Others Accepted Cuts - Los Angeles Times

I am truly astonished by the less-than-thorough research job done by Professor Lester Thurow in preparing his recent Viewpoint piece on the TWA flight attendants’ strike (“Winning the

Battle, Losing the War,” April 27). He seems to believe that the company’s insistence on wage and work-rule concessions is directed solely at the flight attendants, although the widely

publicized facts are otherwise. Both the pilots’ and machinists’ unions have been working since the start of this year under heavily concessionary new contracts, while the airline’s

non-union employees (including the management Thurow erroneously portrays as exempt from sacrifice) are concurrently subject to a 14% pay reduction. They are enduring this not happily, but

with genuine comprehension of the situation. The flight attendants are the odd man out in this picture, having refused for more than two years to negotiate a new contract with the necessary

concessions to help make TWA cost-competitive. Thurow’s feverish depiction of Carl Icahn as someone who fattens his wealth by impoverishing his employees is no less preposterous in its own

way. What should Icahn do--subsidize the flight attendants’ non-competitive wages out of his own pocket? What TWA desperately needs, and has needed for some time, is the opportunity to

function profitably. Icahn’s actions since assuming control of TWA--including his quest for market-rate labor costs--have been aimed at that long-deferred goal. The fact that his succeeding

in that attempt inevitably stands to enrich him should not cause Thurow to chew his own teeth in rage. An incentive system embodying what is known as the “profit motive” is what our economic

system is supposed to be about. W. S. BROWN TWA Corporate Communications MORE TO READ