Play all audios:
POLITICS AND CONTROVERSY Leunig saw 9/11 and the ensuing “War on Terror” as the great turning point in his career. He fearlessly returned to the themes of the Vietnam years, only to receive
caution, rebuke and rejection from editors and readers. He stopped drawing Mr Curly and Vasco Pyjama. The world was no longer safe for the likes of them. Then there was a cartoon refused by
the Age in 2002, deemed by editor Michael Gawenda to be inappropriate: in the first frame, a Jew is confronted by the gates of the death camp: “Work Brings Freedom [Arbeit Macht Frei]”; in
the second frame an Israeli viewing a similar slogan “War Brings Peace”. Rejected, it was never meant to see the light of day, but ABC’s Media Watch and Crikey outed it because of the
constraint its spiking represented to fair media comment on the Middle East. That the cartoon was later entered, without Leunig’s knowledge, in the infamous Iranian “Holocaust Cartoon”
competition of 2006, has only added to its infamy and presaged the internet’s era of the uncontrollable circulation of images. A decade later, from 2012, he reworked Martin Niemöller’s
poetic statement of guilt over the Holocaust. The result was outrage, but also acute division within the Australian Jewish community. Dvir Abramovich (chairperson of the Anti-Defamation
Commission) made a distinction between something challenging, and something racist, believing it was the latter. Harold Zwier (of the Australian Jewish Democratic Society) welcomed the
chance for his community to think critically about Israel’s policies in Gaza and the West Bank. From 2019 – a mother, distracted, looking at her phone rather than her baby. Cries of
“misogyny”, including from Leunig’s very talented cartoonist sister, Mary. Then from 2021 – a COVID-19 vaccination needle atop an armoured tank, rolling towards a helpless citizen. Leunig’s
enforced retirement (it is still debated whether he walked or was pushed) was long and drawn-out. He filed his last cartoon for the Age this August. By then, he had alienated more than a few
of his colleagues in the press and the cartooning profession. SUPPORT OF THE DOWNTRODDEN Do we speak ill of the dead? We hope not. Instead, we hope we are paying respect to a great and
often angry artist who wanted always to challenge the consumer society with its dark cultural and geopolitical secrets. Leunig’s response was a single line of argument: he was “Just a
cartoonist with a moral duty to speak”. You don’t have to agree with every provocation, but his purpose is always to take up the cause of the weak, and deploy all the weaponry at his
disposal to support the downtrodden in their fight. “The role of the cartoonist is not to be balanced”, said Leunig, but rather to “give balance”. For Leunig, the weak were the Palestinian
civilians, the babies of the post-iPhone generation, and those forced to be vaccinated by a powerful state; just as they were the Vietnamese civilians, the children forced to serve their
rulers through state-sanctioned violence, the citizens whose democracy was undercut by stooges of the establishment. That deserves to be his legacy, regardless of whether you agree or not
about his stance. The coming year will give a great many people pause to reflect on the life and work of Leunig. Indeed, he has provided us with a monthly schedule for doing just that:
Leunig may be gone, but 2025 is already provided for, via his last calendar.