- Select a language for the TTS:
- UK English Female
- UK English Male
- US English Female
- US English Male
- Australian Female
- Australian Male
- Language selected: (auto detect) - EN
Play all audios:
ABSTRACT 393 _Poster Session III, Monday, 5/3 (poster 154)_ Adenosine, a known neuromodulator, may play an important role in the prevention of excitotoxic injury in the newborn brain.
Adenosine and postsynaptic A1 receptors may indirectly counteract NMDA-mediated depolarization by its effect on voltage-sensitive K+ currents. Our previous studies have shown that
theophylline, an adenosine receptor antagonist, administration prior to hypoxia prevents the hypoxia-induced increase in free radical generation and lipid peroxidation. The present study
tests the hypothesis that adenosine and its postsynaptic receptors are inhibitory to the NMDA receptor ion-channel function. Studies were conducted on six anesthetized normoxic newborn
piglets, using adenosine and its antagonist, theophylline. P2 brain cell membranes fractions were prepared from the piglet cortices and 3H-MK-801 binding was used as an index of NMDA
receptor activation. Binding studies were carried out at 32°C for 3 hours in a medium containing 10 mM HEPES buffer at pH 7.0, 75 µg membrane protein and 10 nM 3H-MK-801 in the presence and
absence of the activators glutamate and glycine (1-10 µM). Non specific binding was performed in the presence of 10 µM unlabeled MK-801. Binding was also carried out in the presence of
adenosine (1-100 µM), and the adenosine antagonists theophylline (1-100 µM). The glutamate and glycine dependent increase in 3H-MK-801 binding was 29 ± 26% at 1 µM and 118 ± 62% at 10 µM.
Adenosine did not directly inhibit MK-801 binding. Theophylline increased MK-801 binding by 47.8 ± 30% independent of glutamate and glycine activation. In the presence of 100 µM theophylline
and 100 µM adenosine, the 3MK-801 binding was 54 ± 22%, indicating that adenosine did not alter the theophylline-dependent increase in MK-801 binding. These _in vitro_ results show that
adenosine alone does not directly reduce NMDA receptor activation, however, the adenosine antagonist, theophylline, directly increases NMDA receptor activation independently from glutamate
and glycine. The activation of NMDA receptor by theophylline was not blocked by adenosine. We conclude that postsynaptic adenosine receptors play a direct regulatory role on NMDA
receptor-ion channel function. Since theophylline increased 3MK-801 binding without the presence of glutamate and glycine, we speculate that theophylline transduces its effect by interacting
at a site other than the glutamate recognition and the glycine co-activator sites of the NMDA receptor and affecting the ion-channel opening. Funded by NIH-HD-20337 AUTHOR INFORMATION
AUTHORS AND AFFILIATIONS * Department of Pediatrics, Maine Medical Center, Portland, ME Peter J Marro, Juan R Ballesteros, Anli Zhu, Om P Mishra & Maria Delivoria-Papadopoulos *
Department of Pediatrics, MCP Hahnemann University and St. Christopher's Hospital for Children, Philadelphia, PA Peter J Marro, Juan R Ballesteros, Anli Zhu, Om P Mishra & Maria
Delivoria-Papadopoulos Authors * Peter J Marro View author publications You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar * Juan R Ballesteros View author publications You can also
search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar * Anli Zhu View author publications You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar * Om P Mishra View author publications You can
also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar * Maria Delivoria-Papadopoulos View author publications You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar RIGHTS AND
PERMISSIONS Reprints and permissions ABOUT THIS ARTICLE CITE THIS ARTICLE Marro, P., Ballesteros, J., Zhu, A. _et al._ Activation of the N-Methyl-D-Aspartate (NMDA) Receptor by Adenosine
Antagonists in Brain Cell Membranes of Newborn Piglets. _Pediatr Res_ 45, 68 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1203/00006450-199904020-00410 Download citation * Issue Date: 01 April 1999 * DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1203/00006450-199904020-00410 SHARE THIS ARTICLE Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content: Get shareable link Sorry, a shareable link is
not currently available for this article. Copy to clipboard Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative