A theory of the cause of atmospheric electricity

ABSTRACT THE idea that the sun sends out a large amount of Becquerel rays has found considerable support in the scientific world, and has been used to explain a number of difficulties

connected with cosmical physics, for example, the source of the sun's energy and comets' tails. There is still another old standing difficulty which it appears to be able to solve,

viz. the permanent maintenance of the electrical field in the lower regions of the earth's atmosphere. If we take for granted that the sun continually emits Becquerel rays consisting

of positive and negative electrons, one would expect the following to be the consequence. Some of the electrons which reach the earth's atmosphere will be absorbed—probably mainly by

the water vapour and dust in the lower atmosphere—but according to Rutherford's experiments more positive than negative; thus we may expect a greater number of negative electrons to

reach the surface, a corresponding number of positive electrons being held back by the air. We at once see a cause for the positive charge of the air and the corresponding negative charge on

the surface. If there were no “dissipation” the result would be a continual charging up of the atmosphere or an ever increasing potential gradient above the earth's surface; but there

is dissipation, and it counterbalances the tendency of the electrical field to increase. If we had a constant dissipation the result would be a maximum potential gradient in the daytime and

a minimum in the night, for we must assume that more electrons reach the atmosphere in the day than in the night. But we know from Elster and Geitel's measurements that the dissipation

reaches a maximum at midday; this will tend to reduce the maximum of potential gradient which would otherwise be reached about that time. This consideration agrees entirely with the fact,

for Exner has described the daily variation of the potential gradient as “a simple daily period, distorted by a midday depression.” With the fairly constant daily period of the entrance of

electrons into the atmosphere, the main determining factor of the potential gradient will be the dissipation; thus we find a maximum potential gradient in the winter with a corresponding

minimum dissipation. The relation between potential gradient and dissipation has been thoroughly investigated by Elster and Geitel, and they have found experimentally that that which tends

to reduce the dissipation tends to increase the potential gradient, which is just what one would expect from the theory. This theory appears to me to be able to account for a great many more

of the problems of atmospheric electricity, but the above will show the general idea. SIMILAR CONTENT BEING VIEWED BY OTHERS HIGH-FREQUENCY HEATING OF THE SOLAR WIND TRIGGERED BY

LOW-FREQUENCY TURBULENCE Article 24 March 2022 MAGNETIC DIFFUSION IN SOLAR ATMOSPHERE PRODUCES MEASURABLE ELECTRIC FIELDS Article Open access 11 October 2024 ON AN ELECTROMAGNETIC

CALCULATION OF IONOSPHERIC CONDUCTANCE THAT SEEMS TO OVERRIDE THE FIELD LINE INTEGRATED CONDUCTIVITY Article Open access 02 April 2024 ARTICLE PDF Authors * GEORGE SIMPSON View author

publications You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar RIGHTS AND PERMISSIONS Reprints and permissions ABOUT THIS ARTICLE CITE THIS ARTICLE SIMPSON, G. _A Theory of the

Cause of Atmospheric Electricity_ . _Nature_ 69, 270 (1904). https://doi.org/10.1038/069270c0 Download citation * Issue Date: 21 January 1904 * DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/069270c0 SHARE

THIS ARTICLE Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content: Get shareable link Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article. Copy to

clipboard Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative