Tailored elastic surface to body wave umklapp conversion

ABSTRACT Elastic waves guided along surfaces dominate applications in geophysics, ultrasonic inspection, mechanical vibration, and surface acoustic wave devices; precise manipulation of

surface Rayleigh waves and their coupling with polarised body waves presents a challenge that offers to unlock the flexibility in wave transport required for efficient energy harvesting and

vibration mitigation devices. We design elastic metasurfaces, consisting of a graded array of rod resonators attached to an elastic substrate that, together with critical insight from

Umklapp scattering in phonon-electron systems, allow us to leverage the transfer of crystal momentum; we mode-convert Rayleigh surface waves into bulk waves that form tunable beams.

Experiments, theory and simulation verify that these tailored Umklapp mechanisms play a key role in coupling surface Rayleigh waves to reversed bulk shear and compressional waves

independently, thereby creating passive self-phased arrays allowing for tunable redirection and wave focusing within the bulk medium. SIMILAR CONTENT BEING VIEWED BY OTHERS REALIZATION OF

ULTRATHIN WAVEGUIDES BY ELASTIC METAGRATINGS Article Open access 17 March 2022 SUB- AND SUPERSONIC ELASTIC WAVES IN AN ANNULAR HOLE PHONONIC METAMATERIAL Article Open access 03 June 2021

GENERALIZED ACOUSTIC IMPEDANCE METASURFACE Article Open access 15 January 2024 INTRODUCTION The Umklapp, or flip-over process first hypothesised by Peierls1 is conventionally concerned with

describing phonon–phonon scattering to explain thermal conductivity at high temperatures, and has a rich history in the quantum theory of thermal transport2,3. Concepts based around the

Umklapp process are not traditionally incorporated in areas of wave physics concerning designs of elastic metasurfaces; deep elastic substrates support surface Rayleigh waves that propagate

along the surface, often over large distances, which are an essential component of, for instance, surface acoustic wave microfluidic devices4, acoustic microscopy5, at small-scales and of

seismic wave and groundborne vibration propagation at the geophysical scale6. An isotropic, and homogeneous, elastic medium supports two types of bulk waves: compressional, P, and shear, SV

and SH, waves polarised vertically and horizontally that propagate with different wavespeeds _c_p and _c_s with _c_p > _c_s7 with the Rayleigh wavespeed _c_r slower than both. Recently

emerging ideas in graded metamaterial arrays and so-called rainbow-trapping devices have presented novel ways to manipulate wave propagation. Taking advantage of ideas that emerged in optics

around slow-light devices and optical “rainbow” trapping8 have in turn motivated tailored designs of graded Helmholtz resonator arrays in acoustics9, and their analogues in water waves10,

to slow the array-guided waves and trap the waves at different spatial positions, with application to broadband sound absorbers11,12. In almost all wave regimes where these graded systems

are designed, Umklapp effects have been neglected. Neither acoustic nor electromagnetic waves have the additional complications of elasticity, that is, having both shear and compressional

wavespeeds, mode coupling at interfaces and Rayleigh surface waves; this presents an opportunity as the additional degree of freedom in elasticity can be exploited. Elastic graded resonator

arrays use rods or beams, whose length determines the resonance frequency, and grading creates a metawedge13. Trapping and slow-wave phenomena occur but now with the additional physics of

mode conversion from the Rayleigh wave into a forward-propagating shear wave in the bulk as confirmed experimentally14. The trapping phenomena has potential for energy harvesting15; the

metawedge provides spatial segregation by frequency thereby amplifying elastic energy at specific resonators that can be coupled to piezoelectric patches16,17. The physics of a graded

structured array can also be interpreted in terms of phase changes, induced by changes in the array elements, as the wave transits the array. In this vision, a graded array acts as a

self-phased array and one can induce backward-directed radiation from an array (Supplementary Note 5, Supplementary Fig. 4). In the context of a model for flexural waves on thin elastic

plates, a simple scalar model, a graded line array has been shown18 to create focusing and flat-lensing effects, that emulate negative refraction on a line and Pendry–Veselago flat lenses.

Although motivational, the thin plate model also lacks the multiple wavespeeds of the deep elastic substrate, and the array-guided wave only exists below the sound-line, i.e. in the first

Brillouin zone. In this article, by taking an elastic half-space, patterned by a graded resonant array of rods (Fig. 1), we show that, one can obtain mode conversion from surface waves to

compressional, P waves, and not just to shear, S waves in the bulk. Furthermore, this can be directed backward, and used to create focusing, and these features are due to Umklapp scattering

from outside the first Brillouin zone. These striking results are confirmed experimentally from the predictions made by the theory and by simulation. The elastic wave system, having distinct

wave types with different wavespeeds, is imbued with richer physics than acoustic/electromagnetic systems and this yields a greater degree of flexibility and the opportunity for novel

effects; in elasticity we have two distinct sound-lines, also as the Rayleigh surface wave is, unlike spoof surface plasmons, not induced by periodic geometrical changes it is not confined

to lie below the sound-line nor is it confined to be within the first Brillouin zone. RESULTS DESIGN PARADIGM When operating outside the first Brillouin zone, concepts of crystal momentum

become important19. The conventional definition of an Umklapp process, or U-process, is elucidated in Fig. 2a, b, whereby the resultant wavevector of a scattering process within a periodic

crystal lies outside the first Brillouin zone; promotion of a backward-propagating phonon results through crystal momentum transfer, since the wave vector, Q is defined modulo G, i.e. up to

a reciprocal lattice vector. The textbook distinction between normal (N-processes) and U-processes is then given by

$${{\bf{q}}}_{1}+{{\bf{q}}}_{2}-{{\bf{q}}}_{3}=\left\{\begin{array}{ll}{\bf{0}}&{\rm{N}}{\hbox{-}}{\rm{process}},\\ {\bf{G}}&{\rm{U}}{\hbox{-}}{\rm{process}}.\end{array}\right.$$ (1)

where the Q_i_ are the wave vectors in Fig. 2a, b. We stress that these mechanisms do not violate momentum conservation1; unlike in conventional graded structures we are not considering

only the true momenta of interfering waves (phonons) within a crystal, but taking advantage of the momentum of the system as a whole. Nuances of this simplistic definition arise due to the

apparent interchangeability of N-process and U-process through altering the primitive cell, and the associated (quasi)momentum conservation19,20,21. The distinction is achieved throughout by

analysing the dispersion curves of the locally periodic elements, along with simplified isofrequency contours (Supplementary Figs. 1 and 2). Recently the importance of the Umklapp process

has been solidified for electron–electron scattering through experimental verification, highlighting the fundamental role it plays in electrical resistance in pure metals22, along with the

utility to probe electronic structures23. Further to this, new breeds of entirely flat lens devices have been theorised which incorporate Umklapp-scattering processes for surface waves on

dielectric substrates24 by virtue of abrupt, not adiabatic, gradings. Undeterred by its prevalence in quantum, discrete systems we demonstrate the efficacy of U-processes which can preside

over purely passive, classical, continuous elastic devices. The extent of this mechanism is often not considered in the wide range of structures based on (locally) periodic material systems,

and indeed neglected in elasticity theories25. Incorporating this effect is achieved by utilising the existence of surface waves outwith the periodic structure, and marrying the transition

of such a wave to the excited wave within a graded structuring. By doing so, striking reversed conversion into S and P waves can be achieved, and controlled, as predicted in Fig. 3 and

experimentally verified in Fig. 1. We present here the design methodology for structures capable of the conversion of Rayleigh waves directly into both S and P waves independently, by

utilising the dispersion curves and isofrequency contours of perfectly periodic arrays of rods. Due to the adiabatic changes of the array parameters the global spatial properties of the

array are determined by the locally periodic structures; the dispersive properties of the array at a given position are inferred from the periodic dispersion curves of the constituent

element at that position11,13. Shown in Fig. 2c, are the dispersion curves for the longitudinal motion of rods with fixed heights within the second Brillouin zone. These curves are obtained

through an averaging process of the fully polarised dispersion curves (Supplementary Note 2, Supplementary Fig. 1), since incident R-waves excite a superposition of longitudinal and flexural

rod motion26. Utilising modes in this region of reciprocal space, i.e. outwith the first Brillouin Zone, is somewhat counter-intuitive, in that the waves which appear above the light-line

in an irreducible representation of the Brillouin Zone are traditionally ignored when considering spoof surface plasmons27, which are the closest electromagnetic analogue to the Rayleigh

wave. The behaviour of the adiabatically graded array, as shown in Fig. 2e is predicted from these locally periodic curves. For a given frequency, longitudinal motion is preferentially

supported by a number of rods; at some rod height however, there is a transition in preferred rod motion from longitudinal to flexural (or vice versa). This is seen as an effective band gap

in Fig. 2c for the fourth rod, where U-processes dominate; the transfer of crystal momentum results in an effective reversed wavenumber, _Κ_ − G. Depending on the operational frequency, this

can lie within the isocircle of the free S or P body waves; reversed conversion is achieved by conservation of the tangential component of the wavevector. Figure 2d shows the prediction of

this angle by inspection of the last supported longitudinal mode (corresponding to the third resonator). The projected dispersion curves show the resultant wave vector inside the first

Brillouin zone, as a result of transfer of crystal momentum, by the white star corresponding to that in Fig. 2c. The wave can hybridise with a reversed P wave by the phase matching with the

isofrequency circle of the P wave, shown in black. A similar analysis can be carried out for conversion into S waves, by operating at a lower frequency. In this way, either longitudinal or

flexural rod motion can excite either S or P reversed waves by the inspection of the transition from one dominant rod motion to another. When operating at higher frequencies, corresponding

to wavevectors outside the first Brillouin zone, U-processes occur regardless of any grading; energy is continually shed along the array (Supplementary Note 3, Supplementary Fig. 1c),

resembling an elastic leaky wave antenna28. This can be manufactured to take place at a desired position by either adiabatic or abrupt gradings24. A similar effect is observed when exciting

along the opposite array direction; the grading experienced is then from high to low rods. In this case, since the effective bandgap is not a true bandgap, propagation occurs through the

array with Umklapp processes taking place all along the array (Supplementary Note 6, Supplementary Figs. 5 and 6). SIMULATION Within this simple metawedge design paradigm lies many degrees

of freedom: the position, angle and wave-type of reversed conversion, all allow a tailored conversion which simply relies upon a change in primary mode behaviour between neighbouring rods,

within a higher Brillouin Zone. Demonstrated in Fig. 3, modelled using SPECFEM29, is the reversed conversion into S and P modes via the transition from longitudinal to flexural rod motion

for an array with parameters detailed in Supplementary Table 1. The ellipses above the rods convey the ratio of the two dominant rod behaviours via their semi-minor and major axis. The angle

of conversion comes from the conserving the tangential component of the wavevector, determined via the isofrequency contours of the rod prior to the change in rod motion (Supplementary Fig.

 2), showing S conversion for 1.2 MHz and P conversion for 1.45 MHz. EXPERIMENTAL VERIFICATION Simulation results are confirmed experimentally in a 1.8 cm-thick slab of aluminium patterned

using 3D printing, with a graded array of aluminium microrods on the surface (Fig. 1, Supplementary Fig. 6). A laser adaptive photorefractive interferometer scans the surface of the

aluminium sample providing a reading of the displacement field in the out of plane direction _u__z_. The block is attached to a moving platform. Pure Rayleigh waves are generated by an

ultrasonic transducer attached at the surface of the aluminium sample (see “Methods” section for details on the experimental set-up). To enhance the visualisation of the conversion spatial

and frequency filters have been applied. Time series have been bandpassed between 1.1–1.2  and 1.45–1.55 MHz for S and P conversion, respectively. The wavefield scans have been filtered

selecting wavevectors pointing towards (away) from the resonators for the top (bottom) surface. This procedure mainly remove echoes from the boundaries as well as leakage from the

transducer. The wavelength difference between input Rayleigh and converted S-waves suggests that the wavefront is mainly reflected upward in the bulk according to Snell’s law only partly

converting into backward travelling Rayleigh waves along the bottom surface. In the P conversion case, the effect is exacerbated and differences in wavelength, velocity and propagation

direction between top and bottom signal are clear. To conclude, we have shown that crystal momentum transfer via Umklapp scattering is of paramount importance to furthering the modalities of

many metamaterial devices. Leveraging this decades old phenomenon with modern, advanced structured materials permits these remarkable devices to harness further powers of wave manipulation.

For elasticity we have experimentally verified a tailored surface wave to body wave reversed conversion effect, which allows the distinct bulk wave-types to be separated at will

(Supplementary Note 4, Supplementary Fig. 3). The incorporation of these mechanisms motivates hybrid effects with self-phased systems, with potential to spark new paradigms of control across

all wave regimes. METHODS FABRICATION The aluminium resonators were printed by selective laser melting (SLM). The Rayleigh wave was generated by a Panametrics Videoscan V414 0.5 MHz plane

wave transducer and coupled into the sample by a 65° polymer wedge. Phenyl salicylate was used to glue the transducer and wedge to the sample providing good coupling and long-term stability.

A Ritec RPR-4000 programmable pulser drove the transducer using a three-cycle sinusoidal burst at 1 and 1.5 MHz for S and P-conversion, respectively, with an amplitude of 300 V peak-to-peak

and repetition rate of 500 Hz. At this repetition rate, there were no echoes from previous pulses. The sample was mounted on scanning stages and measured with a rough-surface capable

optical detector (Bossanova Tempo-10HF) over an area of 100 × 30 mm and we used a 0.25 mm step-size. An Agilent digital oscilloscope was used to captured the signal with 125 MSa s−1 and 512

averages before transfer to a desktop computer. SIMULATION The 2D wavefield in the halfspace characterised by Rayleigh, P and S waves is simulated using SPECFEM2D, a code that solves the

elastic wave equation using a second-order Newmark integration scheme in time and the spectral element method in space. The code is parallelised using domain decomposition and the MPI

instruction set. The quadrilateral mesh is created using the commercial software Trelis. Stress-free conditions are applied to the rod’s boundary and the top surface, while the lateral and

bottom borders are supplied with absorbing boundaries to avoid undesired reflections. The code runs on a parallel cluster on 32 CPUs. A typical simulation for this work runs in <5 min. 2D

and 3D figures have been created using Python library Matplotlib, Matlab and Blender. Independent corroborations using Abaqus opposed to SPECFEM2D are presented (Supplementary Note 1). DATA

AVAILABILITY The data that supports the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request. CODE AVAILABILITY The software SPECFEM2D is available as

an open source code at: https://geodynamics.org/cig/software/specfem2d/ Meshing and configuration files for the simulations presented here can be obtained upon reasonable request from Dr.

Colombi ([email protected]). REFERENCES * Peierls, R. Zur kinetischen theorie der wärmeleitung in kristallen. _Ann. Phys._ 395, 1055–1101 (1929). Article  Google Scholar  * Hoddeson, L.,

Baym, G. & Eckert, M. The development of the quantum-mechanical electron theory of metals: 1928–1933. _Rev. Mod. Phys._ 59, 287–327 (1987). Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar  * Taylor,

P. L., Taylor, P. L. & Heinonen, O. _A Quantum Approach to Condensed Matter Physics_ (Cambridge University Press, 2002). * Yeo, L. Y. & Friend, J. R. Surface acoustic wave

microfluidics. _Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech._ 46, 379–406 (2014). Article  ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar  * Briggs, A. _Acoustic Microscopy_ (Clarendon Press, 1992). * Dahlen, F. A. & Tromp,

J. _Theoretical Global Seismology_ (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ, 1998). Google Scholar  * Graff, K. F. _Wave Motion in Elastic Solids_ (Oxford University Press, 1975). *

Tsakmakidis, K. L., Boardman, A. D. & Hess, O. Trapped rainbow storage of light in metamaterials. _Nature_ 450, 397–401 (2007). Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar  * Zhu, J. et al.

Acoustic rainbow trapping. _Sci. Rep._ 3, 1728 EP (2013). Article  Google Scholar  * Bennetts, L., Peter, M. & Craster, R. V. Graded resonator arrays for spatial frequency separation and

amplification of water waves. _J. Fluid Mech._ 854, R4 (2018). Article  ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar  * Romero-García, V., Picó, R., Cebrecos, A., Sánchez-Morcillo, V. J. &

Staliunas, K. Enhancement of sound in chirped sonic crystals. _Appl. Phys. Lett._ 102, 091906 (2013). Article  ADS  Google Scholar  * Jimenez, N., Romero-Garcia, V., Pagneux, V. & Groby,

J.-P. Rainbow-trapping absorbers: broadband, perfect and asymmetric sound absorption by subwavelength panels for transmission problems. _Sci. Rep._ 7, 13595 (2017). Article  ADS  Google

Scholar  * Colombi, A., Colquitt, D., Roux, P., Guenneau, S. & Craster, R. V. A seismic metamaterial: the resonant metawedge. _Sci. Rep._ 6, 27717 (2016). Article  ADS  CAS  Google

Scholar  * Colombi, A. et al. Enhanced sensing and conversion of ultrasonic Rayleigh waves by elastic metasurfaces. _Sci. Rep._ 7, 6750 (2017). Article  ADS  Google Scholar  * Cardella, D.,

Celli, P. & Gonella, S. Manipulating waves by distilling frequencies: a tunable shunt-enabled rainbow trap. _Smart Mater. Struct._ 25, 085017 (2016). Article  ADS  Google Scholar  * De

Ponti, J. M. et al. Graded elastic metasurface for enhanced energy harvesting. _New J. Phys._ 22, 013013 (2019). Article  Google Scholar  * Alan, S., Allam, A. & Erturk, A. Programmable

mode conversion and bandgap formation for surface acoustic waves using piezoelectric metamaterials. _Appl. Phys. Lett._ 115, 093502 (2019). Article  ADS  Google Scholar  * Chaplain, G. J.

& Craster, R. V. Flat lensing by graded line meta-arrays. _Phys. Rev. B(R.)_ 99, 220102 (2019). Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar  * Maznev, A. A. & Wright, O. B. Demystifying

umklapp vs normal scattering in lattice thermal conductivity. _Am. J. Phys._ 82, 1062 (2014). Article  ADS  Google Scholar  * Peierls, R. E._Quantum Theory of Solids_ (Clarendon Press,

1996). * Ding, Z. et al. Umklapp scattering is not necessarily resistive. _Phys. Rev. B_ 98, 180302 (2018). Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar  * Wallbank, J. R. et al. Excess resistivity in

graphene superlattices caused by umklapp electron–electron scattering. _Nat. Phys._ 15, 32–36 (2019). Article  CAS  Google Scholar  * Rader, O. & Shikin, A. An elastic sieve to probe

momentum space: Gd chains on w (110). _Phys. Rev. Lett._ 93, 256802 (2004). Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar  * Chaplain, G. J. & Craster, R. V. Ultrathin entirely flat umklapp lenses.

_Phys. Rev. B_ 101, 155430 (2020). Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar  * Gurevich, V. & Thellung, A. Quasimomentum in the theory of elasticity and its conservation. _Phys. Rev. B_ 42,

7345 (1990). Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar  * Colquitt, D., Colombi, A., Craster, R., Roux, P. & Guenneau, S. Seismic metasurfaces: sub-wavelength resonators and Rayleigh wave

interaction. _J. Mech. Phys. Solids_ 99, 379–393 (2017). Article  ADS  MathSciNet  CAS  Google Scholar  * Pendry, J. B., Martín-Moreno, L. & Garcia-Vidal, F. J. Mimicking surface

plasmons with structured surfaces. _Science (New York, NY)_ 305, 847–8 (2004). Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar  * Balanis, C. A. _Modern Antenna Handbook_ (Wiley, 2008). * Peter, D. et al.

Forward and adjoint simulations of seismic wave propagation on fully unstructured hexahedral meshes. _Geophys. J. Int._ 186, 721–739 (2011). Article  ADS  Google Scholar  Download

references ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The authors would like to thank Richard Sélos for printing the sample. A.C. was supported by the Ambizione Fellowship PZ00P2-174009. The support of the UK EPSRC

through grants EP/K021877/1 and EP/T002654/1 is acknowledged as is that of the ERC H2020 FETOpen project BOHEME under grant agreement No. 863179. AUTHOR INFORMATION AUTHORS AND AFFILIATIONS

* Department of Mathematics, Imperial College London, London, SW7 2AZ, UK Gregory J. Chaplain & Richard V. Craster * Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Politecnico di

Milano, Piazza Leonardo da Vinci, 32, 20133, Milano, Italy Jacopo M. De Ponti * Department of Mechanical Engineering, Politecnico di Milano, Via Giuseppe La Masa, 1, 20156, Milano, Italy

Jacopo M. De Ponti * Department of Civil, Environmental and Geomatic Engineering, ETH, Stefano-Franscini-Platz 5, 8093, Zürich, Switzerland Andrea Colombi * Optics and Photonics, Faculty of

Engineering, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, NG7 2RD, UK Rafael Fuentes-Dominguez, Paul Dryburg, Don Pieris, Richard J. Smith & Matt Clark * Advanced Component Engineering

Laboratory (ACEL), Faculty of Engineering, University of Nottingham, NG7 2RD, Nottingham, UK Adam Clare * Department of Mechanical Engineering, Imperial College London, London, SW7 2AZ, UK

Richard V. Craster * UMI 2004 Abraham de Moivre-CNRS, Imperial College London, London, SW7 2AZ, UK Richard V. Craster Authors * Gregory J. Chaplain View author publications You can also

search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar * Jacopo M. De Ponti View author publications You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar * Andrea Colombi View author

publications You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar * Rafael Fuentes-Dominguez View author publications You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar *

Paul Dryburg View author publications You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar * Don Pieris View author publications You can also search for this author inPubMed Google

Scholar * Richard J. Smith View author publications You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar * Adam Clare View author publications You can also search for this author

inPubMed Google Scholar * Matt Clark View author publications You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar * Richard V. Craster View author publications You can also search

for this author inPubMed Google Scholar CONTRIBUTIONS G.J.C. and R.V.C. applied the theory of Umklapp scattering to elastic devices. J.M.D.P. and A.Co. simulated the structures. R.F.-D.,

P.D., D.P., R.J.S., A.Cl. and M.C. performed the experiments. G.J.C. and A.Co. carried out post processing. G.J.C., R.V.C., J.M.D.P., A.Co., R.F.-D. and M.C. contributed to the writing of

the manuscript. CORRESPONDING AUTHOR Correspondence to Gregory J. Chaplain. ETHICS DECLARATIONS COMPETING INTERESTS The authors declare no competing interests. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION PEER

REVIEW INFORMATION _Nature Communications_ thanks the anonymous reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work. PUBLISHER’S NOTE Springer Nature remains neutral with

regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION DESCRIPTION OF ADDITIONAL SUPPLEMENTARY FILES

SUPPLEMENTARY MOVIE 1 SUPPLEMENTARY MOVIE 2 SUPPLEMENTARY MOVIE 3 SUPPLEMENTARY MOVIE 4 RIGHTS AND PERMISSIONS OPEN ACCESS This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0

International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the

source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative

Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by

statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit

http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. Reprints and permissions ABOUT THIS ARTICLE CITE THIS ARTICLE Chaplain, G.J., De Ponti, J.M., Colombi, A. _et al._ Tailored elastic surface to

body wave Umklapp conversion. _Nat Commun_ 11, 3267 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-020-17021-x Download citation * Received: 12 January 2020 * Accepted: 25 May 2020 * Published: 29

June 2020 * DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-020-17021-x SHARE THIS ARTICLE Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content: Get shareable link Sorry, a

shareable link is not currently available for this article. Copy to clipboard Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative