
- Select a language for the TTS:
- UK English Female
- UK English Male
- US English Female
- US English Male
- Australian Female
- Australian Male
- Language selected: (auto detect) - EN
Play all audios:
ABSTRACT OBJECTIVE This study aimed to examine the efficacy of Nutritional Risk Screening 2002 (NRS2002) and Mini Nutritional Assessment Short Form (MNA-SF) in recognizing sarcopenia and
predicting its mortality in Chinese geriatric hospitalized patients. METHODS A prospective analysis was performed in 430 hospitalized geriatric patients. Nutrition status was assessed using
the NRS2002 and MNA-SF scales. Anthropometric measures and biochemical parameters were carried out for each patient. Sarcopenia was defined according to the revised consensus definition of
the European Working Group on Sarcopenia in Older People (EWGSOP2). Patients were follow-up for up to 26 months. RESULTS The overall prevalence of sarcopenia was 35.3% in this population. In
the sarcopenic patients, 53 (34.9%) were malnutrition/nutritional risk according to NRS2002 assessment and 101 (66.4%) patients were malnutrition/nutritional risk according to MNA-SF
assessment. NRS2002 vs MNA-SF showed moderate agreement (_κ_ = 0.460, _P_ < 0.001). Receiver operating characteristic analysis showed that the area under the curve of MNA-SF was larger
than NRS2002 in recognizing sarcopenia (0.763 vs 0.649, _P_ = 0.001). During a median follow-up time of 20.22 months, 48 (31.6%) sarcopenic patients died. The Kaplan–Meier curve demonstrated
that malnutrition/nutritional risk patients according to whether NRS2002 or MNA-SF assessment had a higher risk of death than the normal nutrition patients (_χ_2 = 15.728, _P_ < 0.001;
_χ_2 = 7.039, _P_ = 0.008, respectively). Age, serum albumin levels, and NRS2002 score were independent factors influencing the mortality. CONCLUSION MNA-SF score may be better than the
NRS2002 score to recognize sarcopenia in Chinese geriatric population. Both NRS2002 and MNA-SF scores could predict mortality, but NRS2002 score was the independent predict factor. Access
through your institution Buy or subscribe This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution ACCESS OPTIONS Access through your institution Subscribe to this journal
Receive 12 print issues and online access $259.00 per year only $21.58 per issue Learn more Buy this article * Purchase on SpringerLink * Instant access to full article PDF Buy now Prices
may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout ADDITIONAL ACCESS OPTIONS: * Log in * Learn about institutional subscriptions * Read our FAQs * Contact customer support
SIMILAR CONTENT BEING VIEWED BY OTHERS GERIATRIC NUTRITION RISK INDEX IS CLOSELY ASSOCIATED WITH SARCOPENIA AND QUALITY OF LIFE IN GASTRIC CANCER PATIENTS: A CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDY Article
Open access 28 December 2024 THE GERIATRIC NUTRITIONAL RISK INDEX PREDICTS SARCOPENIA IN PATIENTS WITH CIRRHOSIS Article Open access 08 March 2023 PERFORMANCE OF SARC-F AND SARC-CALF SCORES
TO PREDICT RISK OF MORTALITY IN HEMODIALYSIS PATIENTS: A COHORT STUDY Article Open access 06 October 2024 REFERENCES * Cao L, Morley JE. Sarcopenia is recognized as an independent condition
by an international classification of disease, tenth revision, Clinical Modification (ICD-10-CM) Code. J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2016;17:675–7. Article Google Scholar * Fávaro-Moreira NC,
Krausch-Hofmann S, Matthys C, Vereecken C, Vanhauwaert E, Declercq A, et al. Risk factors for malnutrition in older adults: a systematic review of the literature based on longitudinal data.
Adv Nutr. 2016;7:507–22. Article Google Scholar * Álvarez-Hernández J, Planas Vila M, León-Sanz M, García de Lorenzo A, Celaya-Pérez S, García-Lorda P, et al. Prevalence and costs of
malnutrition in hospitalized patients; the PREDyCES Study. Nutr Hosp. 2012;27:1049–59. PubMed Google Scholar * Diekmann R, Winning K, Uter W, Kaiser MJ, Sieber CC, Volkert D, et al.
Screening for malnutrition among nursing home residents—a comparative analysis of the mini nutritional assessment, the nutritional risk screening, and the malnutrition universal screening
tool. J Nutr Health Aging. 2013;17:326–31. Article CAS Google Scholar * Stratton RJ, Hackston A, Longmore D, Dixon R, Price S, Stroud M, et al. Malnutrition in hospital outpatients and
inpatients: prevalence, concurrent validity and ease of use of the ‘malnutrition universal screening tool’ (‘MUST’) for adults. Br J Nutr. 2004;92:799–808. Article CAS Google Scholar *
Correia MI, Waitzberg DL. The impact of malnutrition on morbidity, mortality, length of hospital stay and costs evaluated through a multivariate model analysis. Clin Nutr. 2003;22:235–9.
Article Google Scholar * Beaudart C, Sanchez-Rodriguez D, Locquet M, Reginster JY, Lengelé L, Bruyère O. Malnutrition as a strong predictor of the onset of sarcopenia. Nutrients
2019;11:2883. Article Google Scholar * Eglseer D, Eminovic S, Lohrmann C. Association between sarcopenia and nutritional status in older adults: a systematic literature review. J Gerontol
Nurs. 2016;42:33–41. Article Google Scholar * Vandewoude MF, Alish CJ, Sauer AC, Hegazi RA. Malnutrition-sarcopenia syndrome: is this the future of nutrition screening and assessment for
older adults? J Aging Res. 2012;2012:651570. Article Google Scholar * Rubenstein LZ, Harker JO, Salvà A, Guigoz Y, Vellas B. Screening for undernutrition in geriatric practice: developing
the Short-form Mini-Nutritional Assessment (MNA-SF). J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2001;56:M366–72. Article CAS Google Scholar * Cederholm T, Bosaeus I, Barazzoni R, Bauer J, Van Gossum
A, Klek S, et al. Diagnostic criteria for malnutrition—an ESPEN Consensus Statement. Clin Nutr. 2015;34:335–40. Article CAS Google Scholar * Liguori I, Curcio F, Russo G, Cellurale M,
Aran L, Bulli G, et al. Risk of malnutrition evaluated by mini nutritional assessment and sarcopenia in noninstitutionalized elderly people. Nutr Clin Pract. 2018;33:879–86. Article Google
Scholar * Cruz-Jentoft AJ, Bahat G, Bauer J, Boirie Y, Bruyère O, Cederholm T, et al. Sarcopenia: revised European consensus on definition and diagnosis. Age Ageing. 2019;48:16–31. Article
Google Scholar * Aliberti MJR, Szlejf C, Covinsky KE, Lee SJ, Jacob-Filho W, Suemoto CK. Prognostic value of a rapid sarcopenia measure in acutely ill older adults. Clin Nutr.
2019;S0261-5614:33038–9. Google Scholar * Tresignie J, Scafoglieri A, Pieter Clarys J, Cattrysse E. Reliability of standard circumferences in domain-related constitutional applications. Am
J Hum Biol. 2013;25:637–42. Article Google Scholar * Cereda E, Veronese N, Caccialanza R. The final word on nutritional screening and assessment in older persons. Curr Opin Clin Nutr Metab
Care. 2018;21:24–9. Article Google Scholar * Berthon BS, Wood LG. Nutrition and respiratory health–feature review. Nutrients. 2015;7:1618–43. Article CAS Google Scholar * Ravera A,
Carubelli V, Sciatti E, Bonadei I, Gorga E, Cani D, et al. Nutrition and cardiovascular disease: finding the perfect recipe for cardiovascular health. Nutrients. 2016;8:363. Article Google
Scholar * Sieber CC. Malnutrition and sarcopenia. Aging Clin Exp Res. 2019;31:793–8. Article Google Scholar * Baek M, Heo Y. Evaluation of the efficacy of nutritional screening tools to
predict malnutrition in the elderly at a geriatric care hospital. Nutr Res Pract. 2015;9:637–43. Article Google Scholar * Bauer JM, Kaiser MJ, Sieber CC. Evaluation of nutritional status
in older persons: nutritional screening and assessment. Curr Opin Clin Nutr Metab Care. 2010;13:8–13. Article Google Scholar * Abd-El-Gawad WM, Abou-Hashem RM, El Maraghy MO, Amin GE. The
validity of Geriatric Nutrition Risk Index: simple tool for prediction of nutritional-related complication of hospitalized elderly patients. Comparison with Mini Nutritional Assessment. Clin
Nutr. 2014;33:1108–16. Article Google Scholar * Drescher T, Singler K, Ulrich A, Koller M, Keller U, Christ-Crain M, et al. Comparison of two malnutrition risk screening methods (MNA and
NRS 2002) and their association with markers of protein malnutrition in geriatric hospitalized patients. Eur J Clin Nutr. 2010;64:887–93. Article CAS Google Scholar * Wu ML, Courtney MD,
Shortridge-Baggett LM, Finlayson K, Isenring EA. Validity of the malnutrition screening tool for older adults at high risk of hospital readmission. J Gerontol Nurs. 2012;38:38–45. Article
CAS Google Scholar * Maeda K, Shamoto H, Wakabayashi H, Akagi J. Sarcopenia is highly prevalent in older medical patients with mobility limitation. Nutr Clin Pract. 2017;32:110–5. Article
Google Scholar * Chang KV, Hsu TH, Wu WT, Huang KC, Han DS. Is sarcopenia associated with depression? A systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies. Age Ageing.
2017;46:738–46. Article Google Scholar * Chang KV, Hsu TH, Wu WT, Huang KC, Han DS. Association between sarcopenia and cognitive impairment: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Am Med
Dir Assoc. 2016;17:1164.e7–1164.e15. Article Google Scholar * Hu X, Zhang L, Wang H, Hao Q, Dong B, Yang M. Malnutrition-sarcopenia syndrome predicts mortality in hospitalized older
patients. Sci Rep. 2017;7:3171. Article Google Scholar * Koga Y, Fujita M, Yagi T, Todani M, Nakahara T, Kawamura Y, et al. Early enteral nutrition is associated with reduced in-hospital
mortality from sepsis in patients with sarcopenia. J Crit Care. 2018;47:153–8. Article Google Scholar * Holst M, Yifter-Lindgren E, Surowiak M, Nielsen K, Mowe M, Carlsson M, et al.
Nutritional screening and risk factors in elderly hospitalized patients: association to clinical outcome? Scand J Caring Sci. 2013;27:953–61. Article Google Scholar * Donini LM,
Poggiogalle E, Molfino A, Rosano A, Lenzi A, Rossi Fanelli F, et al. Mini-nutritional assessment, malnutrition universal screening tool, and nutrition risk screening tool for the nutritional
evaluation of older nursing home residents. J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2016;17:959.e11–e18. Article Google Scholar * Raslan M, Gonzalez MC, Dias MC, Nascimento M, Castro M, Marques P, et al.
Comparison of nutritional risk screening tools for predicting clinical outcomes in hospitalized patients. Nutrition. 2010;26:721–6. Article Google Scholar Download references
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS We thank all the team involved in the development and implementation of the study: Jin Wang, Caihua Zhang, Xuelian Chen, Xiaokang Sun, and Ji Li. AUTHOR INFORMATION Author
notes * These author contributed equally: Xing-liang Zhang, Zhen Zhang AUTHORS AND AFFILIATIONS * Department of Geriatrics, Shanghai Jiaotong University Affiliated Sixth People’s Hospital,
No. 600, Yi Shan road, Shanghai, 200233, China Xing-liang Zhang, Zhen Zhang, Yun-xia Zhu, Jun Tao, Yue Zhang, Yan-yan Wang, Ying-ying Ke, Chen-xi Ren, Jun Xu & Xiao-yan Zhang Authors *
Xing-liang Zhang View author publications You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar * Zhen Zhang View author publications You can also search for this author inPubMed
Google Scholar * Yun-xia Zhu View author publications You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar * Jun Tao View author publications You can also search for this author
inPubMed Google Scholar * Yue Zhang View author publications You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar * Yan-yan Wang View author publications You can also search for this
author inPubMed Google Scholar * Ying-ying Ke View author publications You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar * Chen-xi Ren View author publications You can also search
for this author inPubMed Google Scholar * Jun Xu View author publications You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar * Xiao-yan Zhang View author publications You can also
search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar CONTRIBUTIONS The paper was conceived by author XLZ. XLZ, ZZ, YXZ, YYW, YYK, CXR and JX contributed to the implementation of the program and
acquisition of the data. YXZ and JT performed the statistical analysis. XLZ and ZZ wrote the paper. XLZ finalized the paper. All authors contributed to the interpretation of data analysis,
drafted or reviewed the paper and approved this version for publication. CORRESPONDING AUTHOR Correspondence to Xiao-yan Zhang. ETHICS DECLARATIONS CONFLICT OF INTEREST The authors declare
that they have no conflict of interest. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION PUBLISHER’S NOTE Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional
affiliations. RIGHTS AND PERMISSIONS Reprints and permissions ABOUT THIS ARTICLE CITE THIS ARTICLE Zhang, Xl., Zhang, Z., Zhu, Yx. _et al._ Comparison of the efficacy of Nutritional Risk
Screening 2002 and Mini Nutritional Assessment Short Form in recognizing sarcopenia and predicting its mortality. _Eur J Clin Nutr_ 74, 1029–1037 (2020).
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41430-020-0621-8 Download citation * Received: 18 December 2019 * Revised: 18 March 2020 * Accepted: 20 March 2020 * Published: 09 April 2020 * Issue Date: July 2020
* DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41430-020-0621-8 SHARE THIS ARTICLE Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content: Get shareable link Sorry, a shareable link is
not currently available for this article. Copy to clipboard Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative