The adjuvant treatment of kidney cancer: a multidisciplinary outlook

feature-image

Play all audios:

Loading...

ABSTRACT Approximately 70% of cases of kidney cancer are localized or locally advanced at diagnosis. Among patients who undergo surgery for these cancers, 30–35% will eventually develop


potentially fatal metachronous distant metastases. Effective adjuvant treatments are urgently needed to reduce the risk of recurrence of kidney cancer and of dying of metastatic disease. To


date, almost all of the tested adjuvant agents have failed to demonstrate any benefit. Only two trials of an autologous renal tumour cell vaccine and of the vascular endothelial growth


factor receptor (VEGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitor sunitinib have shown positive results, but these have been criticized for methodological reasons and conflicting data, respectively. The


results of two additional trials of targeted agents as adjuvant therapies have not yet been published. Novel immune checkpoint inhibitors are promising approaches to adjuvant therapy in


kidney cancer, and a number of trials are now underway. An important component of the management of patients with kidney cancer, particularly those who undergo radical resection for


localized renal cell carcinoma, is the preservation of kidney function to reduce morbidity and mortality. The optimal management of these patients therefore requires a multidisciplinary


approach involving nephrologists, oncologists, urologists and pathologists. KEY POINTS * Effective adjuvant treatments for kidney cancer are needed to reduce the risk of recurrence and of


dying of metastatic disease. * To date, almost all of the tested adjuvant agents have failed to demonstrate any benefit in clinical trials; the two positive trials were criticized for


methodological reasons and conflicting results. * Only one drug — sunitinib — has been approved for the adjuvant treatment of kidney cancer in the USA; however, this drug has not been


approved as an adjuvant therapy in Europe. * Positive results with immune checkpoint inhibitors in metastatic renal cell carcinoma (RCC) suggest that these agents might also be effective


adjuvant therapies; trials of these agents are underway. * Preservation of kidney function in patients with RCC is important to reduce morbidity; therefore, multidisciplinary management


should be mandatory for almost all patients with radically resected kidney cancer. Access through your institution Buy or subscribe This is a preview of subscription content, access via your


institution ACCESS OPTIONS Access through your institution Access Nature and 54 other Nature Portfolio journals Get Nature+, our best-value online-access subscription $29.99 / 30 days


cancel any time Learn more Subscribe to this journal Receive 12 print issues and online access $209.00 per year only $17.42 per issue Learn more Buy this article * Purchase on SpringerLink *


Instant access to full article PDF Buy now Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout ADDITIONAL ACCESS OPTIONS: * Log in * Learn about institutional


subscriptions * Read our FAQs * Contact customer support SIMILAR CONTENT BEING VIEWED BY OTHERS ADJUVANT THERAPY OPTIONS IN RENAL CELL CARCINOMA — TARGETING THE METASTATIC CASCADE Article 11


November 2022 COMPLEMENTARY ROLES OF SURGERY AND SYSTEMIC TREATMENT IN CLEAR CELL RENAL CELL CARCINOMA Article 11 May 2022 UNDERSTANDING AND INTEGRATING CYTOREDUCTIVE NEPHRECTOMY WITH


IMMUNE CHECKPOINT INHIBITORS IN THE MANAGEMENT OF METASTATIC RCC Article 03 July 2023 REFERENCES * Ferlay, J. et al. Cancer incidence and mortality worldwide: sources, methods and major


patterns in GLOBOCAN 2012. _Int. J. Cancer_ 136, E359–E386 (2015). Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar  * American Cancer Society. Key statistics about kidney cancer. _cancer.org_


https://www.cancer.org/cancer/kidney-cancer/about/key-statistics.html (updated 4 Jan 2018). * Lam, J. S., Leppert, J. T., Figlin, R. A. & Belldegrun, A. S. Surveillance following radical


or partial nephrectomy for renal cell carcinoma. _Curr. Urol. Rep._ 6, 7–18 (2005). Article  PubMed  Google Scholar  * Gupta, K., Miller, J. D., Li, J. Z., Russel, M. W. & Charbonneau,


C. Epidemiologic and socioeconomic burden of metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC): a literature review. _Cancer Treat. Rev._ 34, 193–205 (2008). Article  PubMed  Google Scholar  * American


Cancer Society. Survival rates for kidney cancer. _cancer.org_ https://www.cancer.org/cancer/kidney-cancer/detection-diagnosis-staging/survival-rates.html (updated 31 Jan 2019). * Massari,


F. et al. Adjuvant therapy in renal cell carcinoma. _Cancer Treat. Rev._ 60, 152–157 (2017). Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar  * Porta, C., Chiellino, S., Ferrari, A., Mariucci, S. &


Liguigli, W. Pharmacotherapy for treating metastatic clear cell renal cell carcinoma. _Expert Opin. Pharmacother._ 18, 205–216 (2017). Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar  * Zisman, A. et


al. Improved prognostication of renal cell carcinoma using an integrated staging system. _J. Clin. Oncol._ 19, 1649–1657 (2001). Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar  * Leibovich, B. C. et


al. Prediction of progression after radical nephrectomy for patients with clear cell renal cell carcinoma: a stratification tool for prospective clinical trials. _Cancer_ 97, 1663–1671


(2003). Article  PubMed  Google Scholar  * Tan, M. H. et al. Comparison of the UCLA Integrated Staging System and the Leibovich score in survival prediction for patients with nonmetastatic


clear cell renal cell carcinoma. _Urology_ 75, 1365–1370 (2010). Article  PubMed  Google Scholar  * Frank, I. et al. An outcome prediction model for patients with clear cell renal cell


carcinoma treated with radical nephrectomy based on tumor stage, size, grade and necrosis: the SSIGN score. _J. Urol._ 168, 2395–2400 (2002). Article  PubMed  Google Scholar  * Karakiewicz,


P. I. et al. Multi-institutional validation of a new renal cancer-specific survival nomogram. _J. Clin. Oncol._ 25, 1316–1322 (2007). Article  PubMed  Google Scholar  * Kattan, M. W.,


Reuter, V., Motzer, R. J., Katz, J. & Russo, P. A postoperative prognostic nomogram for renal cell carcinoma. _J Urol._ 166, 63–67 (2001). Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar  * Pal, S.


K. & Haas, N. B. Adjuvant therapy for renal cell carcinoma: past, present, and future. _Oncologist_ 19, 851–859 (2014). Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar  * Brooks,


S. A. et al. ClearCode34: a prognostic risk predictor for localized clear cell renal cell carcinoma. _Eur. Urol._ 66, 77–84 (2014). Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar  *


Brannon, A. R. et al. Molecular stratification of clear cell renal cell carcinoma by consensus clustering reveals distinct subtypes and survival patterns. _Genes Cancer_ 1, 152–163 (2010).


Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar  * Rini, B. et al. A 16-gene assay to predict recurrence after surgery in localised renal cell carcinoma: development and validation


studies. _Lancet Oncol._ 16, 676–685 (2015). Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar  * Kapur, P. et al. Effects on survival of BAP1 and PBRM1 mutations in sporadic clear-cell renal-cell


carcinoma: a retrospective analysis with independent validation. _Lancet Oncol._ 14, 159–167 (2013). Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar  * Kjaer, M. et al. A randomized


trial of postoperative radiotherapy versus observation in stage II and III renal adenocarcinoma. A study by the Copenhagen Renal Cancer Study Group. _Scand. J. Urol. Nephrol._ 21, 285–289


(1987). Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar  * Pizzocaro, G. et al. Interferon adjuvant to radical nephrectomy in Robson stages II and III renal cell carcinoma: a multicentric randomized


study. _J. Clin. Oncol._ 19, 425–431 (2001). Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar  * Messing, E. M. et al. Phase III study of interferon alfa-NL as adjuvant treatment for resectable renal


cell carcinoma: an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group/Intergroup trial. _J. Clin. Oncol._ 21, 1214–1222 (2003). Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar  * Clark, J. I. et al. Adjuvant high-dose


bolus interleukin-2 for patients with high-risk renal cell carcinoma: a Cytokine Working Group randomized trial. _J. Clin. Oncol._ 21, 3133–3140 (2003). Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar


  * Atzpodien, J. et al. Adjuvant treatment with interleukin-2- and interferon-alpha2a-based chemoimmunotherapy in renal cell carcinoma post tumour nephrectomy: results of a prospectively


randomised trial of the German Cooperative Renal Carcinoma Chemoimmunotherapy Group (DGCIN). _Br. J. Cancer_ 92, 843–846 (2005). Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar  *


Passalacqua, R. et al. Adjuvant low-dose Interleukin-2 (IL-2) plus Interferon-α (IFN-α) in operable renal cell carcinoma (RCC): a phase III, randomized, multicentre trial of the Italian


Oncology Group for Clinical Research (GOIRC). _J. Immunother._ 37, 440–447 (2014). Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar  * Aitchison, M. et al. Adjuvant 5-flurouracil, alpha-interferon and


interleukin-2 versus observation in patients at high risk of recurrence after nephrectomy for renal cell carcinoma: results of a phase III randomised European Organisation for Research and


Treatment of Cancer (Genito-Urinary Cancers Group)/National Cancer Research Institute trial. _Eur. J. Cancer_ 50, 70–77 (2014). Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar  * Adler, A. et al.


Active specific immunotherapy of renal cell carcinoma patients: a prospective randomized study of hormono-immuno-versus hormonotherapy. Preliminary report of immunological and clinical


aspects. _J. Biol. Response Mod._ 6, 610–624 (1987). CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar  * Galligioni, E. et al. Adjuvant immunotherapy treatment of renal carcinoma patients with autologous tumor


cells and bacillus Calmette-Guèrin: five-year results of a prospective randomized study. _Cancer_ 77, 2560–2566 (1996). Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar  * Jocham, D. et al. Adjuvant


autologous renal tumour cell vaccine and risk of tumour progression in patients with renal-cell carcinoma after radical nephrectomy: phase III, randomised controlled trial. _Lancet_ 363,


594–599 (2004). THIS TRIAL IS THE ONLY FORMALLY POSITIVE STUDY OF ADJUVANT THERAPY IN RCC; HOWEVER, IT HAS BEEN HEAVILY CRITICIZED. Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar  * Wood, C. et al. An


adjuvant autologous therapeutic vaccine (HSPPC-96; vitespen) versus observation alone for patients at high risk of recurrence after nephrectomy for renal cell carcinoma: a multicentre,


open-label, randomised phase III trial. _Lancet_ 372, 145–154 (2008). Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar  * Pizzocaro, G. et al. Adjuvant medroxyprogesterone acetate to radical nephrectomy


in renal cancer: 5-year results of a prospective randomized study. _J. Urol._ 138, 1379–1381 (1987). Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar  * Naito, S. et al. Postoperative UFT adjuvant and


the risk factors for recurrence in renal cell carcinoma: a long-term follow-up study. Kyushu University Urological Oncology Group. _Int. J. Urol._ 4, 8–12 (1997). Article  CAS  PubMed 


Google Scholar  * Margulis, V. et al. Randomized trial of adjuvant thalidomide versus observation in patients with completely resected high-risk renal cell carcinoma. _Urology_ 73, 337–341


(2009). Article  PubMed  Google Scholar  * Chamie, K. et al. Adjuvant weekly girentuximab following nephrectomy for high-risk renal cell carcinoma: the ARISER randomized clinical trial.


_JAMA Oncol._ 3, 913–920 (2017). Article  PubMed  Google Scholar  * Supuran, C. T. Carbonic anhydrase inhibition and the management of hypoxic tumors. _Metabolites_ 7, 48 (2017). Article 


PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar  * Kramar, A. et al. Guidelines for the definition of time-to-event end points in renal cell cancer clinical trials: results of the DATECAN project.


_Ann. Oncol._ 26, 2392–2398 (2015). Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar  * Massari, F. et al. Adjuvant treatment for resected renal cell carcinoma: are all strategies equally negative?


Potential implications for trial design with targeted agents. _Clin. Genitourin. Cancer_ 11, 471–476 (2013). Article  PubMed  Google Scholar  * Gnarra, J. R. et al. Mutations of the VHL


tumour suppressor gene in renal carcinoma. _Nat. Genet._ 7, 85–90 (1994). Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar  * Shuin, T. et al. Frequent somatic mutations and loss of heterozygosity of


the von Hippel-Lindau tumor suppressor gene in primary human renal cell carcinomas. _Cancer Res._ 54, 2852–2855 (1994). CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar  * Herman, J. G. et al. Silencing of the


VHL tumor-suppressor gene by DNA methylation in renal carcinoma. _Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA_ 91, 9700–9704 (1994). Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar  * Gruber, M. &


Simon, M. C. Hypoxia-inducible factors, hypoxia, and tumor angiogenesis. _Curr. Opin. Hematol._ 13, 169–174 (2006). Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar  * Shen, C. & Kaelin, W. G. The


VHL/HIF axis in clear cell renal carcinoma. _Semin. Cancer Biol._ 23, 18–25 (2013). Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar  * Haas, N. B. et al. Adjuvant sunitinib or sorafenib for high-risk,


non-metastatic renal-cell carcinoma (ECOG-ACRIN E2805): a double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomised, phase 3 trial. _Lancet_ 387, 2008–2016 (2016). THIS TRIAL OF A TARGETED AGENT AS


ADJUVANT THERAPY REPORTS NEGATIVE RESULTS. Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar  * Ravaud, A. et al. Adjuvant sunitinib in high-risk renal-cell carcinoma after nephrectomy.


_N. Engl. J. Med._ 375, 2246–2254 (2016). THIS ADJUVANT STUDY OF SUNITINIB IN RCC IS POSITIVE IN TERMS OF DFS (ITS PRIMARY END POINT) BUT NOT IN TERMS OF OS. Article  CAS  PubMed  Google


Scholar  * Motzer, R. J. et al. Randomized phase III trial of adjuvant pazopanib versus placebo after nephrectomy in patients with localized or locally advanced renal cell carcinoma. _J.


Clin. Oncol._ 35, 3916–3923 (2017). THIS TRIAL OF A TARGETED AGENT AS ADJUVANT THERAPY ALSO REPORTS NEGATIVE RESULTS. Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar  * Gross-Goupil, M.


et al. Axitinib versus placebo as an adjuvant treatment of renal cell carcinoma: results from the phase III randomized ATLAS trial. _Ann. Oncol._ 29, 2371–2378 (2018). Article  CAS  PubMed


  PubMed Central  Google Scholar  * US National Library of Medicine. _ClinicalTrials.gov_ https://www.clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT00492258 (2013). THIS IS THE LATEST NEGATIVE TRIAL


INVESTIGATING A VEGFR TKI. * U.S. Food and Drug Administration. FDA approves sunitinib malate for adjuvant treatment of renal cell carcinoma. _FDA.gov_


https://www.fda.gov/Drugs/InformationOnDrugs/ApprovedDrugs/ucm585686.htm (updated 16 Aug 2018). * Haas, N. B. et al. Adjuvant treatment for high-risk clear cell renal cancer: updated results


of a high-risk subset of the ASSURE randomized trial. _JAMA Oncol._ 3, 1249–1252 (2017). Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar  * Sternberg, C. et al. Pazopanib exposure


relationship with clinical efficacy and safety in the adjuvant treatment of advanced renal cell carcinoma. _Clin. Cancer Res._ 24, 3005–3013 (2018). Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central 


Google Scholar  * Bex, A. et al. Updated European Association of Urology guidelines regarding adjuvant therapy for renal cell carcinoma. _Eur. Urol._ 71, 719–722 (2017). Article  PubMed 


Google Scholar  * European Medicines Agency. Withdrawal assessment report: Sutent. _ema.europa.eu_


https://www.ema.europa.eu/documents/withdrawal-report/withdrawal-assessment-report-sutent_en.pdf (2018). * US National Library of Medicine. _ClinicalTrials.gov_


https://www.clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT01120249 (2018). * Vasudev, N. S. & Reynolds, A. R. Anti-angiogenic therapy for cancer: current progress, unresolved questions and future


directions. _Angiogenesis_ 17, 471–494 (2014). Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar  * Kim, B. J. et al. The role of targeted agents in the adjuvant treatment of colon


cancer: a meta-analysis of randomized phase III studies and review. _Oncotarget_ 8, 31112–31118 (2017). Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar  * Motzer, R. J. et al. Nivolumab


versus everolimus in advanced renal-cell carcinoma. _N. Engl. J. Med._ 373, 1803–1813 (2015). Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar  * Motzer, R. J. et al. Nivolumab plus


ipilimumab versus sunitinib in advanced renal-cell carcinoma. _N. Engl. J. Med._ 378, 1277–1290 (2018). THIS TRIAL ESTABLISHES A NEW STANDARD OF CARE FOR THE FIRST-LINE TREATMENT OF


METASTATIC RCC. Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar  * Motzer, R. J. et al. IMmotion151: a randomized phase III study of atezolizumab plus bevacizumab versus sunitinib in


untreated metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma (mRCC) [abstract]. _J. Clin. Oncol._ 36 (Suppl. 6), 578 (2018). Article  Google Scholar  * Motzer, R. J. et al. JAVELIN Renal 101: a randomized,


phase 3 study of avelumab+axitinib versus sunitinib as first-line treatment of advanced renal cell carcinoma (aRCC) [abstract]. _Ann. Oncol._ 29 (Suppl. 8), LBAA6_PR (2018). Google Scholar 


* US National Library of Medicine. _ClinicalTrials.gov_ https://www.clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03055013 (2019). * US National Library of Medicine. _ClinicalTrials.gov_


https://www.clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03024996 (2019). * US National Library of Medicine. _ClinicalTrials.gov_ https://www.clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03142334 (2019). * US National


Library of Medicine. _ClinicalTrials.gov_ https://www.clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03288532 (2018). * US National Library of Medicine. _ClinicalTrials.gov_


https://www.clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03138512 (2019). * Liu, J. et al. Improved efficacy of neoadjuvant compared to adjuvant immunotherapy to eradicate metastatic disease. _Cancer


Discov._ 6, 1382–1399 (2016). Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar  * Hung, P. H. et al. Increased risk of end-stage renal disease in patients with renal cell carcinoma: a 12-year nationwide


follow-up study. _Medicine (Baltimore)_ 93, e52 (2014). Article  PubMed  Google Scholar  * Barlow, L. J., Korets, R., Laudano, M., Benson, M. & McKiernan, J. Predicting renal functional


outcomes after surgery for renal cortical tumours: a multifactorial analysis. _BJU Int._ 106, 489–492 (2010). Article  PubMed  Google Scholar  * Jeon, H. G., Jeong, I. G., Lee, J. W., Lee,


S. E. & Lee, E. Prognostic factors for chronic kidney disease after curative surgery in patients with small renal tumors. _Urology_ 74, 1064–1068 (2009). Article  PubMed  Google Scholar


  * Li, L. et al. Risk of chronic kidney disease after cancer nephrectomy. _Nat. Rev. Nephrol._ 10, 135–145 (2014). Article  PubMed  Google Scholar  * Cho, A. et al. Post-operative acute


kidney injury in patients with renal cell carcinoma is a potent risk factor for new-onset chronic kidney disease after radical nephrectomy. _Nephrol. Dial. Transplant._ 26, 3496–3501 (2011).


Article  PubMed  Google Scholar  * Lam, A. Q. & Humphreys, B. D. Onco-nephrology: AKI in the cancer patient. _Clin. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol._ 7, 1692–1700 (2012). Article  CAS  PubMed 


PubMed Central  Google Scholar  * Gallieni, M. et al. Acute kidney injury in cancer patients. _Contrib. Nephrol._ 13, 137–148 (2018). Article  Google Scholar  * Cosmai, L. et al. Opening an


onconephrology clinic: recommendations and basic requirements. _Nephrol. Dial. Transplant._ 33, 1503–1510 (2018). THIS PAPER DISCUSSES THE REQUIREMENTS NEEDED TO RUN AN ONCO-NEPHROLOGY


CLINIC AS WELL AS ITS FIELD OF INTEREST. Article  PubMed  Google Scholar  * Taylor, A. T. Radionuclides in nephrourology, part 2: pitfalls and diagnostic applications. _Nucl. J. Med._ 55,


786–798 (2014). Article  CAS  Google Scholar  * Srigley, J. R. et al. Protocol for the examination of specimens from patients with invasive carcinoma of renal tubular origin. _Arch. Pathol.


Lab. Med._ 134, e25–e30 (2010). Article  PubMed  Google Scholar  * Algaba, F. et al. Handling and reporting of nephrectomy specimens for adult renal tumors: a survey by the European Network


of Uropathology. _J. Clin. Pathol._ 65, 106–113 (2012). Article  PubMed  Google Scholar  * Gupta, S. et al. Safety and efficacy of molecularly targeted agents in patients with metastatic


kidney cancer with renal dysfunction. _Anticancer Drugs._ 22, 794–800 (2011). Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar  * Nouhaud, F. X. et al. Baseline chronic kidney disease is


associated with toxicity and survival in patients treated with targeted therapies for metastatic renal cell carcinoma. _Anticancer Drugs._ 26, 866–871 (2015). Article  CAS  PubMed  Google


Scholar  * Zabor, E. C. et al. Factors associated with recovery of renal function following radical nephrectomy for kidney neoplasm. _Clin. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol._ 11, 101–107 (2016). Article


  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar  * Huang, W. C. et al. Chronic kidney disease after nephrectomy in patients with renal cortical tumours: a retrospective cohort study. _Lancet Oncol._ 7,


735–740 (2006). Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar  * Calvo, E. et al. Improvement in survival end points of patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma through sequential


targeted therapy. _Cancer Treat. Rev._ 50, 109–117 (2016). Article  PubMed  Google Scholar  * Escudier, B. et al. Renal cell carcinoma: ESMO clinical practice guidelines for diagnosis,


treatment and follow-up. _Ann. Oncol._ 27 (Suppl. 5), v58–v68 (2016). Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar  Download references ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS REVIEWER INFORMATION _Nature Reviews


Nephrology_ thanks H. Hammers, M. H. Rosner and the other anonymous reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work. AUTHOR INFORMATION AUTHORS AND AFFILIATIONS *


Department of Internal Medicine, University of Pavia, Pavia, Italy Camillo Porta * Division of Translational Oncology, I.R.C.C.S. Istituti Clinici Scientifici Maugeri, Pavia, Italy Camillo


Porta * Division of Nephrology, A.S.S.T. Santi Paolo e Carlo, San Carlo Borromeo Hospital, Milan, Italy Laura Cosmai & Maurizio Gallieni * Department of Urology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester,


MN, USA Bradley C. Leibovich * Barts Cancer Institute Experimental Medicine Centre, Queen Mary University of London St Bartholomew’s Hospital, London, UK Thomas Powles * Department of


Clinical and Biomedical Sciences “Luigi Sacco”, University of Milan, Milan, Italy Maurizio Gallieni * Department of Urology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, Netherlands Axel Bex


Authors * Camillo Porta View author publications You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar * Laura Cosmai View author publications You can also search for this author


inPubMed Google Scholar * Bradley C. Leibovich View author publications You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar * Thomas Powles View author publications You can also


search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar * Maurizio Gallieni View author publications You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar * Axel Bex View author publications


You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar CONTRIBUTIONS All authors researched the data, contributed to discussions of the content, wrote the article and reviewed or edited


the manuscript before submission. CORRESPONDING AUTHOR Correspondence to Camillo Porta. ETHICS DECLARATIONS COMPETING INTERESTS C.P. and A.B. contributed to the European Medicines Agency


(EMA) Committee for Medicinal Products for Human Use (CHMP) discussion regarding approval of sunitinib as an adjuvant treatment for resected renal cell carcinoma. The other authors declare


no competing interests. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION PUBLISHER’S NOTE Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.


SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION RIGHTS AND PERMISSIONS Reprints and permissions ABOUT THIS ARTICLE CITE THIS ARTICLE Porta, C., Cosmai, L., Leibovich, B.C. _et al._ The


adjuvant treatment of kidney cancer: a multidisciplinary outlook. _Nat Rev Nephrol_ 15, 423–433 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41581-019-0131-x Download citation * Published: 26 March 2019


* Issue Date: July 2019 * DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41581-019-0131-x SHARE THIS ARTICLE Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content: Get shareable link


Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article. Copy to clipboard Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative