, Darmstadt, Germany), 16 mM OX063 (Oxford Instruments,


Abingdon, UK) and 1 mM Gadoterate Meglumine (Dotarem, Guerbet Laboratories Ltd., Villepinte, France) was polarized with a HyperSense DNP Polarizer (Oxford Instruments, Abingdon, UK) using a


microwave frequency of 94.172 GHz until 90% of the saturation polarization level at 3.35 T and 1.2 K was reached. The frozen sample was rapidly dissolved using 4.2 ml buffer solution


containing distilled water, 80 mM TRIS (Merck, Darmstadt, Germany), 0.1 g/l EDTA (Merck, Darmstadt, Germany) and 80 mM sodium hydroxide (NaOH), which was preheated to 180 °C resulting in an


80 mM [1-13C]pyruvate solution at a physiological pH with a mean polarization level of 38% at the start of dissolution under the given experimental conditions20. MAGNETIC RESONANCE


SPECTROSCOPY AND IMAGING Rats were anesthetized by isoflurane (1.5–2.5%; O2-flow: 2 l/min; CP-Pharma, Burgdorf, Germany) and tail vein catheterized (Becton Dickinson Company, Franklin Lakes,


USA) for the injection of the hyperpolarized agent. Animals were kept at 37 °C using warm air (Mistral-Air Plus, The37°Company, Amersfoort, Netherlands) and temperature and breathing were


monitored with a rectal temperature sensor and pressure pad (SA Instruments Inc., New York, USA). Experiments were performed in a 7.0 T magnet (Agilent Technologies, Oxford, UK) small animal


MRI scanner (initially Discovery MR901, GE Healthcare, Waukesha, Wisconsin, USA for hyperpolarized imaging; converted to AVANCE III HD electronics, Bruker Corporation, Billerica, USA for


hyperpolarized spectroscopy). Anesthesia duration was kept consistent at an average of 95 min for all experiments to avoid differences in measurements due to anesthesia time. For endogenous


HCC, a 2D phase-encoded free induction decay chemical shift imaging (FID-CSI) sequence and a dual-tuned 1H/13C volume resonator (72 mm inner diameter, RAPID Biomedical GmbH, Würzburg-Rimpar,


Germany) were used for radiofrequency transmission and signal reception. Metabolite images were acquired ~ 15 s after injection for 30 s with 9.9 s per single frame; matrix size 12 × 12;


centric acquisition order in k-space; single slice thickness 5 mm; field of view 48 × 48 mm; receive bandwidth 5 kHz; 2048 spectral points; TR 68 ms; 6° flip angle; three time-frames. A


total of 17 tumors in 13 DENA-treated rats and 4 healthy livers in 4 control rats were examined. Of these, 1 tumor scan was excluded due to a poor signal-to-noise ratio and shimming


artefacts which made peak identification impossible. For subcutaneous tumors, signal was measured by a 20 mm 13C surface receive coil (RAPID Biomedical GmbH, Würzburg-Rimpar, Germany) in


combination with the 1H/13C volume resonator used for 13C transmission. A dynamic, slice-selective spectroscopy sequence with the following parameters was applied: 8 kHz transmit bandwidth,


2 kHz receive bandwidth; 512 acquisition points; center frequency between [1-13C]pyruvate and [1-13C]lactate at 175 ppm; TR 2 s; 5° flip angle and a single slice of thickness of 10 mm. Data


acquisition began upon dissolution and 90 spectra were acquired over 180 s. Slice positioning was based on anatomical _T_2w coronal and axial images (coronal: field of view 128 × 72 mm; TR 3


 s; TE 20 ms; slice thickness 1 mm; data matrix 256 × 144; 36 slices; readout bandwidth 200 kHz; transmit bandwidth 2 kHz; axial: field of view 72 × 54 mm; TR 4 s; TE 48 ms; slice thickness


2 mm; data matrix 240 × 180; 35 slices; readout bandwidth 200 kHz; transmit bandwidth 2 kHz). 13C-DATA ANALYSIS Data processing was performed in Matlab (The Mathworks, Inc., Natick, USA)


with in-house developed software. FID-CSI HPMRSI data of endogenous HCCs (cohort A) were linearly interpolated in image size by a factor of two and line broadened by 40 Hz. Data was analyzed


by the calculation of [1-13C]lactate to alanine peak signal ratios (L/A) from 2D whole tumor ROIs drawn based on the _T_2w anatomical image. Magnitude spectral data of dynamic HPMRS-data


(cohort B) was line-broadened by 30 Hz. Signal maxima of [1-13C]pyruvate and [1-13C]lactate were normalized to the maximum intensity of pyruvate. A fitting routine was developed based on a


two-site kinetic exchange model as described in21. Incorporating back-conversion from lactate to pyruvate, _T_1-relaxation and RF-excitation losses into an effective decay rate _ρ_pyr, the


pyruvate signal curve is given by $${M}_{pyr}\left(t\right)= {M}_{pyr,max}\bullet {e}^{{-R}_{pyr,eff}\bullet t}$$ (1) where the overall effective decay rate \({R}_{pyr,eff}= {k}_{pl}+ {\rho


}_{pyr}\) is the sum of the kinetic pyruvate-to-lactate conversion rate constant _k_pl and the effective decay rate \({\rho }_{pyr}\). Assuming back-conversion to be negligible, one can


correct the effective spin–lattice relaxation constant \({T}_{1.pyr}^{*}=\frac{1}{{\rho }_{pyr}}\) for RF excitation losses by $$\frac{1}{{T}_{1,pyr}}=


\frac{1}{{T}_{1,pyr}^{*}}+\frac{ln(coscos \left(FA\right) )}{TR}$$ (2) where _FA_ is the excitation flip angle, _TR_ the repetition time and \({T}_{1,pyr}\) the intrinsic spin–lattice


constant of [1-13C]pyruvate in vivo at 7 T. Modelling of several datasets (see examples in Fig. 4, Supplementary Figure S2) yielded _k_pl > _R_pyr,eff, hence giving _T_1,pyr < 0 which


is physically unreasonable22. The detected lactate signal in the tumor was therefore assumed to be augmented by inflowing lactate produced in other tissues (e.g. heart, liver, contralateral


tumor) or by re-circulating lactate from the observed tumor itself. This observation was included in the model by assuming the time curve of inflowing lactate to be of the same shape as the


time curve of overall lactate measured in the tumor, and therefore proportional to it. Mathematically, this was accounted for by separating the overall lactate signal into an inflow- and a


tumor-originating fraction. The signal from tumor-originating lactate \({M}_{lac,tumor}\) is given by $${M}_{lac,tumor}=SF\bullet {M}_{lac,tot}$$ (3) with _SF_ being a scaling factor between


0 and 1 (see the Supplementary Material for details). The lactate time curve from the tumor was then modelled according to $$\frac{{dM}_{lac,tumor}}{dt}= {k}_{pl}\bullet


{M}_{pyr}\left(t\right)-{R}_{lac,eff}\bullet {M}_{lac,tumor}\left(t\right),$$ (4) which can be discretized and from which _k__pl_ and _R__lac,eff_ can be obtained using the Moore–Penrose


pseudoinverse matrix. Here, _R__lac,eff_ is the overall effective decay rate of the hyperpolarized lactate signal, including back-conversion from lactate to pyruvate, RF excitation and


intrinsic _T_1 relaxation. The scaling factor _SF_ was chosen such that _T_1,pyr = 30 s holds, derived from Eq. (2), based on previously reported values for _T_1 of [1-13C]pyruvate from in


vivo experiments and taking into account the _B_0-field dependence of _T__1_22,23. Quality-of-fit was evaluated based on the calculation of L1-residuals with a threshold of ~ 0.7 and visual


inspection of fit quality at early timepoints. HISTOLOGY AND IMMUNOHISTOCHEMISTRY Tumor cell agarose pellets were prepared from tumor cell lines, fixated in 10% neutral buffered formalin,


paraffin embedded, sliced and confirmed as HCC by immunostaining for CK7 (dilution 1:200; Abcam) and HepPar1 (dilution 1:50; Dako)24,25. The tumor specimens were formalin-fixed and


paraffin-embedded according to standard protocol. The endogenous HCCs were stained with H&E for classification as HCC lesions by a board-certified veterinary pathologist (KS). The


subcutaneous tumors were stained with H&E and anti-CD31 rabbit antibody (dilution 1:50; Abcam, Cambridge, UK) using an automated BondRxm staining unit. To analyze CD31 staining, 6


representative visual fields (20 × magnification) were allocated over the whole slide of each tumor, and vessel ingates were enumerated and then averaged. STATISTICAL ANALYSIS All


statistical analyses were performed using Prism 7 (GraphPad Software, LaJolla, USA). The distribution of the values was tested with D'Agostino & Pearson normality test. For group


comparison, non-normal data were analyzed with the Mann–Whitney-U and normally distributed data with the Student’s T-test. All data presented as mean with standard deviation. A statistical


significance level of p < 0.05 was defined. RESULTS To examine changes in the signal of each metabolite and therefore the glycolytic flux during HCC pathogenesis, FID-CSI after


hyperpolarized [1-13C]pyruvate injection was performed in an endogenous HCC model and healthy control rats (Fig. 1a–d). HPMRSI revealed significantly higher L/A in tumor tissue (n = 16,


meantumor 1.60 ± 0.50) compared to control animal normal liver tissue (n = 4, meancontrol 1.04 ± 0.05; Mann–Whitney-U-test p = 0.039). Additionally, tumor L/A ratios were overdispersed,


indicating differences in the metabolic attributes of the tumors (Fig. 1e). Ex vivo validation confirmed these findings, showing both significantly elevated absolute L/A concentration


ratios, due to significantly increased lactate pools (Supplementary Figure S1), and LDH/GPT ratios in tumor tissue extracts compared to normal liver extracts in 1H spectroscopy (Fig. 2a,


meantumor 4.83 ± 1.36, n = 17; meancontrol 3.24 ± 0.17; n = 4; Mann–Whitney-U-test-p = 0.009) and in enzyme activity assays (Fig. 2b, meantumor 8.48 ± 5.04, n = 17; meancontrol 2.81 ± 0.33;


n = 4; Mann–Whitney-U-test-p = 0.001). Examples of spectra of control (a) and tumor (b) tissue are shown in Supplementary Figure S1. The determined metabolite ratios from 1H spectroscopy


were also used to assess the influence of the steady state metabolite pool sizes from lactate and alanine on the metabolite ratios obtained from hyperpolarized 13C MRSI imaging. Metabolite


ratios from imaging (L/A ratio 13C-MRI) and 1H spectroscopy (cL/cA 1H MRS) showed no considerable correlation (see Supplementary Figure S3), indicating that the total metabolite pool size


obtained from 1H MRS does not strongly influence the observed in vivo metabolite kinetics in our model. To further assess the role of lactate in HCC, primary tumor cell lines were isolated


and characterized from two tumors showing the lowest and highest L/A in HPMRSI (see Fig. 1e) before reimplantation (LA-L and LA-H cells). Both cell lines were confirmed as HCC clones by


immunostaining for HepPar1 and CK7. LA-H cells exhibited a pleomorphic partially elongated shape compared to the more compact, cuboid shape of LA-L cells (see Supplementary Figure S4). Cell


extract LDH-activity assays revealed significantly higher LDH activity in LA-H cells (meanLA-H 3971 ± 91 U/l, n = 3) compared to LA-L cells (meanLA-L 2820 ± 125 U/l, n = 3;


Mann–Whitney-U-test p < 0.001, Fig. 3a). The _Seahorse Glycostress_ assay also indicated slightly elevated basal glycolysis in LA-H (32.3 ± 4.2 mpH/min/RFU) compared to LA-L cells (24.5 ±


 3.8 mpH/min/RFU) (Fig. 3b, c). Characterized LA-L and LA-H cell line clones were successfully reestablished as subcutaneous tumors in nude rats. Tumors from LA-H cells reached ≥ 10 mm


diameter faster (14.8 days) than tumors from LA-L cells (16.8 days). Visual inspection of slice-selective HPMRS revealed sufficient [1-13C]pyruvate and [1-13C]lactate signal to noise ratios.


(Fig. 4a, b). To distinguish between tumor-derived (i.e. endogenous) and systemic (i.e. wash-in) lactate and to allow the computation of accurate exchange rate constants between


[1-13C]pyruvate and [1-13C]lactate (_k__pl_), a two-site exchange model was employed, with scaling factors applied to the [1-13C]lactate signal time-course (on average for all tumors 0.48;


range: 0.35 to 0.85, see Supplementary Figures S5 and S6) such that the fit _T_1 of [1-13C]pyruvate was fixed at 30 s. In detail, [1-13C]lactate signal curves were iteratively multiplied


with scaling factors between 0 and 1 in steps of 0.05 and the resulting lactate signal curve was then fitted with the kinetic model. The fit for which T1,pyr closest matched _T_1,pyr = 30 s


was chosen to be valid for _k_pl. Scaled data, shown in Fig. 4c,d, revealed significantly higher _k__pl_ values for LA-H compared to LA-L derived tumors (0.041 ± 0.008 s-1 vs. 0.028 ± 0.01 


s-1, p < 0.001) (Fig. 4e). Three _k__pl_ values were excluded because of a fit residual > 0.7. Ex vivo LDH activity measurement of the tumor tissue extracts corroborated this finding


by demonstrating significantly higher LDH activity in LA-H tumor extracts compared to LA-L extracts (128 ± 16 U/g vs. 69 ± 20 U/g, Student’s T-test p < 0.001, Fig. 4f). No differences


were noted in immunohistochemically assessed vascularization. However, LA-H tumors showed predominantly vacuolized tumor cells compatible with lipid accumulation (fatty change) and only few


solid tumor areas, whereas LA-L tumors showed larger solid areas of neoplastic cells with an eosinophilic cytoplasm, sometimes with a spindle cell appearance interspersed with vacuolized


tumor cells (see Supplementary Figure S7). DISCUSSION Here we introduce the non-invasive metabolic phenotyping of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) by HPMRS(I) in endogenous and reimplanted


subcutaneous rat tumor models. Our results constitute a proof-of-concept for HPMRS(I) in HCC and provide a framework for a better understanding of in vivo metabolic processes underlying


pathophysiology and options for treatment. The here-established rat HCC cell lines with differing lactate production will allow further dissection of the underlying genetic tumor landscape.


HPMRS(I) provides additional insight into in vivo metabolic activity beyond 18F-FDG PET imaging, a standard clinical functional imaging method, as it allows for the real time visualization


of enzymatic conversions26. Pyruvate is a downstream metabolite of glycolysis that can be used to differentiate tissues based on the predominant enzymatic reaction leading towards the


production of lactate, alanine or utilization in the TCA cycle. Lactate provides growth advantages to tumors like immune evasion and promotion of angiogenesis3,5,6, and it has been shown in


other tumor entities that high lactate production leads to higher biological aggressiveness7,8,9, mirrored in the higher growth rates observed in LA-H tumors. Furthermore, pyruvate can be a


promising probe molecule for the differentiation of particularly aggressive tumor phenotypes, as has been shown for several tumor entities, including breast cancer27 or for the early


monitoring of tumor cell death, where HPMRS has been shown to outperform 18F-FDG PET28. In human HCC, LDH activity is up-regulated as a result of miRNA383 suppression29 and serum LDH levels


have shown a prognostic value in the prognostication of HCC treatment response30,31. Additionally, a shift towards increased lactate production was described in human HCC tissue samples32.


Furthermore, the suppression of MCT in human HCC cells resulted in a decrease of the tumor proliferation rate33. Thus, the non-invasive monitoring of glycolysis and in particular the


alternative conversion of pyruvate into lactate could serve as an indicator of therapy response to novel metabolic therapy interventions such as PARP inhibition by Olaparib11. In vivo MRS


offers options beyond pyruvate with additional substrates such as glutamate34 or zymonic acid35, which can be used for probing of alternate metabolic pathways such as oxidative


phosphorylation, pH or inflammation-related phenomena. A downregulation of oxidative phosphorylation with a concurrent increase in inflammation has recently been shown to be associated with


significant differences in HCC patient survival10. Our own results also show an increased extracellular acidification in LA-H cells in the in vitro_ Seahorse_ assay, supporting this finding.


However, major technical and logistic challenges like low SNR, short signal half-life and rapid signal decay due to applied radiofrequency pulses pose strong limitations to the experimental


setup and must be overcome to enable clinical usage of HPMRSI. Until these barriers are resolved, predictive model systems such as the here-employed endogenous19 and subcutaneous rat models


are a necessity and can bridge the translational gap on the molecular level for differentiation of metabolic heterogeneity and testing of personalized therapy regimens, e.g. via patient


derived xenograft model systems36. A further challenge in the extraction of quantitative measures arises from the cellular export and re-circulation of lactate, mandating the inclusion of


systemic lactate levels into the modelling of local conversion rates37. For example, Wespi et al. demonstrate that 13C-lactate signal of the heart measured by slice selective spectroscopy is


overestimated because of contributions from the liver to the 13C-lactate signal of the heart38. Lactate wash-in can originate from label exchange in other organs or other tumor sites37. In


this work, the additional lactate inflow term was estimated and accounted for using a two-site kinetic exchange model with a scaling factor separating wash-in [1-13C]lactate from the locally


originating tumor [1-13C]lactate signal. The scaling factor was determined by matching the fitted _T_1 of [1-13C]pyruvate to its previously reported value for in vivo experiments, i.e. 30 


s22,39. As a potential limitation of our study, isolated cell clones might have undergone cell culture-related selection processes which cannot be adequately distinguished in the imaging


experiments, although cell morphology is consistent with previous findings40. Additionally, subcutaneous tumor generation does not represent the normal process of hepatocarcinogenesis, nor


the microenvironment of the liver, both of which are better represented in the endogenous tumor model we employed. The subcutaneous model however allows a precise positioning of surface


coils for measurements. Furthermore, we believe the influence of macro-metabolism to still be unclear, although we followed recommendations regarding fasting the animals before image


acquisition41. Lastly, in vivo imaging techniques employed in our study suffer from the limitation of low spatial resolution, requiring further technical developments. In conclusion, our


study provides evidence for the usage of HPMRS(I) in the in vivo metabolic differentiation of HCC. The application of HPMRS(I) in preclinical therapy trials will enable the validation of


HPMRS(I)-based endpoints as surrogates of tumor biology and therapy response. CHANGE HISTORY * _ 28 MAY 2021 A Correction to this paper has been published:


https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-90697-3 _ REFERENCES * World Health Organization. _Liver Cancer Fact Sheet_,


<https://gco.iarc.fr/today/data/factsheets/cancers/11-Liver-fact-sheet.pdf>. (2018) * Ally, A. _et al._ Comprehensive and integrative genomic characterization of hepatocellular


carcinoma. _Cell_ 169, 1327–1341 (2017). Article  Google Scholar  * Beckert, S. _et al._ Lactate stimulates endothelial cell migration. _Wound Repair Regenerat._ 14, 321–324 (2006). Article


  Google Scholar  * Stern, R., Shuster, S., Neudecker, B. A. & Formby, B. Lactate stimulates fibroblast expression of hyaluronan and CD44: the Warburg effect revisited. _Exp. Cell Res._


276, 24–31 (2002). Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar  * Fischer, K. _et al._ Inhibitory effect of tumor cell–derived lactic acid on human T cells. _Blood_ 109, 3812–3819 (2007). Article 


CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar  * Goetze, K., Walenta, S., Ksiazkiewicz, M., Kunz-Schughart, L. A. & Mueller-Klieser, W. Lactate enhances motility of tumor cells and inhibits monocyte


migration and cytokine release. _Int. J. Oncol._ 39, 453–463 (2011). CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar  * Brizel, D. M. _et al._ Elevated tumor lactate concentrations predict for an increased risk


of metastases in head-and-neck cancer. _Int. J. Radiat. Oncol. Biol. Phys._ 51, 349–353 (2001). Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar  * Walenta, S. & Mueller-Klieser, W. F. _Lactate:


mirror and motor of tumor malignancy_ in Seminars in radiation oncology (ed Albert J. van der Kogel) 267–274 (Elsevier, 2004). * Walenta, S. _et al._ High lactate levels predict likelihood


of metastases, tumor recurrence, and restricted patient survival in human cervical cancers. _Can. Res._ 60, 916–921 (2000). ADS  CAS  Google Scholar  * Bidkhori, G. _et al._ Metabolic


network-based stratification of hepatocellular carcinoma reveals three distinct tumor subtypes. _Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci._ 115, E11874–E11883. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1807305115 (2018).


Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar  * Iansante, V. _et al._ PARP14 promotes the Warburg effect in hepatocellular carcinoma by inhibiting JNK1-dependent PKM2 phosphorylation


and activation. _Nat. Commun._ 6, 7882. https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms8882 (2015). Article  ADS  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar  * Kaissis, G. A. _et al._ Combined DCE-MRI- and


FDG-PET enable histopathological grading prediction in a rat model of hepatocellular carcinoma. _Eur. J. Radiol._ 124, 108848. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrad.2020.108848 (2020). Article 


PubMed  Google Scholar  * EASL. EASL clinical practice guidelines: management of hepatocellular carcinoma. _J. Hepatol._ 69, 182–236 (2018). Article  Google Scholar  * Hu, S. _et al._


13C-pyruvate imaging reveals alterations in glycolysis that precede c-Myc-induced tumor formation and regression. _Cell Metab._ 14, 131–142 (2011). Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar  *


Lu, J., Tan, M. & Cai, Q. The Warburg effect in tumor progression: mitochondrial oxidative metabolism as an anti-metastasis mechanism. _Cancer Lett._ 356, 156–164 (2015). Article  CAS 


PubMed  Google Scholar  * Faubert, B. _et al._ Lactate metabolism in human lung tumors. _Cell_ 171, 358–371 (2017). Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar  * Serrao, E. M.


& Brindle, K. M. Potential clinical roles for metabolic imaging with hyperpolarized [1-13C] pyruvate. _Front Oncol_ 6, 59 (2016). Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar  *


Witney, T. H. _et al._ A comparison between radiolabeled fluorodeoxyglucose uptake and hyperpolarized 13C-labeled pyruvate utilization as methods for detecting tumor response to treatment.


_Neoplasia_ 11, 574-IN511 (2009). Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar  * Groß, C. _et al._ Model matters: differences in orthotopic rat hepatocellular carcinoma physiology


determine therapy response to sorafenib. _Clin. Cancer Res._ 21, 4440–4450 (2015). Article  ADS  PubMed  Google Scholar  * Hundshammer, C. _et al._ Simultaneous characterization of tumor


cellularity and the Warburg effect with PET, MRI and hyperpolarized 13C-MRSI. _Theranostics_ 8, 4765 (2018). Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar  * Day, S. E. _et al._


Detecting tumor response to treatment using hyperpolarized 13 C magnetic resonance imaging and spectroscopy. _Nat. Med._ 13, 1382–1387 (2007). Article  ADS  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar  *


Larson, P. E. _et al._ Investigation of analysis methods for hyperpolarized 13C-pyruvate metabolic MRI in prostate cancer patients. _NMR Biomed._ 31, e3997 (2018). Article  PubMed  PubMed


Central  Google Scholar  * Chattergoon, N., Martínez-Santiesteban, F., Handler, W., Ardenkjær-Larsen, J. H. & Scholl, T. Field dependence of T1 for hyperpolarized [1-13C] pyruvate.


_Contrast Media Mol. Imaging_ 8, 57–62 (2013). Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar  * Siddiqui, M. T., Hossein Saboorian, M., Tunc Gokaslan, S. & Ashfaq, R. Diagnostic utility of the


HepPar1 antibody to differentiate hepatocellular carcinoma from metastatic carcinoma in fine-needle aspiration samples. _Cancer Cytopathol. Interdiscip. Int. J. Am. Cancer Soc._ 96, 49–52


(2002). Google Scholar  * Jain, D. Tissue diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma. _J. Clin. Exp. Hepatol._ 4, S67–S73 (2014). Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar  * Kurhanewicz,


J. _et al._ Hyperpolarized 13C MRI: path to clinical translation in oncology. _Neoplasia_ 21, 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neo.2018.09.006 (2019). Article  PubMed  Google Scholar  *


Gallagher, F. A. _et al._ Imaging breast cancer using hyperpolarized carbon-13 MRI. _Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci._ 117, 2092–2098. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1913841117 (2020). Article  CAS 


PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar  * Hesketh, R. L. & Brindle, K. M. Magnetic resonance imaging of cancer metabolism with hyperpolarized (13)C-labeled cell metabolites. _Curr. Opin.


Chem. Biol._ 45, 187–194. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cbpa.2018.03.004 (2018). Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar  * Fang, Z. _et al._ The miR-383-LDHA axis regulates cell proliferation,


invasion and glycolysis in hepatocellular cancer. _Iran J. Basic Med. Sci._ 20, 187–192. https://doi.org/10.22038/ijbms.2017.8246 (2017). Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar  *


Faloppi, L. _et al._ Lactate dehydrogenase in hepatocellular carcinoma: something old, Something New. _Biomed. Res. Int._ 2016, 7196280. https://doi.org/10.1155/2016/7196280 (2016). Article


  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar  * Zhang, J. P. _et al._ Lactate dehydrogenase is an important prognostic indicator for hepatocellular carcinoma after partial hepatectomy.


_Transl. Oncol._ 8, 497–503. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tranon.2015.11.006 (2015). Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar  * Teilhet, C. _et al._ Specificities of human


hepatocellular carcinoma developed on non-alcoholic fatty liver disease in absence of cirrhosis revealed by tissue extracts 1H-NMR spectroscopy. _Metabolites_


https://doi.org/10.3390/metabo7040049 (2017). Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar  * Huang, Q. _et al._ CD147 promotes reprogramming of glucose metabolism and cell proliferation


in HCC cells by inhibiting the p53-dependent signaling pathway. _J. Hepatol._ 61, 859–866. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhep.2014.04.035 (2014). Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar  *


Gallagher, F. A. _et al._ Detection of tumor glutamate metabolism in vivo using 13C magnetic resonance spectroscopy and hyperpolarized [1-13C]glutamate. _Magn. Reson. Med._ 66, 18–23.


https://doi.org/10.1002/mrm.22851 (2011). Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar  * Düwel, S. _et al._ Imaging of pH in vivo using hyperpolarized 13C-labelled zymonic acid. _Nat. Commun._ 8,


15126. https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms15126 (2017). Article  ADS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar  * Moreira, L. _et al._ Pancreas 3D organoids: current and future aspects as a


research platform for personalized medicine in pancreatic cancer. _Cell. Mol. Gastroenterol. Hepatol._ 5, 289–298. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcmgh.2017.12.004 (2018). Article  PubMed  Google


Scholar  * Serrao, E. _et al._ Analysis of 13C and 14C labeling in pyruvate and lactate in tumor and blood of lymphoma-bearing mice injected with 13C-and 14C-labeled pyruvate. _NMR Biomed._


31, e3901 (2018). Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar  * Wespi, P., Steinhauser, J., Kwiatkowski, G. & Kozerke, S. Overestimation of cardiac lactate production caused


by liver metabolism of hyperpolarized [1-13 C] pyruvate. _Magn. Reson. Med._ 80, 1882–1890 (2018). Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar  * Marco-Rius, I. _et al._ Hyperpolarized singlet


lifetimes of pyruvate in human blood and in the mouse. _NMR Biomed._ 26, 1696–1704. https://doi.org/10.1002/nbm.3005 (2013). Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar  * Muenzner,


J. K. _et al._ Generation and characterization of hepatocellular carcinoma cell lines with enhanced cancer stem cell potential. _J. Cell Mol. Med._ 22, 6238–6248 (2018). Article  CAS 


PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar  * Serrao, E. M. _et al._ Effects of fasting on serial measurements of hyperpolarized [1-(13) C]pyruvate metabolism in tumors. _NMR Biomed._ 29,


1048–1055. https://doi.org/10.1002/nbm.3568 (2016). Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar  Download references FUNDING This work was supported by the Deutsche


Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG, German Research Foundation—391523415, SFB 824) to Rickmer Braren and Franz Schilling. Georgios Kaissis received funding from the Technical University of Munich


clinician scientist programme (Grant Reference H14). Jens Siveke is supported by the German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG, Collaborative Research Center


SFB824 (project C4, INST 95/1017-3), SI 1549/3-1 (Clinical Research Unit KFO337), SI 1549/4-1 / AI 186/1) and the German Cancer Aid (grant no. 70112505; PIPAC consortium) and reports


research funding from BMS, Celgene and Roche; consulting and personal fees from AstraZeneca, Bayer, Baxalta, BMS, Celgene, Immunocore, Lilly, Novartis, Roche, Shire; has minor equity in FAPI


Holding and Pharma15 (<3%) and is a member of the Board of Directors for Pharma15 outside the submitted work. Open Access funding enabled and organized by Projekt DEAL. AUTHOR


INFORMATION Author notes * These authors contributed equally: Elisabeth Bliemsrieder and Georgios Kaissis. AUTHORS AND AFFILIATIONS * School of Medicine, Institute of Diagnostic and


Interventional Radiology, Technical University of Munich, 81675, Munich, Germany Elisabeth Bliemsrieder, Georgios Kaissis, Fabian Lohöfer, Irina Heid, Dominik Keim, Selamawit Gebrekidan, 


Marcus Makowski & Rickmer Braren * School of Medicine, Department of Nuclear Medicine, Technical University of Munich, 81675, Munich, Germany Elisabeth Bliemsrieder, Martin Grashei, 


Geoffrey Topping, Christian Hundshammer, Markus Schwaiger & Franz Schilling * School of Medicine, Clinic and Policlinic of Internal Medicine II, Technical University of Munich, 81675,


Munich, Germany Jennifer Altomonte * Division of Solid Tumor Translational Oncology, German Cancer Consortium (DKTK, Partner Site Essen) and German Cancer Research Center, DKFZ, Heidelberg,


Germany Marija Trajkovic-Arsic, AM Winkelkotte & Jens Siveke * Institute for Developmental Cancer Therapeutics, West German Cancer Center, University Medicine Essen, 45147, Essen,


Germany Marija Trajkovic-Arsic, AM Winkelkotte & Jens Siveke * School of Medicine, Institute of Pathology, Technical University of Munich, 81675, Munich, Germany Katja Steiger * School


of Medicine, Clinic and Policlinic of Urology, Technical University of Munich, 81675, Munich, Germany Roman Nawroth * Department of Computing, Imperial College London, London, SW7 2AZ, UK


Georgios Kaissis Authors * Elisabeth Bliemsrieder View author publications You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar * Georgios Kaissis View author publications You can


also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar * Martin Grashei View author publications You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar * Geoffrey Topping View author


publications You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar * Jennifer Altomonte View author publications You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar * Christian


Hundshammer View author publications You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar * Fabian Lohöfer View author publications You can also search for this author inPubMed 


Google Scholar * Irina Heid View author publications You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar * Dominik Keim View author publications You can also search for this author


inPubMed Google Scholar * Selamawit Gebrekidan View author publications You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar * Marija Trajkovic-Arsic View author publications You can


also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar * AM Winkelkotte View author publications You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar * Katja Steiger View author


publications You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar * Roman Nawroth View author publications You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar * Jens Siveke


View author publications You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar * Markus Schwaiger View author publications You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar *


Marcus Makowski View author publications You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar * Franz Schilling View author publications You can also search for this author inPubMed 


Google Scholar * Rickmer Braren View author publications You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar CONTRIBUTIONS E.B. performed animal and cell experiments and wrote the


initial manuscript. G.K. performed animal experiments, wrote and reviewed the initial and corrected manuscripts. M.G. performed signal modelling and wrote the initial and corrected


manuscript. G.T. performed animal MRI experiments and corrected the initial manuscript. J.A .performed cell isolation and cultivation. H.C. performed ex vivo MRS experiments. F.L. performed


in vitro cell experiments and assisted with animal MRI experiments. I.H. performed in vitro experiments and created the figures. D.K. performed animal experiments. L.G. performed animal and


cell experiments. M.T.A. and A.W. performed cell experiments and Seahorse analyses. K.S. carried out animal pathology analyses. R.N. performed ex-vivo cell analyses. J.S. performed cell


analyses and provided project supervision and support. M.S. and M.R.M. provided project supervision and support. F.S. performed signal modelling, reviewed the initial and corrected


manuscript and provided project supervision and support. R.B. provided project supervision and support, wrote and reviewed the initial and corrected manuscript. All authors reviewed and


approved the final manuscript. CORRESPONDING AUTHOR Correspondence to Rickmer Braren. ETHICS DECLARATIONS COMPETING INTERESTS The authors declare no competing interests. ADDITIONAL


INFORMATION The original online version of this Article was revised: The original version of this Article contained an error in the spelling of the author AM Winkelkotte which was


incorrectly given as Aline Winkelkotte. In addition, the Funding section was incomplete. PUBLISHER'S NOTE Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in


published maps and institutional affiliations. The original online version of this Article was revised: The original version of this Article contained an error in the spelling of the author


AM Winkelkotte which was incorrectly given as Aline Winkelkotte. In addition, the Funding section was incomplete. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION. RIGHTS AND PERMISSIONS


OPEN ACCESS This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or


format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or


other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not


included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission


directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. Reprints and permissions ABOUT THIS ARTICLE CITE THIS ARTICLE


Bliemsrieder, E., Kaissis, G., Grashei, M. _et al._ Hyperpolarized 13C pyruvate magnetic resonance spectroscopy for in vivo metabolic phenotyping of rat HCC. _Sci Rep_ 11, 1191 (2021).


https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-80952-4 Download citation * Received: 04 June 2020 * Accepted: 18 December 2020 * Published: 13 January 2021 * DOI:


https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-80952-4 SHARE THIS ARTICLE Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content: Get shareable link Sorry, a shareable link is not


currently available for this article. Copy to clipboard Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative