Long-term outcomes of endopyelotomy and pyeloplasty are worse than expected


Play all audios:

Access through your institution Buy or subscribe Dimarco DS _ et al_. (2006) Long-term success of antegrade endopyelotomy compared with pyeloplasty at a single institution. _J Endourol_ 20:


707–712 Ureteropelvic junction obstruction has traditionally been treated with open pyeloplasty, but antegrade endopyelotomy is a less-invasive, widely accepted, alternative therapy. Dimarco


and colleagues have compared the long-term outcomes of these two treatments. This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution ACCESS OPTIONS Access through your


institution Subscribe to this journal Receive 12 print issues and online access $209.00 per year only $17.42 per issue Learn more Buy this article * Purchase on SpringerLink * Instant access


to full article PDF Buy now Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout ADDITIONAL ACCESS OPTIONS: * Log in * Learn about institutional subscriptions * Read


our FAQs * Contact customer support RIGHTS AND PERMISSIONS Reprints and permissions ABOUT THIS ARTICLE CITE THIS ARTICLE Long-term outcomes of endopyelotomy and pyeloplasty are worse than


expected. _Nat Rev Urol_ 4, 64 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1038/ncpuro0691 Download citation * Issue Date: February 2007 * DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/ncpuro0691 SHARE THIS ARTICLE Anyone


you share the following link with will be able to read this content: Get shareable link Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article. Copy to clipboard Provided by the


Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative