- Select a language for the TTS:
- UK English Female
- UK English Male
- US English Female
- US English Male
- Australian Female
- Australian Male
- Language selected: (auto detect) - EN
Play all audios:
CC V SECRETARY OF STATE FOR WORK AND PENSIONS (ESA): [2019] UKUT 14 (AAC) Upper Tribunal Administrative Appeals Chamber decision by Judge Poole on 7 January 2019 Read the full decision in
CSE/266/2018 Judicial Summary The tribunal did not err in law by failing expressly to put its findings about the claimant’s tearfulness at the hearing to her for comment. The case sets out
the principles guiding when specific matters need to be put to claimants. Claimants should have an opportunity to be heard, but natural justice does not in general demand that tribunals
expressly put for claimant comment matters of demeanour, inference, or observations. However, where a decision turns on a new matter, then natural justice may require the claimant to have
been given an opportunity to be heard on that matter. UPDATES TO THIS PAGE Published 9 April 2019
