Notes | Nature


Play all audios:

ABSTRACT PROMOTERS of the proposal to put the hands of timepieces forward by an hour during certain months of the year are now advocating the adoption of this principle of “Daylight Saving”


by deception on the grounds of national economy in fuel and light. The scheme has been before the public for many years, and has been rejected by Parliament on more than one occasion. It has


not received the approval of a single scientific society of any importance, and only one or two scientific men have given it any support. Yet Lord Salvesen made the astounding assertion, in


the _Times_ of March 31, that the Daylight Saving Bill “is supported by substantially the whole intelligent opinion of the country.” He evidently believes that “intelligent opinion” upon


time-standards is not to be found in the views of experts, but in the resolutions of town councils, district councils, chambers of commerce, and like bodies, who want to pretend that during


a prescribed period every year the hour of seven o'clock is really eight, and so for other hours. It is usually understood that people cannot be made sober by Act of Parliament, yet it


is seriously suggested that they should be made to rise earlier by a legalised plan of national deception. We have condemned this ridiculous measure whenever it has been brought forward, and


dealt with it in detail in an article in NATURE of May 11, 1911 (vol. lxxxvi., p. 349). A correspondent suggests that we should reprint this article, but we doubt whether the corporations


who want Parliament to do for them what they could do for themselves by changing their habits would be convinced by any appeal to authoritative opinion. They might not be in favour of


altering temperature standards during certain months of the year, so that in the summer 80° shall be called 70° by Act of Parliament, in order to pretend that the weather is not really so


hot as the thermometer indicates, yet the principle which they adopt so cheerfully is precisely the same. If they understood the meaning of time-standards so well as they know those of


length, weight, and temperature, the “Daylight Saving” scheme would long since have passed into the limbo of forgotten things. Access through your institution Buy or subscribe This is a


preview of subscription content, access via your institution ACCESS OPTIONS Access through your institution Subscribe to this journal Receive 51 print issues and online access $199.00 per


year only $3.90 per issue Learn more Buy this article * Purchase on SpringerLink * Instant access to full article PDF Buy now Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during


checkout ADDITIONAL ACCESS OPTIONS: * Log in * Learn about institutional subscriptions * Read our FAQs * Contact customer support RIGHTS AND PERMISSIONS Reprints and permissions ABOUT THIS


ARTICLE CITE THIS ARTICLE _Notes_ . _Nature_ 97, 126–130 (1916). https://doi.org/10.1038/097126b0 Download citation * Issue Date: 06 April 1916 * DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/097126b0 SHARE


THIS ARTICLE Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content: Get shareable link Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article. Copy to


clipboard Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative