Woman redefines her relationship status at 70-plus

feature-image

Play all audios:

Loading...

At my age, the term “boyfriend” is too cute, and when applied to Jonathan, it’s most inadequate. We met on Match.com when I was 60 and he was 58. First came our G-rated no-mance, then time


off, then a reunion. The night he announced he didn’t want to be just friends anymore, he confided a worry — that women he’d dated after his divorce eventually asked, “Where is this going?”


“Ha!” said I, widowed after 34 years of marriage. “You’ve come to the right place!” Ten years in, we both feel as committed as two unmarrieds can be. We live in separate Manhattan


apartments, a mile apart, on a bus route that brings us from door to door. We spend weekends together 60 miles north of Manhattan, in a house on a lake, and we were isolation-mates there


during the pandemic. Whether cohabitating for 18 COVID-conscious months or just on weekends, it works. He is excellent company, an excellent listener, cheerleader, bed maker and appreciator


of my cooking. He sets the table and does the dishes. He is a neatnik, but in the best way. He notices grime where I don’t. I remember looking out the window in awe, watching him hose down


the chrome canisters that held the toilet brush and plunger. I know some couples believe that sharing hobbies and sports is critical. Not us. If Jonathan announces he’s going on a hike, I


say, “Fine! Enjoy!” We share the same values, the same religion, the same politics and the same view of wall-to-wall togetherness: It’s overrated. Do I mind that this ex-Liverpudlian can


watch soccer matches all weekend? Not at all. When I disappear to write, does he mind being left to his crossword puzzles, his books, his own work? No. If there’s a secret to our success, I


think it’s this: love between two reasonable people who appreciate their comfortable proximity. Back in the city, we have a standing Wednesday night date; when not together on other


weeknights, we have cocktails via FaceTime. If Liverpool has a weeknight match, we watch in tandem, remotely, and text our commentary. He is my partner, my significant other, my confidant


and my emergency contact. I coach him from time to time: “If one of us is in the hospital, who do you say you are?” “Your husband.” Correct. Just as I’d say, “I’m his wife.” Is anyone going


to demand a marriage license? I think not. Early on, when I invited him to some future event, I’d add coyly, “That is, if we’re still together …”. To which he’d always say, “I’m not going


anywhere.” He still says that, but now it’s to make me laugh, mocking the early days when I was afraid to take endurance for granted. Nine years ago, a neighbor stopped me in the lobby of


our building after one of Jonathan’s visits. He said, grinning, “When you two saw each other, your faces illuminated, and you both lost 15 years. This is the real thing.” Thank you, kind and


observant neighbor. Thank you, life and your cosmic algorithms. Thank you, Jonathan. Because years later, all that we have fashioned is still the real thing.