- Select a language for the TTS:
- UK English Female
- UK English Male
- US English Female
- US English Male
- Australian Female
- Australian Male
- Language selected: (auto detect) - EN
Play all audios:
ABSTRACT IT can scarcely have been the intrinsic worth of these occasional essays which induced the “Rationalist Press Association” to circulate them in an English dress. The volume is
marked by all the confident dogmatism and loose reasoning for which the author of “Force and Matter” is unfavourably known to serious students. Its value as a contribution to genuine thought
on the ulti mate constitution of the world around is of the slightest. The author's position is that thought and will are secondary derivatives of a reality which is, in its own
nature, “material” in the sense of being not mental, but for this position no proof whatever is offered. The “idealist,” who comes in for a good deal of abuse which, from an English point of
view, must be pronounced de cidedly undignified, is never fairly met. His real argu ment, that the physical world itself is only given us in terms of the experiences of a sentient
perceiver, isquietly ignored, and he is only allowed to make thefutile objection that he does not know by what special process physical energy is “transformed” into conscious ness. The
writer's competence in philosophic discussion is shown by the fact that he thinks the inability of savages to count beyond four a proof that mathematical science is purely empirical.
Similarly, he thinks Kant's view of the presence of an a _priori_ element in knowledge refuted by the irrelevant appeal to the fact that know ledge has been acquired by a process of
gradual develop ment. The real point has, of course, nothing to do with the process by which we come to know; it is purely a question of how knowledge is constituted when you have got it.
The excursions into philosophic history made in such essays as those on “Hobbes” and on “Buddhism and Christianity” are even sorrier stuff than the rest of the book. Büchner seems to have
known little or nothing about the subject; he repeats complacently the absurd farrago by which Pythagoras has been brought into connection with Buddha, and expressly praises Hobbes for
being—precisely what he was not—an empiricist. The “Rationalist Press Association” is doing scientific thought no good service in issuing such a mixture of anti- ecclesiastical rhetoric and
crass metaphysical dogmatism as representing the views of serious science about the world. Last Words on Materialism. By L. Büchner. Translated by J. McCabe. Pp. xxxiv + 299. (London: Watts
and Co., 1901.) Price 6_s_. net. ARTICLE PDF Authors * A. E. T. View author publications You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar RIGHTS AND PERMISSIONS Reprints and
permissions ABOUT THIS ARTICLE CITE THIS ARTICLE T., A. _Last Words on Materialism_ . _Nature_ 66, 29 (1902). https://doi.org/10.1038/066029a0 Download citation * Issue Date: 08 May 1902 *
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/066029a0 SHARE THIS ARTICLE Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content: Get shareable link Sorry, a shareable link is not
currently available for this article. Copy to clipboard Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative