
- Select a language for the TTS:
- UK English Female
- UK English Male
- US English Female
- US English Male
- Australian Female
- Australian Male
- Language selected: (auto detect) - EN
Play all audios:
A 1980S-THEMED BAR HAS SPARKED A SEXISM ROW AFTER MEMBERS OF THE PUBLIC ASKED WHY THEY HAD ADVERTISED FOR 'FEMALE STAFF' - WHILE OTHERS SAID THEIR LISTING COULD EVEN BE ILLEGAL
20:13, 15 May 2023 A job advert for a 1980s-themed bar has divided opinion after some people complained that the advert was 'sexist'. Maverick's, in Huddersfield, West
Yorkshire posted a job advert on its Facebook page over the weekend that read: "We are hiring! Female bar staff. No experience necessary. Team spirit. Bubbly personality." But some
members of the public have written under the post asking why they had asked specifically for applicants from one gender, which could potentially be illegal under the Equality Act 2010. One
woman asked: "Can I just ask why you're specifically asking for females. Why would it matter?" READ MORE: Mum fumes as neighbour lets grandchildren play in her garden and use
trampoline The bar replied to her question, saying: "We are trying to balance the team as we have loads of boys already working, that's all." One man commented on the job
advert post: "You might need to check yourself. It's illegal to specify a gender." Speaking to Yorkshire Live about the potential legal issues involved in advertising to
applicants of only one sex, Emily Battock of law firm Doyle Clayton said: "Under the Equality Act 2010, it is unlawful to treat someone less favourably because of a protected
characteristic, such as sex. "The protection afforded by the Equality Act extends to candidates for a job role as well as employees." Ms Battock said that in a scenario where a
male candidate applied for a role specified for women and was rejected, the Employment Tribunal would consider what was the reason for the candidate’s rejection. If the reason for rejection
was the candidate’s sex, then this "would be direct sex discrimination" and the candidate could potentially bring a claim in the Employment Tribunal, she explained. Ms Battock
added: "Employers are not able to put forward an objective justification to direct sex discrimination. "Employers can however rely on some exceptions to the Equality Act which
permit conduct that would be otherwise unlawful if there is a genuine 'occupational requirement' for employees to be of a certain sex. But she it would be "difficult to see
how a bar may be able to prove an occupational requirement on which it could lawfully rely to justify what would otherwise be sex discrimination." The Mirror has contacted
Maverick's for a comment. Article continues belowREAD MORE: Two in five women wouldn't even talk to close friends - about their private partsREAD MORE: Outrage as student gets
detention for taking bag into toilet while on her periodREAD MORE: Loose Women's Janet Street-Porter makes savage dig at UK's Eurovision entry Mae MullerREAD MORE: Boy, 8, dubbed
'mini Del Boy' as he sneakily tries to flog his dad's watch to buy a bikeREAD MORE: Tory fumes we're not having enough kids in rant at Marxist threat to
'children's souls'