
- Select a language for the TTS:
- UK English Female
- UK English Male
- US English Female
- US English Male
- Australian Female
- Australian Male
- Language selected: (auto detect) - EN
Play all audios:
An analysis by _Nature_ reveals who holds the most grants from the US National Institutes of Health. Access through your institution Buy or subscribe This is a preview of subscription
content, access via your institution ACCESS OPTIONS Access through your institution Subscribe to this journal Receive 51 print issues and online access $199.00 per year only $3.90 per issue
Learn more Buy this article * Purchase on SpringerLink * Instant access to full article PDF Buy now Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout ADDITIONAL
ACCESS OPTIONS: * Log in * Learn about institutional subscriptions * Read our FAQs * Contact customer support Authors * Eric Hand View author publications You can also search for this author
inPubMed Google Scholar RELATED LINKS RELATED LINKS RELATED LINKS IN NATURE RESEARCH Study says middle sized labs do best 2010-Nov-16 222 NIH grants: 22 researchers 2008-Mar-19 Grants fall
victim to NIH success 2006-Oct-25 RELATED EXTERNAL LINKS Sally Rockey's NIH blog RIGHTS AND PERMISSIONS Reprints and permissions ABOUT THIS ARTICLE CITE THIS ARTICLE Hand, E. Extra
scrutiny for ‘grandee grantees’. _Nature_ 482, 450–451 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1038/482450a Download citation * Published: 20 February 2012 * Issue Date: 23 February 2012 * DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1038/482450a SHARE THIS ARTICLE Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content: Get shareable link Sorry, a shareable link is not currently
available for this article. Copy to clipboard Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative